AzTrials
AzTrials

SarcomaOPTISARCNCT05272358

Economic Evaluation of Sarcoma Patients Management in France

An observational study of Sarcoma, run by Centre Leon Berard at 25 sites in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this project is to (1) evaluate the efficiency of early management of sarcoma patients by the sarcoma referral network (NETSARC) vs. outside the network; (2) measure the budgetary impact of the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy across the country; (3) identify the organizational and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Sarcoma
What is being tested?
NETSARC network
How many people
2,431 participants
Where
25 sitesFrance
Study dates
8 Feb 2021to 8 Feb 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Cohort of sarcoma patient diagnosed in 2013 with a surgery of initial tumour.

Who may be able to join

  • Sarcoma diagnosis between 01/01/2013 and 31/12/2013
  • International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code 10: C49 Malignant neoplasm of other connective and soft tissue, or C48 Malignant neoplasm of retroperitoneum and peritoneum, or C40-41 Malignant neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage of limbs)
  • Surgery of the primary tumour.

Who cannot join

  • Gastro intestinal stromal tumour
  • Diagnosis not confirmed by the a second histological review

Trial locations and contacts

25 sites in 1 country.

25 sites in 1 country

France25 sites, 25 recruiting
  • CHU Jean Minjoz

    Besançon, 25000

    Loic Chaigneau, MD

    Recruiting
  • Institut Bergonié

    Bordeaux, 33000

    Antoine Italiano, PU-PH

    Recruiting
  • Centre François Baclesse

    Caen, 14000

    Sharmini Varatharajah, MD

    Recruiting
  • Centre Jean Perrin

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63000

    Pascale Dubray-Longeras, MD

    Recruiting
  • Centre Georges François Leclerc

    Dijon, 21000

    Sylvain Causeret, MD

    Recruiting
  • CHU Saint-Pierre

    La Réunion, 97000

    Jean-Christophe Ruzic, MD

    Recruiting
  • Centre Oscar Lambret

    Lille, 59000

    Nicolas PENEL, PU-PH

    Recruiting
  • CHU Dupuytren

    Limoges, 87000

    Fabrice Fiorenza, MD

    Recruiting
  • Centre Leon Berard

    Lyon, 69008

    Jean-Yves Blay, PU-PH

    Recruiting
  • CHU Timone

    Marseille, 13000

    Florence Duffaud, PU-PH

    Recruiting
  • Institut Paoli Calmettes

    Marseille, 13000

    François Bertucci, PU-PH

    Recruiting
  • ICM Val d'Aurelle

    Montpellier, 34000

    Sébastien Carrère, MD

    Recruiting
  • Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine

    Nancy, 54000

    Maria Rios, MD

    Recruiting
  • Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest

    Nantes, 44800

    Emmanuelle Bompas, MD

    Recruiting
  • Centre Antoine Lacassagne

    Nice, 06000

    Esma Saada, MD

    Recruiting
  • CHU Cochin

    Paris, 75000

    Philippe Anract, PU-PH

    Recruiting
  • CHU Saint-Louis

    Paris, 75000

    Céleste Lebbé, PU-PH

    Recruiting
  • Institut Curie

    Paris, 75000

    Sophie Piperno-Neumann, MD

    Recruiting
  • Institut jean Godinot

    Reims, 51000

    Pauline Soibinet-Oudot, MD

    Recruiting
  • CHU Pontchaillou

    Rennes, 35000

    Mickael Ropars, PU-PH

    Recruiting
  • Centre Henri Becquerel

    Rouen, 76000

    Cécile Guillemet, MD

    Recruiting
  • Institut de Cancérologie CHU Hautepierre

    Strasbourg, 67000

    Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz, PU-PH

    Recruiting
  • IUCT Institut Claudius Régaud

    Toulouse, 31000

    Christine Chevreau, MD

    Recruiting
  • CHU Trousseau

    Tours, 37000

    Philippe Rosset, PU-PH

    Recruiting
  • Gustave Roussy

    Villejuif, 94100

    Axel Le Cesne, Prof.

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Economic Evaluation of Early Management of Sarcoma Patients by the Sarcoma Reference Network (NETSARC), Exploration of Organisational and Financial Constraints

The aim of this project is to (1) evaluate the efficiency of early management of sarcoma patients by the sarcoma referral network (NETSARC) vs. outside the network; (2) measure the budgetary impact of the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy across the country; (3) identify the organizational and financial constraints likely to hinder the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy and propose solutions, and finally (4) analyse the budgetary impact of a generalization of sarcoma patient care by the reference network by integrating the organizational and financial solutions proposed.

The study relies on an exhaustive national cohort of all sarcoma patients who underwent primary tumor surgery for the year 2013. Patients will be allocated to four distinct strategies, each representing a different management of sarcoma patients who had a sarcoma-specialized multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) before the initial surgery and complete initial management in the network (strategy 1); patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB before the initial surgery and initial management outside the network (strategy 2); patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB after initial surgery and initial management outside the network (strategy 3); patients who had an initial management outside the network, without sarcoma-specialized MDTB neither before nor after the initial surgery (strategy 4).

Matching of the National Health Data System (SNDS) and the NETSARC databases made it possible to include 2431 patients in the study. These databases will allow to obtain information on patients, estimate overall survival and identify healthcare consumption, which will be useful in achieving study's objectives.

Read the detailed description

Introduction

Sarcomas are a large family of rare and heterogeneous tumors. As a consequence, their diagnosis and management are difficult and complex, which can lead to misdiagnosis and suboptimal patient management. Thus, in 2009, the National Cancer Institute (INCa) and the "Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins" (DGOS) supported the creation of a sarcoma reference network (NETSARC) with the aim to guarantee optimal care for sarcoma patients. Numerous studies show that initial patients' management in the sarcoma referral network reduces the risk of death and relapse. However, the proportion of sarcoma patients initially managed within the referral network is still too low today. The aim of this project is to (1) evaluate the efficiency of early management of sarcoma patients by the sarcoma referral network vs. outside the network; (2) measure the budgetary impact of the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy across the country; (3) identify the organizational and financial constraints likely to hinder the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy and propose solutions, and finally (4) analyses the budgetary impact of a generalization of sarcoma patient care by the reference network by integrating the organizational and financial solutions proposed.

Methods and analysis

The study relies on an exhaustive national cohort of all sarcoma patients (ICD code 10 C49, C48 or C40-41) who underwent primary tumor surgery for the year 2013. Patients will be allocated to four distinct strategies, each representing a different management of sarcoma patients: patients who had a sarcoma-specialized multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) before the initial surgery and complete initial management in the network (strategy 1); patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB before the initial surgery and initial management outside the network (strategy 2); patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB after initial surgery and initial management outside the network (strategy 3); patients who had an initial management outside the network, without sarcoma-specialized MDTB neither before nor after the initial surgery (strategy 4).

Matching of the National Health Data System (SNDS) and the NETSARC databases made it possible to include 2431 patients in the study. These databases will allow to obtain information on patients, estimate overall survival and identify healthcare consumption, which will be useful to achieve study's objectives.

The evaluation of early management of operable sarcoma patients by the sarcoma reference network vs. outside the network will be based on three approaches which are both distinct and complementary in terms of decision support. (1) Firstly, an efficiency assessment based on a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and a cost-utility analysis (CUA) will be carried out. The short-term CEA will use the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) expressed as cost per life year gained, while the long-term CUA will use the ICER expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The efficiency analysis will be complemented by a Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) based on an estimate of the additional and avoided costs induced by the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy determined in the previous steps. (2) Next, an organizational evaluation focusing on a flow analysis will be carried out. (3) Finally, an innovative financing model will be developed to encourage inter-center cooperation.

Ethics and dissemination

The OPTISARC project will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki developed by the World Medical Association (WMA). This study falls within the framework of research not involving the human person, study or health assessment (RNIPH) and will be conducted in accordance with the French and European laws and regulations in force, as well as any other applicable guidelines.

This Project has obtained a favorable opinion from the "Comité d'Expertise pour les Recherches, les Etudes et les Evaluations dans le domaine de la Santé" (CEREES) and an authorization from the "Comité National Informatique et Liberté" (CNIL) allowing the access to SNDS data (DCIR and PMSI) from 2013 to 2018.

Conditions
Sarcoma
Being tested
NETSARC network
Keywords
cost effectiveness, network, organization, payment model, sarcoma, patient' management, initial surgery, multi disciplinary tumor board
Medical subject headings
Sarcoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NETSARC networkOther

    MDTB and/or surgery in NETSARC network

Study groups in NCT05272358
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
strategy 1: sarcoma MDTB before surgery and initial management in the NETSARC networkPatients who had a sarcoma-specialized multidisciplinary tumour board (MDTB) before the initial surgery and complete initial management (including surgery) in the network (also including patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB after the initial surgery and complete initial management in the network) (strategy 1)
Receives: Other: NETSARC network
strategy 2: sarcoma MDTB before surgery and initial management outside the NETSARC networkPatients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB before the initial surgery and initial management (including surgery) outside the network (strategy 2)
Receives: Other: NETSARC network
strategy 3: sarcoma MDTB after surgery and initial management outside the NETSARC networkPatients who had initial management (including surgery) outside the network and a sarcoma-specialized MDTB after initial surgery (strategy 3)
Receives: Other: NETSARC network
strategy 4: No sarcoma MDTB and initial management outside the NETSARC networkPatients who had an initial management (including surgery) outside the network, without sarcoma-specialized MDTB neither before nor after the initial surgery (strategy 4).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Short-term cost-effectiveness analysis

    The main objective of this study is to evaluate the short-term effectiveness (over a 5-year period) of sarcoma patient management by the sarcoma referral network vs. outside the network. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) based on the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) will be used to compare strategies 1, 2, 3 and 4.

    Measured: 5 years

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Long-term cost-utility analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis

    In accordance with the High Authority of Health (Haute Autorité de Santé - HAS, in French) requirements, the short-term cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) will be supplemented by a whole-life cost-utility analysis (CUA) (and a whole-life CEA) to assess the efficiency of sarcoma patient management by the sarcoma referral network vs. outside the network. More specifically, an extrapolation to a time frame of 15 years will be used to achieve this whole-life CUA. In the same way as the short-term CEA, the whole-life CUA and CEA will use the ICER to compare strategies 1, 2, 3 and 4 with each other.

    Measured: 15 years

  2. Budget Impact Analysis

    The decision to include a Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) in this study is in line with the framework agreement signed in January 2016 between the Economic Committee for Medicinal Products (Comité Economique des Produits de Santé - CEPS, in French) and the Pharmaceutical Industry (Les Entreprises du Médicament - LEEM, in French), which advises the implementation of a BIA in addition to the medico-economic study. The BIA will strictly comply with the HAS requirements presented in its methodological guide for BIA.

    Measured: 5 years

  3. Organizational Assessment

    A quantitative comparison of the pathway models of the four strategies with reference pathway models (calculation of the distance between the models) will be accomplish.

    Measured: 5 years

  4. Define the incentive mechanisms most likely to neutralize the main obstacles identified in a theoretical model of cooperation

    Measurement tool: discrete choice questionnaire (validated by an ethical committee) with several scenarios, administered to a panel of health professionals from the sarcoma expert centers and local centers.

    The objective is to reveal the preferences of professionals for different modalities of cooperation in order to maximise their willingness to modify their current practices, whether they are in reference or peripheral centres, in the direction of greater complementarity. The method used for this investigation will be based on the design, implementation and analysis of data from a discrete choice experiment. More precisely, it is a method based on stated preferences in which the respondents are placed in a hypothetical choice situation.

    Measured: 5 years

  5. Pricing model

    Measurement: in euros 2022 - Cost impact of a transition from diagnosis related groups (DRG) to bundle payment

    To establish a pricing model that can be implemented in France, to improve the quality of care by encouraging health establishments to cooperate.

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Mar 2022
  2. Study start8 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Jun 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion8 Feb 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
2,431 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05272358
Sponsor's protocol ID
OPTISARC
Acronym
OPTISARC
Status last verified
Feb 2022
First submitted
9 Sep 2021
Last updated
9 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No sharing of individual data

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Sarcoma, run by Centre Leon Berard at 25 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 25 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Lionel Perrier, PhD (+33 478782908, lionel.perrier@lyon.unicancer.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Short-term cost-effectiveness analysis (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in