Diabetes MellitusGOOD-ERNCT05197829
Glycemic Optimization On Discharge From the Emergency Room
A study testing Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Care Coordination in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by Mark O'Connor at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Continuous glucose monitors can help people with diabetes avoid blood sugar levels that are either dangerously high or low. This study evaluates whether continuous glucose monitoring after discharge from the emergency room can help people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes avoid repeat emergency room visits, achieve… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Care Coordination
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Jan 2022to 5 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Seen in the Emergency Department for hypo- or hyperglycemia
- Either an existing diabetes center patient or a new referral
- Type 1 or type 2 diabetes
- Able to provide informed consent
- Fluent in English or Spanish
Who cannot join
- Current CGM use
- Need for hospital admission
- Upcoming CT or MRI within 2 weeks
- Pregnancy
- Altered mental status
- Not appropriate for diabetes center follow up
- Prisoners
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UMass Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Continuous glucose monitors can help people with diabetes avoid blood sugar levels that are either dangerously high or low. This study evaluates whether continuous glucose monitoring after discharge from the emergency room can help people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes avoid repeat emergency room visits, achieve improved blood sugar control, and feel less distressed about managing their diabetes.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Care Coordination
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Continuous Glucose MonitoringDevice
Participants in the experimental arm will receive an unblinded flash continuous glucose monitor.
Care CoordinationOther
All participants will receive diabetes education, written handouts, and help setting up ambulatory appointments.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Glucose Monitoring | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Continuous Glucose Monitoring; Other: Care Coordination |
| Care Coordination | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Care Coordination |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Diabetes Distress
Diabetes-related distress will be measured via the 17-question Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). A higher score indicates more diabetes-related distress. The scale ranges from 1 (low distress) to 6 (high distress).
Measured: Change from emergency room visit to first outpatient follow-up visit (2 or 3 weeks)
Outpatient Clinic Attendance Rate
This outcome will measure whether or not each participant attends a subspecialty follow-up appointment as recommended by the emergency room care team.
Measured: Follow-up visits will generally occur within 2 or 3 weeks
Change in the Problem Areas in Diabetes Score
Each participant will fill out the five-question Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID5) scale. A higher score indicates worse quality of life. Scores range from 0 (good quality of life) to 20 (poor quality of life).
Measured: Change from emergency room visit to first outpatient follow-up visit (2 or 3 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Number of Patients With Repeat Emergency Utilization
This metric will include repeat emergency room visits and emergency medical services calls.
Measured: 6 months
Change in Hemoglobin A1c
Hemoglobin A1c values drawn as part of routine care will be recorded. A positive value indicates that the hemoglobin A1c was lower at follow up than it was at baseline.
Measured: 6 Months
Outpatient Visits for Which the CGM Data Changed Management
For each patient in the CGM arm, the provider will complete a survey at the time of the initial outpatient follow-up appointment.
Measured: 2-3 Weeks
Time In Range
For participants in the continuous glucose monitoring arm, we will measure the percentage of time spent with a blood sugar level between 70 and 180 mg/dl.
Measured: Up to 14 days after the initial emergency visit
Percentage Time CGM Active
For participants in the continuous glucose monitoring arm, we will measure the amount of time the sensor was worn.
Measured: Up to 14 days after the initial emergency visit
Number of Sensor Checks Per Day
For participants in the continuous glucose monitoring arm, we will measure the number of times per day the sensor was used to check a blood sugar level.
Measured: Up to 14 days after the initial emergency visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jan 2022
- Study start5 Jan 2022
- Primary completion5 Jan 2023
- Study completion5 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mark O'Connor
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Mark O'Connor, University of Massachusetts, Worcester
- Investigators
- Mark J O'Connor, MD, Principal investigator, University of Massachusetts, Worcester
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05197829
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H00023559
- Acronym
- GOOD-ER
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 13 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 16 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual-level data underlying published results will be shared with other researchers at the discretion of the principal investigator in accordance with local and institutional policies.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Glycemic Optimization On Discharge From the Emergency Room
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05197829
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GOOD-ER / H00023559
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mark O'ConnorUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 16 Apr 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Continuous glucose monitors can help people with diabetes avoid blood sugar levels that are either dangerously high or low. This study evaluates whether continuous glucose monitoring after discharge from the emergency room can help people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes avoid repeat emergency room visits, achieve improved blood sugar control, and feel less distressed about managing their diabetes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Glucose Monitoring | Experimental | Device: Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Other: Care Coordination |
| Care Coordination | Active comparator | Other: Care Coordination |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Seen in the Emergency Department for hypo- or hyperglycemia
- Either an existing diabetes center patient or a new referral
- Type 1 or type 2 diabetes
- Able to provide informed consent
- Fluent in English or Spanish
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Current CGM use
- Need for hospital admission
- Upcoming CT or MRI within 2 weeks
- Pregnancy
- Altered mental status
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Glucose MonitoringParticipants in the experimental arm will receive an unblinded flash continuous glucose monitor. | Device | Continuous Glucose Monitoring |
| Care CoordinationAll participants will receive diabetes education, written handouts, and help setting up ambulatory appointments. | Other | Care Coordination, Continuous Glucose Monitoring |
Primary outcome
Change in Diabetes Distress
Time frame: Change from emergency room visit to first outpatient follow-up visit (2 or 3 weeks)
Diabetes-related distress will be measured via the 17-question Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). A higher score indicates more diabetes-related distress. The scale ranges from 1 (low distress) to 6 (high distress).
Outpatient Clinic Attendance Rate
Time frame: Follow-up visits will generally occur within 2 or 3 weeks
This outcome will measure whether or not each participant attends a subspecialty follow-up appointment as recommended by the emergency room care team.
Change in the Problem Areas in Diabetes Score
Time frame: Change from emergency room visit to first outpatient follow-up visit (2 or 3 weeks)
Each participant will fill out the five-question Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID5) scale. A higher score indicates worse quality of life. Scores range from 0 (good quality of life) to 20 (poor quality of life).
6 secondary outcomes
Number of Patients With Repeat Emergency Utilization
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Hemoglobin A1c
Time frame: 6 Months
Outpatient Visits for Which the CGM Data Changed Management
Time frame: 2-3 Weeks
Time In Range
Time frame: Up to 14 days after the initial emergency visit
Percentage Time CGM Active
Time frame: Up to 14 days after the initial emergency visit
Number of Sensor Checks Per Day
Time frame: Up to 14 days after the initial emergency visit
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Apr 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual-level data underlying published results will be shared with other researchers at the discretion of the principal investigator in accordance with local and institutional policies.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study on the Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Guominkang in the Treatment of Diabetic Kidney Disease
Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD), Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Clinical Application of Stem Cell Educator Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes
Recruiting
Culturally Tailored Program for Food-Insecure Adults: SPICE-D
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D)
RecruitingPhase 2
CAlcium and VAsopressin Following Injury Early Resuscitation (CAVALIER) Trial
Trauma, Hemorrhage
RecruitingObservational study
Study of High Density Lipoprotein Function in Type 1 Diabetic Patients With Nephropathy
Type 1 Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark J O'Connor, MD principal investigator
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Care Coordination in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by Mark O'Connor at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Apr 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Diabetes Distress (time frame: Change from emergency room visit to first outpatient follow-up visit (2 or 3 weeks)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2024.