Ischemic StrokePhase 2MEPI-AVCNCT05222828
Effects of Mepivacaine on the Neurological Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction
A Phase 2 study testing Carbocaine Injectable Product in people with Ischemic Stroke, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
A patient, suffering from cortical blindness after a bi-occipital infarction 1 year earlier, regained near-normal vision in the right visual hemifield a few minutes after subcutaneous administration of mepivacaine. The effect was maintained for several days, and was repeated with each injection of mepivacaine. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ischemic Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Carbocaine Injectable Product
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 38 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 22 Jun 2022to 22 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ischemic stroke more than 30 days old
- Age between 18 and 85 years old
- At least one deficit among:
- motor deficit: score < 56 on the Fugl-Meyer scale
- aphasia: score ≥4 on the Aphasia Rapid Test,
- presence of a clinically observable visual scotoma
- Having given their written consent
- Be affiliated with a social security scheme, Universal Medical Coverage (CMU) or any equivalent scheme
Who cannot join
- Hypersensitivity to amide-bonded local anesthetics.
- Atrioventricular conduction disorders requiring permanent electro-systolic training not yet performed.
- Epilepsy not controlled by treatment.
- Porphyritic subjects.
- Patients with a motor deficit (but no aphasia or scotomas) in whom there is spasticity leading to a major reduction in joint amplitude in passive motion
- Minor patients, under curatorship or guardianship, under legal protection, deprived of liberty, pregnant or breastfeeding women
Show all 11Show fewer
- Pathologies involving the vital prognosis or compromising follow-up during the study period
- Patient undergoing local amine anesthesia in the 7 days preceding V1.
- Patients currently treated with no anti-arrhythmics such as tocainide, aprindine and mexiletine
- Patients with a contraindication to MRI (ferro-magnetic surgical clips, eye implants, metallic foreign body intraocular or in the nervous system, implants or metallic objects likely to contain the radiofrequency field, cochlear implants, cerebral or cardiac pacemaker , implantable cardiac defibrillators)
- Patients participating in research involving the therapeutic human person who may modify functional recovery (whether by medication or by medical device) or subject to an exclusion period for another research
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hôpital Pitié Salpetrière
Paris, 75013
Laurent Cohen, PUPH, 142161801 ext. +33, laurent.cohen@aphp.fr
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Mepivacaine on the Neurological Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction
A patient, suffering from cortical blindness after a bi-occipital infarction 1 year earlier, regained near-normal vision in the right visual hemifield a few minutes after subcutaneous administration of mepivacaine. The effect was maintained for several days, and was repeated with each injection of mepivacaine. This clinical improvement is associated with functional changes in the peri-lesional areas on resting-state functional MRI.
The investigator team hypothesizes that in some patients with chronic neurological symptoms of stroke, the investigator team will observe a favorable response to subcutaneous mepivacaine injection.
Read the detailed description
A patient, suffering from cortical blindness after a bi-occipital infarction 1 year earlier, regained near-normal vision in the right visual hemifield a few minutes after subcutaneous administration of mepivacaine. The effect was maintained for several days, and was repeated with each injection of mepivacaine. This clinical improvement is associated with functional changes in the peri-lesional areas on resting-state functional MRI. The investigator team hypothesizes that in some patients with chronic neurological symptoms of stroke, investigator team will observe a favorable response to subcutaneous mepivacaine injection.
The team will include patients with clinically significant sequelae of ischemic stroke, as was the case with the initial patient. In addition,
- The team hypothesizes that the mechanism of action is not specific to the visual cortex, and therefore should not be limited to visual scotomas
- It is also preferable to consider only deficits that can be objectively quantified in a sufficiently reliable way to be able to evaluate the effect of the treatment
The investigator teamwill therefore include patients with sequelae of at least one of the following three types:
- motor deficit: score =< 56 on the Fugl-Meyer scale, minimal deficit allowing to observe an improvement of 4 points
- aphasia: score >= 4 on the Aphasia Rapid Test (ART) , minimal deficit allowing to observe an improvement of 4 points
- visual scotoma: observable on a clinical assessment of the visual field "on confrontation"
Only patients more than 30 days after the occurrence of the stroke will be included. Indeed, the rapid recovery phase after a stroke lasts about 3 weeks and it is difficult to interpret rapid clinical changes and to attribute them to the treatment (since investigator team do not know the time of onset of the effect of mepivacaine) over this temporal period.
Mepivacaine will be administered as a single injection, subcutaneously, at a dose of 3 mL of mepivacaine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL), or 60mg. If mepivacaine is effective, research participants will experience a temporary reduction in neurological symptoms.
Time course of experiment
- Signing of consent
- Verification of inclusion and exclusion criteria (1h)
- ECG for all patients
- Urine dipstick if female of childbearing age
- Motor, language and visual field scales, depending on the deficit(s) present
- Blood sampling
- Evaluation of the neurological deficit before treatment (1h)
- VAS to evaluate the intensity of symptoms by the patient
- NIHSS
- MRI n°1 (duration 45 min to 1h)
- Administration of mepivacaine 7 Evaluation of the neurological deficit after treatment, at T= 1+/- 30 minutes after administration (duration 1h)
- Motor, language and visual field scales, depending on the deficit(s) present
- VAS to evaluate the intensity of the symptoms by the patient
- NIHSS
8/ MRI n°2 (duration 30 to 45min) 1h30 after administration 9/ Evaluation of the neurological deficit after treatment, at T= 3h45+/- 45 minutes after administration (duration 1h)
- Motor, language and visual field scales, depending on the deficit(s) present
- VAS to evaluate the intensity of the symptoms by the patient
- NIHSS 9/ Call of the patient 1 week later for follow-up of SAEs and evaluation of the duration of the effect, if any ; if the effect persists, the investigator will call the patient every 2 weeks until returning to the usual state..
Brain imaging
MRI will be performed on a SIEMENS 3 Tesla machine, without injection of contrast medium. The duration of the MRI will be approximately 45 minutes to one hour for MRI n°1 (baseline) and 30 to 45 minutes for MRI n°2 performed after the injection of mepivacaine.
MRI acquisitions will include the following sequences:
- T1 (only during MRI n°1 in baseline)
- FLAIR (only during baseline MRI n°1)
- Diffusion sequence (multishell, multiband)
- Perfusion sequence (Arterial Spin Labelling, ASL)
- Resting state BOLD sequence
Drug treatment :
Mepivacaine will be administered:
- Subcutaneously
- In the shoulder on the non-dominant side, or on the non-deficient side in case of hemiplegia
- Dose: 3 mL of mepivacaine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL), or 60mg
- With at disposal
- Resuscitation equipment (in particular, a source of oxygen)
- lipid emulsion to be administered in case of intoxication with clinical signs of neurotoxicity or cardiotoxicity
Genetic samples :
The gene coding for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is of particular interest. BDNF is a protein that contributes to neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation, participates in the creation of new synapses and influences the survival of existing neurons. It is thus currently considered as a crucial element influencing brain plasticity . This could also be an explanatory factor in identifying responders to mepivacaine.
- Conditions
- Ischemic Stroke
- Being tested
- Carbocaine Injectable Product
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Carbocaine Injectable ProductDrug
One injection per patient
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mepivacaine arm | Experimental | mepivacaine injection Receives: Drug: Carbocaine Injectable Product |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
improvement of clinical scores
The response is defined as an improvement 1h (+/- 30min) after injection, compared to the evaluation before mepivacaine injection, on at least one of the clinical scores specific to the symptoms:
- language : decrease of at least 4 points on the ART scale (rated from 0 to 26) , or increase of 20% of the number of images correctly named on a standardized battery (DO80, rated from 0 to 80). The rate of 20% corresponds to an effect considered clinically significant, without any "clinically significant minimal change" published to date.
- motor skills : increase of at least 4 points on the Fugl-Meyer scale (rated from 0 to 60) corresponding to the "clinically significant minimal change" in the re-education studies
- visual field : 20% reduction of a scotoma evaluated in automated static perimetry of Humphrey by the number of deficit areas compared to the total number of areas evaluated (n=43). The rate of 20% corresponds to an effect considered clinically significant
Measured: 1 Day
Secondary outcomes (11)
language-related symptoms
Relative change, in percentage, in the number of correctly named images on a standardized battery (DO80, rated from 0 to 80) between pre- and 1h(+/-30min) post-injection to measure language-related symptoms.
Measured: 1 Day
ART scale
Absolute change, in number of points, on the ART scale (rated from 0 to 26) between before and 1h(+/-30min) after injection to measure language-related symptoms.
Measured: 1 Day
spontaneous language test
Relative change, of he rate from 0 to 10 at the spontaneous language test between before and 1h(+/-30min) after injection to measure language-related symptoms.
Measured: 1 Day
Fugl-Meyer scale
Absolute change, in number of points, on the Fugl-Meyer scale (rated from 0 to 60), between before and 1h(+/-30min) after injection to measure motor symptoms.
Measured: 1Day
Timed up and go test
relative change, on the Timed up and go test (TUG) (rated in seconds), between before and 1h(+/-30min) after injection to measure motor symptoms.
Measured: 1Day
10 metres walking test
Relative change, on the 10 metres walking test (rated in seconds), between before and 1h(+/-30min) after injection to measure motor symptoms.
Measured: 1Day
Perimetry of Humphrey
Relative evolution of visual symptoms, measured in automated static perimetry of Humphrey (STAT-30, Metrovision) by the number of deficit areas compared to the total number of assessed areas (n=43), between before and 1h (+/-30min) after injection
Measured: 1 Day
kinetic perimetry
Relative evolution of visual symptoms, measured in kinetic perimetry by the surface of isoptera III/4, between before and 1h (+/-30min) after injection.
Measured: 1 Day
static perimetry
Evolution of visual deficit volumes, measured in static perimetry in dB.deg2, between before and 1h (+/-30min) after injection.
Measured: 1 Day
NIHSS score changes
Change in severity of neurological sequelae measured by the relative change in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS score) between before and 1h(+/-30min) after injection.
Measured: 1 Day
response delay
Patient Reported Response Start and End Times
Measured: 1 Day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2022
- Study start22 Jun 2022
- Primary completion22 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion22 Jun 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ischemic StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05222828
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APHP190723
- Other IDs
- 2021-005507-13
- Acronym
- MEPI-AVC
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 24 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 26 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Mepivacaine on the Neurological Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05222828
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MEPI-AVC / APHP190723
- Conditions
- Ischemic Stroke
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 22 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A patient, suffering from cortical blindness after a bi-occipital infarction 1 year earlier, regained near-normal vision in the right visual hemifield a few minutes after subcutaneous administration of mepivacaine. The effect was maintained for several days, and was repeated with each injection of mepivacaine. This clinical improvement is associated with functional changes in the peri-lesional areas on resting-state functional MRI.
The investigator team hypothesizes that in some patients with chronic neurological symptoms of stroke, the investigator team will observe a favorable response to subcutaneous mepivacaine injection.
Detailed description
A patient, suffering from cortical blindness after a bi-occipital infarction 1 year earlier, regained near-normal vision in the right visual hemifield a few minutes after subcutaneous administration of mepivacaine. The effect was maintained for several days, and was repeated with each injection of mepivacaine. This clinical improvement is associated with functional changes in the peri-lesional areas on resting-state functional MRI. The investigator team hypothesizes that in some patients with chronic neurological symptoms of stroke, investigator team will observe a favorable response to subcutaneous mepivacaine injection.
The team will include patients with clinically significant sequelae of ischemic stroke, as was the case with the initial patient. In addition,
- The team hypothesizes that the mechanism of action is not specific to the visual cortex, and therefore should not be limited to visual scotomas
- It is also preferable to consider only deficits that can be objectively quantified in a sufficiently reliable way to be able to evaluate the effect of the treatment
The investigator teamwill therefore include patients with sequelae of at least one of the following three types:
- motor deficit: score =< 56 on the Fugl-Meyer scale, minimal deficit allowing to observe an improvement of 4 points
- aphasia: score >= 4 on the Aphasia Rapid Test (ART) , minimal deficit allowing to observe an improvement of 4 points
- visual scotoma: observable on a clinical assessment of the visual field "on confrontation"
Only patients more than 30 days after the occurrence of the stroke will be included. Indeed, the rapid recovery phase after a stroke lasts about 3 weeks and it is difficult to interpret rapid clinical changes and to attribute them to the treatment (since investigator team do not know the time of onset of the effect of mepivacaine) over this temporal period.
Mepivacaine will be administered as a single injection, subcutaneously, at a dose of 3 mL of mepivacaine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL), or 60mg. If mepivacaine is effective, research participants will experience a temporary reduction in neurological symptoms.
Time course of experiment
- Signing of consent
- Verification of inclusion and exclusion criteria (1h)
- ECG for all patients
- Urine dipstick if female of childbearing age
- Motor, language and visual field scales, depending on the deficit(s) present
- Blood sampling
- Evaluation of the neurological deficit before treatment (1h)
- VAS to evaluate the intensity of symptoms by the patient
- NIHSS
- MRI n°1 (duration 45 min to 1h)
- Administration of mepivacaine 7 Evaluation of the neurological deficit after treatment, at T= 1+/- 30 minutes after administration (duration 1h)
- Motor, language and visual field scales, depending on the deficit(s) present
- VAS to evaluate the intensity of the symptoms by the patient
- NIHSS
8/ MRI n°2 (duration 30 to 45min) 1h30 after administration 9/ Evaluation of the neurological deficit after treatment, at T= 3h45+/- 45 minutes after administration (duration 1h)
- Motor, language and visual field scales, depending on the deficit(s) present
- VAS to evaluate the intensity of the symptoms by the patient
- NIHSS 9/ Call of the patient 1 week later for follow-up of SAEs and evaluation of the duration of the effect, if any ; if the effect persists, the investigator will call the patient every 2 weeks until returning to the usual state..
Brain imaging
MRI will be performed on a SIEMENS 3 Tesla machine, without injection of contrast medium. The duration of the MRI will be approximately 45 minutes to one hour for MRI n°1 (baseline) and 30 to 45 minutes for MRI n°2 performed after the injection of mepivacaine.
MRI acquisitions will include the following sequences:
- T1 (only during MRI n°1 in baseline)
- FLAIR (only during baseline MRI n°1)
- Diffusion sequence (multishell, multiband)
- Perfusion sequence (Arterial Spin Labelling, ASL)
- Resting state BOLD sequence
Drug treatment :
Mepivacaine will be administered:
- Subcutaneously
- In the shoulder on the non-dominant side, or on the non-deficient side in case of hemiplegia
- Dose: 3 mL of mepivacaine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL), or 60mg
- With at disposal
- Resuscitation equipment (in particular, a source of oxygen)
- lipid emulsion to be administered in case of intoxication with clinical signs of neurotoxicity or cardiotoxicity
Genetic samples :
The gene coding for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is of particular interest. BDNF is a protein that contributes to neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation, participates in the creation of new synapses and influences the survival of existing neurons. It is thus currently considered as a crucial element influencing brain plasticity . This could also be an explanatory factor in identifying responders to mepivacaine.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mepivacaine arm | Experimental | Drug: Carbocaine Injectable Productmepivacaine injection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Ischemic stroke more than 30 days old
- Age between 18 and 85 years old
- At least one deficit among:
- motor deficit: score < 56 on the Fugl-Meyer scale
- aphasia: score ≥4 on the Aphasia Rapid Test,
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Hypersensitivity to amide-bonded local anesthetics.
- Atrioventricular conduction disorders requiring permanent electro-systolic training not yet performed.
- Epilepsy not controlled by treatment.
- Porphyritic subjects.
- Patients with a motor deficit (but no aphasia or scotomas) in whom there is spasticity leading to a major reduction in joint amplitude in passive motion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Carbocaine Injectable ProductOne injection per patient | Drug | Mepivacaine arm |
Primary outcome
improvement of clinical scores
Time frame: 1 Day
The response is defined as an improvement 1h (+/- 30min) after injection, compared to the evaluation before mepivacaine injection, on at least one of the clinical scores specific to the symptoms: * language : decrease of at least 4 points on the ART scale (rated from 0 to 26) , or increase of 20% of the number of images correctly named on a standardized battery (DO80, rated from 0 to 80). The rate of 20% corresponds to an effect considered clinically significant, without any "clinically significant minimal change" published to date. * motor skills : increase of at least 4 points on the Fugl-Meyer scale (rated from 0 to 60) corresponding to the "clinically significant minimal change" in the re-education studies * visual field : 20% reduction of a scotoma evaluated in automated static perimetry of Humphrey by the number of deficit areas compared to the total number of areas evaluated (n=43). The rate of 20% corresponds to an effect considered clinically significant
11 secondary outcomes
language-related symptoms
Time frame: 1 Day
ART scale
Time frame: 1 Day
spontaneous language test
Time frame: 1 Day
Fugl-Meyer scale
Time frame: 1Day
Timed up and go test
Time frame: 1Day
10 metres walking test
Time frame: 1Day
Perimetry of Humphrey
Time frame: 1 Day
kinetic perimetry
Time frame: 1 Day
static perimetry
Time frame: 1 Day
NIHSS score changes
Time frame: 1 Day
response delay
Time frame: 1 Day
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jan 2024.
Related trials for Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Active, not recruiting
Improving Visual Field Deficits With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation
Visual Field Defect, Peripheral, Stroke
Recruiting
Biomarkers of Paired VNS
Stroke, Ischemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Carbocaine Injectable Product in people with Ischemic Stroke, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact COHEN Laurent, PUPH (142161801 ext. +33, laurent.cohen@aphp.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
improvement of clinical scores (time frame: 1 Day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2024.