AzTrials
AzTrials

Intensive Care, NeonatalNCT05223140

Optimal Time Intervals for Vaginal Breech Births: A Multi-Site Case-Control Study

An observational study of Intensive Care, Neonatal and Perinatal Death, run by King's College London at 5 sites in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study uses a case-control design to test the hypotheses that avoidable delay in late second stage and premature cord clamping are associated with admission to the neonatal unit and/or early perinatal death following vaginal breech births. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
Conditions the study is for
Intensive Care, Neonatal, Perinatal Death
What is being tested?
Birth within 7 minutes of rumping and Premature cord clamping
How many people
225 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
1 Feb 2022to 30 Sep 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Vaginal breech births will be identified by the local PI, who is a member of the clinical care team, through a search of routine electronic healthcare records. Once vaginal breech births have been identified, the primary outcome will be identified for each record in time-descending order, beginning with the most recent vaginal breech birth. When a case (NICU admission or neonatal death) is identified, then two controls will be identified in time-descending order and matched for parity with the case. Only the medical records which have been identified as cases and controls for the study will be accessed for data collection.

Who may be able to join

  • Singleton pregnancy > 37+0 weeks with a breech-presenting fetus born vaginally;
  • Alive on admission to intrapartum care
  • Admission to the neonatal unit or early neonatal death (within 6 days of birth);
  • Healthcare professional in attendance.
  • Singleton pregnancy > 37+0 weeks with a longitudinal breech-presenting fetus born vaginally;
  • No admission to the neonatal unit or early neonatal death (within 6 days of birth);
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Healthcare professional in attendance;
  • Occurring immediately prior to the matched case; and
  • Matched for parity with that case (nullip/multip).

Who cannot join

  • Births which took place prior to the arrival of a trained health care professional;
  • Major congenital anomaly, identified prior to or after birth, likely to have compromised neonatal condition.
  • CONTROLS

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

Shawn Walker, PhD contact

07947819122

Shawn.Walker@kcl.ac.uk

Emma Spillane, MSc contact

07951291826

E.Spillane@nhs.net

5 sites in 1 country

United Kingdom5 sites
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital

    London, SW10 9NH

    Shawn Walker, PhD, 07947819122, Shawn.Walker@kcl.ac.uk

  • West Middlesex Hospital

    London, TW7 6AF

    Shawn Walker, PhD, 07947819122, Shawn.Walker@kcl.ac.uk

  • Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust

    London

    Hannah Mullins, BSc

  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

    London

    Andrew Shennan, Prof

  • Kingston University Hospital NHS Trust

    London

    Emma Spillane, MSc, E.Spillane@nhs.net

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

This study uses a case-control design to test the hypotheses that avoidable delay in late second stage and premature cord clamping are associated with admission to the neonatal unit and/or early perinatal death following vaginal breech births. We aim to determine the predictive value of: 1) adherence/non-adherence to the Physiological Breech Birth Algorithm; and 2) premature cord clamping (<1 minute following birth) for admission to the neonatal unit and/or perinatal death following vaginal breech births. The secondary objectives are to: 1) test all variables for a single-factor association with the primary outcome; and 2) test the predictive values of associated variables using linear regression; in order to 3) explore other factors contributing to adverse outcomes in vaginal breech births.

Read the detailed description

This study replicates a previous successful pilot study (Spillane et al 2021). The sample size calculation for the original study was based on the hypothesis that among those breech births where a neonatal death or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) occurs following the birth, the time between the birth of the fetal pelvis and the birth of the aftercoming head will be greater than three minutes more often than it is among the controls, where no death or NICU admission has occurred. The hypothesis was developed from what is already known from previous research by Reitter, Halliday and Walker (2020). The study found that the time between the birth of the pelvis and the birth of the aftercoming head is more than three minutes in only 25% per cent of breech births with good outcomes. Spillane et al's study hypothesised that this interval would be more than three minutes in 75% of births where death or a NICU admission occurred.

Spillane et al's power calculation determined that a sample size of fifteen cases and thirty controls would be required to infer an association between a pelvis to head interval of >3 minutes and the composite neonatal outcome (death or NICU admission), with a confidence interval of 95% and a power of 80%. The results of that study confirmed that association (p=<.0005).

We have not re-calculated sample size. Our aims in this study are to confirm the results of the original study by replication in multiple different settings and to explore additional confounding variables that may only be apparent in larger data sets. We are particularly interested in the influence of immediate cord clamping on these outcomes, but it was not possible to calculate a sample size based on the original study due to none of the cases having anything other than immediate cord clamping (n=0). Therefore, we are seeking a larger sample size in the hopes of being able to identify an appropriate sample size for future research, and to confirm the results of the previous study.

All anonymised data gathered in each site will be combined and analysed as a single data set by the Co-Investigators. The complete anonymised data set, combining data from all sites, will be downloaded and stored within the KCL Sharepoint for analysis.

We will first calculate the time to event interval for all variables of interest and report descriptive statistics for all variables, including means, medians and range for continuous variables. Exposures and confounders will also be converted into binary variables, reflecting the cut-offs used in the Physiological Breech Birth Algorithm. These will then be tested against the primary outcome using the non-parametric chi-square, or Fisher's Exact tests where cell frequencies are too small for the chi-square test.

Linear and logistic regression analysis will be used to test the predictive values of meeting or exceeding the recommended time limits in the Physiological Breech Birth Algorithm, and of maintaining and intact umbilical cord until the onset of respiration or not. Further linear and logistic regression analyses will be conducted with all variables that show an association with the composite neonatal outcome to determine their predictive value, and additional variables to explore their potential as confounding factors for investigation in future studies.

Being tested
Birth within 7 minutes of rumping, Premature cord clamping
Keywords
Physiological Breech Birth Algorithm, premature cord clamping, NICU, early perinatal death
Medical subject headings
Perinatal Death

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Birth within 7 minutes of rumpingBehavioural

    Also called Adherence to physiological breech birth algorithm

    Birth within 7 minutes of rumping (+3 station), within 5 minutes of birth of pelvis, within 3 minutes of birth of umbilicus

  • Premature cord clampingBehavioural

    Also called Immediate cord clamping

    Umbilical cord clamping <1 minute following birth

Study groups in NCT05223140
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CasesAdmission to NICU or early perinatal death
Receives: Behavioral: Birth within 7 minutes of rumping; Behavioral: Premature cord clamping
ControlsNo admission to NICU or early perinatal death
Receives: Behavioral: Birth within 7 minutes of rumping; Behavioral: Premature cord clamping

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Admission to neonatal unit

    Admission to intensive care or special care neonatal unit

    Measured: Immediately following a vaginal breech birth

  2. Early perinatal death

    Neonatal death

    Measured: Within 6 days following a vaginal breech birth

  3. Composite primary outcome

    Neonatal death or admission

    Measured: Up to 6 days following birth

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Feb 2022
  2. Study start1 Feb 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
225 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05223140
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRAS 309591
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
24 Jan 2022
Last updated
3 Feb 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Fully anonymised data will also be uploaded onto an online open access repository as part of the publication process, to ensure sufficient peer review and public scrutiny. Published results will not contain any personal data that could allow identification of individual participants or the location of the births included in the analysis.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Intensive Care, Neonatal and Perinatal Death, run by King's College London at 5 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Shawn Walker, PhD (07947819122, Shawn.Walker@kcl.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Admission to neonatal unit (time frame: Immediately following a vaginal breech birth). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in