Critically IllNCT05298982
The TEAM Long-Term Cohort Study (A Sub-study of TEAM(III))
An observational study of Critically Ill and Mechanical Ventilation, run by Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre at 16 sites in Australia.
Trial summary
This study is a prospective cohort study to evaluate the long-term effects of early activity and mobilisation compared to standard care on disability, function and health status for patients at 1, 2 and 5 years after recruitment of patients randomised into the TEAM Phase III RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03133377). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Critically Ill, Mechanical Ventilation, Long Term Outcome
- What is being tested?
- Early activity and Mobilisation Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesAustralia
- Study dates
- 11 Feb 2020to Nov 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Up to 380 critically ill adult Australian patients, who met all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, as defined in the TEAM Phase III RCT and consent to follow-up.
Who may be able to join
- Enrolled in the TEAM Phase III RCT Protocol.
Who cannot join
- There are no exclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
16 sites in 1 country
Australia16 sites
Sunshine Coast University Hospital
Birtinya, Queensland
Mater Health
Brisbane, Queensland
Mater Private Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland
Caboolture Hospital
Caboolture, Queensland
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Geelong Hospital - Barwon Health
Geelong, Victoria, 3220
Launceston General Hospital
Launceston, Tasmania
Cabrini Hospital
Malvern, Victoria, 3144
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Alfred Hospital
Prahran, Victoria, 3004
Redcliffe Hospital
Redcliffe, Queensland, 4020
Sunshine Hospital
St Albans, Victoria, 3021
John Hunter Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales
Royal North Shore Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales
Toowoomba Hospital
Toowoomba, Queensland
Wollongong Hospital
Wollongong, New South Wales
About this study
Official title: Long-term Evaluation of Disability and Quality of Life at 1,2 and 5 Years in Invasively Mechanically Ventilated Patients Who Received Early Activity and Mobilisation Compared to Standard Care.
This study is a prospective cohort study to evaluate the long-term effects of early activity and mobilisation compared to standard care on disability, function and health status for patients at 1, 2 and 5 years after recruitment of patients randomised into the TEAM Phase III RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03133377). The primary outcome of the study will be the level of disability as measured by the World Health Organisation's Disability Schedule 2.0, 12 level (WHODAS) at 2 years after recruitment.
Read the detailed description
Incomplete recovery following critical illness is a major public health problem in Australia.
Each year around 150,000 Australians are admitted to intensive care (ICU). These critically ill patients require substantial resources and invasive, expensive interventions. Approximately 10% die and many of the remaining patients who survive have delayed and compromised functional recovery. As many as 25% of the ICU survivors who were living at home prior to ICU are unable to return home due to impaired physical function. Globally, the quality of survival following an ICU admission has been identified as one of the largest health challenges for these patients. This study will address the quality of survival and long-term functional recovery for patients who require life support in ICU. These patients account for 62% of the total bed-days in Australian ICUs, with direct care costs of $2 billion per year. The long-term outcomes for these patients are very poor. In my Australian cohort study, 50% of patients who survived hospital had disability
- Conditions
- Critically Ill, Mechanical Ventilation, Long Term Outcome
- Being tested
- Early activity and Mobilisation Intervention
- Keywords
- Early activity and mobilization, rehabilitation, intensive care, health status
- Medical subject headings
- Critical Illness, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Early activity and Mobilisation InterventionBehavioural
The early activity and mobilisation intervention is comprised of exercises based on a reproducible, physiological approach using both strength and functional activities
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm: TEAM protocol | Based on TEAM (III) protocol patients will be assessed daily by an ICU physiotherapist using the ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) to determine the dosage and type of active exercises the patient will receive, using the early activity and mobilisation protocol. This protocol is hierarchical, with the objective of each intervention session beginning with the highest level of activity possible for the longest time possible, which then steps down to lower levels of activity if the patient fatigues. The intervention will be administered on all days in which the patient is admitted to ICU during the index hospitalisation, censored at 28days after. Receives: Behavioral: Early activity and Mobilisation Intervention | |
| Standard of Care arm: TEAM protocol | Based on TEAM (III) protocol the control group will receive standard care from physiotherapy staff not involved in delivering the intervention. We have previously established that standard care in Australia for a patient receiving prolonged IMV (control group intervention) frequently involves no active exercise out of bed. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Level of disability measured with the World Health Organisation's Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0
level of disability as measured by the World Health Organisation's Disability Schedule 2.0, 2 level (WHODAS) at 2 years after recruitment.
Measured: Assessed 2 years after recruitment
Secondary outcomes (21)
Time from randomisation until death
Measured: From date of randomisation until date of death from all cause, censored at 5 years
All-cause mortality
Measured: From date of randomisation to 1 year
All-cause mortality
Measured: From date of randomisation to 2 years
All-cause mortality
Measured: From date of randomisation to 5 years
Generic function and disability measured using World Health Organisation's Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)
Measured: Assessed 1 year after recruitment
Generic function and disability measured using World Health Organisation's Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)
Measured: Assessed 5 years after recruitment
Quality of life and health status measured using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ5D-5L)
Measured: Assessed 1 year after recruitment
Quality of life and health status measured using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ5D-5L)
Measured: Assessed 2 years after recruitment
Quality of life and health status measured using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ5D-5L)
Measured: Assessed 5 years after recruitment
Independent activities of daily living measured with The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Measured: Assessed 1 year after recruitment
Independent activities of daily living measured with The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Measured: Assessed 2 years after recruitment
Independent activities of daily living measured with The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Measured: Assessed 5 years after recruitment
Cognitive function measured using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA-Blind)
Measured: Assessed 1 year after recruitment
Cognitive function measured using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA-Blind)
Measured: Assessed 2 years after recruitment
Cognitive function measured using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA-Blind)
Measured: Assessed 5 years after recruitment
Psychological function measured using Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Measured: Assessed 1 year after recruitment
Psychological function measured using Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Measured: Assessed 2 years after recruitment
Psychological function measured using Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Measured: Assessed 5 years after recruitment
Psychological function measured using Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R)
Measured: Assessed 1 year after recruitment
Psychological function measured using Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R)
Measured: Assessed 2 years after recruitment
Psychological function measured using Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R)
Measured: Assessed 5 years after recruitment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Mar 2022
- Study start11 Feb 2020
- Primary completionNov 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Critically IllStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia, ANZICS Clinical Trials Group
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Prof Carol Hodgson, Study chair, ANZIC-RC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05298982
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- U1111-1195-3567-A9
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 18 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 28 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1308-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2637.
PubMed 24638143Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matte A, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, Cooper A, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Kudlow P, Cook D, Slutsky AS, Cheung AM; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1293-304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011802.
PubMed 21470008TEAM Study Investigators; Hodgson C, Bellomo R, Berney S, Bailey M, Buhr H, Denehy L, Harrold M, Higgins A, Presneill J, Saxena M, Skinner E, Young P, Webb S. Early mobilization and recovery in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU: a bi-national, multi-centre, prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2015 Feb 26;19(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0765-4.
PubMed 25715872Iwashyna TJ. Survivorship will be the defining challenge of critical care in the 21st century. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Aug 3;153(3):204-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00013. No abstract available.
PubMed 20679565Iwashyna TJ, Netzer G. The burdens of survivorship: an approach to thinking about long-term outcomes after critical illness. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;33(4):327-38. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1321982. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
PubMed 22875378Higgins AM, Pettila V, Harris AH, Bailey M, Lipman J, Seppelt IM, Webb SA. The critical care costs of the influenza A/H1N1 2009 pandemic in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 May;39(3):384-91. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900308.
PubMed 21675057
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Long-term Evaluation of Disability and Quality of Life at 1,2 and 5 Years in Invasively Mechanically Ventilated Patients Who Received Early Activity and Mobilisation Compared to Standard Care.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05298982
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- U1111-1195-3567-A9
- Conditions
- Critically Ill, Mechanical Ventilation, Long Term Outcome
- Keywords
- Early activity and mobilization, rehabilitation, intensive care, health status
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research CentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia, ANZICS Clinical Trials Group
- Study start
- 11 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a prospective cohort study to evaluate the long-term effects of early activity and mobilisation compared to standard care on disability, function and health status for patients at 1, 2 and 5 years after recruitment of patients randomised into the TEAM Phase III RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03133377). The primary outcome of the study will be the level of disability as measured by the World Health Organisation's Disability Schedule 2.0, 12 level (WHODAS) at 2 years after recruitment.
Detailed description
Incomplete recovery following critical illness is a major public health problem in Australia.
Each year around 150,000 Australians are admitted to intensive care (ICU). These critically ill patients require substantial resources and invasive, expensive interventions. Approximately 10% die and many of the remaining patients who survive have delayed and compromised functional recovery. As many as 25% of the ICU survivors who were living at home prior to ICU are unable to return home due to impaired physical function. Globally, the quality of survival following an ICU admission has been identified as one of the largest health challenges for these patients. This study will address the quality of survival and long-term functional recovery for patients who require life support in ICU. These patients account for 62% of the total bed-days in Australian ICUs, with direct care costs of $2 billion per year. The long-term outcomes for these patients are very poor. In my Australian cohort study, 50% of patients who survived hospital had disability
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm: TEAM protocol | – | Behavioral: Early activity and Mobilisation InterventionBased on TEAM (III) protocol patients will be assessed daily by an ICU physiotherapist using the ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) to determine the dosage and type of active exercises the patient will receive, using the early activity and mobilisation protocol. This protocol is hierarchical, with the objective of each intervention session beginning with the highest level of activity possible for the longest time possible, which then steps down to lower levels of activity if the patient fatigues. The intervention will be administered on all days in which the patient is admitted to ICU during the index hospitalisation, censored at 28days after. |
| Standard of Care arm: TEAM protocol | – | –Based on TEAM (III) protocol the control group will receive standard care from physiotherapy staff not involved in delivering the intervention. We have previously established that standard care in Australia for a patient receiving prolonged IMV (control group intervention) frequently involves no active exercise out of bed. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Up to 380 critically ill adult Australian patients, who met all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, as defined in the TEAM Phase III RCT and consent to follow-up.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Enrolled in the TEAM Phase III RCT Protocol.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- There are no exclusion criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Early activity and Mobilisation InterventionThe early activity and mobilisation intervention is comprised of exercises based on a reproducible, physiological approach using both strength and functional activities | Behavioural | Intervention arm: TEAM protocol |
Primary outcome
Level of disability measured with the World Health Organisation's Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0
Time frame: Assessed 2 years after recruitment
level of disability as measured by the World Health Organisation's Disability Schedule 2.0, 2 level (WHODAS) at 2 years after recruitment.
21 secondary outcomes
Time from randomisation until death
Time frame: From date of randomisation until date of death from all cause, censored at 5 years
All-cause mortality
Time frame: From date of randomisation to 1 year
All-cause mortality
Time frame: From date of randomisation to 2 years
All-cause mortality
Time frame: From date of randomisation to 5 years
Generic function and disability measured using World Health Organisation's Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)
Time frame: Assessed 1 year after recruitment
Generic function and disability measured using World Health Organisation's Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)
Time frame: Assessed 5 years after recruitment
Quality of life and health status measured using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ5D-5L)
Time frame: Assessed 1 year after recruitment
Quality of life and health status measured using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ5D-5L)
Time frame: Assessed 2 years after recruitment
Quality of life and health status measured using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ5D-5L)
Time frame: Assessed 5 years after recruitment
Independent activities of daily living measured with The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Time frame: Assessed 1 year after recruitment
Independent activities of daily living measured with The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Time frame: Assessed 2 years after recruitment
Independent activities of daily living measured with The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Time frame: Assessed 5 years after recruitment
Cognitive function measured using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA-Blind)
Time frame: Assessed 1 year after recruitment
Cognitive function measured using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA-Blind)
Time frame: Assessed 2 years after recruitment
Cognitive function measured using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA-Blind)
Time frame: Assessed 5 years after recruitment
Psychological function measured using Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Time frame: Assessed 1 year after recruitment
Psychological function measured using Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Time frame: Assessed 2 years after recruitment
Psychological function measured using Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Time frame: Assessed 5 years after recruitment
Psychological function measured using Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R)
Time frame: Assessed 1 year after recruitment
Psychological function measured using Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R)
Time frame: Assessed 2 years after recruitment
Psychological function measured using Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R)
Time frame: Assessed 5 years after recruitment
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Mar 2022.
- Background: PubMed 24638143Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1308-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2637.
- Background: PubMed 21470008Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matte A, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, Cooper A, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Kudlow P, Cook D, Slutsky AS, Cheung AM; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1293-304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011802.
- Background: PubMed 25715872TEAM Study Investigators; Hodgson C, Bellomo R, Berney S, Bailey M, Buhr H, Denehy L, Harrold M, Higgins A, Presneill J, Saxena M, Skinner E, Young P, Webb S. Early mobilization and recovery in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU: a bi-national, multi-centre, prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2015 Feb 26;19(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0765-4.
- Background: PubMed 20679565Iwashyna TJ. Survivorship will be the defining challenge of critical care in the 21st century. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Aug 3;153(3):204-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00013. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22875378Iwashyna TJ, Netzer G. The burdens of survivorship: an approach to thinking about long-term outcomes after critical illness. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;33(4):327-38. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1321982. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
- Background: PubMed 21675057Higgins AM, Pettila V, Harris AH, Bailey M, Lipman J, Seppelt IM, Webb SA. The critical care costs of the influenza A/H1N1 2009 pandemic in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 May;39(3):384-91. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900308.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Critically Ill
Recruiting
Cycling Within an Interactive and Immersive Virtual Environment During Critical Illness: a Patient-centred Approach for Lower Limb Rehabilitation
Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Dynamic Inflammatory Changes and Nutritional Risk Scores in ICU Patients Aged 65 Years and Older
Critical Illness, Geriatric Patient
Recruiting
Individualised Blood Pressure Targets Versus Standard Care Among Critically Ill Patients With Shock
Critical Illness, Shock
Recruiting
Characterization and Longitudinal Monitoring of Muscular Phenotype in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care for Sepsis
Sepsis, Myopathy Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio and Glucose Variability in Critically Ill Patients
Critical Illness, Hyperglycemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Prof Carol Hodgson study chair
ANZIC-RC
16 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Critically Ill and Mechanical Ventilation, run by Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre at 16 sites in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Level of disability measured with the World Health Organisation's Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 (time frame: Assessed 2 years after recruitment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05298982, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2022.