AzTrials
AzTrials

InfertilityCHROMAPSNCT05290051

Prospective Study to Assess Medical Performance of Optical Mapping and Long Read Sequencing in Detecting Numerical and Structural Chromosome Abnormalities

A study testing Optical Genome Mapping (Bionano®) and Longread sequencing (Nanopore®) in people with Infertility and Intellectual Disability, run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chromosomal aberrations are major causes of developmental disorders (Intellectual disability (ID), multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), autism spectrum disorders (ASD)) as well as reproductive disorders (RD) in particular gametogenesis defects and recurrent miscarriages. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Infertility, Intellectual Disability, Malformation
What is being tested?
Optical Genome Mapping (Bionano®) and Longread sequencing (Nanopore®)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
350 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
26 Sep 2022to 26 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Inclusion Criteria: patient requiring chromosome analysis either in case of infertility or in case of Intellectual deficiency/malformation

-

Exclusion Criteria: no exclusion criteria but we defined Non-inclusion criteria

  • ID in a context of perinatal suffering (e.g. hypoxia during labor)
  • Children born to non-native French-speaking parents in case of speech/language retardation
  • Obstructive azoospermia
  • Children under 5kg or whenever blood sampling cannot meet the required volume.
  • Missing or wrong blood collection tube
  • Insufficient blood volume
  • Missing or incomplete consent to research (e.g. only one parental consent for a child)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Cochin APHP

    Paris, 75014

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Etude Prospective Comparative Des Performances de Détection Des Variations de Nombre et de Structure Des Chromosomes Par Les Techniques de Cartographie Moléculaire et de Séquençage de Grands Fragments

Chromosomal aberrations are major causes of developmental disorders (Intellectual disability (ID), multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), autism spectrum disorders (ASD)) as well as reproductive disorders (RD) in particular gametogenesis defects and recurrent miscarriages. Current first tier genetic investigations for chromosome analysis in clinical settings include karyotyping in case of RD (5 ~ 10% diagnosis rate) and chromosomal microarrays (CMA) in case of ID/MM (10 ~ 20% diagnosis rate). However, both assays show significant drawbacks, e.g. low resolution for karyotyping and inability to detect balanced structural rearrangement for CMA.

Optical genome mapping and long read genome sequencing are emerging technologies that offer new opportunities to overcome these limitations and allow for a higher resolution chromosome analysis.

This project aims at assessing the performance of optical mapping and long read whole genome sequencing compared to current gold standard cytogenetics methods in a prospective study. The investigator will evaluate their ability to become the all-in-one methodology for genomic analysis that could replace both karyotype and CMA and their added-value compared to these latter by uncovering new diagnoses.

Read the detailed description

Chromosome aberrations are found in up to 1% of the general population. Structural aberrations, either balanced (3.6‰) or unbalanced (0.9‰), represent a third of them. Most (but not all) unbalanced anomalies are associated with a relevant phenotype, while most (but not all) balanced rearrangements have no consequence on the phenotype except possible reproductive disorders. Indeed, the prevalence of the latter among infertile individuals is ten times higher than in the fertile population. Moreover, 6% - 27% of apparently balanced rearrangements can lead to developmental disorders through various mechanisms.

First tier chromosome analysis methods, karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), are hampered either by a low resolution (karyotype) or by their inability to detect balanced rearrangements (CMA). However, karyotyping is still the gold standard analysis in case of reproductive disorders (RD) and recurrent miscarriages because of the high prevalence of aneuploidies (mainly sex chromosome aneuploidies, i.e. 45,X or 47,XXY) or balanced structural abnormalities.

According to a French national annual survey carried out by the Agence de la Biomedecine, the diagnostic yield is ~5%-10% for karyotyping in RD and ~15-20% for CMA in ID/MCA. Hence, many patients remain without a molecular diagnosis of their condition after these first tier studies. Whole exome sequencing and now whole genome sequencing have been shown to be able to rise the diagnostic yield to up to 50-60% in ID patients. However, current short read sequencing methods fall short to providing robust data for structural variation (SV) detection, because of the inability of bioinformatic tools to map correctly the sequences due to the high proportion of homologous sequences at SV breakpoints. New emerging methodologies based on long DNA fragments are now available and may provide a way to circumvent current limitations: long read sequencing (lrNGS) and optical genome mapping (OGM) :

OGM has been developed by Bionano Genomics and combines microfluidic and high-resolution microscopy to offer an imaging of long, high molecular weight, DNA molecules (up to more than 1Mb) labelled with specific sequence tags. From these images, a de novo assembly of any patient's genome can be performed and compared to a reference genome map to unravel all kind of structural rearrangements with a resolution that is 100 to 1000 times higher than with karyotyping. A second pipeline based on coverage in each region allows for the detection of large CNVs and aneuploidies.

lrNGS of long DNA fragments (several kb) reduces short read sequencing based assembly issues due to repetitive sequences, and allow for detection of all mutations, from SNVs to SVs and CNVs. Due to the large size of fragment inserts, less false positive are expected for SV calling than observed with short read or linked-read sequencing. Although bioinformatics pipelines are improving, prospective detection of large SV/SNV remains challenging, with a very high rate of false positives and false negatives. Furthermore, no study has been conducted to test prospectively the feasibility and medical efficiency of using long read sequencing as a first-tier all-in-one test for SV and CNV identification.

Primary Objective The main objective of this prospective study is to compare the diagnosis rate of OGM (Bionano®) and lrNGS (Nanopore®) to the one of standard-of-care technologies, e.g. karyotyping for patients presenting with reproductive disorders (primary amenorrhea, premature ovarian insufficiency, severe oligozoospermia, azoospermia) or CMA in case of developmental disorders (ID/MCA).

Secondary Objectives Refine the data on the incidence and type of chromosomal aberrations in the different clinical categories of patients Assess the limits of Bionano® and Nanopore® Assess the impact of enhanced detection of subchromosomal anomalies by Bionano® or Nanopore® on the medical care of the patient Compare the cost-effectiveness of both approaches

Study type This is a national multicentric prospective cohort study involving 14 French certified constitutional cytogenetic centers. The same patients will be offered genome wide analysis using standard techniques (Karyotyping or CMA according to the reason for referral) and two new genome wide analysis methods, OGM (Bionano®) and lrNGS (Nanopore®).

Being tested
Optical Genome Mapping (Bionano®), Longread sequencing (Nanopore®)
Medical subject headings
Infertility, Intellectual Disability, Congenital Abnormalities, Abortion, Spontaneous

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Optical Genome Mapping (Bionano®)Genetic

    Search for chromosome abnormalities through alteration of the optical map of the genome compared to reference genome using the Bionano® 's pipeline.

  • Longread sequencing (Nanopore®)Genetic

    Search for chromosome abnormalities from the sequencing data obtain from high molecular weight DNA molecules using dedicated analysis pipeline.

Study groups in NCT05290051
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients referred for cytogenetic analysisExperimentalAnalysis of patient DNA with Optical Genome Mapping (Bionano®) and long read Sequencing (Nanopore®) in search for chromosome abnormalities (aneuploidies and SV)
Receives: Genetic: Optical Genome Mapping (Bionano®); Genetic: Longread sequencing (Nanopore®)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of verified clinically significant chromosomal aberrations detected by Bionano® and Nanopore® compared to the percentage of those detected by karyotyping or CMA according to reason for referral.

    The significance of an aberration is assessed according to international guidelines, clinical history, as well as publications and public databases.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Incidence and distribution of different kinds of chromosomal aberrations per category of referral.

    Two main referral indication: infertility or Intellectual deficiency/Malformation

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Type of chromosome abnormalities that are overlooked by Bionano® and/or Nanopore® while detected by standard-of-care techniques

    Abnormalities detected with either karyotype or CMA and not by OGM (Optical Genome Mapping) or longread sequencing

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Percentage of patients for which the detection of a chromosomal aberration by Bionano® or Nanopore® and not by karyotyping or CMA resulted in a change in the disease management

    Abnormalities detected by either OGM or lrNGS but not by gold standard techniques leading to a change in patient care (including genetic counselling).

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Overall cost and benefit of each technique including delay to diagnosis and changes in the disease management

    Medico-economic evaluation of the new technologies compared to gold standard diagnostic tools.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Mar 2022
  2. Study start26 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion26 Mar 2025
  4. Study completion26 Mar 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Comparison of new diagnostic procedures with gold standard used in clinical setting
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
350 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05290051
Sponsor's protocol ID
C21-35
Acronym
CHROMAPS
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
2 Mar 2022
Last updated
22 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Optical Genome Mapping (Bionano®) and Longread sequencing (Nanopore®) in people with Infertility and Intellectual Disability, run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of verified clinically significant chromosomal aberrations detected by Bionano® and Nanopore® compared to the percentage of those detected by karyotyping or CMA according to reason for referral. (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in