AzTrials
AzTrials

Venous ThromboembolismNCT05264168

Prediction of the COBRRA VTE Anticoagulant Trial in Healthcare Claims Data

An observational study of Venous Thromboembolism and Pulmonary Embolism, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale replication of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 120 years
Conditions the study is for
Venous Thromboembolism, Pulmonary Embolism, DVT
What is being tested?
Rivaroxaban and Apixaban
How many people
41,875 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
3 May 2021to 15 Jun 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 120 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: This study will involve a new user, parallel group, propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study design comparing rivaroxaban to apixaban users. The patients will be required to have continuous enrollment during a baseline period of 180 days before initiation of rivaroxaban or apixaban (index date). Analysis is restricted to patients hospitalized with a VTE.

Who may be able to join

  • Hospitalization for PE or Proximal DVT [Day -14, Day 0]
  • At least 18 years of age

Who cannot join

  • Prior use of a DOAC or warfarin [Day -180, Day 0]
  • Stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease [Day -180, Day 0]
  • Dialysis or renal transplant [Day -180, Day 0]
  • Recent major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding [Day -180, Day 0]
  • Cancer [Day -180, Day 0]
  • Bypass surgery, obesity, or the use of a weight loss or appetite suppressor [Day -180, Day 0]
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Significant liver disease and coagulopathy [Day -180, Day 0]
  • Use of CYP3A4 or P-gp inhibitors or inducers [Day -180, Day 0]
  • Other indications for anticoagulation (atrial fibrillation or prosthetic heart valve) [Day -180, Day 0]
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding [Day -180, Day 0]
  • Use of an antiplatelet [Day -180, Day 0]

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02120

Other trials in United States

About this study

Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale replication of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.

Read the detailed description

This is a non-randomized, non-interventional study that is part of the RCT DUPLICATE initiative (www.rctduplicate.org) of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School. It is intended to replicate, as closely as possible in healthcare insurance claims data, the trial listed below/above. Although many features of the trial cannot be directly replicated in healthcare claims, key design features, including outcomes, exposures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, were selected to proxy those features from the trial. Randomization is also not replicable in healthcare claims data but was proxied through a statistical balancing of measured covariates through standard practice. Investigators assume that the RCT provides the reference standard treatment effect estimate and that failure to replicate RCT findings is indicative of the inadequacy of the healthcare claims data for replication for a range of possible reasons and does not provide information on the validity of the original RCT finding.

Being tested
Rivaroxaban, Apixaban
Medical subject headings
Venous Thromboembolism, Pulmonary Embolism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RivaroxabanDrug

    Also called Xarelto

    Any rivaroxaban dispensing claim is used as the reference group

  • ApixabanDrug

    Also called Eliquis

    Any apixaban dispensing claim is used as the exposure group

Study groups in NCT05264168
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RivaroxabanReference group
Receives: Drug: Rivaroxaban
ApixabanExposure group
Receives: Drug: Apixaban

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Relative hazard of major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events

    Claims-based algorithm: relative hazard of major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events

    Measured: Through study completion or censoring, up to 90 days

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Relative hazard of major bleeding

    Claims-based algorithm: relative hazard of major bleeding

    Measured: Through study completion or censoring, up to 90 days

  2. Relative hazard of clinically relevant non-major bleeding

    Claims-based algorithm: relative hazard of clinically relevant non-major bleeding

    Measured: Through study completion or censoring, up to 90 days

  3. Relative hazard of all-cause mortality

    Claims-based algorithm: relative hazard of all-cause mortality

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 90 days

  4. Relative hazard of recurrent VTE

    Claims-based algorithm: relative hazard of recurrent VTE

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 90 days

  5. Relative hazard of extracranial bleeding

    Claims-based algorithm: relative hazard of extracranial bleeding

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 90 days

  6. Relative hazard of intracranial bleeding

    Claims-based algorithm: relative hazard of intracranial bleeding

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 90 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Mar 2022
  2. Study start3 May 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion15 Jun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
41,875 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05264168
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018P002966-DUP-COBRRA-VT
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
22 Feb 2022
Last updated
27 Jul 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Mahesri M, Schneeweiss S, Lin KJ, Zabotka L, Concato J, Bradley MC, Wang SV. Bleeding Risk With Apixaban Versus Rivaroxaban: A Reference Trial Emulation Predicting the Results of COBRRA-VTE and COBRRA-AF Using US Health Care Claims. Circ Popul Health Outcomes. 2026 Jul;19(7):e012892. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.125.012892. Epub 2026 Jul 2.

    PubMed 42389777

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Venous Thromboembolism and Pulmonary Embolism, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Relative hazard of major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events (time frame: Through study completion or censoring, up to 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05264168, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in