AzTrials
AzTrials

Plaque PsoriasisPhase 2FRONTIER 1NCT05223868

A Study of JNJ-77242113 in Participants With Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 2 study testing JNJ-77242113 in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 76 sites in 10 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Th purpose of the study is to evaluate the dose response of JNJ-77242113 in efficacy at Week 16 in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Plaque Psoriasis
What is being tested?
JNJ-77242113
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
255 participants
Where
76 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
3 Feb 2022to 15 Dec 2022
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participant has a diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for at least 6 months prior to the first administration of study intervention
  • Participant be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis
  • Participant has a total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline
  • Participant has a total Psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline
  • Participant has a total Investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline

Who cannot join

  • Participant has a nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
  • Participant has current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
  • Participant have previously received any other therapeutic agent directly targeted to interleukin 23 receptor (IL-23R) (including but not limited to guselkumab, tildrakizumab, or risankizumab)
  • Participant has received any therapeutic agent directly targeted to interleukin 17 receptor (IL-17) or interleukin 12/23 receptor (IL-12/23) (including but not limited to secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, or ustekinumab) or has received anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha biologic therapy (including, but not limited to adalimumab) within 12 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, of the first administration of study intervention
  • Participant has received agents that deplete B cells (including, but not limited to, rituximab, or alemtuzumab) within 26 weeks of the first administration of study intervention

Trial locations and contacts

76 sites in 10 countries.

76 sites in 10 countries

United States21 sites
  • Atlanta Dermatology, Vein & Research Center

    Alpharetta, Georgia, 30022

  • Modern Research Associates

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Windsor Dermatology, PC

    East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520

  • Hamzavi Dermatology

    Fort Gratiot, Michigan, 48059

  • Center for Clinical Studies

    Houston, Texas, 77004

  • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group LLC

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250

  • Vivida Dermatology

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119

  • Virginia Clinical Research

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23502

  • Renstar Medical Research

    Ocala, Florida, 34470

  • Austin Institute for Clinical Research

    Pflugerville, Texas, 78660

  • Medical Dermatology Specialists

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85006

  • University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Indiana Clinical Trial Center

    Plainfield, Indiana, 46168

  • Oregon Dermatology and Research Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • DermAssociates, PC

    Rockville, Maryland, 20850

  • Arlington Dermatology

    Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008

  • Pacific Skin Institute

    Sacramento, California, 95815

  • Dermatology Associates

    Seattle, Washington, 98101

  • Premier Clinical Research

    Spokane, Washington, 99202

  • Forcare Clinical Research Inc

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • Center for Clinical Studies

    Webster, Texas, 77598

Other trials in United States

Germany14 sites
  • Fachklinik Bad Bentheim

    Bad Bentheim, 48455

  • Charite - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin (CCM)

    Berlin, 10117

  • Rothhaar Studien GmbH

    Berlin, 10783

  • ISA - Interdisciplinary Study Association GmbH

    Berlin, 10789

  • Niesmann & Othlinghaus GbR

    Bochum, 44793

  • Rosenpark Research GmbH

    Darmstadt, 64283

  • Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt

    Frankfurt am Main, 60590

  • Derma-Study-Center Friedrichshafen GmbH

    Friedrichshafen, 88045

  • MensingDerma research GmbH

    Hamburg, 22391

  • Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Universitatsklinikum Schleswig Holstein Kiel

    Kiel, 24105

  • Universitatsklinikum Leipzig AOR

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Dermatologische Gemeinschaftspraxis

    Mahlow, 15831

  • Hautarztpraxis

    Witten, 58453

Other trials in Germany

Japan10 sites
  • Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital

    Kofu, 400-8506

  • Miyata Dermatology Clinic

    Matsudo, 271-0092

  • Takagi Dermatological Clinic

    Obihiro-shi, 080-0013

  • Kume Clinic

    Sakai, 593 8324

  • Sapporo Skin Clinic

    Sapporo, 060 0063

  • Shizuoka General Hospital

    Shizuoka, 420-8527

  • Shirasaki Dermatology Clinic

    Takaoka, 933-0871

  • Kumamoto Kenhoku Hospital

    Tamana, 865-0005

  • Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital

    Toyama, 930 8550

  • Nomura Dermatology Clinic

    Yokohama, 221 0825

Other trials in Japan

Poland5 sites
  • Nzoz Zdrowie Osteo-Medic

    Bialystok, 15-351

  • Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o

    Lodz, 90-265

  • Dermodent Centrum Medyczne Aldona Czajkowska Rafal Czajkowski S C

    Osielsko, 86031

  • Klinika Ambroziak Estederm Sp. z o.o

    Warsaw, 02-953

  • Wro Medica

    Wroclaw, 51-685

Other trials in Poland

South Korea5 sites
  • Pusan National University Hospital

    Busan, 49241

  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    Gyeonggi-do, 13620

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, 03080

  • Konkuk University Medical Center

    Seoul, 05030

  • KyungHee University Hospital

    Seoul, 102-1703

Other trials in South Korea

Spain5 sites
  • Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol

    Barcelona, 08916

  • Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre

    Madrid, 28041

  • Hosp. Provincial de Pontevedra

    Pontevedra, 36001

  • Hosp. Univ. I Politecni La Fe

    Valencia, 46026

  • Hosp. de Manises

    Valencia, 46940

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom5 sites
  • Castle Hill Hospital

    Cottingham, HU16 5JQ

  • Russell's Hall Hospital

    Dudley, DY1 2HQ

  • Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust

    London, SE1 9RT

  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

    Southampton, SO16 6YD

  • Mid Yorkshire Hospital NHS Trust- Pinderfields Hospital

    Wakefield, WF1 4DG

Other trials in United Kingdom

Canada4 sites
  • Dermatrials Research

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1Y2

  • Innovaderm Research

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1

  • Alliance Clinical Trials

    Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4

  • XLR8 Medical Research

    Windsor, Ontario, N8W 1E6

Other trials in Canada

Taiwan4 sites
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Kaohsiung City, 83342

  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital

    Tainan, 70403

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 10048

  • Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, LinKou Branch

    Taoyuan, 333

Other trials in Taiwan

France3 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier Le Mans

    Le Mans, 72037

  • Hopital Charles Nicolle

    Rouen, 76031

  • HIA Sainte Anne

    Toulon, 83800

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2b Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Th purpose of the study is to evaluate the dose response of JNJ-77242113 in efficacy at Week 16 in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Read the detailed description

The populations of people living with moderate to severe psoriasis is approximately 3.5 billion which are mostly managed with topical and conventional therapies. JNJ-77242113, investigational drug, targets the immune responses in the body and skin which impacts diseases, such as psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and this study evaluates JNJ-77242113 as options of advanced therapies in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The total duration of this study is up to 24 weeks which includes a screening period of less than or equal to (<=) 4 weeks, a 16-week treatment period, and a 4-week safety follow-up period. Safety will be assessed by adverse events (AEs), clinical safety laboratory assessments, electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital signs and physical examinations.

Being tested
JNJ-77242113, Placebo

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • JNJ-77242113Drug

    JNJ-77242113 tablet will be administered orally.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo tablet will be administered orally.

Study groups in NCT05223868
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1: JNJ-77242113 Dose 1 Once Daily (QD) and PlaceboExperimentalParticipants will receive JNJ-77242113 Dose 1 QD and placebo from Week 0 through Week 16. Participants will receive placebo to maintain the blinding of dose regimens.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: Placebo
Group 2: JNJ-77242113 Dose 2 QD and PlaceboExperimentalParticipants will receive JNJ-77242113 Dose 2 QD and placebo from Week 0 through Week 16. Participants will receive placebo to maintain the blinding of dose regimens.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: Placebo
Group 3: JNJ-77242113 Dose 3 QD and PlaceboExperimentalParticipants will receive JNJ-77242113 Dose 3 QD and placebo from Week 0 through Week 16. Participants will receive placebo to maintain the blinding of dose regimens.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: Placebo
Group 4: JNJ-77242113 Dose 1 Twice Daily (BID) and PlaceboExperimentalParticipants will receive JNJ-77242113 Dose 1 BID and placebo from Week 0 through Week 16. Participants will receive placebo to maintain the blinding of dose regimens.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: Placebo
Group 5: JNJ-77242113 Dose 3 BID and PlaceboExperimentalParticipants will receive JNJ-77242113 Dose 3 BID and placebo from Week 0 through Week 16. Participants will receive placebo to maintain the blinding of dose regimens.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: Placebo
Group 6: PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive placebo BID from Week 0 through Week 16.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (greater than or equal to [>=] 75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-90) at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-100) at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: At Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: At Week 16

  6. Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

    A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16

  7. Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16

  8. Change From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PSSD sign scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily sign score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 6 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that sign score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal to (=) 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Symptoms Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 1

    The PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score = 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >=1

    The PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily sign score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 6 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that sign score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) , Week 16

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline DLQI Score Greater Than (>) 1

    The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  12. Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16

    PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score= worst pain. Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score=more of concept being measured i.e. higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16

    PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score=worst pain. Each domain includes 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; SD of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score= more of the concept being measured i.e. higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference and sleep disturbance) indicated worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function and social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  14. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any event that occurred at or after the initial administration of study agent.

    Measured: From Week 0 through Week 20

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Feb 2022
  2. Study start3 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion15 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
255 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05223868
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR109138
Other IDs
2021-003700-41, 77242113PSO2001
Acronym
FRONTIER 1
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
24 Jan 2022
Last updated
13 Feb 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Publications

  • Strawn D, Krueger JG, Bissonnette R, Eyerich K, Ferris LK, Paller AS, Pinter A, Richards D, Chen EY, Paget K, Horowitz D, Parast R, Rusbuldt JJ, Sendecki J, Bhagat S, Tomsho LP, Chou CH, Polak ME, Keyes BE, Bozenhardt E, Xiong Y, Zhou W, DeKlotz C, Newbold P, Waterworth DM, Miller M, Ota T, Yang YW, Leung MW, Miller LS, Cuff CA, McRae B, Ruane D, Kannan AK. Icotrokinra induces early and sustained pharmacodynamic responses in phase IIb study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. JCI Insight. 2025 Dec 22;10(24):e193563. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.193563. eCollection 2025 Dec 22.

    PubMed 41424381
  • Bissonnette R, Pinter A, Ferris LK, Gerdes S, Rich P, Vender R, Miller M, Shen YK, Kannan A, Li S, DeKlotz C, Papp K. An Oral Interleukin-23-Receptor Antagonist Peptide for Plaque Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2024 Feb 8;390(6):510-521. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2308713.

    PubMed 38324484

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing JNJ-77242113 in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 76 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 76 sites in United States, Germany, Japan, Poland, South Korea and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05223868, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in