Critical IllnessYBU-BANYONCT07919912
Soap-and-Water Bed Bath Versus Disposable Wipe Bath in the Same ICU Patients
An observational study of Critical Illness and Pain, run by Sinop Atatürk State Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Bed bathing is a routine nursing procedure in the intensive care unit (ICU). In the study units, every patient routinely receives both a traditional bed bath with warm water and soap (every 10 days) and a bath with pre-packaged, disposable, no-rinse wipes (every 3 days). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Critical Illness, Pain, Procedural Anxiety
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 10 Nov 2026to 10 Mar 2027
- How long will I take part?
- 30 Days
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Age 18 years or older. Admitted to the second- or third-level adult ICU within the previous 48 hours and expected to stay at least another 24 hours
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years or older
- Admitted to the second- or third-level adult ICU within the previous 48 hours and expected to stay at least another 24 hours
- Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score between -3 and +1
- Judged by the attending physician to be clinically suitable for a whole-body bed bath with two lateral turns
- Hemodynamically stable: no vasopressor, or norepinephrine ≤ 0.1 µg/kg/min (or equivalent) without dose increase in the previous 6 hours
- Written informed consent from the patient or the legal representative
Who cannot join
- RASS ≤ -4 or ≥ +2
- Use of neuromuscular blocking agents
- End-of-life or exclusively palliative care
- Severe neurological injury (brain death, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8 not due to sedation)
- Extensive skin damage (burns, widespread dermatitis, large open wounds) or known allergy to the wipe ingredients
- Open abdomen, unstable spinal fracture, ECMO or any other condition preventing lateral turning
- Initiation or dose change of anxiolytic or antipsychotic treatment within the previous 24 hours
- Previous participation in this study within the last 30 days
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Sinop Atatürk State Hospital, Intensive Care Units
Sinop, 57000
özhan özcan, MD, ozhanturkey@gmail.com
Bilge BAL ÖZKAPTAN, Assoc. Prof. PhD, +905339391739, bozkaptan@sinop.edu.tr
About this study
Official title: Within-Patient Comparison of Traditional Soap-and-Water Bed Bath and Disposable No-Rinse Wipe Bath on Procedural Pain Behavior, Comfort and Physiological Response in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Randomized Crossover Trial
Bed bathing is a routine nursing procedure in the intensive care unit (ICU). In the study units, every patient routinely receives both a traditional bed bath with warm water and soap (every 10 days) and a bath with pre-packaged, disposable, no-rinse wipes (every 3 days). Little is known about how these two methods compare for pain, comfort and physiological stress in the same patient.
The goal of this randomized crossover trial is to compare the two bathing methods within the same adult ICU patients. The main question it aims to answer is: Does pain-related behavior during the bath, measured with the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) while the patient is turned to the side, differ between the soap-and-water bath and the wipe bath? Other questions include whether the methods differ in vital signs and body temperature after the bath, anxiety, comfort, feeling of cleanliness, satisfaction and preference in patients who can self-report, bath duration, nursing time, cost, and adverse events.
The routine bathing schedule does not change. Only the order of each participant's first two study baths is decided by chance: either soap-and-water first and wipes 72 hours later, or wipes first and soap-and-water 72 hours later. Each patient serves as his or her own control. The first minute of the first lateral turn in both baths is video-recorded (face, upper body and arms only) and scored by an assessor who does not know which method was used.
Read the detailed description
Design: Single-center, prospective, randomized, two-period, two-sequence (wash-wipe / wipe-wash) crossover trial embedded in routine care, with blinded video-based assessment of the primary outcome. Setting: second-level (16 beds) and third-level (22 beds) adult ICUs, Sinop Atatürk State Hospital, Türkiye.
Routine care and schedule: All ICU patients routinely receive a whole-body soap-and-water bed bath every 10 days and a whole-body disposable wipe bath every 3 days. In the study, Session 1 is given within 24 hours after randomization with the method determined by the allocated sequence, and Session 2 is given with the other method 72 hours (±12 hours) later, which matches the routine 3-day interval. Thereafter, the routine schedule continues (soap-and-water every 10 days from the first wash; wipes every 3 days; if both fall on the same day, only the soap-and-water bath is given). Routine oral and perineal care continues. Additional baths are allowed when clinically needed.
Randomization: Sequences are allocated 1:1 using computer-generated lists with permuted blocks of 4 and 6, stratified by ICU level and communication status (Stratum A: able to self-report - RASS -1 to +1, CAM-ICU negative, able to use a visual analogue scale; Stratum B: unable to self-report). Allocation is concealed with sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.
Interventions: Both methods cover the whole body in the same clean-to-dirty order with two lateral turns, two nurses, privacy measures, linen change and a standardized information script. Soap-and-water bath: warm water (43.5-46 °C), liquid soap, separate cloths and towels; each area is soaped, rinsed and towel-dried. Wipe bath: chlorhexidine-free, no-rinse disposable wipes warmed to ≤40 °C; a new wipe for each area, at least three passes with light pressure, air-dried.
Measurements: Full measurements are made in Sessions 1 and 2 at T0 (before the bath after ≥15 minutes of rest), during the bath, T1 (10 minutes after), T2 (30 minutes after) and during the 2 hours after the bath. CPOT and vital signs are recorded in all patients; Stratum A patients also rate anxiety (VAS-A), comfort, cleanliness and satisfaction, and state their preferred method after Session 2. For later routine baths, date, method, duration, materials and adverse events are recorded; skin is assessed at baseline, at each soap-and-water bath and at ICU discharge (descriptive only, because every patient receives both methods).
Blinding: The first minute of the first lateral turn in Sessions 1 and 2 is video-recorded with a hospital-owned, password-protected device (face, upper body and arms; ventilator screen in intubated patients; bathing materials and genital area excluded). Videos are coded without method or session information and scored in random order by an assessor not involved in bathing. The muscle tension item is taken from the in-room nurse. If no video is available, the in-room CPOT score is used. Videos are deleted after scoring.
Sample size: Assuming a clinically relevant within-patient difference of 1 CPOT point and a standard deviation of differences of 2.0 (dz = 0.5), two-sided alpha 0.05 and 80% power, 34 patients completing both sessions are required. Allowing about 15% loss before Session 2, 40 patients will be randomized.
Statistical analysis: Procedural CPOT will be analyzed with a linear mixed model including method, period, sequence and session-specific resting CPOT as fixed effects and patient as a random effect, adjusted for ICU level and stratum; all randomized patients contribute available data. Sensitivity analyses: Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Hodges-Lehmann estimate in completers, in-room scores, video-only sessions, adjustment for sedative infusions, and an ordinal mixed model. Secondary outcomes are analyzed with mixed models, McNemar tests or exact binomial test (preference), and interpreted as exploratory.
Safety: The bath is stopped if SpO2 < 90% for >1 minute, MAP < 65 mmHg or >20% fall, heart rate >130 or <50/min or new arrhythmia, RASS ≥ +2, tube or catheter displacement, or at the patient's request.
- Conditions
- Critical Illness, Pain, Procedural Anxiety
- Keywords
- Bed bath; Disposable wipes; No-rinse bathing; Crossover; Intensive care unit; Nursing care; Patient comfort; Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool
- Medical subject headings
- Critical Illness, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Soap-and-Water Bed Bath | Whole-body bed bath with warm water (43.5-46 °C) and liquid soap; each body area is soaped, rinsed and towel-dried; two lateral turns, two nurses. First bath within 24 hours after randomization, then every 10 days until ICU discharge. | |
| Disposable Wipe Bath | Whole-body bed bath with pre-packaged, chlorhexidine-free, no-rinse disposable wipes warmed to ≤40 °C; a new wipe for each body area, no rinsing or towel-drying; two lateral turns, two nurses. Same schedule as the comparator arm. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Procedural pain behavior during the first lateral turn (CPOT)
Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) total score (range 0-8; higher scores indicate more pain-related behavior), scored from a video recording of the first minute of the first lateral turn by an assessor blinded to group allocation. Compared between groups adjusted for resting CPOT at T0.
Measured: During the first study bath, at the first lateral turn (within 24 hours after randomization)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Proportion of patients with significant pain behavior during the bath
Proportion of patients with procedural CPOT score > 2 (range 0-8) during the first lateral turn of the first study bath.
Measured: During the first study bath (within 24 hours after randomization)
Post-bath CPOT score
CPOT total score (0-8; higher = more pain-related behavior), adjusted for resting CPOT.
Measured: 10 and 30 minutes after the end of the first study bath
Anxiety in patients able to self-report
Visual analogue scale for anxiety (VAS-A; 0-10 cm; higher = more anxiety) in Stratum A patients, adjusted for the pre-bath score.
Measured: 10 and 30 minutes after the end of the first study bath
Comfort, cleanliness and satisfaction in patients able to self-report
Numeric rating scales (0-10; higher = better) for comfort, feeling clean and fresh, and satisfaction with the bath, in Stratum A patients
Measured: 10 minutes after the end of the first study bath
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Nov 2026
- Study start10 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion10 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Critical IllnessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 30 Days
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sinop Atatürk State Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ozhan Ozcan, Sinop Atatürk State Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07919912
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SINOP UNV. 2026/149
- Acronym
- YBU-BANYO
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results may be made available upon reasonable request to the principal investigator after publication, subject to approval by the ethics committee and in compliance with Turkish Personal Data Protection Law No. 6698. Video recordings will not be shared and will be deleted after scoring.
Publications
Veje PL, Chen M, Jensen CS, Sorensen J, Primdahl J. Bed bath with soap and water or disposable wet wipes: Patients' experiences and preferences. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jun;28(11-12):2235-2244. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14825. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
PubMed 30786096Gelinas C, Fillion L, Puntillo KA, Viens C, Fortier M. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients. Am J Crit Care. 2006 Jul;15(4):420-7.
PubMed 16823021Larson EL, Ciliberti T, Chantler C, Abraham J, Lazaro EM, Venturanza M, Pancholi P. Comparison of traditional and disposable bed baths in critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care. 2004 May;13(3):235-41.
PubMed 15149058Groven FM, Zwakhalen SM, Odekerken-Schroder G, Joosten EJ, Hamers JP. How does washing without water perform compared to the traditional bed bath: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 25;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0425-4.
PubMed 28118815
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Within-Patient Comparison of Traditional Soap-and-Water Bed Bath and Disposable No-Rinse Wipe Bath on Procedural Pain Behavior, Comfort and Physiological Response in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Randomized Crossover Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07919912
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- YBU-BANYO / SINOP UNV. 2026/149
- Conditions
- Critical Illness, Pain, Procedural Anxiety
- Keywords
- Bed bath; Disposable wipes; No-rinse bathing; Crossover; Intensive care unit; Nursing care; Patient comfort; Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sinop Atatürk State HospitalOther government
- Study start
- 10 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 10 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Nov 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bed bathing is a routine nursing procedure in the intensive care unit (ICU). In the study units, every patient routinely receives both a traditional bed bath with warm water and soap (every 10 days) and a bath with pre-packaged, disposable, no-rinse wipes (every 3 days). Little is known about how these two methods compare for pain, comfort and physiological stress in the same patient.
The goal of this randomized crossover trial is to compare the two bathing methods within the same adult ICU patients. The main question it aims to answer is: Does pain-related behavior during the bath, measured with the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) while the patient is turned to the side, differ between the soap-and-water bath and the wipe bath? Other questions include whether the methods differ in vital signs and body temperature after the bath, anxiety, comfort, feeling of cleanliness, satisfaction and preference in patients who can self-report, bath duration, nursing time, cost, and adverse events.
The routine bathing schedule does not change. Only the order of each participant's first two study baths is decided by chance: either soap-and-water first and wipes 72 hours later, or wipes first and soap-and-water 72 hours later. Each patient serves as his or her own control. The first minute of the first lateral turn in both baths is video-recorded (face, upper body and arms only) and scored by an assessor who does not know which method was used.
Detailed description
Design: Single-center, prospective, randomized, two-period, two-sequence (wash-wipe / wipe-wash) crossover trial embedded in routine care, with blinded video-based assessment of the primary outcome. Setting: second-level (16 beds) and third-level (22 beds) adult ICUs, Sinop Atatürk State Hospital, Türkiye.
Routine care and schedule: All ICU patients routinely receive a whole-body soap-and-water bed bath every 10 days and a whole-body disposable wipe bath every 3 days. In the study, Session 1 is given within 24 hours after randomization with the method determined by the allocated sequence, and Session 2 is given with the other method 72 hours (±12 hours) later, which matches the routine 3-day interval. Thereafter, the routine schedule continues (soap-and-water every 10 days from the first wash; wipes every 3 days; if both fall on the same day, only the soap-and-water bath is given). Routine oral and perineal care continues. Additional baths are allowed when clinically needed.
Randomization: Sequences are allocated 1:1 using computer-generated lists with permuted blocks of 4 and 6, stratified by ICU level and communication status (Stratum A: able to self-report - RASS -1 to +1, CAM-ICU negative, able to use a visual analogue scale; Stratum B: unable to self-report). Allocation is concealed with sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.
Interventions: Both methods cover the whole body in the same clean-to-dirty order with two lateral turns, two nurses, privacy measures, linen change and a standardized information script. Soap-and-water bath: warm water (43.5-46 °C), liquid soap, separate cloths and towels; each area is soaped, rinsed and towel-dried. Wipe bath: chlorhexidine-free, no-rinse disposable wipes warmed to ≤40 °C; a new wipe for each area, at least three passes with light pressure, air-dried.
Measurements: Full measurements are made in Sessions 1 and 2 at T0 (before the bath after ≥15 minutes of rest), during the bath, T1 (10 minutes after), T2 (30 minutes after) and during the 2 hours after the bath. CPOT and vital signs are recorded in all patients; Stratum A patients also rate anxiety (VAS-A), comfort, cleanliness and satisfaction, and state their preferred method after Session 2. For later routine baths, date, method, duration, materials and adverse events are recorded; skin is assessed at baseline, at each soap-and-water bath and at ICU discharge (descriptive only, because every patient receives both methods).
Blinding: The first minute of the first lateral turn in Sessions 1 and 2 is video-recorded with a hospital-owned, password-protected device (face, upper body and arms; ventilator screen in intubated patients; bathing materials and genital area excluded). Videos are coded without method or session information and scored in random order by an assessor not involved in bathing. The muscle tension item is taken from the in-room nurse. If no video is available, the in-room CPOT score is used. Videos are deleted after scoring.
Sample size: Assuming a clinically relevant within-patient difference of 1 CPOT point and a standard deviation of differences of 2.0 (dz = 0.5), two-sided alpha 0.05 and 80% power, 34 patients completing both sessions are required. Allowing about 15% loss before Session 2, 40 patients will be randomized.
Statistical analysis: Procedural CPOT will be analyzed with a linear mixed model including method, period, sequence and session-specific resting CPOT as fixed effects and patient as a random effect, adjusted for ICU level and stratum; all randomized patients contribute available data. Sensitivity analyses: Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Hodges-Lehmann estimate in completers, in-room scores, video-only sessions, adjustment for sedative infusions, and an ordinal mixed model. Secondary outcomes are analyzed with mixed models, McNemar tests or exact binomial test (preference), and interpreted as exploratory.
Safety: The bath is stopped if SpO2 < 90% for >1 minute, MAP < 65 mmHg or >20% fall, heart rate >130 or <50/min or new arrhythmia, RASS ≥ +2, tube or catheter displacement, or at the patient's request.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 30 Days
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Soap-and-Water Bed Bath | – | –Whole-body bed bath with warm water (43.5-46 °C) and liquid soap; each body area is soaped, rinsed and towel-dried; two lateral turns, two nurses. First bath within 24 hours after randomization, then every 10 days until ICU discharge. |
| Disposable Wipe Bath | – | –Whole-body bed bath with pre-packaged, chlorhexidine-free, no-rinse disposable wipes warmed to ≤40 °C; a new wipe for each body area, no rinsing or towel-drying; two lateral turns, two nurses. Same schedule as the comparator arm. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Age 18 years or older. Admitted to the second- or third-level adult ICU within the previous 48 hours and expected to stay at least another 24 hours
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 18 years or older
- Admitted to the second- or third-level adult ICU within the previous 48 hours and expected to stay at least another 24 hours
- Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score between -3 and +1
- Judged by the attending physician to be clinically suitable for a whole-body bed bath with two lateral turns
- Hemodynamically stable: no vasopressor, or norepinephrine ≤ 0.1 µg/kg/min (or equivalent) without dose increase in the previous 6 hours
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- RASS ≤ -4 or ≥ +2
- Use of neuromuscular blocking agents
- End-of-life or exclusively palliative care
- Severe neurological injury (brain death, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8 not due to sedation)
- Extensive skin damage (burns, widespread dermatitis, large open wounds) or known allergy to the wipe ingredients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Procedural pain behavior during the first lateral turn (CPOT)
Time frame: During the first study bath, at the first lateral turn (within 24 hours after randomization)
Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) total score (range 0-8; higher scores indicate more pain-related behavior), scored from a video recording of the first minute of the first lateral turn by an assessor blinded to group allocation. Compared between groups adjusted for resting CPOT at T0.
4 secondary outcomes
Proportion of patients with significant pain behavior during the bath
Time frame: During the first study bath (within 24 hours after randomization)
Post-bath CPOT score
Time frame: 10 and 30 minutes after the end of the first study bath
Anxiety in patients able to self-report
Time frame: 10 and 30 minutes after the end of the first study bath
Comfort, cleanliness and satisfaction in patients able to self-report
Time frame: 10 minutes after the end of the first study bath
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 30786096Veje PL, Chen M, Jensen CS, Sorensen J, Primdahl J. Bed bath with soap and water or disposable wet wipes: Patients' experiences and preferences. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jun;28(11-12):2235-2244. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14825. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 16823021Gelinas C, Fillion L, Puntillo KA, Viens C, Fortier M. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients. Am J Crit Care. 2006 Jul;15(4):420-7.
- Results publication: PubMed 15149058Larson EL, Ciliberti T, Chantler C, Abraham J, Lazaro EM, Venturanza M, Pancholi P. Comparison of traditional and disposable bed baths in critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care. 2004 May;13(3):235-41.
- Results publication: PubMed 28118815Groven FM, Zwakhalen SM, Odekerken-Schroder G, Joosten EJ, Hamers JP. How does washing without water perform compared to the traditional bed bath: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 25;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0425-4.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results may be made available upon reasonable request to the principal investigator after publication, subject to approval by the ethics committee and in compliance with Turkish Personal Data Protection Law No. 6698. Video recordings will not be shared and will be deleted after scoring.
Related trials for Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound-Calibrated Pulse Contour Cardiac Output Monitoring: Value and Accuracy in Hemodynamic Care
Sepsis, Circulatory Instability
Active, not recruiting
Weighted Blankets for Agitation in Adults in the Intensive Care Unit
Psychomotor Agitation, Critical Illness
RecruitingObservational study
Predicting Extubation Failure Using Machine Learning
Extubation Failure, Critical Illness
Not yet recruiting
ICU-SUCCEED for Survivors of Acute Respiratory Failure and Their Caregivers
Acute Respiratory Failure, Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Core Competencies in General Intensive Care Ultrasound (GenIUS): a Delphi Study
Critical Illness, Ultrasound
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Critical Illness and Pain, run by Sinop Atatürk State Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact özhan özcan, M.D (+905055491245, ozhanturkey@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Procedural pain behavior during the first lateral turn (CPOT) (time frame: During the first study bath, at the first lateral turn (within 24 hours after randomization)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07919912, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2026.