SedationPhase 3INSPiRE-ICU2NCT05327296
Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients (INSPiRE-ICU2)
A Phase 3 study testing Isoflurane and Propofol in people with Sedation, run by Sedana Medical at 16 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a study to compare safety and efficacy of inhaled isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD-S device system versus intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sedation
- What is being tested?
- Isoflurane and Propofol
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 282 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2022to 14 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults ≥18 years of age;
- Patients who are anticipated to require >12 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation and continuous sedation in the ICU; and
- Receipt of continuous sedation due to clinical need for sedation to RASS <0.
Who cannot join
- Need for RASS -5;
- Sedation for invasive mechanical ventilation immediately prior to Baseline for >72 hours;
- Severe neurological condition before ICU admission that causes the patient to lack ability to participate in the study (ie, unable to be assessed for RASS and CPOT);
- Ventilator tidal volume <200 or >1000 mL at Baseline;
- Need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R), high frequency oscillation ventilation (HFOV), or high frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) at Screening;
- Comfort care only (end of life care);
Show all 20Show fewer
- Contraindication to propofol or isoflurane;
- Known or family history of MH;
- Severe hemodynamic compromise, defined as the need for norepinephrine ≥0.3 mcg/kg/min (or equivalent vasopressor dose) to maintain blood pressure within acceptable range, assumed to be mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg unless prescribed clinically;
- Allergy to isoflurane or propofol, or have propofol infusion syndrome.
- History of ventricular tachycardia/Long QT Syndrome;
- Requirement of IV benzodiazepine or barbiturate administration for seizures or dependencies, including alcohol withdrawal
- Neuromuscular disease that impairs spontaneous ventilation (eg, C5 or higher spinal cord injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, etc);
- Concurrent enrollment in another study that, in the Investigator's opinion, would impact the patient's safety or assessments of this study;
- Participation in other study involving investigational drug(s) or devices(s) within 30 days prior to Randomization;
- Anticipated requirement of treatment with continuous infusion of a neuromuscular blocking agent for >4 hours;
- Female patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding;
- Imperative need for continuous active humidification through mechanical ventilation circuit;
- Attending physician's refusal to include the patient; or
- Inability to obtain informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 1 country.
16 sites in 1 country
United States16 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
The Cooper Health System
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
University of Miami
Coral Gables, Florida, 33146
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Memorial Hermann Health Services
Houston, Texas, 77030
Memorial Health Services
Long Beach, California, 90807
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095
The New York and Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10032
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Stanford University
Redwood City, California, 94063
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23284
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, 92023
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Assessor-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients (INSPiRE-ICU2)
This is a study to compare safety and efficacy of inhaled isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD-S device system versus intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting.
Read the detailed description
This is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, assessor-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled isoflurane delivered via the Sedaconda ACD-S compared to intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated Intensive Care Unit (ICU) adult patients.
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IsofluraneDrug
Inhaled isoflurane administered by Sedaconda ACD-S
PropofolDrug
Intravenous infusion of propofol
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Isoflurane | Experimental | Inhaled isoflurane administered via Sedaconda ACD-S Receives: Drug: Isoflurane |
| Propofol | Active comparator | Propofol administered as intravenous infusion Receives: Drug: Propofol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Time Sedation Depth is Maintained Within the Target Range, in Absence of Rescue Sedation, as Assessed According to the RASS Scale, in Isoflurane- vs Propofol-treated Patients
The Target Range is RASS -1 to -4.
The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) is used to measure the level of agitation or sedation in patients, particularly in critical care settings. It is a 10-point scale ranging from -5 to +4:
+4 Combative - Violent, immediate danger to staff. +3 Very agitated - Pulls or removes tubes or catheters; aggressive. +2 Agitated - Frequent non-purposeful movement, fights ventilator. +1 Restless - Anxious but movements are not aggressive. 0 Alert and calm. -1 Drowsy - Not fully alert, but has sustained awakening (eye-opening/eye contact) to voice for more than 10 seconds. -2 Light sedation - Briefly awakens with eye contact to voice for less than 10 seconds. -3 Moderate sedation - Movement or eye opening to voice, but no eye contact. -4 Deep sedation - No response to voice, but movement or eye opening to physical stimulation. -5 Unarousable - No response to voice or physical stimulation.
Measured: From start to end of study treatment (up to 48 (±6) hours)
Secondary outcomes (13)
Key Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Use of Opioids During the Study Treatment Period
To compare the effect of isoflurane vs propofol on use of opioids during the study treatment period by measuring change in mean fentanyl-equivalent opioid dose during the study treatment period compared to mean opioid dose during the 60 minutes prior to baseline.
Measured: From 60 minutes prior to Baseline until end of study treatment (60 minutes + up to 48 (±6) hours)
Key Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on the Wake up Time at End of Study Drug Treatment
Measured: Up to 4 hours after stop of study drug treatment (up to 54 (±6) hours)
Key Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Cognitive Recovery After End of Study Drug Treatment
Cognitive recovery will be assessed by the 7-point scale of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU-7) at 60 (±10) minutes after end of study drug treatment in patients not re-sedated with benzodiazepine or propofol infusions.
The scale ranges from 0 to 7, with higher scores indicating more severe delirium
Measured: At 60 minutes (±10 minutes) after end of study drug treatment (up to 49 (±6) hours)
Key Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Spontaneous Breathing Effort During the Study Drug Treatment Period
Proportion of ventilator parameter observations with spontaneous breathing efforts during the study drug treatment period
Measured: From start to end of study treatment, up to 48 (±6) hours
Other Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Time From Sedation Termination to Extubation in Patients for Whom Study Drug is Terminated for Extubation
Measured: From end of study drug treatment to extubation (up to 7 Days after randomization)
Other Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Days Alive and Free of Mechanical Ventilation Through Study Day 30
Measured: From start of study treatment up to 30 days
Other Secondary: To Compare the Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Days Alive and Free of the ICU
Measured: From start of study treatment up to 30 days
Other Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Delirium and Coma Free Days Until 7 Days After End of Study Treatment
Measured: From start of study treatment until 7 days after end of treatment (up to 9 days post study drug treatment initiation)
Other Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Mortality at 30 Days After Randomization
Participants reported represent participants that died between randomization and 30 days in the Safety population
Measured: At 30 days after randomization
Other Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Mortality at 3 Months After Randomization
Participants reported represent participants that died between randomization and 3 months in the Safety population
Measured: At 3 months after randomization
Other Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Mortality at 6 Months After Randomization
Participants reported represent participants that died between randomization and 6 months in the Safety population
Measured: At 6 months after randomization
Other Secondary: Sedaconda ACD-S Device Deficiencies in Patients Receiving Isoflurane
Measured: From start to end of study treatment (up to 48 (±6) hours)
Other Secondary: The Use of Restraints in Patients Receiving Isoflurane vs Propofol
Incidence of restraints measured twice daily
Measured: From start to end of study treatment (up to 48 (±6) hours)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Apr 2022
- Study start30 Jun 2022
- Primary completion28 May 2024
- Study completion14 Nov 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SedationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 282 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sedana Medical
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jeremy Beitler, M.D., Principal investigator, Columbia University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05327296
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SED004
- Acronym
- INSPiRE-ICU2
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Apr 2022
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, Watson PL, Weinhouse GL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Balas MC, van den Boogaard M, Bosma KJ, Brummel NE, Chanques G, Denehy L, Drouot X, Fraser GL, Harris JE, Joffe AM, Kho ME, Kress JP, Lanphere JA, McKinley S, Neufeld KJ, Pisani MA, Payen JF, Pun BT, Puntillo KA, Riker RR, Robinson BRH, Shehabi Y, Szumita PM, Winkelman C, Centofanti JE, Price C, Nikayin S, Misak CJ, Flood PD, Kiedrowski K, Alhazzani W. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
PubMed 30113379Shehabi Y, Howe BD, Bellomo R, Arabi YM, Bailey M, Bass FE, Bin Kadiman S, McArthur CJ, Murray L, Reade MC, Seppelt IM, Takala J, Wise MP, Webb SA; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group and the SPICE III Investigators. Early Sedation with Dexmedetomidine in Critically Ill Patients. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2506-2517. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904710. Epub 2019 May 19.
PubMed 31112380Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1471-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422002.
PubMed 10816184Mehta S, Burry L, Cook D, Fergusson D, Steinberg M, Granton J, Herridge M, Ferguson N, Devlin J, Tanios M, Dodek P, Fowler R, Burns K, Jacka M, Olafson K, Skrobik Y, Hebert P, Sabri E, Meade M; SLEAP Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Daily sedation interruption in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients cared for with a sedation protocol: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012 Nov 21;308(19):1985-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.13872.
PubMed 23180503Sackey PV, Martling CR, Carlsward C, Sundin O, Radell PJ. Short- and long-term follow-up of intensive care unit patients after sedation with isoflurane and midazolam--a pilot study. Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):801-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E3181652FEE.
PubMed 18431266Mesnil M, Capdevila X, Bringuier S, Trine PO, Falquet Y, Charbit J, Roustan JP, Chanques G, Jaber S. Long-term sedation in intensive care unit: a randomized comparison between inhaled sevoflurane and intravenous propofol or midazolam. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jun;37(6):933-41. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2187-3. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
PubMed 21445642Meiser A, Volk T, Wallenborn J, Guenther U, Becher T, Bracht H, Schwarzkopf K, Knafelj R, Faltlhauser A, Thal SC, Soukup J, Kellner P, Druner M, Vogelsang H, Bellgardt M, Sackey P; Sedaconda study group. Inhaled isoflurane via the anaesthetic conserving device versus propofol for sedation of invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units in Germany and Slovenia: an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Nov;9(11):1231-1240. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00323-4. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
PubMed 34454654Kong KL, Willatts SM, Prys-Roberts C. Isoflurane compared with midazolam for sedation in the intensive care unit. BMJ. 1989 May 13;298(6683):1277-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6683.1277.
PubMed 2500195Chanques G, Constantin JM, Devlin JW, Ely EW, Fraser GL, Gelinas C, Girard TD, Guerin C, Jabaudon M, Jaber S, Mehta S, Langer T, Murray MJ, Pandharipande P, Patel B, Payen JF, Puntillo K, Rochwerg B, Shehabi Y, Strom T, Olsen HT, Kress JP. Analgesia and sedation in patients with ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2342-2356. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06307-9. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
PubMed 33170331Jerath A, Ferguson ND, Cuthbertson B. Inhalational volatile-based sedation for COVID-19 pneumonia and ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;46(8):1563-1566. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06154-8. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
PubMed 32588067Bellgardt M, Bomberg H, Herzog-Niescery J, Dasch B, Vogelsang H, Weber TP, Steinfort C, Uhl W, Wagenpfeil S, Volk T, Meiser A. Survival after long-term isoflurane sedation as opposed to intravenous sedation in critically ill surgical patients: Retrospective analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Jan;33(1):6-13. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000252.
PubMed 25793760Hughes CG, Mailloux PT, Devlin JW, Swan JT, Sanders RD, Anzueto A, Jackson JC, Hoskins AS, Pun BT, Orun OM, Raman R, Stollings JL, Kiehl AL, Duprey MS, Bui LN, O'Neal HR Jr, Snyder A, Gropper MA, Guntupalli KK, Stashenko GJ, Patel MB, Brummel NE, Girard TD, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW, Pandharipande PP; MENDS2 Study Investigators. Dexmedetomidine or Propofol for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Adults with Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1424-1436. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024922. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
PubMed 33528922Krannich A, Leithner C, Engels M, Nee J, Petzinka V, Schroder T, Jorres A, Kruse J, Storm C. Isoflurane Sedation on the ICU in Cardiac Arrest Patients Treated With Targeted Temperature Management: An Observational Propensity-Matched Study. Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):e384-e390. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002185.
PubMed 27941501Girard TD, Kress JP, Fuchs BD, Thomason JW, Schweickert WD, Pun BT, Taichman DB, Dunn JG, Pohlman AS, Kinniry PA, Jackson JC, Canonico AE, Light RW, Shintani AK, Thompson JL, Gordon SM, Hall JB, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW. Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008 Jan 12;371(9607):126-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60105-1.
PubMed 18191684Pandharipande PP, Girard TD, Jackson JC, Morandi A, Thompson JL, Pun BT, Brummel NE, Hughes CG, Vasilevskis EE, Shintani AK, Moons KG, Geevarghese SK, Canonico A, Hopkins RO, Bernard GR, Dittus RS, Ely EW; BRAIN-ICU Study Investigators. Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1306-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301372.
PubMed 24088092
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Assessor-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered Via the Sedaconda ACD-S Compared to Intravenous Propofol for Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Adult Patients (INSPiRE-ICU2)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05327296
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INSPiRE-ICU2 / SED004
- Conditions
- Sedation
- Keywords
- sedation, mechanical ventilation, propofol, ICU, isoflurane
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 282 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sedana MedicalIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Nov 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 3 Mar 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a study to compare safety and efficacy of inhaled isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD-S device system versus intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting.
Detailed description
This is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, assessor-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled isoflurane delivered via the Sedaconda ACD-S compared to intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated Intensive Care Unit (ICU) adult patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Isoflurane | Experimental | Drug: IsofluraneInhaled isoflurane administered via Sedaconda ACD-S |
| Propofol | Active comparator | Drug: PropofolPropofol administered as intravenous infusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adults ≥18 years of age;
- Patients who are anticipated to require >12 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation and continuous sedation in the ICU; and
- Receipt of continuous sedation due to clinical need for sedation to RASS <0.
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Need for RASS -5;
- Sedation for invasive mechanical ventilation immediately prior to Baseline for >72 hours;
- Severe neurological condition before ICU admission that causes the patient to lack ability to participate in the study (ie, unable to be assessed for RASS and CPOT);
- Ventilator tidal volume <200 or >1000 mL at Baseline;
- Need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R), high frequency oscillation ventilation (HFOV), or high frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) at Screening;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IsofluraneInhaled isoflurane administered by Sedaconda ACD-S | Drug | Isoflurane |
| PropofolIntravenous infusion of propofol | Drug | Propofol |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Time Sedation Depth is Maintained Within the Target Range, in Absence of Rescue Sedation, as Assessed According to the RASS Scale, in Isoflurane- vs Propofol-treated Patients
Time frame: From start to end of study treatment (up to 48 (±6) hours)
The Target Range is RASS -1 to -4. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) is used to measure the level of agitation or sedation in patients, particularly in critical care settings. It is a 10-point scale ranging from -5 to +4: +4 Combative - Violent, immediate danger to staff. +3 Very agitated - Pulls or removes tubes or catheters; aggressive. +2 Agitated - Frequent non-purposeful movement, fights ventilator. +1 Restless - Anxious but movements are not aggressive. 0 Alert and calm. -1 Drowsy - Not fully alert, but has sustained awakening (eye-opening/eye contact) to voice for more than 10 seconds. -2 Light sedation - Briefly awakens with eye contact to voice for less than 10 seconds. -3 Moderate sedation - Movement or eye opening to voice, but no eye contact. -4 Deep sedation - No response to voice, but movement or eye opening to physical stimulation. -5 Unarousable - No response to voice or physical stimulation.
13 secondary outcomes
Key Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Use of Opioids During the Study Treatment Period
Time frame: From 60 minutes prior to Baseline until end of study treatment (60 minutes + up to 48 (±6) hours)
Key Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on the Wake up Time at End of Study Drug Treatment
Time frame: Up to 4 hours after stop of study drug treatment (up to 54 (±6) hours)
Key Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Cognitive Recovery After End of Study Drug Treatment
Time frame: At 60 minutes (±10 minutes) after end of study drug treatment (up to 49 (±6) hours)
Key Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Spontaneous Breathing Effort During the Study Drug Treatment Period
Time frame: From start to end of study treatment, up to 48 (±6) hours
Other Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Time From Sedation Termination to Extubation in Patients for Whom Study Drug is Terminated for Extubation
Time frame: From end of study drug treatment to extubation (up to 7 Days after randomization)
Other Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Days Alive and Free of Mechanical Ventilation Through Study Day 30
Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days
Other Secondary: To Compare the Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Days Alive and Free of the ICU
Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days
Other Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Delirium and Coma Free Days Until 7 Days After End of Study Treatment
Time frame: From start of study treatment until 7 days after end of treatment (up to 9 days post study drug treatment initiation)
Other Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Mortality at 30 Days After Randomization
Time frame: At 30 days after randomization
Other Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Mortality at 3 Months After Randomization
Time frame: At 3 months after randomization
Other Secondary: The Effect of Isoflurane vs Propofol on Mortality at 6 Months After Randomization
Time frame: At 6 months after randomization
Other Secondary: Sedaconda ACD-S Device Deficiencies in Patients Receiving Isoflurane
Time frame: From start to end of study treatment (up to 48 (±6) hours)
Other Secondary: The Use of Restraints in Patients Receiving Isoflurane vs Propofol
Time frame: From start to end of study treatment (up to 48 (±6) hours)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 30113379Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, Watson PL, Weinhouse GL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Balas MC, van den Boogaard M, Bosma KJ, Brummel NE, Chanques G, Denehy L, Drouot X, Fraser GL, Harris JE, Joffe AM, Kho ME, Kress JP, Lanphere JA, McKinley S, Neufeld KJ, Pisani MA, Payen JF, Pun BT, Puntillo KA, Riker RR, Robinson BRH, Shehabi Y, Szumita PM, Winkelman C, Centofanti JE, Price C, Nikayin S, Misak CJ, Flood PD, Kiedrowski K, Alhazzani W. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
- Background: PubMed 31112380Shehabi Y, Howe BD, Bellomo R, Arabi YM, Bailey M, Bass FE, Bin Kadiman S, McArthur CJ, Murray L, Reade MC, Seppelt IM, Takala J, Wise MP, Webb SA; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group and the SPICE III Investigators. Early Sedation with Dexmedetomidine in Critically Ill Patients. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2506-2517. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904710. Epub 2019 May 19.
- Background: PubMed 10816184Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1471-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422002.
- Background: PubMed 23180503Mehta S, Burry L, Cook D, Fergusson D, Steinberg M, Granton J, Herridge M, Ferguson N, Devlin J, Tanios M, Dodek P, Fowler R, Burns K, Jacka M, Olafson K, Skrobik Y, Hebert P, Sabri E, Meade M; SLEAP Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Daily sedation interruption in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients cared for with a sedation protocol: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012 Nov 21;308(19):1985-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.13872.
- Background: PubMed 18431266Sackey PV, Martling CR, Carlsward C, Sundin O, Radell PJ. Short- and long-term follow-up of intensive care unit patients after sedation with isoflurane and midazolam--a pilot study. Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):801-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E3181652FEE.
- Background: PubMed 21445642Mesnil M, Capdevila X, Bringuier S, Trine PO, Falquet Y, Charbit J, Roustan JP, Chanques G, Jaber S. Long-term sedation in intensive care unit: a randomized comparison between inhaled sevoflurane and intravenous propofol or midazolam. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jun;37(6):933-41. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2187-3. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
- Background: PubMed 34454654Meiser A, Volk T, Wallenborn J, Guenther U, Becher T, Bracht H, Schwarzkopf K, Knafelj R, Faltlhauser A, Thal SC, Soukup J, Kellner P, Druner M, Vogelsang H, Bellgardt M, Sackey P; Sedaconda study group. Inhaled isoflurane via the anaesthetic conserving device versus propofol for sedation of invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units in Germany and Slovenia: an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Nov;9(11):1231-1240. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00323-4. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
- Background: PubMed 2500195Kong KL, Willatts SM, Prys-Roberts C. Isoflurane compared with midazolam for sedation in the intensive care unit. BMJ. 1989 May 13;298(6683):1277-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6683.1277.
- Background: PubMed 33170331Chanques G, Constantin JM, Devlin JW, Ely EW, Fraser GL, Gelinas C, Girard TD, Guerin C, Jabaudon M, Jaber S, Mehta S, Langer T, Murray MJ, Pandharipande P, Patel B, Payen JF, Puntillo K, Rochwerg B, Shehabi Y, Strom T, Olsen HT, Kress JP. Analgesia and sedation in patients with ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2342-2356. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06307-9. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
- Background: PubMed 32588067Jerath A, Ferguson ND, Cuthbertson B. Inhalational volatile-based sedation for COVID-19 pneumonia and ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;46(8):1563-1566. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06154-8. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 25793760Bellgardt M, Bomberg H, Herzog-Niescery J, Dasch B, Vogelsang H, Weber TP, Steinfort C, Uhl W, Wagenpfeil S, Volk T, Meiser A. Survival after long-term isoflurane sedation as opposed to intravenous sedation in critically ill surgical patients: Retrospective analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Jan;33(1):6-13. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000252.
- Background: PubMed 33528922Hughes CG, Mailloux PT, Devlin JW, Swan JT, Sanders RD, Anzueto A, Jackson JC, Hoskins AS, Pun BT, Orun OM, Raman R, Stollings JL, Kiehl AL, Duprey MS, Bui LN, O'Neal HR Jr, Snyder A, Gropper MA, Guntupalli KK, Stashenko GJ, Patel MB, Brummel NE, Girard TD, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW, Pandharipande PP; MENDS2 Study Investigators. Dexmedetomidine or Propofol for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Adults with Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1424-1436. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024922. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
- Isoflurane 100% inhalation vapour, liquid. Summary of product characteristics. West Drayton, United Kingdon. Piramal Critical Care Ltd. Electronic medicines compendium(emc), last updated 29 October 2019. Accessed 09 September 2020.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Sedation
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Changes to Prostate Procedures
Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Weighted Blankets for Agitation in Adults in the Intensive Care Unit
Psychomotor Agitation, Critical Illness
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Media Use, Anxiety, Sedation, and Recovery in Children Having Upper GI Endoscopy
Anesthesia, Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeremy Beitler, M.D. principal investigator
Columbia University
16 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Isoflurane and Propofol in people with Sedation, run by Sedana Medical at 16 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Mar 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Time Sedation Depth is Maintained Within the Target Range, in Absence of Rescue Sedation, as Assessed According to the RASS Scale, in Isoflurane- vs Propofol-treated Patients (time frame: From start to end of study treatment (up to 48 (±6) hours)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05327296, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2026.