Low Back PainNCT05214456
The Effect of Dry Needling Compared to Lumbar Spine Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Non Specific Low Back Pain
A study testing Dry needling and Mobilization in people with Low Back Pain, run by Iran University of Medical Sciences at 1 site in Iran.
Trial summary
Low back pain is a major public health challenge worldwide. The aim of this study will be to compare the effect of dry needling with mobilization on pain, functional disability, quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold using a randomized controlled trial… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Dry needling and Mobilization
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIran
- Study dates
- 20 Oct 2022to 30 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants aged between 18 to 45 years.
- Moderate pain intensity (between 30 to 60) based on Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0 means no pain and 100 is the most imaginable pain).
- Participants with trigger points in the quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus muscles.
- The Participant's symptoms are provoked with passive accessory intervertebral movements on at least one level of the lumbar spine vertebrae.
- Patients are able to read and write Persian.
Who cannot join
- Complications that affect the treatment process such as systemic diseases, neurological disorders, inflammatory conditions, infectious conditions, structural and degenerative changes, metabolic bone diseases and bleeding disorders.
- History of lumbar surgery.
- Specific low back pain (Neurogenic low back pain, spinal stenosis, cauda equina syndrome, spondylolisthesis, and Presence of any signs or symptoms of non- musculoskeletal pathology e.g. cancer, infection and fracture based on paraclinical findings)
- Inability to obtain prone lying.
- Pregnancy.
- Needle phobia.
- Long history of steroid use
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Iran1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
IRANums
Tehran
Hamide Mirzaie, M.Sc candidate, 00989134146786, hamide.mirzaie@yahoo.com
About this study
Official title: To Compare the Effect of Dry Needling Versus Lumbar Spine Mobilization on Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Low back pain is a major public health challenge worldwide. The aim of this study will be to compare the effect of dry needling with mobilization on pain, functional disability, quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold using a randomized controlled trial design. pain and functional disability are primary outcomes and quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold are considered as secondary outcomes. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups: The experimental group (dry needling, sham mobilization and routine physiotherapy) and the control group (mobilization, sham dry needling and routine physiotherapy).
Read the detailed description
The present study will be a randomized, parallel group, two-arm, double-blind, double-dummy, superiority, controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The main objective of this study is to compare the effects of dry needling and lumbar spinal mobilization on pain intensity, functional disability, lumbar multifidus and quadratus lumborum muscles function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. After selecting individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain by non-probability purposive sampling method, patients will be randomly assigned to two groups of dry needling (for lumbar Multifidus and Quadratus lumborum muscles) plus sham mobilization (first group) and lumbar spine mobilization plus sham dry needling group (second group). In addition, participants in both treatment groups will receive routine physiotherapy (including low-power laser and core stability exercise). Both groups will be treated for 8 sessions over 4 weeks. Primary outcomes include pain and functional disability, and secondary outcomes include quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold. This study is a double-blind study in which the participants, the person evaluating the outcome, and the person analyzing the data will be blinded to the allocation of patients to the two treatment groups. All of the participants will be identified and recruited by posters and word-of-mouth from the university and the surrounding local communities. Eligible participants will be explained about the aim of the study and the examination involved in this study, and all eligible patients will sign a written informed consent before entering the study. The study will be performed in the Rehabilitation Sciences school of Iran University of Medical Sciences.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Dry needling, Mobilization
- Keywords
- Low Back Pain, dry needling, mobilization, pain pressure threshold, muscle function
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dry needlingOther
The method of performing the dry needling technique will be based on the method presented by Dommerholt and Fernandez-de-las-Penas. The length of the needle (Tony, china) for each patient will be selected based on the size of the patient: 1) Multifidus: the patient will be placed in a prone position with a pillow under their belly to accommodate lumbar lordosis. The needles will be inserted into the lumbar multifidus muscles, 1.5 to 2 cm lateral to the spinous process of all lumbar vertebrates, perpendicular to the lamina (after piercing the skin, needles are directed inferomedially). 2) Quadratus lumborum: The patient will be placed in the side lying position with the side to be treated facing up. After identifying the lateral border of the quadratus lumborum muscle, the needle will be aimed straight downward in the direction of the transverse process, followed by slight anterior, posterior, and caudal needling to explore the entire muscle.
MobilizationOther
Also called Non-thrust manipulation
To perform Maitland's mobilization for lumbar spine, the anterior-posterior mobilization technique will be used and it is performed by pushing the heel (pisiform grip) or thumbs (thumb grip) to the vertebrae and can immediately reduce pain and restore motor function. First, the complete physical orthopedic evaluation of manual therapies will be performed using the Maitland evaluation method. Then, based on the findings of the patient evaluation, the severity, rhythm, duration and the degree of the mobilization and the place of force (spine or lamina) will be determined. To apply mobilization, the person will sleep in a prone position and the physiotherapist will use the heel of the hand or the thumbs to apply force to the first to fifth vertebrae of the lumbar spine. In segments that do not have a problem based on evaluation, first grade of the anterior-posterior Maitland's mobilization will be applied to the spinous process of the segment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional group | Experimental | The interventional group will comprise 28 participants with chronic non-specific low back pain. The treatments of this group will include dry needling plus sham mobilization for the lumbar spine and routine physiotherapy. The needles will be inserted to obtain local twitch responses, and this process will continue until no more local twitch response occurs in each session. Then the needles will be left in place for 20 minutes. Sham mobilization for the lumbar spine will be done in the same way as the real mobilization, with the difference that the mobilization will be applied only on the skin surface and less than the first degree of Maitland's mobilization. Routine physical therapy will include low-level laser therapy and motor control training. The treatment will last 4 weeks, 8 sessions, twice a week. Receives: Other: Dry needling |
| Control group | Active comparator | The control group will comprise 28 participants with chronic non-specific low back pain. The treatments of this group will include anterior-posterior mobilization based on the Maitland technique for the lumbar spine plus sham dry needling and routine physiotherapy. Based on the findings of the patient evaluation, the severity, rhythm, time, the degree of mobilization and the place of force (spine or lamina) will be determined. For sham dry needling The needles will be inserted subcutaneously and there will be no local twitch response. Then the needles will be left in place for 20 minutes. Routine physical therapy will include low-level laser therapy and motor control training. The treatment will last 4 weeks, 8 sessions, twice a week. Receives: Other: Mobilization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain intensity
Mean Change from Baseline in Pain Scores on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0 means no pain and 100 means the most imaginable pain).
9
Measured: Pain intensity measurement before intervention and 7 days after intervention
Functional disability
Mean Change from Baseline in Functional disability Scores based on Oswestry Disability Index. 0% to 20% indicate minimal disability, 21% to 40% indicate moderate disability, 41%-60% indicates severe disability, 61%-80% means crippled and 81%-100% indicates that the patient is either bed-bound or exaggerating his/her symptoms. The validity and the reliability of the Persian version of this questionnaire has been shown in the previous studies.
Measured: Before intervention and 7 days after intervention
Secondary outcomes (3)
Lumbar multifidus and quadratus lumborum muscles functional change
Mean Change from Baseline in Lumbar multifidus and quadratus lumborum muscles Functional changes based on the measurement of thickness changes between rest and contraction status of these muscles by using ultrasound.
Measured: Before intervention and 7 days after intervention
Range of motion
Mean Change from Baseline in Range of motion based on the measurement with tape
Measured: Before intervention and 7 days after intervention
Pain pressure threshold
Mean Change from Baseline in Pain pressure threshold based on measurement with algometer
Measured: Before intervention and 7 days after intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jan 2022
- Study start20 Oct 2022
- Primary completion30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Iran University of Medical Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hamide Mirzaie, MSc student, Principal investigator, Iran University of Medical SciencesMohammadreza Pourahmadi, PhD, Study director, Iran University of Medical Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05214456
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IR. IUMS.REC.1400.651
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 15 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 16 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The data sets of this study will be available on a reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Publications
Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017 Feb 18;389(10070):736-747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
PubMed 27745712Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP, Humphrey LL, Vijan S. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
PubMed 28192789Coulter ID, Crawford C, Hurwitz EL, Vernon H, Khorsan R, Suttorp Booth M, Herman PM. Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2018 May;18(5):866-879. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
PubMed 29371112Couto C, de Souza IC, Torres IL, Fregni F, Caumo W. Paraspinal stimulation combined with trigger point needling and needle rotation for the treatment of myofascial pain: a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial. Clin J Pain. 2014 Mar;30(3):214-23. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182934b8d.
PubMed 23629597Dommerholt J, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Trigger point dry needling e-book: an evidence and clinical-based approach: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018.
Gildir S, Tuzun EH, Eroglu G, Eker L. A randomized trial of trigger point dry needling versus sham needling for chronic tension-type headache. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(8):e14520. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014520.
PubMed 30813155Itoh K, Katsumi Y, Hirota S, Kitakoji H. Effects of trigger point acupuncture on chronic low back pain in elderly patients--a sham-controlled randomised trial. Acupunct Med. 2006 Mar;24(1):5-12. doi: 10.1136/aim.24.1.5.
PubMed 16618043Thiry P, Reumont F, Brismee JM, Dierick F. Short-term increase in discs' apparent diffusion is associated with pain and mobility improvements after spinal mobilization for low back pain. Sci Rep. 2018 May 29;8(1):8281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26697-7.
PubMed 29844484Pecos-Martin D, de Melo Aroeira AE, Veras Silva RL, Martinez de Tejada Pozo G, Rodriguez Solano LM, Plaza-Manzano G, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Falla D. Immediate effects of thoracic spinal mobilisation on erector spinae muscle activity and pain in patients with thoracic spine pain: a preliminary randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2017 Mar;103(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.10.016. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
PubMed 27012824Elly H. Maitland's vertebral manipulation, management of Neuromusculoskeletal disorders. London: Churchill Livingstone. 2013.
Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, Montazeri A, Mobini B. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 15;31(14):E454-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222141.61424.f7.
PubMed 16778675Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3. No abstract available.
PubMed 6450426Liu IS, Chai HM, Yang JL, Wang SF. Inter-session reliability of the measurement of the deep and superficial layer of lumbar multifidus in young asymptomatic people and patients with low back pain using ultrasonography. Man Ther. 2013 Dec;18(6):481-6. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 May 28.
PubMed 23726537Schryver A, Rivaz H, Rizk A, Frenette S, Boily M, Fortin M. Ultrasonography of Lumbar Multifidus Muscle in University American Football Players. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Jul;52(7):1495-1501. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002292.
PubMed 32028457Fraeulin L, Holzgreve F, Brinkbaumer M, Dziuba A, Friebe D, Klemz S, Schmitt M, Theis A AL, Tenberg S, van Mark A, Maurer-Grubinger C, Ohlendorf D. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of joint range of motion tests using tape measure, digital inclinometer and inertial motion capturing. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0243646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243646. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33301541
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- To Compare the Effect of Dry Needling Versus Lumbar Spine Mobilization on Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05214456
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IR. IUMS.REC.1400.651
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- Low Back Pain, dry needling, mobilization, pain pressure threshold, muscle function
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Iran University of Medical SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Low back pain is a major public health challenge worldwide. The aim of this study will be to compare the effect of dry needling with mobilization on pain, functional disability, quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold using a randomized controlled trial design. pain and functional disability are primary outcomes and quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold are considered as secondary outcomes. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups: The experimental group (dry needling, sham mobilization and routine physiotherapy) and the control group (mobilization, sham dry needling and routine physiotherapy).
Detailed description
The present study will be a randomized, parallel group, two-arm, double-blind, double-dummy, superiority, controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The main objective of this study is to compare the effects of dry needling and lumbar spinal mobilization on pain intensity, functional disability, lumbar multifidus and quadratus lumborum muscles function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. After selecting individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain by non-probability purposive sampling method, patients will be randomly assigned to two groups of dry needling (for lumbar Multifidus and Quadratus lumborum muscles) plus sham mobilization (first group) and lumbar spine mobilization plus sham dry needling group (second group). In addition, participants in both treatment groups will receive routine physiotherapy (including low-power laser and core stability exercise). Both groups will be treated for 8 sessions over 4 weeks. Primary outcomes include pain and functional disability, and secondary outcomes include quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold. This study is a double-blind study in which the participants, the person evaluating the outcome, and the person analyzing the data will be blinded to the allocation of patients to the two treatment groups. All of the participants will be identified and recruited by posters and word-of-mouth from the university and the surrounding local communities. Eligible participants will be explained about the aim of the study and the examination involved in this study, and all eligible patients will sign a written informed consent before entering the study. The study will be performed in the Rehabilitation Sciences school of Iran University of Medical Sciences.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional group | Experimental | Other: Dry needlingThe interventional group will comprise 28 participants with chronic non-specific low back pain. The treatments of this group will include dry needling plus sham mobilization for the lumbar spine and routine physiotherapy. The needles will be inserted to obtain local twitch responses, and this process will continue until no more local twitch response occurs in each session. Then the needles will be left in place for 20 minutes. Sham mobilization for the lumbar spine will be done in the same way as the real mobilization, with the difference that the mobilization will be applied only on the skin surface and less than the first degree of Maitland's mobilization. Routine physical therapy will include low-level laser therapy and motor control training. The treatment will last 4 weeks, 8 sessions, twice a week. |
| Control group | Active comparator | Other: MobilizationThe control group will comprise 28 participants with chronic non-specific low back pain. The treatments of this group will include anterior-posterior mobilization based on the Maitland technique for the lumbar spine plus sham dry needling and routine physiotherapy. Based on the findings of the patient evaluation, the severity, rhythm, time, the degree of mobilization and the place of force (spine or lamina) will be determined. For sham dry needling The needles will be inserted subcutaneously and there will be no local twitch response. Then the needles will be left in place for 20 minutes. Routine physical therapy will include low-level laser therapy and motor control training. The treatment will last 4 weeks, 8 sessions, twice a week. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participants aged between 18 to 45 years.
- Moderate pain intensity (between 30 to 60) based on Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0 means no pain and 100 is the most imaginable pain).
- Participants with trigger points in the quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus muscles.
- The Participant's symptoms are provoked with passive accessory intervertebral movements on at least one level of the lumbar spine vertebrae.
- Patients are able to read and write Persian.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Complications that affect the treatment process such as systemic diseases, neurological disorders, inflammatory conditions, infectious conditions, structural and degenerative changes, metabolic bone diseases and bleeding disorders.
- History of lumbar surgery.
- Specific low back pain (Neurogenic low back pain, spinal stenosis, cauda equina syndrome, spondylolisthesis, and Presence of any signs or symptoms of non- musculoskeletal pathology e.g. cancer, infection and fracture based on paraclinical findings)
- Inability to obtain prone lying.
- Pregnancy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dry needlingThe method of performing the dry needling technique will be based on the method presented by Dommerholt and Fernandez-de-las-Penas. The length of the needle (Tony, china) for each patient will be selected based on the size of the patient: 1) Multifidus: the patient will be placed in a prone position with a pillow under their belly to accommodate lumbar lordosis. The needles will be inserted into the lumbar multifidus muscles, 1.5 to 2 cm lateral to the spinous process of all lumbar vertebrates, perpendicular to the lamina (after piercing the skin, needles are directed inferomedially). 2) Quadratus lumborum: The patient will be placed in the side lying position with the side to be treated facing up. After identifying the lateral border of the quadratus lumborum muscle, the needle will be aimed straight downward in the direction of the transverse process, followed by slight anterior, posterior, and caudal needling to explore the entire muscle. | Other | Interventional group |
| MobilizationAlso: Non-thrust manipulationTo perform Maitland's mobilization for lumbar spine, the anterior-posterior mobilization technique will be used and it is performed by pushing the heel (pisiform grip) or thumbs (thumb grip) to the vertebrae and can immediately reduce pain and restore motor function. First, the complete physical orthopedic evaluation of manual therapies will be performed using the Maitland evaluation method. Then, based on the findings of the patient evaluation, the severity, rhythm, duration and the degree of the mobilization and the place of force (spine or lamina) will be determined. To apply mobilization, the person will sleep in a prone position and the physiotherapist will use the heel of the hand or the thumbs to apply force to the first to fifth vertebrae of the lumbar spine. In segments that do not have a problem based on evaluation, first grade of the anterior-posterior Maitland's mobilization will be applied to the spinous process of the segment. | Other | Control group |
Primary outcome
Pain intensity
Time frame: Pain intensity measurement before intervention and 7 days after intervention
Mean Change from Baseline in Pain Scores on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0 means no pain and 100 means the most imaginable pain). 9
Functional disability
Time frame: Before intervention and 7 days after intervention
Mean Change from Baseline in Functional disability Scores based on Oswestry Disability Index. 0% to 20% indicate minimal disability, 21% to 40% indicate moderate disability, 41%-60% indicates severe disability, 61%-80% means crippled and 81%-100% indicates that the patient is either bed-bound or exaggerating his/her symptoms. The validity and the reliability of the Persian version of this questionnaire has been shown in the previous studies.
3 secondary outcomes
Lumbar multifidus and quadratus lumborum muscles functional change
Time frame: Before intervention and 7 days after intervention
Range of motion
Time frame: Before intervention and 7 days after intervention
Pain pressure threshold
Time frame: Before intervention and 7 days after intervention
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Feb 2023.
- Background: PubMed 27745712Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017 Feb 18;389(10070):736-747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
- Background: PubMed 28192789Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP, Humphrey LL, Vijan S. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 29371112Coulter ID, Crawford C, Hurwitz EL, Vernon H, Khorsan R, Suttorp Booth M, Herman PM. Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2018 May;18(5):866-879. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
- Background: PubMed 23629597Couto C, de Souza IC, Torres IL, Fregni F, Caumo W. Paraspinal stimulation combined with trigger point needling and needle rotation for the treatment of myofascial pain: a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial. Clin J Pain. 2014 Mar;30(3):214-23. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182934b8d.
- BackgroundDommerholt J, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Trigger point dry needling e-book: an evidence and clinical-based approach: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018.
- Background: PubMed 30813155Gildir S, Tuzun EH, Eroglu G, Eker L. A randomized trial of trigger point dry needling versus sham needling for chronic tension-type headache. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(8):e14520. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014520.
- Background: PubMed 16618043Itoh K, Katsumi Y, Hirota S, Kitakoji H. Effects of trigger point acupuncture on chronic low back pain in elderly patients--a sham-controlled randomised trial. Acupunct Med. 2006 Mar;24(1):5-12. doi: 10.1136/aim.24.1.5.
- Background: PubMed 29844484Thiry P, Reumont F, Brismee JM, Dierick F. Short-term increase in discs' apparent diffusion is associated with pain and mobility improvements after spinal mobilization for low back pain. Sci Rep. 2018 May 29;8(1):8281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26697-7.
- Background: PubMed 27012824Pecos-Martin D, de Melo Aroeira AE, Veras Silva RL, Martinez de Tejada Pozo G, Rodriguez Solano LM, Plaza-Manzano G, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Falla D. Immediate effects of thoracic spinal mobilisation on erector spinae muscle activity and pain in patients with thoracic spine pain: a preliminary randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2017 Mar;103(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.10.016. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
- BackgroundElly H. Maitland's vertebral manipulation, management of Neuromusculoskeletal disorders. London: Churchill Livingstone. 2013.
- Background: PubMed 16778675Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, Montazeri A, Mobini B. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 15;31(14):E454-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222141.61424.f7.
- Background: PubMed 6450426Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The data sets of this study will be available on a reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hamide Mirzaie, MSc student principal investigator
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Mohammadreza Pourahmadi, PhD study director
Iran University of Medical Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dry needling and Mobilization in people with Low Back Pain, run by Iran University of Medical Sciences at 1 site in Iran.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Iran. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hamide Mirzaie, MSc student (00989335785767, hamide.mirzaie@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain intensity (time frame: Pain intensity measurement before intervention and 7 days after intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05214456, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Feb 2023.