AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back PainNCT05310214

Effect of Acupuncture and Laser Acupuncture in the Treatment of People With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain.

A study testing Acupuncture and Laser acupuncture in people with Low Back Pain, run by University of Nove de Julho.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this randomized clinical trial will be to compare the efficacy between acupuncture and laser acupuncture on pain and disability in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Low Back Pain
What is being tested?
Acupuncture and Laser acupuncture
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Apr 2022to 30 Sep 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-65 years;
  • Non-specific LBP for at least three months
  • Pain intensity of at least 2 points measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy;
  • Any contraindication to ACP or having undergone treatment in the previous six months
  • Having undergone spinal surgery in the previous six months;
  • Serious spinal pathology (e.g. metastasis, spinal fracture, inflammatory, and infective diseases, caudal equine syndrome, canal stenosis, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis and lumbar radiculopathy);
  • Currently in an acute inflammatory phase of known gastrointestinal or urinary diseases (such as cholecysticis, renal calculi, peritonitis, appendicitis);

About this study

Official title: Effect of Acupuncture and Laser Acupuncture on Pain and Functional Capacity in People With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: a Randomised Controlled, Blinded Clinical Trial

The aim of this randomized clinical trial will be to compare the efficacy between acupuncture and laser acupuncture on pain and disability in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain .

Read the detailed description

Forty-four patients with chronic cnLBP of more than three months duration will be randomly allocated to two groups: acupuncture group (ACP) (n = 22) and laser acupuncture group (LACP) (n = 22).Interventions will last one hour, and will happen twice a week for 5 weeks. The primary clinical outcomes will be pain intensity (11-point numeric pain rating scale) as measured and functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index).The secondary outcomes will be the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Patient-Specific Functional Scale and fingertip-to-floor test. Evaluations will be performed before and after the first session, after 5 weeks of treatment, and three months after randomization (follow-up). The findings will be analyzed statistically considering a 5% significance level (p ≤ 0.05).

Conditions
Low Back Pain
Being tested
Acupuncture, Laser acupuncture
Keywords
Acupuncture, laser therapy, low back pain, acupuncture points
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AcupunctureOther

    Treatment with ACP will be performed by inserting sterile acupuncture needles 0.25 x 13 mm into the acupoints BL23 (Shenshu), BL25 (Dachangshu), BL40 (Weizhong), BL62 (Qixue), SI3 (Houxi) and Jiaji , for the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain. Interventions will last one hour, and will happen twice a week for 5 weeks.

    In order to increase the effectiveness of blinding for both groups, in this study the model was adopted: "combined simulated control". In this case, Sham acupuncture points will be used to simulate the treatment, as follows: i) Arms: 3 cm above the lateral epicondyle of the elbow, ii) Lumbar spine: Iliac crest on the same line as the greater trochanter of the femur. Thus, in the ACP group, the placebo LACP (without dosemetry) will be applied to these 4 points together with the real treatment.

  • Laser acupunctureOther

    The use of LACP (808 nm wavelength, 100 mW, energy 6 J per acp point), on acupoints BL23 (Shenshu), BL25 (Dachangshu), BL40 (Weizhong), BL62 (Qixue), SI3 (Houxi) and Jiaji will be used as a treatment for nonspecific chronic low back pain. Interventions will last one hour, and will happen twice a week for 5 weeks.

    Sham acupuncture points will be used to simulate the treatment, as follows: i) Arms: 3 cm above the lateral epicondyle of the elbow, ii) Lumbar spine: Iliac crest on the same line as the greater trochanter of the femur. These sham points will be inserted superficially so that the depth is sufficient to keep them fixed during the experiment, without individuals reporting the "dequi".

Study groups in NCT05310214
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Acupuncture treatment (ACP)ExperimentalThe experimental group will be treated with acupuncture
Receives: Other: Acupuncture
Laser acupuncture treatment (LACP)Active comparatorThe active comparator group will be treated with laser acupuncture
Receives: Other: Laser acupuncture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain intensity

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale will be used to determine the level of pain intensity perceived by the patient using an 11-point scale on which 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 represents the worst pain imaginable.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Functional disability

    The Oswestry Disability Index will be used to determine the functional disability of participants. Questionnaire examines perceived level of disability in 10 everyday activities of daily living. The 6 statements are scored from 0 to 5 with the first statement scoring 0 through to the last at 5. Interpretation of Scores

    1. 0% to 20% - minimal disability
    2. 21%-40% - moderate disability
    3. 41%-60%- severe disability
    4. 61%-80%- crippled
    5. 81%-100%: These patients are either bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Pain Catastrophizing

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale will be used to assess catastrophic thinking related to pain. 13 items rated on 5-point Likert scales, from (0) not at all to (4) all the time. Higher score indicates higher level of catastrophizing

    Item scores are summed into a total score (PCS-T) and three subscale scores:

    • Rumination: Items 8, 9, 10, and 11 (response: 0-16 points)
    • Magnification: Items 6, 7, 13 (response: 0-12 points)
    • Helplessness: Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 12 (response: 0-24points) A total score above 30 indicates clinically relevant level of catastrophizing

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Functional independence.

    The Patient-Specific Functional Scale will be used to assess the participant's levels of functional independence. Patients are asked to rate (on an 11-point scale) the current level of difficulty associated with each activity. Following the intervention, patients are asked again to rate the activities previously identified (and are given the chance to nominate new problematic activities that might have arisen during that time).

    "0" represents "unable to perform" and "10" represents "able to perform at prior level"

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Mobility of spine and pelvis

    The fingertip-to-floor test will be used to evaluate the mobility of both the whole spine and the pelvis in the overall motion of bending forward.

    If the fingertip-to-floor test is "0"cm or the patient is able to place their palms to the floor with no pain, a different outcome measure should be considered.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Apr 2022
  2. Study start1 Apr 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion10 Jun 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
randomised clinical trial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
44 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05310214
Sponsor's protocol ID
GA-2022
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
14 Mar 2022
Last updated
4 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Acupuncture and Laser acupuncture in people with Low Back Pain, run by University of Nove de Julho.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain intensity (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in