AzTrials
AzTrials

EducationNCT05290974

Online Regional Anesthesia Resources - Are They Effective?

A study testing Self exploring of available online material on supraclavicular brachial plexus block and Conventional in-person teaching on supraclavicular brachial plexus block in people with Education, run by University of Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Anatomical-based ultrasound imaging has been one of the most rapidly advancing innovations in the field of regional anesthesia in recent years. The proper performance of ultrasound guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) is a useful competency for any anesthesiologist. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Education
What is being tested?
Self exploring of available online material on supraclavicular brachial plexus block and Conventional in-person teaching on supraclavicular brachial plexus block
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
23 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 Jul 2022to 1 Jul 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • First year anesthesiology residents, willing to be present for a standardized in-person teaching module or perform an independent study of standardized online material, with no more than one previously performed supraclavicular ultrasound guided block, and willing to undergo to an anonymous skill acquisition assessment.

Who cannot join

  • Learner refusal to participate and decision to withdraw from the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Mount Sinai Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Comparison Between Self-directed Online Educational Material and Conventional Teaching in Acquiring Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia Skills for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block by Novice Performers

Anatomical-based ultrasound imaging has been one of the most rapidly advancing innovations in the field of regional anesthesia in recent years. The proper performance of ultrasound guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) is a useful competency for any anesthesiologist. However, there are some obstacles in regional anesthesia education for trainees. The increasing availability of UGRA related online information may have an important educational value for trainees and consultants. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of using educational material from The New York School of Regional Anesthesia (NYSORA) and Ultrasound for Regional Anesthesia (USRA) websites on image acquisition and anatomical interpretation learning process of novice trainees residents performing ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. We hypothesize that the use of those online educational materials will give learners non inferior ability and knowledge for image acquisition and anatomical interpretation of ultrasound image for supraclavicular brachial plexus block, when compared to conventional in person teaching.

Read the detailed description

Introduction Anatomical-based ultrasound imaging has been one of the most rapidly advancing innovations in the field of regional anesthesia in recent years. Compared with landmark based or peripheral nerve stimulation techniques, benefits of ultrasound guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) include increased nerve block success rate, faster onset time, decreased volume of local anesthetic, and reduced risk of complications. Most experts now consider ultrasound-guidance to be the standard of care for peripheral nerve blocks. To successfully perform a UGRA procedure, a triad of three distinct but interrelated skills is required: image acquisition and anatomical interpretation are needed to identify the needle insertion point; hand-eye coordination is then needed to advance the needle to the target. First, the clinician must successfully acquire an image and then correctly interpret the sonoanatomy. Next, the needle must be visualized and guided to the desired target. This dynamic process often requires constant needle manipulation with simultaneous adjustments of the ultrasound transducer.

The proper performance of UGRA is a useful competency for any anesthesiologist, and most anesthesia residency programs are required to have a minimum curriculum for education of the most frequent and well stablished peripheral nerve blocks. However, there are some obstacles in regional anesthesia education for trainees. The traditional "apprenticeship model" of learning while concurrently providing clinical care can result in inconsistent learning experiences, variability in case numbers, and compromised patient safety. It is not feasible to practice all UGRA steps (especially needling) in live voluntary models. Simulation-based techniques (animal, cadavers) can be expensive and logistically difficult to use on a regular basis. Conventional regional anesthesia training in most regional anesthesia courses and workshops consists of theoretical teaching (in-person instruction of indications, anatomical concepts, techniques and complications) followed by hands-on image acquisition demonstration and practice on live voluntary models. This structured teaching method can be impractical in a medical residency program, where time constraints during clinical care can limit teaching opportunities. Moreover, for novices, it provides a brief, isolated exposure to the procedure, which limits long-term retention and associated with decay of skill execution.

There is a growing availability of online UGRA related material, including good quality open access educational information, assembled by related societies (The New York School of Regional Anesthesia - NYSORA; Ultrasound for Regional Anesthesia - USRA). Therefore, an opportunity may exist for using this kind of content for UGRA learning in anesthesiology medical residency programs.

Significance The increasing availability of UGRA related online information may have an important educational value for trainees and consultants. The structured use of this material, can contribute to learners' skill acquisition and reduce requirements for human resources and time needed for UGRA training. It also provides easy access to review skills to improve retain competency.

Objectives To assess the impact of using educational material from NYSORA and USRA websites on image acquisition and anatomical interpretation learning process of novice trainees performing supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Hypothesis Use of online educational materials for ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus from NYSORA and USRA will give learners non inferior ability and knowledge for image acquisition and anatomical interpretation of ultrasound image for supraclavicular brachial plexus block, when compared to conventional in person teaching.

Methods Study type Single-center randomized controlled trial, blinded for evaluator, comparing two educational strategies (directed independent learning with online educational material versus conventional in-person teaching) in acquiring two ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia skills (image acquisition and anatomical interpretation) for supraclavicular brachial plexus block, among novice to UGRA (University of Toronto first year anesthesiology residents, rotating at Sinai Health System - Mount Sinai Hospital). Following Ethics Research Board approval, subjects will be recruited for the study. Their eligibility for participation will be assessed and they will be consented for voluntary participation in the study by signing an informed written consent.

Study interventions The participants will be randomized to one of the two groups using a computer-generated random numbers table: in-person standardized teaching group (in-person group) or independent learning with online educational material group (online group).

The participants randomized to the in-person group will be scheduled for a standardized in-person theoretical teaching session, performed by the same anesthesiologist with wide experience in ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. The in-person teaching will involve a maximum of five learners per session.

The online group will not participate in any in-person teaching. This group will receive the online material for self-directed reading and exploration (including available figures and videos). The educational material from NYSORA (available on: https://www.nysora.com/regional-anesthesia-for-specific-surgical-procedures/upper-extremity-regional-anesthesia-for-specific-surgical-procedures/anesthesia-and-analgesia-for-elbow-and-forearm-procedures/ultrasound-guided-supraclavicular-brachial-plexus-block/) and USRA (available on: http://www.usra.ca/regional-anesthesia/specific-blocks/upper-limb/suprablock.php) websites are going to be used, and were selected because of their high quality, validated in other studies. It is not possible to ensure the in-person group does not also utilize online resources in preparation, a key factor will be explicit direction to the online group to review these specific high-quality resources.

All participants will be requested to be present for a practical demonstration of ultrasound imaging acquisition and skill evaluation, within two weeks following the in-person teaching or online material independent learning. Participants will demonstrate the technique they will have learned, in the same live model volunteer for both groups. They will use the same equipment (Edge II; Sonosite, Bothel, Washington.). They will try to acquire the best ultrasound image for an optimal ultrasound guided right supraclavicular brachial plexus block, under evaluation of the same UGRA experienced evaluator. Participants' performance will be evaluated using a checklist for acquiring and interpreting the sonogram of key neural and nonneural structures relevant to ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. This checklist was adapted from previous studies [appendix 1 - Sonographic Proficiency Assessment Score (SPAS) for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block]. It generates a score that ranges from 0 to 33. This checklist assesses participants' performance based on their capability to describe and demonstrate the indications of the block; territorial distribution of anesthesia; patient position; range of sterility; correct transducer option and position; anatomical structures on ultrasound image; needle insertion; direction and final position; expected local anesthetic spread; adequate local anesthetic volume; possible complications and how to avoid them. The evaluator for participants' SPAS will be blinded for which group they were randomized to. The best acquired image demonstrating the required landmarks will also be captured and later assessed by an independent blinded evaluator.

Sample size There is no previous data in the literature comparing the independent use of online educational material with conventional in person teaching, for image acquisition and anatomical interpretation of ultrasound image for supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Sample size was therefore based on a previous study comparing the effect of two methods on the learning curve for acquiring sonographic skills for axillary brachial plexus block, among ten medical students. In order to achieve a larger power than the aforementioned study, recruitment and randomization of 20 PGY1s is planned..

Study data analysis Normal distributed variables values will be presented and analyzed as mean values +- standard deviation. Non-normal distributed variables values will be presented and analyzed as median and minimum and maximum values. Qualitative variables will be presented as frequency of occurrence. Statistical test to be performed might be: t-Student, Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square. Statistical software will be used for analysis: SPSS 13.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism Version 4.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Conditions
Education
Being tested
Self exploring of available online material on supraclavicular brachial plexus block, Conventional in-person teaching on supraclavicular brachial plexus block
Keywords
Regional Anesthesia, Ultrasonic Imaging

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Self exploring of available online material on supraclavicular brachial plexus blockOther

    Potential new method of learning a specific regional anesthesia technique

  • Conventional in-person teaching on supraclavicular brachial plexus blockOther

    Conventional method of learning a specific regional anesthesia technique

Study groups in NCT05290974
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
In-person groupActive comparatorConventional in-person standardized teaching
Receives: Other: Conventional in-person teaching on supraclavicular brachial plexus block
Online groupExperimentalIndependent learning with online educational material
Receives: Other: Self exploring of available online material on supraclavicular brachial plexus block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sonographic Proficiency Assessment Score for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

    Checklist for acquiring and interpreting the sonogram of key neural and nonneural structures relevant to ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block

    Measured: Two weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Quality of the acquired image

    Quality of the best acquired image by two experienced anesthesiologists

    Measured: Two weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Mar 2022
  2. Study start1 Jul 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
23 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05290974
Sponsor's protocol ID
MSH REB 22-0007-E
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
13 Mar 2022
Last updated
11 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Make individual anonymized data available, after the conclusion of the study, through a RedCap exported data sheet.

Publications

  • Barrington MJ, Kluger R. Ultrasound guidance reduces the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity following peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):289-99. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318292669b.

    PubMed 23788067
  • Marhofer P, Harrop-Griffiths W, Kettner SC, Kirchmair L. Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia: part 1. Br J Anaesth. 2010 May;104(5):538-46. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq069. Epub 2010 Apr 2.

    PubMed 20364022
  • Chen XX, Trivedi V, AlSaflan AA, Todd SC, Tricco AC, McCartney CJL, Boet S. Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia Simulation Training: A Systematic Review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):741-750. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000639.

    PubMed 28759501
  • Kim TE, Tsui BCH. Simulation-based ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia curriculum for anesthesiology residents. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Feb;72(1):13-23. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00317. Epub 2018 Nov 27.

    PubMed 30481945
  • Smith HM, Kopp SL, Jacob AK, Torsher LC, Hebl JR. Designing and implementing a comprehensive learner-centered regional anesthesia curriculum. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):88-94. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819e734f. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19282705
  • Ramirez AG, Hu Y, Kim H, Rasmussen SK. Long-Term Skills Retention Following a Randomized Prospective Trial on Adaptive Procedural Training. J Surg Educ. 2018 Nov;75(6):1589-1597. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 May 24.

    PubMed 29803772
  • Tewfik GL, Work AN, Shulman SM, Discepola P. Objective validation of YouTube educational videos for the instruction of regional anesthesia nerve blocks: a novel approach. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01084-w.

    PubMed 32646371
  • Barrington MJ, Viero LP, Kluger R, Clarke AL, Ivanusic JJ, Wong DM. Determining the Learning Curve for Acquiring Core Sonographic Skills for Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):667-670. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000487.

    PubMed 27685348
  • Udani AD, Harrison TK, Mariano ER, Derby R, Kan J, Ganaway T, Shum C, Gaba DM, Tanaka P, Kou A, Howard SK; ADAPT (Anesthesiology-Directed Advanced Procedural Training) Research Group. Comparative-Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Deliberate Practice Versus Self-Guided Practice on Resident Anesthesiologists' Acquisition of Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia Skills. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):151-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000361.

    PubMed 26866296

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Self exploring of available online material on supraclavicular brachial plexus block and Conventional in-person teaching on supraclavicular brachial plexus block in people with Education, run by University of Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sonographic Proficiency Assessment Score for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block (time frame: Two weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05290974, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in