SarcomaOPTISARCNCT05272358
Economic Evaluation of Sarcoma Patients Management in France
An observational study of Sarcoma, run by Centre Leon Berard at 25 sites in France.
Trial summary
The aim of this project is to (1) evaluate the efficiency of early management of sarcoma patients by the sarcoma referral network (NETSARC) vs. outside the network; (2) measure the budgetary impact of the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy across the country; (3) identify the organizational and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Sarcoma
- What is being tested?
- NETSARC network
- How many people
- 2,431 participants
- Where
- 25 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 8 Feb 2021to 8 Feb 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Cohort of sarcoma patient diagnosed in 2013 with a surgery of initial tumour.
Who may be able to join
- Sarcoma diagnosis between 01/01/2013 and 31/12/2013
- International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code 10: C49 Malignant neoplasm of other connective and soft tissue, or C48 Malignant neoplasm of retroperitoneum and peritoneum, or C40-41 Malignant neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage of limbs)
- Surgery of the primary tumour.
Who cannot join
- Gastro intestinal stromal tumour
- Diagnosis not confirmed by the a second histological review
Trial locations and contacts
25 sites in 1 country.
25 sites in 1 country
France25 sites, 25 recruiting
- Recruiting
CHU Jean Minjoz
Besançon, 25000
Loic Chaigneau, MD
- Recruiting
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux, 33000
Antoine Italiano, PU-PH
- Recruiting
Centre François Baclesse
Caen, 14000
Sharmini Varatharajah, MD
- Recruiting
Centre Jean Perrin
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
Pascale Dubray-Longeras, MD
- Recruiting
Centre Georges François Leclerc
Dijon, 21000
Sylvain Causeret, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Saint-Pierre
La Réunion, 97000
Jean-Christophe Ruzic, MD
- Recruiting
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, 59000
Nicolas PENEL, PU-PH
- Recruiting
CHU Dupuytren
Limoges, 87000
Fabrice Fiorenza, MD
- Recruiting
Centre Leon Berard
Lyon, 69008
Jean-Yves Blay, PU-PH
- Recruiting
CHU Timone
Marseille, 13000
Florence Duffaud, PU-PH
- Recruiting
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, 13000
François Bertucci, PU-PH
- Recruiting
ICM Val d'Aurelle
Montpellier, 34000
Sébastien Carrère, MD
- Recruiting
Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine
Nancy, 54000
Maria Rios, MD
- Recruiting
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest
Nantes, 44800
Emmanuelle Bompas, MD
- Recruiting
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, 06000
Esma Saada, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Cochin
Paris, 75000
Philippe Anract, PU-PH
- Recruiting
CHU Saint-Louis
Paris, 75000
Céleste Lebbé, PU-PH
- Recruiting
Institut Curie
Paris, 75000
Sophie Piperno-Neumann, MD
- Recruiting
Institut jean Godinot
Reims, 51000
Pauline Soibinet-Oudot, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Pontchaillou
Rennes, 35000
Mickael Ropars, PU-PH
- Recruiting
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen, 76000
Cécile Guillemet, MD
- Recruiting
Institut de Cancérologie CHU Hautepierre
Strasbourg, 67000
Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz, PU-PH
- Recruiting
IUCT Institut Claudius Régaud
Toulouse, 31000
Christine Chevreau, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Trousseau
Tours, 37000
Philippe Rosset, PU-PH
- Recruiting
Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, 94100
Axel Le Cesne, Prof.
About this study
Official title: Economic Evaluation of Early Management of Sarcoma Patients by the Sarcoma Reference Network (NETSARC), Exploration of Organisational and Financial Constraints
The aim of this project is to (1) evaluate the efficiency of early management of sarcoma patients by the sarcoma referral network (NETSARC) vs. outside the network; (2) measure the budgetary impact of the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy across the country; (3) identify the organizational and financial constraints likely to hinder the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy and propose solutions, and finally (4) analyse the budgetary impact of a generalization of sarcoma patient care by the reference network by integrating the organizational and financial solutions proposed.
The study relies on an exhaustive national cohort of all sarcoma patients who underwent primary tumor surgery for the year 2013. Patients will be allocated to four distinct strategies, each representing a different management of sarcoma patients who had a sarcoma-specialized multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) before the initial surgery and complete initial management in the network (strategy 1); patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB before the initial surgery and initial management outside the network (strategy 2); patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB after initial surgery and initial management outside the network (strategy 3); patients who had an initial management outside the network, without sarcoma-specialized MDTB neither before nor after the initial surgery (strategy 4).
Matching of the National Health Data System (SNDS) and the NETSARC databases made it possible to include 2431 patients in the study. These databases will allow to obtain information on patients, estimate overall survival and identify healthcare consumption, which will be useful in achieving study's objectives.
Read the detailed description
Introduction
Sarcomas are a large family of rare and heterogeneous tumors. As a consequence, their diagnosis and management are difficult and complex, which can lead to misdiagnosis and suboptimal patient management. Thus, in 2009, the National Cancer Institute (INCa) and the "Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins" (DGOS) supported the creation of a sarcoma reference network (NETSARC) with the aim to guarantee optimal care for sarcoma patients. Numerous studies show that initial patients' management in the sarcoma referral network reduces the risk of death and relapse. However, the proportion of sarcoma patients initially managed within the referral network is still too low today. The aim of this project is to (1) evaluate the efficiency of early management of sarcoma patients by the sarcoma referral network vs. outside the network; (2) measure the budgetary impact of the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy across the country; (3) identify the organizational and financial constraints likely to hinder the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy and propose solutions, and finally (4) analyses the budgetary impact of a generalization of sarcoma patient care by the reference network by integrating the organizational and financial solutions proposed.
Methods and analysis
The study relies on an exhaustive national cohort of all sarcoma patients (ICD code 10 C49, C48 or C40-41) who underwent primary tumor surgery for the year 2013. Patients will be allocated to four distinct strategies, each representing a different management of sarcoma patients: patients who had a sarcoma-specialized multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) before the initial surgery and complete initial management in the network (strategy 1); patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB before the initial surgery and initial management outside the network (strategy 2); patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB after initial surgery and initial management outside the network (strategy 3); patients who had an initial management outside the network, without sarcoma-specialized MDTB neither before nor after the initial surgery (strategy 4).
Matching of the National Health Data System (SNDS) and the NETSARC databases made it possible to include 2431 patients in the study. These databases will allow to obtain information on patients, estimate overall survival and identify healthcare consumption, which will be useful to achieve study's objectives.
The evaluation of early management of operable sarcoma patients by the sarcoma reference network vs. outside the network will be based on three approaches which are both distinct and complementary in terms of decision support. (1) Firstly, an efficiency assessment based on a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and a cost-utility analysis (CUA) will be carried out. The short-term CEA will use the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) expressed as cost per life year gained, while the long-term CUA will use the ICER expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The efficiency analysis will be complemented by a Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) based on an estimate of the additional and avoided costs induced by the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy determined in the previous steps. (2) Next, an organizational evaluation focusing on a flow analysis will be carried out. (3) Finally, an innovative financing model will be developed to encourage inter-center cooperation.
Ethics and dissemination
The OPTISARC project will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki developed by the World Medical Association (WMA). This study falls within the framework of research not involving the human person, study or health assessment (RNIPH) and will be conducted in accordance with the French and European laws and regulations in force, as well as any other applicable guidelines.
This Project has obtained a favorable opinion from the "Comité d'Expertise pour les Recherches, les Etudes et les Evaluations dans le domaine de la Santé" (CEREES) and an authorization from the "Comité National Informatique et Liberté" (CNIL) allowing the access to SNDS data (DCIR and PMSI) from 2013 to 2018.
- Conditions
- Sarcoma
- Being tested
- NETSARC network
- Keywords
- cost effectiveness, network, organization, payment model, sarcoma, patient' management, initial surgery, multi disciplinary tumor board
- Medical subject headings
- Sarcoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NETSARC networkOther
MDTB and/or surgery in NETSARC network
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| strategy 1: sarcoma MDTB before surgery and initial management in the NETSARC network | Patients who had a sarcoma-specialized multidisciplinary tumour board (MDTB) before the initial surgery and complete initial management (including surgery) in the network (also including patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB after the initial surgery and complete initial management in the network) (strategy 1) Receives: Other: NETSARC network | |
| strategy 2: sarcoma MDTB before surgery and initial management outside the NETSARC network | Patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB before the initial surgery and initial management (including surgery) outside the network (strategy 2) Receives: Other: NETSARC network | |
| strategy 3: sarcoma MDTB after surgery and initial management outside the NETSARC network | Patients who had initial management (including surgery) outside the network and a sarcoma-specialized MDTB after initial surgery (strategy 3) Receives: Other: NETSARC network | |
| strategy 4: No sarcoma MDTB and initial management outside the NETSARC network | Patients who had an initial management (including surgery) outside the network, without sarcoma-specialized MDTB neither before nor after the initial surgery (strategy 4). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Short-term cost-effectiveness analysis
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the short-term effectiveness (over a 5-year period) of sarcoma patient management by the sarcoma referral network vs. outside the network. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) based on the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) will be used to compare strategies 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Long-term cost-utility analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis
In accordance with the High Authority of Health (Haute Autorité de Santé - HAS, in French) requirements, the short-term cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) will be supplemented by a whole-life cost-utility analysis (CUA) (and a whole-life CEA) to assess the efficiency of sarcoma patient management by the sarcoma referral network vs. outside the network. More specifically, an extrapolation to a time frame of 15 years will be used to achieve this whole-life CUA. In the same way as the short-term CEA, the whole-life CUA and CEA will use the ICER to compare strategies 1, 2, 3 and 4 with each other.
Measured: 15 years
Budget Impact Analysis
The decision to include a Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) in this study is in line with the framework agreement signed in January 2016 between the Economic Committee for Medicinal Products (Comité Economique des Produits de Santé - CEPS, in French) and the Pharmaceutical Industry (Les Entreprises du Médicament - LEEM, in French), which advises the implementation of a BIA in addition to the medico-economic study. The BIA will strictly comply with the HAS requirements presented in its methodological guide for BIA.
Measured: 5 years
Organizational Assessment
A quantitative comparison of the pathway models of the four strategies with reference pathway models (calculation of the distance between the models) will be accomplish.
Measured: 5 years
Define the incentive mechanisms most likely to neutralize the main obstacles identified in a theoretical model of cooperation
Measurement tool: discrete choice questionnaire (validated by an ethical committee) with several scenarios, administered to a panel of health professionals from the sarcoma expert centers and local centers.
The objective is to reveal the preferences of professionals for different modalities of cooperation in order to maximise their willingness to modify their current practices, whether they are in reference or peripheral centres, in the direction of greater complementarity. The method used for this investigation will be based on the design, implementation and analysis of data from a discrete choice experiment. More precisely, it is a method based on stated preferences in which the respondents are placed in a hypothetical choice situation.
Measured: 5 years
Pricing model
Measurement: in euros 2022 - Cost impact of a transition from diagnosis related groups (DRG) to bundle payment
To establish a pricing model that can be implemented in France, to improve the quality of care by encouraging health establishments to cooperate.
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2022
- Study start8 Feb 2021
- Primary completion15 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion8 Feb 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SarcomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Leon BerardThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 2,431 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon Berard
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Saint Etienne School of Mine, Rennes University Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jean-Yves Blay, PU-PH, Principal investigator, Centre Leon Berard
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05272358
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OPTISARC
- Acronym
- OPTISARC
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 9 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No sharing of individual data
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Economic Evaluation of Early Management of Sarcoma Patients by the Sarcoma Reference Network (NETSARC), Exploration of Organisational and Financial Constraints
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05272358
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPTISARC / OPTISARC
- Conditions
- Sarcoma
- Keywords
- cost effectiveness, network, organization, payment model, sarcoma, patient' management, initial surgery, multi disciplinary tumor board
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 2,431 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon BerardUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Saint Etienne School of Mine, Rennes University Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Study start
- 8 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 8 Feb 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this project is to (1) evaluate the efficiency of early management of sarcoma patients by the sarcoma referral network (NETSARC) vs. outside the network; (2) measure the budgetary impact of the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy across the country; (3) identify the organizational and financial constraints likely to hinder the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy and propose solutions, and finally (4) analyse the budgetary impact of a generalization of sarcoma patient care by the reference network by integrating the organizational and financial solutions proposed.
The study relies on an exhaustive national cohort of all sarcoma patients who underwent primary tumor surgery for the year 2013. Patients will be allocated to four distinct strategies, each representing a different management of sarcoma patients who had a sarcoma-specialized multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) before the initial surgery and complete initial management in the network (strategy 1); patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB before the initial surgery and initial management outside the network (strategy 2); patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB after initial surgery and initial management outside the network (strategy 3); patients who had an initial management outside the network, without sarcoma-specialized MDTB neither before nor after the initial surgery (strategy 4).
Matching of the National Health Data System (SNDS) and the NETSARC databases made it possible to include 2431 patients in the study. These databases will allow to obtain information on patients, estimate overall survival and identify healthcare consumption, which will be useful in achieving study's objectives.
Detailed description
Introduction
Sarcomas are a large family of rare and heterogeneous tumors. As a consequence, their diagnosis and management are difficult and complex, which can lead to misdiagnosis and suboptimal patient management. Thus, in 2009, the National Cancer Institute (INCa) and the "Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins" (DGOS) supported the creation of a sarcoma reference network (NETSARC) with the aim to guarantee optimal care for sarcoma patients. Numerous studies show that initial patients' management in the sarcoma referral network reduces the risk of death and relapse. However, the proportion of sarcoma patients initially managed within the referral network is still too low today. The aim of this project is to (1) evaluate the efficiency of early management of sarcoma patients by the sarcoma referral network vs. outside the network; (2) measure the budgetary impact of the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy across the country; (3) identify the organizational and financial constraints likely to hinder the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy and propose solutions, and finally (4) analyses the budgetary impact of a generalization of sarcoma patient care by the reference network by integrating the organizational and financial solutions proposed.
Methods and analysis
The study relies on an exhaustive national cohort of all sarcoma patients (ICD code 10 C49, C48 or C40-41) who underwent primary tumor surgery for the year 2013. Patients will be allocated to four distinct strategies, each representing a different management of sarcoma patients: patients who had a sarcoma-specialized multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) before the initial surgery and complete initial management in the network (strategy 1); patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB before the initial surgery and initial management outside the network (strategy 2); patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB after initial surgery and initial management outside the network (strategy 3); patients who had an initial management outside the network, without sarcoma-specialized MDTB neither before nor after the initial surgery (strategy 4).
Matching of the National Health Data System (SNDS) and the NETSARC databases made it possible to include 2431 patients in the study. These databases will allow to obtain information on patients, estimate overall survival and identify healthcare consumption, which will be useful to achieve study's objectives.
The evaluation of early management of operable sarcoma patients by the sarcoma reference network vs. outside the network will be based on three approaches which are both distinct and complementary in terms of decision support. (1) Firstly, an efficiency assessment based on a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and a cost-utility analysis (CUA) will be carried out. The short-term CEA will use the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) expressed as cost per life year gained, while the long-term CUA will use the ICER expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The efficiency analysis will be complemented by a Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) based on an estimate of the additional and avoided costs induced by the generalization of the most cost-effective strategy determined in the previous steps. (2) Next, an organizational evaluation focusing on a flow analysis will be carried out. (3) Finally, an innovative financing model will be developed to encourage inter-center cooperation.
Ethics and dissemination
The OPTISARC project will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki developed by the World Medical Association (WMA). This study falls within the framework of research not involving the human person, study or health assessment (RNIPH) and will be conducted in accordance with the French and European laws and regulations in force, as well as any other applicable guidelines.
This Project has obtained a favorable opinion from the "Comité d'Expertise pour les Recherches, les Etudes et les Evaluations dans le domaine de la Santé" (CEREES) and an authorization from the "Comité National Informatique et Liberté" (CNIL) allowing the access to SNDS data (DCIR and PMSI) from 2013 to 2018.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| strategy 1: sarcoma MDTB before surgery and initial management in the NETSARC network | – | Other: NETSARC networkPatients who had a sarcoma-specialized multidisciplinary tumour board (MDTB) before the initial surgery and complete initial management (including surgery) in the network (also including patients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB after the initial surgery and complete initial management in the network) (strategy 1) |
| strategy 2: sarcoma MDTB before surgery and initial management outside the NETSARC network | – | Other: NETSARC networkPatients who had a sarcoma-specialized MDTB before the initial surgery and initial management (including surgery) outside the network (strategy 2) |
| strategy 3: sarcoma MDTB after surgery and initial management outside the NETSARC network | – | Other: NETSARC networkPatients who had initial management (including surgery) outside the network and a sarcoma-specialized MDTB after initial surgery (strategy 3) |
| strategy 4: No sarcoma MDTB and initial management outside the NETSARC network | – | –Patients who had an initial management (including surgery) outside the network, without sarcoma-specialized MDTB neither before nor after the initial surgery (strategy 4). |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Cohort of sarcoma patient diagnosed in 2013 with a surgery of initial tumour.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Sarcoma diagnosis between 01/01/2013 and 31/12/2013
- International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code 10: C49 Malignant neoplasm of other connective and soft tissue, or C48 Malignant neoplasm of retroperitoneum and peritoneum, or C40-41 Malignant neoplasm of bone and articular cartilage of limbs)
- Surgery of the primary tumour.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Gastro intestinal stromal tumour
- Diagnosis not confirmed by the a second histological review
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NETSARC networkMDTB and/or surgery in NETSARC network | Other | strategy 1: sarcoma MDTB before surgery and initial management in the NETSARC network, strategy 2: sarcoma MDTB before surgery and initial management outside the NETSARC network, strategy 3: sarcoma MDTB after surgery and initial management outside the NETSARC network |
Primary outcome
Short-term cost-effectiveness analysis
Time frame: 5 years
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the short-term effectiveness (over a 5-year period) of sarcoma patient management by the sarcoma referral network vs. outside the network. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) based on the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) will be used to compare strategies 1, 2, 3 and 4.
5 secondary outcomes
Long-term cost-utility analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis
Time frame: 15 years
Budget Impact Analysis
Time frame: 5 years
Organizational Assessment
Time frame: 5 years
Define the incentive mechanisms most likely to neutralize the main obstacles identified in a theoretical model of cooperation
Time frame: 5 years
Pricing model
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Mar 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No sharing of individual data
Related trials for Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial Evaluating 68Ga-HX01 Injection for PET/CT Imaging
Soft Tissue Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Measuring if Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy is Better Than Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Aggressive Poorly Differentiated Sarcomas
Metastatic Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma, Metastatic Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of MDX2003 in Patients With Different Types of Lymphoma
Lymphoma, Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Evaluation of the I-phase Clinical Trial of 177Lu-HX02 Injection in Patients With Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors
Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean-Yves Blay, PU-PH principal investigator
Centre Leon Berard
25 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Sarcoma, run by Centre Leon Berard at 25 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 25 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lionel Perrier, PhD (+33 478782908, lionel.perrier@lyon.unicancer.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Short-term cost-effectiveness analysis (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2022.