AzTrials
AzTrials

Difficult AirwayNCT05327842

Evaluation of a Flexible Videoscope Training Simulator

A study testing New training simulator and Traditional simulator in people with Difficult Airway, run by Tongji Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Flexible bronchoscope or videoscope plays important roles in managing difficult airway. But this technique is time-consuming and very difficult to learn for novices. The investigators design a simple training simulator to help them master this technique. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Difficult Airway
What is being tested?
New training simulator and Traditional simulator
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
43 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
15 May 2022to 2 Jul 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Resident or Medical student
  • Willing to participate to the study
  • Consent to evaluate the measured data

Who cannot join

  • experienced anesthetists

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital

    Wuhan, Hubei

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of a Flexible Videoscope Training Simulator: a Randomized, Controlled, Simulation Teaching Study

Flexible bronchoscope or videoscope plays important roles in managing difficult airway. But this technique is time-consuming and very difficult to learn for novices. The investigators design a simple training simulator to help them master this technique.

Read the detailed description

In this study, residents without operational experience will be recruited. The training effect of the new simulator will be evaluated by comparison with traditional simulation teaching. Participants will receive training with the new simulator or traditional method for 1hour, and then they perform intubation with flexible videoscope in a simulated difficult airway model. The insertion time and success rate will be recorded. Last, they will complete the questionnaire.

Being tested
New training simulator, Traditional simulator
Keywords
intubation, flexible bronchoscope, difficult airway

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • New training simulatorDevice

    Participants receive training with new simulator

  • Traditional simulatorDevice

    Participants receive traditional training

Study groups in NCT05327842
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
New training simulatorExperimentalParticipants received training with new simulator
Receives: Device: New training simulator
Traditional methodActive comparatorParticipants received traditional training
Receives: Device: Traditional simulator

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. insertion time

    time when participants perform flexible videoscope from incisor to carina

    Measured: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. success rate

    the rate of participants used flexible videoscope to view carina successfully

    Measured: 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Apr 2022
  2. Study start15 May 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion2 Jul 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
43 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05327842
Sponsor's protocol ID
TJMZK220405
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
6 Apr 2022
Last updated
13 Jul 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Zhou Z, Zhang K, Zhao X, Hu Y, He Y, Wan L, Yao W. Evaluation of a 12-hole clock model for improving bronchoscopic skills in simulated normal and difficult airways among anesthesia residents: A randomized controlled study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 7;103(23):e38510. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038510.

    PubMed 38847658

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing New training simulator and Traditional simulator in people with Difficult Airway, run by Tongji Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

insertion time (time frame: 1 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05327842, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in