AIN Transfer for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Introduction Peripheral nerve trauma especially through compressive injury is very common. Of these, ulnar neuropathy at the elbow is the second most prevalent. In severe cases, functional outcomes even with surgery are often poor. Principle reasons being that the ulnar nerve innervates a large number of intrinsic hand muscles. At an average of 350 mm from the site of injury to the target muscles, the distance is very long, Although peripheral nerve fibres have the ability to regenerate, it is very slow at only 1 mm/day. That would translate to a year for the regenerating fibres to reach the hand. With the favorable condition in the distal stump and target muscles to regrowth rapidly declining over time, few axons will successfully reach target. Therefore, alternative methods of surgical treatments are being sought to circumvent this major hurdle.

Rationale and purpose One potentially promising alternative is through distal nerve transfer by using a terminal branch of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to the pronator quadratus muscle and coapt it to the ulnar nerve close to the wrist. That would greatly shorten the distance to target by 200 mm or more. By approximating the end of the AIN donor stump to the side of the ulnar nerve through an eipneurial window (termed reverse end to side or RETS) transfer, it allows preservation of the integrity of the ulnar nerve fibres thus providing a conduit for the regenerating native axons to reach the hand. While this concept is theoretically appealing and has gained increasing popularity in clinical practice, a crucial question of central importance remains answered: Can the AIN donor axons indeed breach the ulnar nerve trunk and reinnervate the hand muscles? Aside from testing the central premise of RETS, it would be important to know the exact magnitude of reinnervation that can be achieved from the donor nerve through this procedure.

With the above rationale in mind, the objective of this proposal is to test the hypothesis that reinnervation of ulnar intrinsic hand muscles by the AIN can be achieved through the RETS procedure. This will be done through quantifying the amount of innervation by the AIN donor nerve to the ulnar intrinsic hand muscles using motor unit number estimation, a non-invasive electrophysiological technique. The investigators will also evaluate whether there is an associated improvement in hand function following the procedure.

Experimental protocol Subjects For this study, the investigators aim to recruit a prospective series of 60 patients with severe cubital tunnel syndrome causing marked motor axonal loss.

Primary outcome measures Motor unit number estimations of native axons in the ulnar nerve innervation the intrinsic hand muscles compared to those from the AIN.

Secondary outcomes

Motor function:

1. Pinch strength using a pinch gauge ii) Grip strength using a Jamar dynamometer iii) Disabilities of Arm, Hand and Shoulder (DASH) Questionnaire

Procedures and follow up All outcomes will be measured at baseline and repeated at 3 and 6 months post op. Motor unit number estimation will be done using the multiple point stimulation technique. To briefly summarize, recording surface electrodes will be placed over the belly of the hypothenar muscles. To estimate the number of native ulnar axons innverating the hypothenar hand muscles, supramaximal stimulation of the ulnar nerve in the mid forearm above the site of AIN coaptation will be done. A sample of single motor unit action potentials will be obtained by discretely stimulating individual motor axons using finely graded stimuli. A motor unit number estimation will be calculated from the ratio of the compound muscle action potential amplitude and the average single motor unit action potentials. To estimate the motor unit innervation from the AIN, the same procedure will be done by stimulating the median nerve while recording from the hypothenar muscles.

Surgery Eligible patients will undergo surgical decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Additionally, a reverse end-to-side transfer to the ulnar nerve will be done using a terminal branch of the AIN to the pronator quadratus muscle. It will be coapted to the side of the motor fascicle of the ulnar nerve just above the wrist through a 5 mm epineurial window.

Statistical analysis To address the central question of AIN innervation, descriptive statistics (mean and sd) will be used to quantify the extent of nerve growth through the epineurial window created by the RETS procedure. Since there is no AIN innervation of the hypothenar muscles at baseline, growth of motor axons through the epineurial window should be easy to discern through motor unit number estimation. Changes in motor hand strength and disability following surgery will be compared using repaired measure one way ANOVA with time as the independent factor. With this being a pilot exploratory study, further analytic statistical analysis would not be justified as the sample size will be too small to allow for any meaningful interpretation.

Expected outcomes and significance This will be further aided by the very substantial distance difference between the entry point of the AIN to the ulnar nerve trunk at just above the wrist and the native ulnar motor axons that regenerate from the elbow. At less than 100 mm from the target muscles, many AIN motor axons should reach the hypothenar muscles by 3 months and all by 6 months. In contrast, the regenerating native ulnar motor axons would likely not reach the hand muscles for a year or more, as shown in the investigators' previous publications.

Given the importance of this critical question and the potential utilities of distal nerve transfers, this should be a worthwhile effort.