Bone MetastasesNCT05250687
MR Guided Focused Ultrasound vs Radiotherapy for Palliative Pain Tx in Bone Metastases
A study testing MR- High intensity focused ultrasound and External beam radiotherapy in people with Bone Metastases, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, single-center, randomized study directly comparing outcomes after MR guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR HIFU) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatment of painful bone metastases. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bone Metastases
- What is being tested?
- MR- High intensity focused ultrasound and External beam radiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2024to Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Painful metastatic bone lesions, with NRS > 4 documented at screening visit
- Pain from target lesion is distinguishable from other lesions*
- Target lesion lovation is accessible for MR-HIFU and EBRT**
- Target lesion is visible om MR or CT imaging obtained < 3 months prior to screening, with a maximum diameter of 8 cm.
- Reasonable performance score (KPS > 50% or ECOG <3)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Life expectancy > 3 months as determined by the study PI or referring oncologist
- Ability to understand and the willingness to personally sign the written IRB-approved informed consent document
- Solitary painful metastatic bone lesion or multiple metastatic lesions with one predominantly painful target lesion (≥2 points higher pain score than other lesions).
- e.g.: Extremities, pelvis (os pubis, os ilium, os ischium, sacrum, acetabulum), shoulders, in selected cases ribs and sternum
Who cannot join
- Previous surgery, radiation, HIFU, or other local therapy on the target location
- Neurological symptoms due to nerve involvement of target lesion
- Need for surgery of targeted location due to (impending) pathological fracture
- Unavoidable critical structures or dense tissues in target area*
- Curative intention of treatment plan
- Patients with contraindication for MR imaging such as implanted metallic devices that are not MRI - safe, size limitations, claustrophobia, etc.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Patients with known intolerance or allergy to MR contrast agent (gadolinium chelates) including advanced kidney disease (GFR <30mL/min/1.73 m^2) or on dialysis
- Pregnant and nursing patients will be excluded from the study because of a contraindication to administering MRI contrast agents to these patients
- Patients unable to receive general anesthesia, as determinded by anesthesiologist, study PI or referring oncologist
- Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary position during treatment (can be up to 4 hrs of total table time) via self report
- Participant enrolled in another clinical interventional study related to bone metastases treatment or pain relief treatment
- Clinically relevant medical history or physical findings that could interfere with the patient's safety as judged by the treating physician
- as judged by the operator. e.g.: nerve bundles, skin, extensive scarring, non-targeted bones, air (e.g. hollow viscera), (external) fixation device
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: MR Guided Focused Ultrasound Versus Radiotherapy for Palliative Pain Treatment in Patients With Bone Metastases
This is a prospective, single-center, randomized study directly comparing outcomes after MR guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR HIFU) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatment of painful bone metastases.
Read the detailed description
The primary purpose of this study is to see if MR guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) treats bone pain faster than the standard radiation therapy (External beam radiation therapy: EBRT) and to evaluate the patient's pain experience 14 days after completion of the treatment. The secondary purpose is to evaluate the outcomes of the pain, side effects, and quality of life and survival in the first 6 months after treatment.
- Conditions
- Bone Metastases
- Being tested
- MR- High intensity focused ultrasound, External beam radiotherapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MR- High intensity focused ultrasoundProcedure or surgery
Also called MR-HIFU
The intervention treatment is MR-HIFU, which will be given as a standalone treatment. MRHIFU treatment will be delivered using the ExAblate 2100 System (INSIGHTEC, Tirat Carmel, Israel), which is an FDA-approved device for pain palliation of bone metastasesThe ExAblate focused ultrasound device operates in conjunction with an MRI machine. Gadavist is being administered intraveneously as contrast medium for MRI.
External beam radiotherapyRadiation
Also called EBRT
Standard of care for pain palliation of bone metastases consists of single fraction external beam radiotherapy of 8-16 Gray (Gy) or a multi-fraction regime of 20 Gy in 5 fractions, 24 Gy in 6 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The radiation schedule is at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MR guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) | Experimental | MRHIFU treatment will be delivered using the ExAblate 2100 System (INSIGHTEC, Tirat Carmel, Israel), which is an FDA-approved device for pain palliation of bone metastases. Receives: Procedure: MR- High intensity focused ultrasound |
| External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) | Active comparator | Patients will undergo radiotherapy for painful bone metastases. Receives: Radiation: External beam radiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants that achieve a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)
Complete response (CR): Complete response is defined as a pain score of zero at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake (stable or reducing analgesics in daily oral morphine equivalents). Partial Response (PR): Partial response is to be defined as any of the following: Pain reduction of 2 or more points at the treated site on a 0-10 scale without analgesic increase; or analgesic dose reduction of 25% or more in daily morphine equivalent from baseline without an increase in pain.
Measured: 14 days after treatment
Secondary outcomes (9)
Patient-reported pain scores - Pain Diary
Patient reported pain scores will be based on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (from 0 to 10) 0 = no pain and 10= worst pain. Assessed using the patient pain diary from treatment day to 1 month after completion treatment.
Measured: 1 month
Patient-reported pain scores - BPI (Brief Pain Inventory)
The BPI measures pain interference on seven 0-10 integer subscales, as well as the mean of the seven subscales.
Measured: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Physician-reported adverse events
Assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v. 5.0; we will report the number of pathologic fractures at the site of treatment
Measured: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Patient-reported quality of life - EORTC QLQ-BM22
During follow up, patient will received quality of life questionnaire on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months after completion of treatment.
Measured: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Patient-reported quality of life - EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL
During follow up, patient will received quality of life questionnaire on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months after completion of treatment.
Measured: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Patient-reported quality of life - EQ-5D-5L
During follow up, patient will received quality of life questionnaire on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months after completion of treatment.
Measured: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Patient-reported quality of life - PGIC
During follow up, patient will received quality of life questionnaire on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months after completion of treatment. Patient Global Impression of Change scale has a single question with a 7 point likert scale about overall improvement after treatment assessing change in pain, from "Much Better" to "Much Worse"
Measured: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Local tumor control
Assessed using CT and/or MRI imaging at three and/or six months after completion of treatment
Measured: 3 and 6 months after completion of treatment
Anxiety and depression scores
Assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). This measures anxiety and depression separately on seven four-point (0-3) subscales, giving total scores from 0-21 for both constructs.
Measured: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Feb 2022
- Study startJun 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Insigthec is no longer seeking support of the device used for this clinical trial
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bone MetastasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pejman Ghanouni, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05250687
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-62458
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 1 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- MR Guided Focused Ultrasound Versus Radiotherapy for Palliative Pain Treatment in Patients With Bone Metastases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05250687
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB-62458
- Conditions
- Bone Metastases
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Insigthec is no longer seeking support of the device used for this clinical trial
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, single-center, randomized study directly comparing outcomes after MR guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR HIFU) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatment of painful bone metastases.
Detailed description
The primary purpose of this study is to see if MR guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) treats bone pain faster than the standard radiation therapy (External beam radiation therapy: EBRT) and to evaluate the patient's pain experience 14 days after completion of the treatment. The secondary purpose is to evaluate the outcomes of the pain, side effects, and quality of life and survival in the first 6 months after treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MR guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) | Experimental | Procedure: MR- High intensity focused ultrasoundMRHIFU treatment will be delivered using the ExAblate 2100 System (INSIGHTEC, Tirat Carmel, Israel), which is an FDA-approved device for pain palliation of bone metastases. |
| External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) | Active comparator | Radiation: External beam radiotherapyPatients will undergo radiotherapy for painful bone metastases. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Painful metastatic bone lesions, with NRS > 4 documented at screening visit
- Pain from target lesion is distinguishable from other lesions*
- Target lesion lovation is accessible for MR-HIFU and EBRT**
- Target lesion is visible om MR or CT imaging obtained < 3 months prior to screening, with a maximum diameter of 8 cm.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Previous surgery, radiation, HIFU, or other local therapy on the target location
- Neurological symptoms due to nerve involvement of target lesion
- Need for surgery of targeted location due to (impending) pathological fracture
- Unavoidable critical structures or dense tissues in target area*
- Curative intention of treatment plan
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MR- High intensity focused ultrasoundAlso: MR-HIFUThe intervention treatment is MR-HIFU, which will be given as a standalone treatment. MRHIFU treatment will be delivered using the ExAblate 2100 System (INSIGHTEC, Tirat Carmel, Israel), which is an FDA-approved device for pain palliation of bone metastasesThe ExAblate focused ultrasound device operates in conjunction with an MRI machine. Gadavist is being administered intraveneously as contrast medium for MRI. | Procedure or surgery | MR guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) |
| External beam radiotherapyAlso: EBRTStandard of care for pain palliation of bone metastases consists of single fraction external beam radiotherapy of 8-16 Gray (Gy) or a multi-fraction regime of 20 Gy in 5 fractions, 24 Gy in 6 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The radiation schedule is at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist. | Radiation | External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) |
Primary outcome
Number of participants that achieve a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)
Time frame: 14 days after treatment
Complete response (CR): Complete response is defined as a pain score of zero at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake (stable or reducing analgesics in daily oral morphine equivalents). Partial Response (PR): Partial response is to be defined as any of the following: Pain reduction of 2 or more points at the treated site on a 0-10 scale without analgesic increase; or analgesic dose reduction of 25% or more in daily morphine equivalent from baseline without an increase in pain.
9 secondary outcomes
Patient-reported pain scores - Pain Diary
Time frame: 1 month
Patient-reported pain scores - BPI (Brief Pain Inventory)
Time frame: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Physician-reported adverse events
Time frame: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Patient-reported quality of life - EORTC QLQ-BM22
Time frame: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Patient-reported quality of life - EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL
Time frame: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Patient-reported quality of life - EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Patient-reported quality of life - PGIC
Time frame: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Local tumor control
Time frame: 3 and 6 months after completion of treatment
Anxiety and depression scores
Time frame: on baseline, at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bone Metastases
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Randomized Study Comparing Two Dosing Schedules for Hypofractionated Image-Guided Radiation Therapy
Melanoma, Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Iscador® P (Mistletoe) Immunotherapy for Recurrent Resectable Osteogenic Sarcoma
Osteogenic Sarcoma Recurrent
RecruitingObservational study
Change in Fat Fraction Quantification Before and After Treatment in Bone Metastases
Neoplasm Metastasis / Bone and Bones
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
REducing Systemic Inflammation With LOw-dose Colchicine to ImproVE Cardiovascular Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pilot Randomized Open-Label Trial
Chronic Kidney Disease Mineral and Bone Disorder, Cognitive Function
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pejman Ghanouni, MD, PhD principal investigator
Stanford University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MR- High intensity focused ultrasound and External beam radiotherapy in people with Bone Metastases, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants that achieve a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (time frame: 14 days after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2024.