AzTrials
AzTrials

Renal CancerSMARTNCT05210933

Study of Minimally-invasive Ablative Renal Therapies (SMART) Registry

An observational study of Renal Cancer, run by University of Alberta at 2 sites in Canada.

Suspended

Paused. Enrolment is on hold for now and may resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Multi-center prospective cohort study examining curative intent renal cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for small renal mass treatment in patients who are poor candidates for surgical resection, We will capture clinical, radiological, and pathological data as well as resource utilization (ex: time in hospital… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Renal Cancer
How many people
750 participants
Where
2 sitesCanada
Study dates
1 Apr 2022to 31 Dec 2031
How long will I take part?
10 Years
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult Albertans with a diagnosis of kidney cancer

Who may be able to join

  • Adults with prior kidney tumor diagnosis;
  • Willing to permit provincial agencies (e.g Alberta Health Services, Alberta Health, Netcare, Service Alberta) to disclose health-related information to study;
  • Canadian and Albertan residents;
  • Signed informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Unwilling to participate in the study;
  • Unavailable for standard clinical urological care or follow-up in Alberta

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Canada2 sites
  • University of Calgary

    Calgary, Alberta

  • University of Alberta

    Edmonton, Alberta

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Multi-center prospective cohort study examining curative intent renal cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for small renal mass treatment in patients who are poor candidates for surgical resection, We will capture clinical, radiological, and pathological data as well as resource utilization (ex: time in hospital, ER visits), complications, and long-term functional and oncological outcomes. The investigators will also be biobanking blood and urine samples from participants for biological studies in the lab.

Read the detailed description

Currently the standard-of-care for non-operative renal masses which require treatment is curative ablative therapy. Curative ablative therapies include radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryotherapy. A significant number of patients (approximately 40-50%) can only be treated with cryotherapy rather than RFA because of the target lesions close proximity to the collecting system, ureter, solid organs or hollow viscera. Cryotherapy allows for size control of the ablation zone with CT surveillance to avoid iatrogenic injury to these vital structures. On the other hand RFA does not allow for the same ability to control the size of ablation and, unfortunately due to the thermal energy, can result in injury to these structure precluding the use of RFA as a curative therapy for these patients.

Cryoablation of small renal masses provides equivalent intermediate-term cancer control compared to partial nephrectomy. Three-year local recurrence-free survival is 98% for both cryoablation and partial nephrectomy. Similarly metastasis-free survival three years after treatment is 100% for cryoablation and 99% for partial nephrectomy. Curative renal mass ablations provide the added benefit of being outpatient procedures which do not routinely require more than a 4 hour post-procedural recovery and over-the-counter post-procedural analgesic.

Research Question and Objectives:

The objective is to to provide cryotherapy and RFA as curative treatment options for small renal mass treatment in patients who are poor candidates for surgical resection or for those who are not surgical candidates due to co-morbidities. The investigators aim to establish a database that prospectively captures clinical, radiological, and pathological data as well as resource utilization (ex: time in hospital, ER visits), complications, and long-term functional and oncological outcomes. The study will also be biobanking blood and urine samples from participants for biological studies in the lab.

Methods:

Program Design Ablation to be performed percutaneously under CT/ultrasound guidance at the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Edmonton or the Rocky View Health Centre in Calgary, by a team of Interventional Radiologists and Urologists. A CT technologist, Ultrasound technologist and an Interventional Radiologist/Urologist are required for each procedure.

Each patient must have cross sectional imaging (CT or MRI) to confirm that they are a candidate to be treated with curative ablative therapy and to plan the procedure.

Pre-procedural consults by both the Urologist and IR performing the procedure. Patients to be assessed in the diagnostic imaging recovery room (DIRR) prior to the procedure and post-procedure to return to the DIRR or OR recovery room. Procedure to be performed with anesthesia support for deep sedation. Post treatment follow-up will be in accordance with the Canadian Urological Associations published guidelines

Blood and urine samples will be collected at baseline (i.e. study entry), yearly during follow-up for 5 years, and when changes occur in cancer status, for example after radical kidney therapy (surgical removal) or after disease progression (new metastases) during the study's potential observation period.

In addition to the samples, an intake survey must be completed at baseline and ongoing questionnaires completed by participant once a year for five years and when new cancer problems arise until up to five years.

Conditions
Renal Cancer
Keywords
renal cancer, cryoablation, small renal mass
Medical subject headings
Kidney Neoplasms

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. kidney cancer disease-specific survival

    Measured: 5 years

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Overall survival

    Overall survival will be calculated in years (Mean and Median will be calculated)

    Measured: 5 years

  2. Glomerular Filtration Rate GFR (mL/min/1.73m2)

    Renal function measured in Glomerular Filtration Rate GFR (mL/min/1.73m2)

    Measured: 5 years

  3. Serum Creatinine (umol/L)

    Renal function measured in Serum Creatinine (umol/L). Serum Cr will be collected pre-cryotherapy and every 3-6 months following for five years as per Canadian Urological Association Guidelines and our study protocol.

    Measured: 5 years

  4. Progression-free survival

    Local and metastatic disease recurrence measured in years

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jan 2022
  2. Study start1 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2031 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Study is currently on hold.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
750 participants (estimated)
Target duration
10 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05210933
Sponsor's protocol ID
HREBA.CC-20-0432
Acronym
SMART
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
13 Dec 2021
Last updated
13 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Kassouf W, Monteiro LL, Drachenberg DE, Fairey AS, Finelli A, Kapoor A, Lattouf JB, Leveridge MJ, Power NE, Pouliot F, Rendon RA, Sabbagh R, So AI, Tanguay S, Breau RH. Canadian Urological Association guideline for followup of patients after treatment of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Aug;12(8):231-238. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5462. Epub 2018 May 31. No abstract available.

    PubMed 30139427
  • Thompson RH, Atwell T, Schmit G, Lohse CM, Kurup AN, Weisbrod A, Psutka SP, Stewart SB, Callstrom MR, Cheville JC, Boorjian SA, Leibovich BC. Comparison of partial nephrectomy and percutaneous ablation for cT1 renal masses. Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

    PubMed 25108580

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Renal Cancer, run by University of Alberta at 2 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

kidney cancer disease-specific survival (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05210933, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in