Coronary Artery DiseaseNCT05248165
Naples PCI Registry
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, run by Federico II University at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The aim of the Naples PCI registry is to collect prospective data on baseline clinical, laboratory, and angiographic characteristics of patients undergoing PCI for acute or chronic coronary artery disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Myocardial Ischemia
- What is being tested?
- PCI
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 5,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2022to 30 Mar 2032
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Year
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI at University of Naples "Federico II".
Who may be able to join
- Clinical evidence of coronary artery disease requiring PCI;
- Age ≥18 years;
- Written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- 1. Inability to provide informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences
Naples, 80131
Raffaele Piccolo, MD,PhD, +390817464325, rafffaele.piccolo@unina.it
About this study
The aim of the Naples PCI registry is to collect prospective data on baseline clinical, laboratory, and angiographic characteristics of patients undergoing PCI for acute or chronic coronary artery disease. All patients receive clinical follow-up at hospital discharge and at 1-year follow-up with the objective to assess clinical outcomes, including death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, target-lesion and target-vessel revascularization, contrast-induced acute kidney injury, and bleeding events.
Read the detailed description
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) constitutes the most commonly performed therapeutic procedure in cardiovascular medicine and one on the most frequent interventions performed in medicine. Since the introduction of the procedure more than 40 years ago, the safety and efficacy profile of PCI has steadily improved with continuous advances in the technique, equipment, and procedural success. In the late 1980s, the advent of coronary stents favored the widespread adoption of PCI in routine clinical practice by eliminating the risk of periprocedural abrupt closure related to coronary dissection and, as corollary, the need for standby emergent coronary artery bypass grafting. Nowadays, about three out of four patients requiring myocardial revascularization are managed PCI.
The objective of this study is to evaluate, within the framework of a prospective registry, the safety and efficacy of PCI by considering all device iterations including stent-based as well as non-stent-based interventions. We will evaluate clinical, laboratory, angiographic data of all patients undergoing PCI at the Federico II University Hospital. Clinical follow-up is collected during hospital stay and at 1-year after PCI. All adverse events are independently adjudicated by a clinical events committee (CEC).
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Myocardial Ischemia, Myocardial Infarction, Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Being tested
- PCI
- Keywords
- Percutaneous coronary intervention, Coronary artery disease
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Ischemia, Myocardial Infarction, Acute Coronary Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PCIDevice
Percutaneous coronary intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention | Chronic or acute coronary syndrome requiring percutaneous myocardial revascularization. Receives: Device: PCI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients with death
Death
Measured: 12 months
Number of patients with myocardial infarction
Myocardial infarction
Measured: 12 months
Number of patients with stroke
Stroke
Measured: 12 months
Number of patients with stent thrombosis
Stent thrombosis
Measured: 12 months
Number of patients with target-vessel revascularization
Target vessel revascularization
Measured: 12 months
Number of patients with target-lesion revascularization
Target lesion revascularization
Measured: 12 months
Number of patients with contrast-induced acute kidney injury
Contrast-induced acute kidney injury
Measured: 12 months
Number of patients with bleeding
Bleeding
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Feb 2022
- Study start1 Mar 2022
- Primary completion30 Mar 2032 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Mar 2032 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 5,000 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 1 Year
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Federico II University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Giovanni Esposito, Federico II University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05248165
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 232/18
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Piccolo R, Giustino G, Mehran R, Windecker S. Stable coronary artery disease: revascularisation and invasive strategies. Lancet. 2015 Aug 15;386(9994):702-13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61220-X.
PubMed 26334162Byrne RA, Stone GW, Ormiston J, Kastrati A. Coronary balloon angioplasty, stents, and scaffolds. Lancet. 2017 Aug 19;390(10096):781-792. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31927-X.
PubMed 28831994Cuisset T, Verheugt FWA, Mauri L. Update on antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous coronary revascularisation. Lancet. 2017 Aug 19;390(10096):810-820. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31936-0.
PubMed 28831996Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?". Lancet. 2005 Jan 1-7;365(9453):82-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8.
PubMed 15639683King M, Nazareth I, Lampe F, Bower P, Chandler M, Morou M, Sibbald B, Lai R. Impact of participant and physician intervention preferences on randomized trials: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005 Mar 2;293(9):1089-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.9.1089.
PubMed 15741531Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, Mehran R, Stone GW, Spertus J, Onuma Y, Morel MA, van Es GA, Zuckerman B, Fearon WF, Taggart D, Kappetein AP, Krucoff MW, Vranckx P, Windecker S, Cutlip D, Serruys PW; Academic Research Consortium. Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Circulation. 2018 Jun 12;137(24):2635-2650. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029289.
PubMed 29891620Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD; Writing Group on the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction; Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Jaffe AS, Katus HA, Apple FS, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Chaitman BA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasche P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2551-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184. Epub 2012 Aug 24. No abstract available.
PubMed 22922414
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Naples PCI Registry
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05248165
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 232/18
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Myocardial Ischemia, Myocardial Infarction, Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Keywords
- Percutaneous coronary intervention, Coronary artery disease
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 5,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Federico II UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2032 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2032 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the Naples PCI registry is to collect prospective data on baseline clinical, laboratory, and angiographic characteristics of patients undergoing PCI for acute or chronic coronary artery disease. All patients receive clinical follow-up at hospital discharge and at 1-year follow-up with the objective to assess clinical outcomes, including death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, target-lesion and target-vessel revascularization, contrast-induced acute kidney injury, and bleeding events.
Detailed description
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) constitutes the most commonly performed therapeutic procedure in cardiovascular medicine and one on the most frequent interventions performed in medicine. Since the introduction of the procedure more than 40 years ago, the safety and efficacy profile of PCI has steadily improved with continuous advances in the technique, equipment, and procedural success. In the late 1980s, the advent of coronary stents favored the widespread adoption of PCI in routine clinical practice by eliminating the risk of periprocedural abrupt closure related to coronary dissection and, as corollary, the need for standby emergent coronary artery bypass grafting. Nowadays, about three out of four patients requiring myocardial revascularization are managed PCI.
The objective of this study is to evaluate, within the framework of a prospective registry, the safety and efficacy of PCI by considering all device iterations including stent-based as well as non-stent-based interventions. We will evaluate clinical, laboratory, angiographic data of all patients undergoing PCI at the Federico II University Hospital. Clinical follow-up is collected during hospital stay and at 1-year after PCI. All adverse events are independently adjudicated by a clinical events committee (CEC).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Year
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention | – | Device: PCIChronic or acute coronary syndrome requiring percutaneous myocardial revascularization. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI at University of Naples "Federico II".
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Clinical evidence of coronary artery disease requiring PCI;
- Age ≥18 years;
- Written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Inability to provide informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PCIPercutaneous coronary intervention | Device | Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention |
Primary outcome
Number of patients with death
Time frame: 12 months
Death
Number of patients with myocardial infarction
Time frame: 12 months
Myocardial infarction
Number of patients with stroke
Time frame: 12 months
Stroke
Number of patients with stent thrombosis
Time frame: 12 months
Stent thrombosis
Number of patients with target-vessel revascularization
Time frame: 12 months
Target vessel revascularization
Number of patients with target-lesion revascularization
Time frame: 12 months
Target lesion revascularization
Number of patients with contrast-induced acute kidney injury
Time frame: 12 months
Contrast-induced acute kidney injury
Number of patients with bleeding
Time frame: 12 months
Bleeding
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2024.
- Background: PubMed 26334162Piccolo R, Giustino G, Mehran R, Windecker S. Stable coronary artery disease: revascularisation and invasive strategies. Lancet. 2015 Aug 15;386(9994):702-13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61220-X.
- Background: PubMed 28831994Byrne RA, Stone GW, Ormiston J, Kastrati A. Coronary balloon angioplasty, stents, and scaffolds. Lancet. 2017 Aug 19;390(10096):781-792. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31927-X.
- Background: PubMed 28831996Cuisset T, Verheugt FWA, Mauri L. Update on antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous coronary revascularisation. Lancet. 2017 Aug 19;390(10096):810-820. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31936-0.
- Background: PubMed 15639683Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?". Lancet. 2005 Jan 1-7;365(9453):82-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8.
- Background: PubMed 15741531King M, Nazareth I, Lampe F, Bower P, Chandler M, Morou M, Sibbald B, Lai R. Impact of participant and physician intervention preferences on randomized trials: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005 Mar 2;293(9):1089-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.9.1089.
- Background: PubMed 29891620Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, Mehran R, Stone GW, Spertus J, Onuma Y, Morel MA, van Es GA, Zuckerman B, Fearon WF, Taggart D, Kappetein AP, Krucoff MW, Vranckx P, Windecker S, Cutlip D, Serruys PW; Academic Research Consortium. Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Circulation. 2018 Jun 12;137(24):2635-2650. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029289.
- Background: PubMed 22922414Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD; Writing Group on the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction; Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Jaffe AS, Katus HA, Apple FS, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Chaitman BA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasche P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2551-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184. Epub 2012 Aug 24. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Recruiting
Multivessel Balloon Occlusion to Investigate Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and aNgina
Stable Angina, Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Lipoic Acid on Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure Patients
Heart Failure Due to Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prognostic Value of Functional-Nutritional Status in Older Adults With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiovascular Acoustics for Early Disease Detection
Valvular Heart Disease, Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, run by Federico II University at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Giovanni Esposito, MD, PhD (+390817463075, espogiov@unina.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients with death (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05248165, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2024.