AzTrials
AzTrials

Lymphocytic Myocarditis (Disorder)Phase 3NCT05237323

Micophenolate Mofetil Versus Azathioprine in Myocarditis

A Phase 3 study testing mycophenolate mofetil 2 g per day and azathioprine of 150 [75; 150] mg per day in people with Lymphocytic Myocarditis (Disorder) and Heart Failure, run by I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University at 1 site in Russia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study is aimed at studying the direct efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (mycophenolate mofetil, CellCept, Genentech, N015393/02, 12.08.2009) (in combination with corticosteroids (methylprednisolone, Metypred, Orion, 003467, 26.02.2016)) in the treatment of lymphocytic myocarditis: the effect on symptoms… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
mycophenolate mofetil 2 g per day and azathioprine of 150 [75; 150] mg per day
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteRussia
Study dates
1 Oct 2020to 10 Jul 2025
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Presence of written informed consent of the patient to participate in the study;
  • Age 18 and older;
  • The diagnosis of myocarditis, established using endomyocardial biopsy (active or borderline myocarditis according to Dallas criteria, virus negative, excluding parvovirus B19);
  • Chronic heart failure 2-4 according to New York Heart Association functional classification;
  • Signs of left ventricular dysfunction, persisting after 2 months of optimal drug therapy (therapy for heart failure, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, diuretics, angiotensin receptors and neprilysin inhibitors): end-diastolic the size of the left ventricle is more than 5.5 cm, the ejection fraction is less than 50%;
  • Non-inclusion criteria:
Show all 19Show fewer
  • History of myocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome.
  • Chronic ischemic heart disease with hemodynamically significant stenoses of the coronary arteries (70% or more).
  • Congenital heart defects.
  • History of infective endocarditis less than 6 months old.
  • Thyrotoxic heart.
  • Hypertensive heart (left ventricular hypertrophy more than 14 mm).
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
  • Verified amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, other storage diseases.
  • Diffuse connective tissue diseases.
  • Verified systemic vasculitis.
  • Lymphoproliferative diseases.
  • Condition after chemotherapy with anthracycline drugs.
  • Heart surgery less than 2 months old.

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal to participate in the study;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Inability to adequately control therapy and follow the research protocol (serious mental disorders, remoteness of residence, non-compliance of the patient)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Russia1 site
  • I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

    Moscow, Bol'shaya Pirogovskaya Street 6, 1 Building ,, 119435

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: The Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Treatment of Lymphocytic Myocarditis in Comparison With Azathioprine

The study is aimed at studying the direct efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (mycophenolate mofetil, CellCept, Genentech, N015393/02, 12.08.2009) (in combination with corticosteroids (methylprednisolone, Metypred, Orion, 003467, 26.02.2016)) in the treatment of lymphocytic myocarditis: the effect on symptoms, structural and functional parameters of the heart, on the outcomes of lymphocytic myocarditis: mortality, the need for transplantation, other surgical interventions, the incidence of unwanted side effects, and forced cancellation (replacement) of the drug. To compare the data on the efficacy and safety of therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (in combination with corticosteroids) with the standard regimen of therapy for lymphocytic myocarditis (corticosteroids in combination with azathioprine), including in cases of forced replacement of drugs with each other.

Read the detailed description

From October 2020 to December 2022, it is planned to enroll 50 patients in "case-control" study diagnosed with virus negative lymphocytic myocarditis at the University Clinical Hospital No. 1, who meet the inclusion criteria. In this study, counting the sample is impossible and such a number of patients is explained by both the rarity of the pathology and the expensive diagnostic endomyocardial biopsy for mandatory confirmation of the diagnosis. Further, the patients will be divided into 2 groups. The main group is methylprednisolone at a starting dose of 24-40 mg / day + mycophenolate 2 g / day per os for 1 month, followed by a decrease in the dose of methylprednisolone to a maintenance dose (4-8 mg / day). The comparison group is methylprednisolone at a starting dose of 24-40 mg / day per os in combination with azathioprine 2 mg / kg per os (100-150 mg / day). All patients will receive standard heart failure therapy including beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (if required), diuretics (if required).

The first stage is the patient screening (medical history, newly admitted with suspected myocarditis) which includes examination to verify the diagnosis of severe and moderate subacute/chronic myocarditis. Basic research methods: anamnesis, physical examination, blood tests (general, biochemical), electrocardiogram, daily monitoring of electrocardiogram by Holter, transthoracic echocardiography, determination of the level of anticardial antibodies in the blood: regardless of the meal, venous blood is collected in a sterile test tube, then on the same day it is transported under normal conditions to the laboratory of the city clinical hospital №52 for immunomorphological examination. Reference values: antibodies to antigens of cardiomyocyte nuclei (no antibody titer), antibodies to endothelial antigens (antibody titer 1:40), antibodies to cardiomyocyte antigens (antibody titer 1:40), antibodies to smooth muscle antigens (antibody titer 1:40), antibodies to the antigens of the fibers of the cardiac conduction system (antibody titer 1:40) Endomyocardial biopsy of the right ventricle with determination of the genome of cardiotropic viruses in the myocardium by polymerase chain reaction, standard histological examination (staining with hematoxylin-eosin, according to Van Gieson), immunohistochemistry-specific antibodies for leukocytes (CD45), macrophages (CD68), T cells (CD3) and their main subtypes, helper (CD4) and cytotoxic (CD8) cells, and B cells (CD19/CD20): quantitative criteria to improve the diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsy in myocarditis include the Marburg criteria, based on the presence of >14 mononuclear leukocytes/mm2 on bioptic samples, with the presence of >7 T lymphocytes per mm2. These criteria were adopted in a position statement by the European Society of Cardiology experts). Additionally (for special indications): multislice computer tomography scanning and / or magnetic resonance imaging of the heart with intravenous contrasting with gadolinium (CAS: 88344-16-5), coronary angiography and myocardial scintigraphy (for patients with suspected coronary artery disease, high pretest likelihood of coronary heart disease more than 65%, positive exercise test, coronary atherosclerosis on computed tomography or previous myocardial infarction), genetic counseling (the process of genetic counseling is about sharing information regarding genetic and disease risks in a manner useful to an individual, couple, or family copes with a possible cause of genetically determined heart diseases: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, canalopathy or restrictive cardiomyopathy).

Endomyocardial biopsy is performed according to indications developed in the clinic and consistent with the European recommendations for myocardial biopsy (2007).

At the second stage, patients who confirmed virus-negative lymphocytic myocarditis during endomyocardial biopsy, are included in the study according to the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria. All patients sign informed consent to participate in the study. The second stage involves the determination of indications for the appointment of immunosuppressive therapy (verified diagnosis of severe and moderate myocarditis, resistance to standard cardiotropic therapy for 2 months, the absence of markers of active viral infection in the blood and viral genome in the myocardium (adenovirus, enterovirus, citomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, human herpes virus 6, hepatitis C virus, the human immunodeficiency virus, influenza, coronavirus (MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2), with the exception of parvovirus B19, the absence of other active infection). The distribution into two groups is made by the researcher. All patients are matched by gender and age. If the patient has previously received azathioprine with insufficient effect or side effects were present, then the patient is included in the main group and vice versa. The observation period is at least 6 months. The frequency of control examinations: 2 months after the start of therapy (with a stable course of myocarditis, studies are performed in absentia): blood tests (general, biochemical), electrocardiogram, 24 hour monitoring of electrocardiogram by Holter, transthoracic echocardiography, determination of the level of anticardial antibodies in the blood) and then every 6 months (with a stable course of myocarditis, studies are performed in absentia): blood tests (general, biochemical), electrocardiogram, daily monitoring of electrocardiogram by Holter, transthoracic echocardiogram, determination of the level of anticardial antibodies in the blood). observation median - one year. Statistical processing: SPSS version 23 software package.

Qualitative, quantitative variables:

Discrete data will be presented in the form of absolute values and percentages, continuous data - in the form of arithmetic mean ± standard deviation in the case of normal distribution or in the form of quartiles 50 [25; 75], if the distribution differs from normal.

Determination of the type of distribution:

To assess the normality of the distribution, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used.

Comparison of indicators between groups depending on the type of distribution:

Comparison of patients by groups will be carried out using χ2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical dichotomous variables, for the rest - using the Student's t-test (with a normal distribution and the number of observations over 25) or Mann-Whitney U-test.

Survival assessment:

Survival analysis will be performed with Kaplan-Meier curves.

Regression analysis:

Correlation analysis followed by linear regression will be performed to identify possible predictors of outcomes.

Differences will be considered significant at a significance level of p≤0.05.

Being tested
mycophenolate mofetil 2 g per day, azathioprine of 150 [75; 150] mg per day
Keywords
virus-negative lymphocytic myocarditis, myocarditis, immunosuppressive therapy, azathioprine, glucocorticosteroids, endomyocardial biopsy, Parvovirus B19, Anticardial antibodies
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure, Cardiomyopathy, Dilated, Cardiomyopathies, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Myocarditis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • mycophenolate mofetil 2 g per dayDrug

    mycophenolate mofetil 2 g per day and methylprednisolone in an average starting dose 24 [24; 32] mg per day and standard drug therapy for heart failure.

  • azathioprine of 150 [75; 150] mg per dayDrug

    azathioprine at an average dose of 150 [75; 150] mg per day and methylprednisolone in an average starting dose 24 [24; 32] mg per day and standard drug therapy for heart failure.

Study groups in NCT05237323
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
main groupExperimentalGroup 1 included 25 patients who received mycophenolate mofetil 2 g per day per os and methylprednisolone in an average starting dose 24 [24; 32] mg per day per os and standard drug therapy for heart failure (beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (if required), diuretics (if required)).
Receives: Drug: mycophenolate mofetil 2 g per day
control groupActive comparatorGroup 2 included 25 patients who received azathioprine at an average dose of 150 [75; 150] mg per day per os and methylprednisolone in an average starting dose 24 [24; 32] mg per day per os and standard drug therapy for heart failure (beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (if required), diuretics (if required))
Receives: Drug: azathioprine of 150 [75; 150] mg per day

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. cardiovascular death

    frequency of biological death from cardiovascular causes of a patient recorded in a hospital or at home, confirmed by a death certificate (with or without autopsy results); the relevant information was obtained directly from the relatives of the deceased.

    Measured: From the start of therapy for at least one year or until the patient's death

  2. heart transplant

    frequency of heart transplantation due to lack of effect from immunosuppressive therapy and standard cardiotropic therapy with persistent heart failure of NYHA functional class 4 requiring constant inotropic or circulatory support or Intractable life-threatening arrhythmias unresponsive to medical therapy, catheter ablation, surgery, and/or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

    Measured: From the start of therapy for at least one year or until the patient's death

Secondary outcomes (22)
  1. Dynamics of heart failure in accordance with New York Heart Association classification

    assessment of the dynamics of the severity of the condition according to the classification of the functional classification of the New York Heart Association using the test with a six-minute walk

    Measured: up to 1 week, 2 months after therapy, then 6 months later

  2. dynamics of left ventricle ejection fraction

    dynamics of left ventricle ejection fraction by Simpson technique according to transthoracic echocardiography

    Measured: up to 1 week

  3. dynamics of left ventricle ejection fraction

    dynamics of left ventricle ejection fraction by Simpson technique according to transthoracic echocardiography

    Measured: 2 months after starting therapy

  4. dynamics of left ventricle ejection fraction

    dynamics of left ventricle ejection fraction by Simpson technique according to transthoracic echocardiography

    Measured: 6 months after starting therapy

  5. dynamics of the end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle (cm)

    dynamics of left end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle (cm) according to transthoracic echocardiography

    Measured: up to 1 week

  6. dynamics of the end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle (cm)

    dynamics of left end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle (cm) according to transthoracic echocardiography

    Measured: 2 months after starting therapy

  7. dynamics of the end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle (cm)

    dynamics of left end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle (cm) according to transthoracic echocardiography

    Measured: 6 months after starting therapy

  8. dynamics of the end-diastolic volume of the left ventricle (ml)

    dynamics of the end-diastolic volume of the left ventricle (ml) according to transthoracic echocardiography

    Measured: up to 1 week

  9. dynamics of the end-diastolic volume of the left ventricle (ml)

    dynamics of the end-diastolic volume of the left ventricle (ml) according to transthoracic echocardiography

    Measured: 2 months after starting therapy

  10. dynamics of the end-diastolic volume of the left ventricle (ml)

    dynamics of the end-diastolic volume of the left ventricle (ml) according to transthoracic echocardiography

    Measured: 6 months after starting therapy

  11. dynamics of the end-systolic volume of the left ventricle (ml)

    dynamics of the end-systolic volume of the left ventricle (ml) according to transthoracic echocardiography

    Measured: up to 1 week

  12. dynamics of the end-systolic volume of the left ventricle (ml)

    dynamics of the end-systolic volume of the left ventricle (ml) according to transthoracic echocardiography

    Measured: 2 months after starting therapy

  13. dynamics of the end-systolic volume of the left ventricle (ml)

    dynamics of the end-systolic volume of the left ventricle (ml) according to transthoracic echocardiography

    Measured: 6 months after starting therapy

  14. dynamics of the systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery according to transthoracic echocardiography data.

    Change in systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery (mm Hg) in comparison with baseline values (at the time of inclusion in the study

    Measured: up to 1 week

  15. dynamics of the systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery according to transthoracic echocardiography data.

    Change in systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery (mm Hg) in comparison with baseline values (at the time of inclusion in the study

    Measured: 2 months after starting therapy

  16. dynamics of the systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery according to transthoracic echocardiography data.

    Change in systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery (mm Hg) in comparison with baseline values (at the time of inclusion in the study

    Measured: 6 months after starting therapy

  17. drug withdrawal

    frequency of drug withdrawal due to side effects: myelodepression (leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia), development of secondary infections, megaloblastic erythropoiesis and macrocytosis, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, skin rash, arthralgia, myalgia, erosive and ulcerative lesions of the oral cavity, medicinal, cholestatic hepatitis, toxic hepatitis or no effect according to transthoracic echocardiography (left ventricle ejection fraction, size of the left ventricle, systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery) and anticardial antibodies.

    Measured: up to 1 week

  18. drug withdrawal

    frequency of drug withdrawal due to side effects: myelodepression (leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia), development of secondary infections, megaloblastic erythropoiesis and macrocytosis, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, skin rash, arthralgia, myalgia, erosive and ulcerative lesions of the oral cavity, medicinal, cholestatic hepatitis, toxic hepatitis or no effect according to transthoracic echocardiography (left ventricle ejection fraction, size of the left ventricle, systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery) and anticardial antibodies.

    Measured: 2 months after starting therapy

  19. drug withdrawal

    frequency of drug withdrawal due to side effects: myelodepression (leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia), development of secondary infections, megaloblastic erythropoiesis and macrocytosis, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, skin rash, arthralgia, myalgia, erosive and ulcerative lesions of the oral cavity, medicinal, cholestatic hepatitis, toxic hepatitis or no effect according to transthoracic echocardiography (left ventricle ejection fraction, size of the left ventricle, systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery) and anticardial antibodies.

    Measured: 6 months after starting therapy

  20. drug replacement due to side effect

    frequency of drug replacement due to side effect: myelodepression (leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia), development of secondary infections, megaloblastic erythropoiesis and macrocytosis, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, skin rash, arthralgia, myalgia, erosive and ulcerative lesions of the oral cavity, medicinal , cholestatic hepatitis, toxic hepatitis or no effect according to ECHO-KG (Ejection fraction, size of the left ventricle, systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery) and anticardial antibodies

    Measured: up to 1 week

  21. drug replacement due to side effect

    frequency of drug replacement due to side effect: myelodepression (leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia), development of secondary infections, megaloblastic erythropoiesis and macrocytosis, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, skin rash, arthralgia, myalgia, erosive and ulcerative lesions of the oral cavity, medicinal , cholestatic hepatitis, toxic hepatitis or no effect according to ECHO-KG (Ejection fraction, size of the left ventricle, systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery) and anticardial antibodies

    Measured: 2 months after starting therapy

  22. drug replacement due to side effect

    frequency of drug replacement due to side effect: myelodepression (leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia), development of secondary infections, megaloblastic erythropoiesis and macrocytosis, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, skin rash, arthralgia, myalgia, erosive and ulcerative lesions of the oral cavity, medicinal , cholestatic hepatitis, toxic hepatitis or no effect according to ECHO-KG (Ejection fraction, size of the left ventricle, systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery) and anticardial antibodies

    Measured: 6 months after starting therapy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Feb 2022
  2. Study start1 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion10 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion10 Jul 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05237323
Sponsor's protocol ID
122
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
13 Jan 2022
Last updated
15 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The provision of data is possible only upon official request.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing mycophenolate mofetil 2 g per day and azathioprine of 150 [75; 150] mg per day in people with Lymphocytic Myocarditis (Disorder) and Heart Failure, run by I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University at 1 site in Russia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

cardiovascular death (time frame: From the start of therapy for at least one year or until the patient's death). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in