NursingNCT05263323
The Effect of the Training on Adaptation to Treatment Provided to Hemodialysis Patients According to the Neuman Systems Theory on Self-Esteem and Perceived Social Support
A study testing Patient education and Data Collecting, No Education in people with Nursing, run by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
ABSTRACT The Effect of the Training on Adaptation to Treatment Provided to Hemodialysis Patients According to the Neuman Systems Theory on Self-Esteem and Perceived Social Support Aim: The present study was conducted to determine the effect of the training provided to hemodialysis patients according to Neuman Systems… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nursing
- What is being tested?
- Patient education and Data Collecting, No Education
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2017to 15 Oct 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Being over 18 years old
- Being literate
- Not being deaf
- Being able to communicate in Turkish
- Continuing hemodialysis treatment for at least 6 months
- Not receiving a medical diagnosis of psychiatric illness
- Being conscious, cooperative
Who cannot join
- Those who cannot communicate in Turkish
- Those who do not want to participate in the research
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Kahramanmaraş Sutçu Imam University Faculty of Health Sciences
Kahramanmaraş
About this study
Official title: The Effect of the Training on Adaptation to Treatment Provided to Hemodialysis Patients
ABSTRACT The Effect of the Training on Adaptation to Treatment Provided to Hemodialysis Patients According to the Neuman Systems Theory on Self-Esteem and Perceived Social Support Aim: The present study was conducted to determine the effect of the training provided to hemodialysis patients according to Neuman Systems Theory on self-esteem and perceived social support in pretest-posttest comparison semi-experimental fashion.
Material and Method: The study population consisted of 108 individuals. The sampling consisted of 84 subjects, 42 of whom constituted the Study Group and 42 of whom constituted the Control Group. The study was conducted in two dialysis centers between 15.04.2017 and 15.10.2017. In the study, the data were collected with Patient Identification Form, Neuman Systems Evaluation Form, Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory, Social Support Perceived from Family and Friends Scale and Hemodialysis Stressor Scale. In the Study Group, the training was repeated to the individuals with the training book "Let Us Learn Hemodialysis", which was prepared by the researcher, after the one-to-one training in houses in line with the Neuman Systems Model. SPSS 20 program was used to evaluate the data. Descriptive statistical methods (number, percentage), chi-square test, paired t test were used to evaluate the data.
Read the detailed description
Nursing care and education are of great importance in solving the existing or potential problems of individuals dependent on hemodialysis due to chronic kidney failure and in patients' adaptation to living with their diseases and treatment (Velioğlu 2012, Pektekin 2013). In this process, nurses benefit from nursing theory-based models to protect and improve the health of sick/healthy individuals, to ensure that they receive optimal care, and to accelerate their recovery process. One of these models is the Neuman Systems Model. The Neuman Systems Model, a well-being-oriented holistic approach that considers patients an open system, is a suitable model for holistic evaluation of patients and guiding nursing practices, as it includes five variables characterizing the individual, namely physiological, developmental, spiritual, psychological, and socio-cultural variables (Uysal et.al.2009). The model concretely defines the nursing activities and the areas in which the nurse provides service; facilitates the planning and implementation of the interventions, and can be used in most of the working areas of nursing (Özer and Gökçe,2015).
Patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment go to dialysis centers, get connected to hemodialysis machines, and fear death due to the illness, all of which cause them to feel lonely. Under this circumstance, the social support systems perceived by the individual come into play, and in case of deficiency, they experience difficulties in coping (Atik et.al.2015). National and international literature has proven that hemodialysis patients receive high social support from family, friends, and special people, which contributes positively to their treatment process, quality of life, social appearance anxiety, and self-esteem. (Atik et.al.2015; Alexopoulou et.al.2016; Silva et.al.2016; Theodoritsi et.al.2016; Karadağ et.al.2013) Many patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment for chronic kidney failure see the dialysis machine as an extension of their own body, consequently leading to deterioration in their self-esteem. Skin, bone, digestive system, nervous system changes, and fistulas related to uremia are factors that increase the loss of body image and self-esteem (Yılmaz,2014). Interventions to be implemented by the nurse to increase self-esteem help hemodialysis patients to use problem-focused coping strategies. Accordingly, improving the role of nurses in boosting patients' self-esteem increases patients' adherence to treatment and enables them to cope with problems more easily (Rezaei and Salehi,2016). National and international studies show that hemodialysis patients' beliefs about their disease and treatment play a significant role in their autonomy and self-esteem, education to improve quality of life affects/increases patients' self-esteem, hemodialysis patients with high self-esteem use problem-focused coping strategies, and individuals receiving hemodialysis treatment have lower self-esteem levels than healthy individuals (Yılmaz ,2014; Soltani-Nejad and Zeighami 2018; Rezaei and Salehi,2016; Jansen et.al.2014; Theofilou 2012).
There are studies in which nursing care and case presentations are made in line with the Neuman Systems Model in our country and the international literature (Uysal et.al.2009; Özer and Gökçe 2015; Braga et.al.2018; Ahmadi and Sadeghi 2017; Luz Omaria et.al.2016; Angosta et.al.2014; Yarcheski et.al.2010; Sultan 2018; Özkan and Öztürk 2013; Mert and Barutçu 2013; Güner and Kavlak 2015; Eren and Çalışkan 2018). These studies have shown that the integration of the model into these case presentations and nursing care reflects positively on the results and serves as a holistic guide in nursing practice. The use of models in the education program that the nurses plan within the scope of their educator role increases the effectiveness of the education, and these educational interventions reflect on the patient behaviors. Neuman Systems Model, which defines the individual as an open system, is preferred for more systematic and effective patient education in hemodialysis patients as it allows the evaluation of many stressors affecting the individual during the hemodialysis treatment process. The stages and content of the education process planned to eliminate the effects of these stressors are compatible with the nursing intervention stages of the model. Accordingly, this study aims to evaluate the effect of Neuman Systems Model guided therapeutic training given to individuals receiving hemodialysis treatment on self-esteem and perceived social support.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Type of the Research This research has a pretest-posttest comparative controlled quasi-experimental design.
Place and Time of the Research The research was carried out at Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Research and Application Hospital Hemodialysis Service and Necip Fazıl City Hospital Hüsnü Öksüz Dialysis Center between 15.04.2017 and 15.10.2017.
Universe and Sample of the Research All patients registered and treated in Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Research and Application Hospital Hemodialysis Service (Experimental group) and Necip Fazıl City Hospital Hüsnü Öksüz Dialysis Center (Control group) constituted the research universe (N:108). Experimental and control groups were formed by purposive sampling. The entire universe was included in the sample without selecting a sample. The study was carried out with 84 patients, experimental (n:42) and control (n:42). Inclusion criteria for the study;
- Being over 18 years old
- Being literate
- Not being deaf
- Being able to communicate in Turkish
- Continuing hemodialysis treatment for at least 6 months
- Not receiving a medical diagnosis of psychiatric illness
- Being conscious, cooperative
Data Collection Tools Patient Information Form The patient information form used in the study consists of a total of 23 questions. It was prepared under the guidance of the relevant literature (Özdemir and Taşçı 2013; Biçer et.al.2013; Davaridolatabadi and Abdeyazdan 2016; Mutlu ve Duyan,2012,Neuman 1996, Fawcett 2001, Alligood and Tomey 2006, Horigan and Barroso 2016) and includes questions about the patient characteristics and hemodialysis treatment characteristics.
Neuman Systems Evaluation Form The form consisting of 21 questions prepared by a thorough literature review (Velioğlu 2012, Uysal et.al.2009, Özer and Gökçe 2015, Mert and Barutçu 2013, Güner and Kavlak 2015, Alligood 2014, Fawcett and Madeya 2013, Turner and Kaylor 2015, Neuman and Fawcett 2011, Neuman 1996, Fawcett and Gigliotti 2001, Alligood and Tomey 2006) allows the patients to be evaluated based on their internal, interpersonal, and external stressors, in line with Neuman's model, which refers to the patient as an open system that interacts with these stressors.
Neuman Systems Model-Based Patient Education Guidelines After the literature review, the education topics of patients receiving hemodialysis treatment were created by the researchers within the scope of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention intervention modes outlined in the Neuman system model (Velioğlu 2012, Özer and Gökçe 2015, Arreguy-Sena et.al.2018, Karadakovan and Kaymakçı 2011). This Neuman Systems Model-based training guideline prepared for the individuals in the experimental group was published as a training booklet called "Let's Learn Hemodialysis" and distributed to the patients. At the end of the research, the training booklet was also distributed to the individuals in the control group.
Scale of Perceived Social Support from Family (PSS-FM) and Friends (PSS-FR) The study used the "Perceived Social Support from Family and Friends Scale" developed to determine the social support score perceived by the patients from their family and friends, which was adapted into Turkish by Eskin (Eskin 1993), and confirmed for validity and reliability. The scale is two independent scales, each including 20 items (Kahriman and Polat 2003).
Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (Adult Form) (SEI) The "Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory" consisting of 25 items was used to evaluate the self-esteem level of the patients. The reliability study in our country was conducted by Turan and it was determined as a valid and reliable scale (Turan and Tufan,1987).
Hemodialysis Stressor Scale (HSS) The hemodialysis stressor scale was adapted to Turkish society by Kara (Kara 2006). Hemodialysis Stressor Scale is a five-point Likert-type scale consisting of 23 items. An increase in the score obtained from the scale indicates an increase in the perceived stress level (Kara 2006).
Data Collection First of all, the patients in the research group were informed about the purpose and importance of the study, and their written and verbal consents were obtained for voluntary participation. Data were collected from the patients in the experimental group in four stages. In the first stage, data were collected through scales and forms. In the second stage, the patients received training prepared in line with the Neuman Systems Model at their homes on a day when they did not go to the hemodialysis unit, and a printed model-based training guide was distributed. The third stage included training repetition and question-answer steps in the dialysis center. In the fourth and final stage, data were collected once again for the last time. Data collection for individuals in the control group included two stages, one at the beginning and one at the end of the study.
Data Analysis Data analysis was performed in a computer environment using SPSS 20 software. Descriptive statistical methods (number, percentage) and chi-square test were used. Parametric tests were used as the scales had normal distribution. In the comparison of quantitative data for scales with normal distribution, independent t-test was used for the difference between the two groups, paired t-test for the pre-test post-test comparative analysis in the same group, and one-way analysis of variance for the comparison of the means of more than two groups.
Ethical Aspect of the Research Following the approval of Atatürk University Faculty of Health Sciences Ethics Committee (Number: 2016/12/04, Date: 09.01.2017), written permission was obtained from the Chief Physician of KSU Research and Application Hospital and the General Secretariat of Kahramanmaraş Public Hospitals Union to conduct the research. The purpose of the study was explained to the participating patients. Verbal and written informed consent forms were obtained.
- Conditions
- Nursing
- Being tested
- Patient education, Data Collecting, No Education
- Keywords
- Self-esteem, patient education, hemodialysis, nursing, neuman systems theory, social support
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Patient educationOther
Providing patient education to hemodialysis patients according to Neuman Systems Model by the researcher.
Data Collecting, No EducationOther
Data were collected at the beginning and end of the study without training the control group.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group - Education Group | Experimental | Stage 1; In the intervention group, at the first stage, the data were filled with the data collection tools of the intervention group.
Stage 2; It was made two weeks after the first visit in stage 1. "Patient education according to Neuman Systems Theory" was given to the patients who participated in the study, who received hemodialysis treatment in the center determined as the intervention group. This training was applied in the form of one-on-one training by going to the homes of the patients on the day they did not go to dialysis, within the topics determined according to the theory.
Stage 3. It was done one month after the 2nd stage. "Patient education according to Neuman Systems Theory" was repeated to the patients, and a pre-prepared education guide called "Let's Learn Hemodialysis" was distributed and a question-answer evaluation was made.
Stage 4; It was done one month after the 3rd stage. The data of the intervention group were collected again with data collection tools. Receives: Other: Patient education |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Data collection for individuals in the control group included two stages, one at the beginning and one at the end of the study.
The first stage was applied to the experimental group during the first stage. The data of the control group were collected with data collection tools.
The second stage was given to the experimental group during the fourth stage. In this visit, The data of the control group were collected again with data collection tools. Receives: Other: Data Collecting, No Education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The increase in perceived social support from family and friends at ten weeks after training on adherence to treatment according to the Neuman systems model.
Scale of Perceived Social Support from Family and Friends.The scale is two independent scales and each scale has 20 items. Scores range from 0-20. It is accepted that the higher the scores, the higher the perceived social support from family and friends.
Measured: week 10
Improvement of patients' self-esteem at ten weeks after training on adherence to treatment according to the Neuman systems model.
Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (Adult Form).The Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (Adult Form) consists of 25 questions. The highest score to be obtained from the scale is 100, and the lowest score is 0. If the score obtained from the scale is between 10-30 points, it indicates low self-esteem, between 30-70 points moderate and between 70-100 points indicates high self-esteem.
Measured: week 10
Decreased hemodialysis stressor levels of patients in ten weeks after training on adherence to treatment according to the Neuman systems model.
Hemodialysis Stressor Scale.The Hemodialysis Stressor Scale is a five-point Likert-type scale consisting of 29 items. Hemodialysis Stressor Scale total score is between 29 and 145. An increase in the score obtained from the scale indicates an increase in the perceived stress level.
Measured: week 10
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Mar 2022
- Study start15 Apr 2017
- Primary completion15 Jul 2017
- Study completion15 Oct 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for NursingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ayse Asli Oktay, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05263323
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KSUAYSEASLİOKTAY001
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 19 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 2 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of the Training on Adaptation to Treatment Provided to Hemodialysis Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05263323
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KSUAYSEASLİOKTAY001
- Conditions
- Nursing
- Keywords
- Self-esteem, patient education, hemodialysis, nursing, neuman systems theory, social support
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Oct 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
ABSTRACT The Effect of the Training on Adaptation to Treatment Provided to Hemodialysis Patients According to the Neuman Systems Theory on Self-Esteem and Perceived Social Support Aim: The present study was conducted to determine the effect of the training provided to hemodialysis patients according to Neuman Systems Theory on self-esteem and perceived social support in pretest-posttest comparison semi-experimental fashion.
Material and Method: The study population consisted of 108 individuals. The sampling consisted of 84 subjects, 42 of whom constituted the Study Group and 42 of whom constituted the Control Group. The study was conducted in two dialysis centers between 15.04.2017 and 15.10.2017. In the study, the data were collected with Patient Identification Form, Neuman Systems Evaluation Form, Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory, Social Support Perceived from Family and Friends Scale and Hemodialysis Stressor Scale. In the Study Group, the training was repeated to the individuals with the training book "Let Us Learn Hemodialysis", which was prepared by the researcher, after the one-to-one training in houses in line with the Neuman Systems Model. SPSS 20 program was used to evaluate the data. Descriptive statistical methods (number, percentage), chi-square test, paired t test were used to evaluate the data.
Detailed description
Nursing care and education are of great importance in solving the existing or potential problems of individuals dependent on hemodialysis due to chronic kidney failure and in patients' adaptation to living with their diseases and treatment (Velioğlu 2012, Pektekin 2013). In this process, nurses benefit from nursing theory-based models to protect and improve the health of sick/healthy individuals, to ensure that they receive optimal care, and to accelerate their recovery process. One of these models is the Neuman Systems Model. The Neuman Systems Model, a well-being-oriented holistic approach that considers patients an open system, is a suitable model for holistic evaluation of patients and guiding nursing practices, as it includes five variables characterizing the individual, namely physiological, developmental, spiritual, psychological, and socio-cultural variables (Uysal et.al.2009). The model concretely defines the nursing activities and the areas in which the nurse provides service; facilitates the planning and implementation of the interventions, and can be used in most of the working areas of nursing (Özer and Gökçe,2015).
Patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment go to dialysis centers, get connected to hemodialysis machines, and fear death due to the illness, all of which cause them to feel lonely. Under this circumstance, the social support systems perceived by the individual come into play, and in case of deficiency, they experience difficulties in coping (Atik et.al.2015). National and international literature has proven that hemodialysis patients receive high social support from family, friends, and special people, which contributes positively to their treatment process, quality of life, social appearance anxiety, and self-esteem. (Atik et.al.2015; Alexopoulou et.al.2016; Silva et.al.2016; Theodoritsi et.al.2016; Karadağ et.al.2013) Many patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment for chronic kidney failure see the dialysis machine as an extension of their own body, consequently leading to deterioration in their self-esteem. Skin, bone, digestive system, nervous system changes, and fistulas related to uremia are factors that increase the loss of body image and self-esteem (Yılmaz,2014). Interventions to be implemented by the nurse to increase self-esteem help hemodialysis patients to use problem-focused coping strategies. Accordingly, improving the role of nurses in boosting patients' self-esteem increases patients' adherence to treatment and enables them to cope with problems more easily (Rezaei and Salehi,2016). National and international studies show that hemodialysis patients' beliefs about their disease and treatment play a significant role in their autonomy and self-esteem, education to improve quality of life affects/increases patients' self-esteem, hemodialysis patients with high self-esteem use problem-focused coping strategies, and individuals receiving hemodialysis treatment have lower self-esteem levels than healthy individuals (Yılmaz ,2014; Soltani-Nejad and Zeighami 2018; Rezaei and Salehi,2016; Jansen et.al.2014; Theofilou 2012).
There are studies in which nursing care and case presentations are made in line with the Neuman Systems Model in our country and the international literature (Uysal et.al.2009; Özer and Gökçe 2015; Braga et.al.2018; Ahmadi and Sadeghi 2017; Luz Omaria et.al.2016; Angosta et.al.2014; Yarcheski et.al.2010; Sultan 2018; Özkan and Öztürk 2013; Mert and Barutçu 2013; Güner and Kavlak 2015; Eren and Çalışkan 2018). These studies have shown that the integration of the model into these case presentations and nursing care reflects positively on the results and serves as a holistic guide in nursing practice. The use of models in the education program that the nurses plan within the scope of their educator role increases the effectiveness of the education, and these educational interventions reflect on the patient behaviors. Neuman Systems Model, which defines the individual as an open system, is preferred for more systematic and effective patient education in hemodialysis patients as it allows the evaluation of many stressors affecting the individual during the hemodialysis treatment process. The stages and content of the education process planned to eliminate the effects of these stressors are compatible with the nursing intervention stages of the model. Accordingly, this study aims to evaluate the effect of Neuman Systems Model guided therapeutic training given to individuals receiving hemodialysis treatment on self-esteem and perceived social support.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Type of the Research This research has a pretest-posttest comparative controlled quasi-experimental design.
Place and Time of the Research The research was carried out at Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Research and Application Hospital Hemodialysis Service and Necip Fazıl City Hospital Hüsnü Öksüz Dialysis Center between 15.04.2017 and 15.10.2017.
Universe and Sample of the Research All patients registered and treated in Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Research and Application Hospital Hemodialysis Service (Experimental group) and Necip Fazıl City Hospital Hüsnü Öksüz Dialysis Center (Control group) constituted the research universe (N:108). Experimental and control groups were formed by purposive sampling. The entire universe was included in the sample without selecting a sample. The study was carried out with 84 patients, experimental (n:42) and control (n:42). Inclusion criteria for the study;
- Being over 18 years old
- Being literate
- Not being deaf
- Being able to communicate in Turkish
- Continuing hemodialysis treatment for at least 6 months
- Not receiving a medical diagnosis of psychiatric illness
- Being conscious, cooperative
Data Collection Tools Patient Information Form The patient information form used in the study consists of a total of 23 questions. It was prepared under the guidance of the relevant literature (Özdemir and Taşçı 2013; Biçer et.al.2013; Davaridolatabadi and Abdeyazdan 2016; Mutlu ve Duyan,2012,Neuman 1996, Fawcett 2001, Alligood and Tomey 2006, Horigan and Barroso 2016) and includes questions about the patient characteristics and hemodialysis treatment characteristics.
Neuman Systems Evaluation Form The form consisting of 21 questions prepared by a thorough literature review (Velioğlu 2012, Uysal et.al.2009, Özer and Gökçe 2015, Mert and Barutçu 2013, Güner and Kavlak 2015, Alligood 2014, Fawcett and Madeya 2013, Turner and Kaylor 2015, Neuman and Fawcett 2011, Neuman 1996, Fawcett and Gigliotti 2001, Alligood and Tomey 2006) allows the patients to be evaluated based on their internal, interpersonal, and external stressors, in line with Neuman's model, which refers to the patient as an open system that interacts with these stressors.
Neuman Systems Model-Based Patient Education Guidelines After the literature review, the education topics of patients receiving hemodialysis treatment were created by the researchers within the scope of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention intervention modes outlined in the Neuman system model (Velioğlu 2012, Özer and Gökçe 2015, Arreguy-Sena et.al.2018, Karadakovan and Kaymakçı 2011). This Neuman Systems Model-based training guideline prepared for the individuals in the experimental group was published as a training booklet called "Let's Learn Hemodialysis" and distributed to the patients. At the end of the research, the training booklet was also distributed to the individuals in the control group.
Scale of Perceived Social Support from Family (PSS-FM) and Friends (PSS-FR) The study used the "Perceived Social Support from Family and Friends Scale" developed to determine the social support score perceived by the patients from their family and friends, which was adapted into Turkish by Eskin (Eskin 1993), and confirmed for validity and reliability. The scale is two independent scales, each including 20 items (Kahriman and Polat 2003).
Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (Adult Form) (SEI) The "Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory" consisting of 25 items was used to evaluate the self-esteem level of the patients. The reliability study in our country was conducted by Turan and it was determined as a valid and reliable scale (Turan and Tufan,1987).
Hemodialysis Stressor Scale (HSS) The hemodialysis stressor scale was adapted to Turkish society by Kara (Kara 2006). Hemodialysis Stressor Scale is a five-point Likert-type scale consisting of 23 items. An increase in the score obtained from the scale indicates an increase in the perceived stress level (Kara 2006).
Data Collection First of all, the patients in the research group were informed about the purpose and importance of the study, and their written and verbal consents were obtained for voluntary participation. Data were collected from the patients in the experimental group in four stages. In the first stage, data were collected through scales and forms. In the second stage, the patients received training prepared in line with the Neuman Systems Model at their homes on a day when they did not go to the hemodialysis unit, and a printed model-based training guide was distributed. The third stage included training repetition and question-answer steps in the dialysis center. In the fourth and final stage, data were collected once again for the last time. Data collection for individuals in the control group included two stages, one at the beginning and one at the end of the study.
Data Analysis Data analysis was performed in a computer environment using SPSS 20 software. Descriptive statistical methods (number, percentage) and chi-square test were used. Parametric tests were used as the scales had normal distribution. In the comparison of quantitative data for scales with normal distribution, independent t-test was used for the difference between the two groups, paired t-test for the pre-test post-test comparative analysis in the same group, and one-way analysis of variance for the comparison of the means of more than two groups.
Ethical Aspect of the Research Following the approval of Atatürk University Faculty of Health Sciences Ethics Committee (Number: 2016/12/04, Date: 09.01.2017), written permission was obtained from the Chief Physician of KSU Research and Application Hospital and the General Secretariat of Kahramanmaraş Public Hospitals Union to conduct the research. The purpose of the study was explained to the participating patients. Verbal and written informed consent forms were obtained.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group - Education Group | Experimental | Other: Patient educationStage 1; In the intervention group, at the first stage, the data were filled with the data collection tools of the intervention group. Stage 2; It was made two weeks after the first visit in stage 1. "Patient education according to Neuman Systems Theory" was given to the patients who participated in the study, who received hemodialysis treatment in the center determined as the intervention group. This training was applied in the form of one-on-one training by going to the homes of the patients on the day they did not go to dialysis, within the topics determined according to the theory. Stage 3. It was done one month after the 2nd stage. "Patient education according to Neuman Systems Theory" was repeated to the patients, and a pre-prepared education guide called "Let's Learn Hemodialysis" was distributed and a question-answer evaluation was made. Stage 4; It was done one month after the 3rd stage. The data of the intervention group were collected again with data collection tools. |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Other: Data Collecting, No EducationData collection for individuals in the control group included two stages, one at the beginning and one at the end of the study. The first stage was applied to the experimental group during the first stage. The data of the control group were collected with data collection tools. The second stage was given to the experimental group during the fourth stage. In this visit, The data of the control group were collected again with data collection tools. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Being over 18 years old
- Being literate
- Not being deaf
- Being able to communicate in Turkish
- Continuing hemodialysis treatment for at least 6 months
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Those who cannot communicate in Turkish
- Those who do not want to participate in the research
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Patient educationProviding patient education to hemodialysis patients according to Neuman Systems Model by the researcher. | Other | Experimental Group - Education Group |
| Data Collecting, No EducationData were collected at the beginning and end of the study without training the control group. | Other | Control Group |
Primary outcome
The increase in perceived social support from family and friends at ten weeks after training on adherence to treatment according to the Neuman systems model.
Time frame: week 10
Scale of Perceived Social Support from Family and Friends.The scale is two independent scales and each scale has 20 items. Scores range from 0-20. It is accepted that the higher the scores, the higher the perceived social support from family and friends.
Improvement of patients' self-esteem at ten weeks after training on adherence to treatment according to the Neuman systems model.
Time frame: week 10
Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (Adult Form).The Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (Adult Form) consists of 25 questions. The highest score to be obtained from the scale is 100, and the lowest score is 0. If the score obtained from the scale is between 10-30 points, it indicates low self-esteem, between 30-70 points moderate and between 70-100 points indicates high self-esteem.
Decreased hemodialysis stressor levels of patients in ten weeks after training on adherence to treatment according to the Neuman systems model.
Time frame: week 10
Hemodialysis Stressor Scale.The Hemodialysis Stressor Scale is a five-point Likert-type scale consisting of 29 items. Hemodialysis Stressor Scale total score is between 29 and 145. An increase in the score obtained from the scale indicates an increase in the perceived stress level.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Mar 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nursing
Not yet recruiting
Mobile Game-Based Versus Classic First Aid Education in Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial
First Aid, Health Education in Schoolchildren
Not yet recruiting
The Effectiveness of Comic-based Learning Materials on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence in Dementia Care
Dementia Care Education, Students, Nursing
Enrolling by invitation
ProFoUND PCC= A Program For a Userbased Nursing Development in Person-Centered Care, is a Project That Aims to Develop, Test and Evaluate Effects of a Co-created Intervention to Increase Person-centred Care in Residential Care Settings for Older People.
To Develop, Test, Implement and Evaluate a Model for Person-centred Care for Older People at Two Academic Residential Care Facilities
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Oxygen Cage Support During Cataract Surgery
Cataract
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Soap-and-Water Bed Bath Versus Disposable Wipe Bath in the Same ICU Patients
Critical Illness, Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Patient education and Data Collecting, No Education in people with Nursing, run by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The increase in perceived social support from family and friends at ten weeks after training on adherence to treatment according to the Neuman systems model. (time frame: week 10). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2022.