BreastfeedingNCT05311631
Breastfeeding - a Good Start Together
A study testing Breastfeeding support in people with Breastfeeding and Breastfeeding, Exclusive, run by University of Copenhagen at 21 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
The Breastfeeding - a Good Start Together intervention study aims to increase the proportion of women who breastfeed for four and six months, and proportionately more in a group of women who are in risk of early breastfeeding cessation; and thus reduce social inequality of mother and infant health. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breastfeeding, Breastfeeding, Exclusive
- What is being tested?
- Breastfeeding support
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5,010 participants
- Where
- 21 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- 26 Apr 2022to 30 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 1a. Families discharged <72 hours post partum (from 26 April 2022 - 17 January 2023)
- 1b. Families discharged < 7 days post partum (from 18 January 2023 onwards due to lower than expected recruitment rate)
- 2. Families with intention of breastfeeding
Who cannot join
- Insufficient skills in Danish or English language to be able to answer questionnaires and understand interventions conveyed in Danish or English
- Families with mothers with known substance abuse or addiction
- Families expecting more than one child
- Families having delivered preterm, prior to 37 weeks of gestation
- Families with mothers or child having difficulty breastfeeding due to a known morbidity or disablement
Trial locations and contacts
21 sites in 1 country.
21 sites in 1 country
Denmark21 sites
Aabenraa Kommune
Aabenraa, 6200
Jammerbugt Kommune
Aabybro, 9440
Vesthimmerland Kommune
Aars, 9600
Assens Kommune
Assens, 5610
Billund Kommune
Billund, 7190
Esbjerg Kommune
Esbjerg, 6700
Fredericia Kommune
Fredericia, 7000
Frederikshavn Kommune
Frederikshavn, 9900
Haderslev Kommune
Haderslev, 6100
Mariagerfjord Kommune
Hobro, 9500
Kolding Kommune
Kolding, 6000
Middelfart Kommune
Middelfart, 5500
Morsø Kommune
Nykøbing Mors, 7900
Odense Kommune
Odense, 5000
Faaborg-Midtfyn Kommune
Ringe, 5750
Sønderborg Kommune
Sønderborg, 6400
Svendborg Kommune
Svendborg, 5700
Thisted Kommune
Thisted, 7700
Tønder Kommune
Tønder, 6270
Varde Kommune
Varde, 6800
Vejen Kommune
Vejen Municipality, 6600
About this study
The Breastfeeding - a Good Start Together intervention study aims to increase the proportion of women who breastfeed for four and six months, and proportionately more in a group of women who are in risk of early breastfeeding cessation; and thus reduce social inequality of mother and infant health.
Read the detailed description
Breastfeeding has numerous health benefits for both mothers and children, and the World Health Organization recommends exclusive breastfeeding for six months. Still, only 12 % of mothers in Denmark breastfeed exclusively at six months postpartum and breastfeeding is subject to significant social inequality. Mothers of young age (below 25 years) and with low educational attainment (not exceeding primary school or vocational) breastfeed for a shorter duration of time than their counterparts. Thus, this group is in high risk of early breastfeeding cessation and is hereafter termed 'the high-risk group'.
The Breastfeeding - a Good Start Together intervention consists of theory based breastfeeding support, supported by printed materials and a web-page providing support and knowledge for families when health visitors are off work, and an intensified intervention aimed at the high-risk group, comprising close follow-up by telephone and an extra home visit. In total, the high-risk group will receive seven telephone calls during week two post partum and 15 weeks post partum, with the highest intensity in the first month (contact once a week), gradually decreasing as the child grows older (contact every second week during the second month, and every third week during the third and fourth month).
Hypothesis: Improving the relationship between health visitors and new families, drawing on tailoring of the communication, which ensures that breastfeeding support matches the needs of the family, will enhance trust and therefore the likelihood of families reaching out to the health nurse when breastfeeding problems occur and thus improving chances of successful breastfeeding in a longer duration of time. Moreover, the theory based breastfeeding support will make the support more easily attainable for families, independent of their sociodemographic background. Improving chances of a successful breastfeeding will improve mother and infant health, the latter especially with regards to lower infant morbidity related to nutrition.
The intervention is a complex intervention, designed as a cluster-randomized trial. Twenty-one municipalities situated in the North Denmark Region and Region of Southern Denmark participate in the study, and according to the number of births among inhabitants these have been randomized to either intervention or control group; 11 intervention municipalities and 10 control municipalities. Basing the randomization on number of births proved to successfully account for other factors, such as rural or urban areas and proportion of high-risk individuals.
The intervention will be implemented from March 2022-December 2023, with data collection commencing April 2022. Health visitors in the intervention municipalities will receive training before delivering the new breastfeeding counselling to the families. The training is expected to reach 225 health visitors in the intervention municipalities and 6000 families of whom 30-40% are in the high-risk group. After the trial period, health visitors in the control municipalities will receive the same training.
The primary outcome measures of the intervention is breastfeeding duration and proxies for infant morbidity related to nutrition. Secondary outcomes are the families' perception of their relationship with the health visitor and parents' action competence and self-efficacy related to breastfeeding.
The primary and secondary outcome measures, are studied in a survey study using electronic questionnaires distributed to mothers recruited through the health-visiting programme at three time-points, and to fathers/partners at one time-point. Further, the effectiveness of the intervention will be analysed using register-data. A difference-in-difference design is applied to measure changes in primary outcomes from before to after the intervention period in both intervention sites and control sites.
The overall target group of the intervention study is all new families accepting the health visiting program with a specific high-risk group of families with mothers of young age or who have low educational attainment. Outcomes of the trial will be analysed for the total population and for the sub-group.
For sample size calculation an estimation of 8 clusters in the intervention arm and 8 clusters in the control arm were used, as this calculation was made prior to successfully recruiting a total of 21 clusters to the trial. The investigators expect a participation of 80% with an attrition of 30%. The ambition is to improve the breastfeeding duration in the intervention clusters to the national level, corresponding to an OR 1.32. With an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.001, a strength of 80% and a 5% significance level can be reached if data are collected from 111 mothers in each cluster, including 52 mothers from the high-risk group in each cluster.
All effectiveness analyses will be using an intention-to-treat approach and will account for the clustering of individuals and potential confounding in a controlled mixed effect regression.
The implementation of the intervention will be analysed in a process evaluation using qualitative and quantitative data. A realist evaluation using qualitative data will explore the mechanisms of change in the intervention, and will highlight what works for whom, under what circumstances.
Further, a health economic evaluation will be performed as a cost-effectiveness analysis where health benefits are measured as changes in the proportion of women breastfeeding at four months post partum, and as a cost-utility analysis where health benefits are measured as gained Quality Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs). Moreover, an analysis of the costs of the intervention related to the costs (and possible savings) in the health system surrounding the intervention sites.
- Conditions
- Breastfeeding, Breastfeeding, Exclusive
- Being tested
- Breastfeeding support
- Keywords
- Social inequality, Breastfeeding self-efficacy, Breastfeeding support, Complex interventions, Public health
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Feeding
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Breastfeeding supportBehavioural
The core of the intervention is a trustful relation between the health visitor and the families based on principles of needs based communication. Health visitors will enhance parents' action competence based on breastfeeding self-efficacy, focusing on parents' wishes and needs.
The breastfeeding support includes four main messages: joint parenting task, skin-to-skin contact, frequent breastfeeding, and good positioning.
Training of health visitors includes e-learning and a two-day course with physical attendance. Supportive materials are developed including communicative support tools and a web-page providing support and knowledge when the health visitor is off hours.
All families in intervention sites accepting the health visitor program will receive the improved breastfeeding support. Families in the high-risk group are offered an intensified intervention with close follow-up by telephone in planned time-intervals, thus a higher dose of the intervention.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Improved breastfeeding support provided by health visitors supporting families after discharge from maternity ward at hospital. The intervention is implemented into the existing national health visitor program that is offered free of charge to all. The program is accepted by more than 95% of families. Receives: Behavioral: Breastfeeding support |
| Control | No intervention | Health visitors in the control municipalities will give breastfeeding support according to standard care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maternal self-report of breastfeeding status (full vs not full)
Self-reported breastfeeding measured in questionnaires by the mothers and health visitors' record of breastfeeding status. Full breastfeeding is conceptualized as exclusive breastmilk-feeding after discharge from the hospital. In Denmark, the concept allows for a supplement to mother's milk of water and the like and / or a maximum of one meal with infant formula per week.
Measured: Four months post partum
Secondary outcomes (9)
Maternal self-report of breastfeeding status (full vs not full)
Self-reported breastfeeding measured in questionnaires by the mother. In Denmark, full breastfeeding allows for a supplement to mother's milk of water and the like and / or a maximum of one meal with infant formula per week
Measured: Six months post partum
Infant thriving - jaundice
Change in readmissions of children dur to jaundice is used as an indicator of infant morbidity related to nutritional problems. Measured by self-report in questionnaires and obtained from Danish registers of hospital admissions.
Measured: From birth to one months post partum
Infant thriving - weight loss
Change in readmissions of children due to weight loss is used as an indicator of infant morbidity related to nutritional problems. Measured by self-report in questionnaires and obtained from Danish registers of hospital admissions.
Measured: From birth to one months post partum
Infant thriving - dehydration
Change in readmissions of children due dehydration is used as an indicator of infant morbidity related to nutritional problems. Measured by self-report in questionnaires and obtained from Danish registers of hospital admissions.
Measured: From birth to one months post partum
Breastfeeding problems
Change in frequency of pain during breastfeeding, sores or cracks on nipples, problems with latching on, the experience of having too little milk, the experience of having too much milk, the experience that the infant wants to feed very frequently, the experience of long duration of each breastfeeding, problems with low infant weight gain, breast tension, mastitis. This will be assessed through maternal self report in questionnaires.
Measured: One week and one month post partum
Trust in visiting nurse
Maternal self reported feeling of being seen, respected and heard
Measured: One month and four months
Breastfeeding self-efficacy
Maternal and paternal self report in survey
Measured: One month
Duration of full breastfeeding (weeks)
Self-reported full breastfeeding measured in questionnaires by the mothers.
Measured: From birth to six months postpartum
Any breastfeeding
Self-reported breastfeeding status measured in questionnaires by the mothers. Any breastfeeding includes a mothers report of some to full breastfeeding.
Measured: From birth to 12 months postpartum
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Apr 2022
- Study start26 Apr 2022
- Primary completion6 Nov 2023
- Study completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for BreastfeedingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Clusters (municipalities) are randomized to either intervention or control (standard care). Intervention coverage 6000 infants and their families in intervention municipalities. Primary trial outcome is assessed using survey data where 3339 families from the intervention and control arm will be enrolled according to the power calculation.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5,010 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Copenhagen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Danish Committee for Health Education, 21 municipalities in Denmark, Nordea-fonden, Det Obelske Familiefond
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sarah Fredsted Villadsen, University of Copenhagen
- Investigators
- Ingrid SM Nilsson, PhD, Principal investigator, The Danish Committee of Health Education
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05311631
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Breastfeeding
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gadeberg AK, Nilsson IMS, Christensen U, Harris K, Rossau HK, Villadsen SF. Addressing social inequity in breastfeeding through proactive support: a realist evaluation from Denmark. BMC Public Health. 2026 Mar 19;26(1):1388. doi: 10.1186/s12889-026-26981-6.
PubMed 41857528Jacobsen MH, Gadeberg AK, Rossau HK, Nilsson IMS, Villadsen SF. Understanding fathers' responses to breastfeeding as a "shared parental task": a realist evaluation of a Danish breastfeeding support intervention. Arch Public Health. 2025 Nov 27;83(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01790-2.
PubMed 41299756Rossau HK, Gadeberg AK, Strandberg-Larsen K, Nilsson IMS, Villadsen SF. Process evaluation of a breastfeeding support intervention to promote exclusive breastfeeding and reduce social inequity: a mixed-methods study in a cluster-randomised trial. Int J Equity Health. 2024 Oct 8;23(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02295-0.
PubMed 39380053Nilsson I, Busck-Rasmussen M, Villadsen SF. Development of a complex intervention to strengthen municipality-based breastfeeding support to reduced social inequity in breastfeeding. Arch Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;82(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01401-6.
PubMed 39358759Rossau HK, Nilsson IMS, Gadeberg AK, Forman JL, Strandberg-Larsen K, Nielsen J, Villadsen SF. Strengthening health visitors' breastfeeding support: Results from a cluster randomised study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Jul;78:104033. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104033. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
PubMed 38905959Rossau HK, Nilsson IMS, Busck-Rasmussen M, Ekstrom CT, Gadeberg AK, Hirani JC, Strandberg-Larsen K, Villadsen SF. Effectiveness of a community-based support programme to reduce social inequality in exclusive breastfeeding: study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial. BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15256-z.
PubMed 36890478
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Breastfeeding - a Good Start Together
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05311631
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Breastfeeding
- Conditions
- Breastfeeding, Breastfeeding, Exclusive
- Keywords
- Social inequality, Breastfeeding self-efficacy, Breastfeeding support, Complex interventions, Public health
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 5,010 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CopenhagenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Danish Committee for Health Education, 21 municipalities in Denmark, Nordea-fonden, Det Obelske Familiefond
- Study start
- 26 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Breastfeeding - a Good Start Together intervention study aims to increase the proportion of women who breastfeed for four and six months, and proportionately more in a group of women who are in risk of early breastfeeding cessation; and thus reduce social inequality of mother and infant health.
Detailed description
Breastfeeding has numerous health benefits for both mothers and children, and the World Health Organization recommends exclusive breastfeeding for six months. Still, only 12 % of mothers in Denmark breastfeed exclusively at six months postpartum and breastfeeding is subject to significant social inequality. Mothers of young age (below 25 years) and with low educational attainment (not exceeding primary school or vocational) breastfeed for a shorter duration of time than their counterparts. Thus, this group is in high risk of early breastfeeding cessation and is hereafter termed 'the high-risk group'.
The Breastfeeding - a Good Start Together intervention consists of theory based breastfeeding support, supported by printed materials and a web-page providing support and knowledge for families when health visitors are off work, and an intensified intervention aimed at the high-risk group, comprising close follow-up by telephone and an extra home visit. In total, the high-risk group will receive seven telephone calls during week two post partum and 15 weeks post partum, with the highest intensity in the first month (contact once a week), gradually decreasing as the child grows older (contact every second week during the second month, and every third week during the third and fourth month).
Hypothesis: Improving the relationship between health visitors and new families, drawing on tailoring of the communication, which ensures that breastfeeding support matches the needs of the family, will enhance trust and therefore the likelihood of families reaching out to the health nurse when breastfeeding problems occur and thus improving chances of successful breastfeeding in a longer duration of time. Moreover, the theory based breastfeeding support will make the support more easily attainable for families, independent of their sociodemographic background. Improving chances of a successful breastfeeding will improve mother and infant health, the latter especially with regards to lower infant morbidity related to nutrition.
The intervention is a complex intervention, designed as a cluster-randomized trial. Twenty-one municipalities situated in the North Denmark Region and Region of Southern Denmark participate in the study, and according to the number of births among inhabitants these have been randomized to either intervention or control group; 11 intervention municipalities and 10 control municipalities. Basing the randomization on number of births proved to successfully account for other factors, such as rural or urban areas and proportion of high-risk individuals.
The intervention will be implemented from March 2022-December 2023, with data collection commencing April 2022. Health visitors in the intervention municipalities will receive training before delivering the new breastfeeding counselling to the families. The training is expected to reach 225 health visitors in the intervention municipalities and 6000 families of whom 30-40% are in the high-risk group. After the trial period, health visitors in the control municipalities will receive the same training.
The primary outcome measures of the intervention is breastfeeding duration and proxies for infant morbidity related to nutrition. Secondary outcomes are the families' perception of their relationship with the health visitor and parents' action competence and self-efficacy related to breastfeeding.
The primary and secondary outcome measures, are studied in a survey study using electronic questionnaires distributed to mothers recruited through the health-visiting programme at three time-points, and to fathers/partners at one time-point. Further, the effectiveness of the intervention will be analysed using register-data. A difference-in-difference design is applied to measure changes in primary outcomes from before to after the intervention period in both intervention sites and control sites.
The overall target group of the intervention study is all new families accepting the health visiting program with a specific high-risk group of families with mothers of young age or who have low educational attainment. Outcomes of the trial will be analysed for the total population and for the sub-group.
For sample size calculation an estimation of 8 clusters in the intervention arm and 8 clusters in the control arm were used, as this calculation was made prior to successfully recruiting a total of 21 clusters to the trial. The investigators expect a participation of 80% with an attrition of 30%. The ambition is to improve the breastfeeding duration in the intervention clusters to the national level, corresponding to an OR 1.32. With an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.001, a strength of 80% and a 5% significance level can be reached if data are collected from 111 mothers in each cluster, including 52 mothers from the high-risk group in each cluster.
All effectiveness analyses will be using an intention-to-treat approach and will account for the clustering of individuals and potential confounding in a controlled mixed effect regression.
The implementation of the intervention will be analysed in a process evaluation using qualitative and quantitative data. A realist evaluation using qualitative data will explore the mechanisms of change in the intervention, and will highlight what works for whom, under what circumstances.
Further, a health economic evaluation will be performed as a cost-effectiveness analysis where health benefits are measured as changes in the proportion of women breastfeeding at four months post partum, and as a cost-utility analysis where health benefits are measured as gained Quality Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs). Moreover, an analysis of the costs of the intervention related to the costs (and possible savings) in the health system surrounding the intervention sites.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Clusters (municipalities) are randomized to either intervention or control (standard care). Intervention coverage 6000 infants and their families in intervention municipalities. Primary trial outcome is assessed using survey data where 3339 families from the intervention and control arm will be enrolled according to the power calculation.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Breastfeeding supportImproved breastfeeding support provided by health visitors supporting families after discharge from maternity ward at hospital. The intervention is implemented into the existing national health visitor program that is offered free of charge to all. The program is accepted by more than 95% of families. |
| Control | No intervention | –Health visitors in the control municipalities will give breastfeeding support according to standard care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 1a. Families discharged <72 hours post partum (from 26 April 2022 - 17 January 2023)
- 1b. Families discharged < 7 days post partum (from 18 January 2023 onwards due to lower than expected recruitment rate)
- 2. Families with intention of breastfeeding
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Insufficient skills in Danish or English language to be able to answer questionnaires and understand interventions conveyed in Danish or English
- Families with mothers with known substance abuse or addiction
- Families expecting more than one child
- Families having delivered preterm, prior to 37 weeks of gestation
- Families with mothers or child having difficulty breastfeeding due to a known morbidity or disablement
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Breastfeeding supportThe core of the intervention is a trustful relation between the health visitor and the families based on principles of needs based communication. Health visitors will enhance parents' action competence based on breastfeeding self-efficacy, focusing on parents' wishes and needs. The breastfeeding support includes four main messages: joint parenting task, skin-to-skin contact, frequent breastfeeding, and good positioning. Training of health visitors includes e-learning and a two-day course with physical attendance. Supportive materials are developed including communicative support tools and a web-page providing support and knowledge when the health visitor is off hours. All families in intervention sites accepting the health visitor program will receive the improved breastfeeding support. Families in the high-risk group are offered an intensified intervention with close follow-up by telephone in planned time-intervals, thus a higher dose of the intervention. | Behavioural | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Maternal self-report of breastfeeding status (full vs not full)
Time frame: Four months post partum
Self-reported breastfeeding measured in questionnaires by the mothers and health visitors' record of breastfeeding status. Full breastfeeding is conceptualized as exclusive breastmilk-feeding after discharge from the hospital. In Denmark, the concept allows for a supplement to mother's milk of water and the like and / or a maximum of one meal with infant formula per week.
9 secondary outcomes
Maternal self-report of breastfeeding status (full vs not full)
Time frame: Six months post partum
Infant thriving - jaundice
Time frame: From birth to one months post partum
Infant thriving - weight loss
Time frame: From birth to one months post partum
Infant thriving - dehydration
Time frame: From birth to one months post partum
Breastfeeding problems
Time frame: One week and one month post partum
Trust in visiting nurse
Time frame: One month and four months
Breastfeeding self-efficacy
Time frame: One month
Duration of full breastfeeding (weeks)
Time frame: From birth to six months postpartum
Any breastfeeding
Time frame: From birth to 12 months postpartum
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41857528Gadeberg AK, Nilsson IMS, Christensen U, Harris K, Rossau HK, Villadsen SF. Addressing social inequity in breastfeeding through proactive support: a realist evaluation from Denmark. BMC Public Health. 2026 Mar 19;26(1):1388. doi: 10.1186/s12889-026-26981-6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41299756Jacobsen MH, Gadeberg AK, Rossau HK, Nilsson IMS, Villadsen SF. Understanding fathers' responses to breastfeeding as a "shared parental task": a realist evaluation of a Danish breastfeeding support intervention. Arch Public Health. 2025 Nov 27;83(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01790-2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39380053Rossau HK, Gadeberg AK, Strandberg-Larsen K, Nilsson IMS, Villadsen SF. Process evaluation of a breastfeeding support intervention to promote exclusive breastfeeding and reduce social inequity: a mixed-methods study in a cluster-randomised trial. Int J Equity Health. 2024 Oct 8;23(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02295-0.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39358759Nilsson I, Busck-Rasmussen M, Villadsen SF. Development of a complex intervention to strengthen municipality-based breastfeeding support to reduced social inequity in breastfeeding. Arch Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;82(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01401-6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38905959Rossau HK, Nilsson IMS, Gadeberg AK, Forman JL, Strandberg-Larsen K, Nielsen J, Villadsen SF. Strengthening health visitors' breastfeeding support: Results from a cluster randomised study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Jul;78:104033. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104033. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36890478Rossau HK, Nilsson IMS, Busck-Rasmussen M, Ekstrom CT, Gadeberg AK, Hirani JC, Strandberg-Larsen K, Villadsen SF. Effectiveness of a community-based support programme to reduce social inequality in exclusive breastfeeding: study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial. BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15256-z.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breastfeeding
Enrolling by invitation
The Effect of Breastfeeding Education Delivered Via a Hybrid Model on Breastfeeding Efficacy and Postpartum Comfort Levels
Breastfeeding, Postpartum Comfort
Not yet recruiting
THE EFFECT OF A VIRTUAL REALITY BREASTFEEDING EXPERIENCE ON BREASTFEEDING EXPECTATIONS AND AVOIDANCE
Breastfeeding Expectations, Breastfeeding Avoidance
RecruitingObservational study
A Global Prospective Observational Study of Women With Fabry Disease and Their Infants During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding
Fabry Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of a Breastfeeding Chatbot on Mothers' Breastfeeding Attitudes, Behaviors, and Self-Efficacy
Breastfeeding, Breastfeeding Attitudes
Recruiting
Effect of Solution-Focused Approach Education on Breastfeeding Avoidance and Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy in Primiparous Mothers
Breastfeeding Avoidance and Breastfeeding Self-efficacy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ingrid SM Nilsson, PhD principal investigator
The Danish Committee of Health Education
21 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Breastfeeding support in people with Breastfeeding and Breastfeeding, Exclusive, run by University of Copenhagen at 21 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 21 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maternal self-report of breastfeeding status (full vs not full) (time frame: Four months post partum). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05311631, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2026.