Ventilation Therapy; ComplicationsNCT05365620
In-line Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation in the Management of Ventilated Patients
A study testing Mechanical In-Line Inexsufflation and catheter suction in people with Ventilation Therapy; Complications and Airway Clearance Impairment, run by Alyn Pediatric & Adolescent Rehabilitation Hospital.
Trial summary
Catheter suction (CS), the standard method for airway secretion management during mechanical ventilation, is invasive and has significant hemodynamic and traumatic side effects. In-line mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (IL-MIE) is a new, noninvasive technology that clears secretions by cough-simulation, without… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ventilation Therapy; Complications, Airway Clearance Impairment
- What is being tested?
- Mechanical In-Line Inexsufflation and catheter suction
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2015to 1 Jul 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients undergoing mechanical ventilation during the immediate recovery period following a cardiac or neuro-surgical procedure
- Ventilation expected to last more than 8 hours
Who cannot join
- acute spinal cord shock
- recent airway trauma or surgery
- cardiogenic pulmonary edema or ARDS necessitating ventilation with a peak end expiratory pressure (PEEP) equal to or greater than 6 cmH2O
- pneumothorax
- hemoptysis
- severe ischemic heart disease
Show all 10Show fewer
- lung tumors
- pulmonary Tuberculosis
- history of lung transplantation
- pregnant or breastfeeding women
About this study
Official title: In-line Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation as an Alternative to Invasive Suction for Secretion Management in Ventilated Patients
Catheter suction (CS), the standard method for airway secretion management during mechanical ventilation, is invasive and has significant hemodynamic and traumatic side effects. In-line mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (IL-MIE) is a new, noninvasive technology that clears secretions by cough-simulation, without interrupting ongoing ventilation. It is not known whether IL-MIE can be safely and effectively used as an alternative to CS in ventilated patients. Methods: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study comparing a standard protocol of CS, with automatic IL-MIE (CoughSync, Ruxin Medical Systems, Beijing) performed every 30 minutes, with CS added only if needed, in post-operative ventilated patients.
Read the detailed description
The study was designed as a randomized, open-label, parallel, non-inferiority, controlled trial. The study was carried out in two Intensive Care Units - the Cardiac Surgery ICU at Anzhen Hospital, and the Critical Care Medicine ICU at Tian Tan Hospital - both in Beijing, China, over a 36 month period between July 2015 and July 2018. The study group included patients aged 18 to 75 years undergoing mechanical ventilation during the immediate recovery period following a cardiac or neuro-surgical procedure.
Subjects were randomized to either a control group, managed for 8 hours with CS whenever the subject showed signs of airway secretion accumulation, as per standard clinical practice for those ICU's, or a study group, managed for 8 hours with automatic IL-MIE treatments (CoughSync, Ruxin Medical Systems Company Ltd, Beijing, China) performed automatically every 30 minutes, and with CS performed only if signs of airway secretion accumulation manifested despite ongoing IL-MIE. IL-MIE was performed using standard IL-MIE parameters (exsufflation pressure = -60 cm H2O, with flutter, 10 coughs/treatment).
Before each CS treatment, 100% oxygen was administered for one minute, regardless of the patient's baseline oxygen requirement, as per standard operating protocol in that ICU. Before IL-MIE treatments, no additional oxygen was administered beyond the patient's baseline oxygen requirement.
Pharmacological management in both groups included analgesia and sedation as routinely used postoperatively in those ICU's.
Demographic information and vital signs were recorded for all subjects. Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2 ) and oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) were defined as the primary end points of the study, and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), pulseoximetry (SpO2), heart rate (HR), and ventilator parameters (inspired oxygen, tidal volume [Vt], peak inspiratory pressure [PIP], airway plateau pressure [Pplat], and PEEP) as secondary end points.
All primary and secondary end-point data were recorded at baseline (2 minutes prior to starting the trial), and at 5 minutes, 4 hours and 8 hours after commencement of the trial. The number of CS treatments performed on each subject was recorded throughout the trial. Follow up for adverse events was performed during, and 48 hours after completion of, the trial.
Statistical Analysis:
The minimum sample size required to demonstrate non-inferiority, was calculated to be 49 in each cohort, or a total of 98 subjects in total.
Collected data were analyzed with a mixed model with repeated measures (MMRM) considering all observations (2 minutes before commencement of the trial protocol, and at 5 minutes, 4 hours and 8 hours thereafter) and accounting for the baseline value of oxygenation. For the indices of oxygenation derived from blood gas measurements (PaO2, SaO2 , and oxygenation index), non-inferiority was evaluated by comparison to the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the treatment effect in the MMRM model, with non-inferiority between the IL-MIE and control cohorts established if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the intergroup difference in least squares mean for a measured index was found to be higher than the pre-determined non-inferiority margin for that index. For comparison of other quantitative data between groups, a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test was used, based on the data distribution. For between-group comparison of subjects with significant adverse events, a chi-square test was used. The number of CS treatments performed in each cohort was analyzed post-hoc as an exploratory analysis.
- Being tested
- Mechanical In-Line Inexsufflation, catheter suction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mechanical In-Line InexsufflationDevice
In-line mechanical inexsufflation (IL-MIE) is a new method for performing MIE in intubated patients, which overcomes the drawbacks of MIE for ICU use . IL-MIE devices are integrated in-line with the patient's ventilator circuit, and do not themselves perform insufflations. Rather, the regular inspiration provided by the ventilator serves as the insufflation phase of each simulated cough, and the IL-MIE device performs only exsufflation, timing the onset of each exsufflation to the beginning of passive exhalation. Figure 1 demonstrates the setup and mode of operation of an IL-MIE device. The concept of IL-MIE was first developed by one of the authors (EB) in the Department of Respiratory Rehabilitation of ALYN Hospital in Jerusalem, Israel.
catheter suctionProcedure or surgery
catheter suction is the standard, routine method for clearing secretions from the airway of a ventilated subject, by means of inserting a catheter into the endotracheal tube.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Catheter Suction | Active comparator | Patients in this arm were managed for 8 hours with Catheter Suction whenever the subject showed signs of airway secretion accumulation, as per standard clinical practice for those ICU's Receives: Procedure: catheter suction |
| Mechanical Inexsufflation | Experimental | Patients in this are were managed for 8 hours with automatic inexsufflation treatments (CoughSync, Ruxin Medical Systems Company Ltd, Beijing, China) performed automatically every 30 minutes, and with Catheter Suction performed only if signs of airway secretion accumulation manifested Receives: Device: Mechanical In-Line Inexsufflation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PaO2
Arterial partial pressure of oxygen
Measured: change from baseline to 5 minutes
PaO2
Arterial partial pressure of oxygen
Measured: change from baseline to 4 hours
PaO2
Arterial partial pressure of oxygen
Measured: change from baseline to 8 hours
SaO2
arterial oxygen saturation
Measured: change from baseline to 5 minutes
SaO2
arterial oxygen saturation
Measured: change from baseline to 4 hours
SaO2
arterial oxygen saturation
Measured: change from baseline to 8 hours
PaO2/FiO2
oxygenation index - the ratio of blood oxygen to the percentage of inspired oxygen
Measured: change from baseline to 5 minutes
PaO2/FiO2
oxygenation index - the ratio of blood oxygen to the percentage of inspired oxygen
Measured: change from baseline to 4 hours
PaO2/FiO2
oxygenation index - the ratio of blood oxygen to the percentage of inspired oxygen
Measured: change from baseline to 8 hours
Secondary outcomes (24)
PaCO2
arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide
Measured: change from baseline to 5 minutes
PaCO2
arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide
Measured: change from baseline to 4 hours
PaCO2
arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide
Measured: change from baseline to 8 hours
SpO2
blood oxygen saturation
Measured: change from baseline to 5 minutes
SpO2
blood oxygen saturation
Measured: change from baseline to 4 hours
SpO2
blood oxygen saturation
Measured: change from baseline to 8 hours
heart rate
heart rate
Measured: change from baseline to 5 minutes
heart rate
heart rate
Measured: change from baseline to 4 hours
heart rate
heart rate
Measured: change from baseline to 8 hours
inspired oxygen
percent fraction inspired oxygen
Measured: change from baseline to 5 minutes
inspired oxygen
percent fraction inspired oxygen
Measured: change from baseline to 4 hours
inspired oxygen
percent fraction inspired oxygen
Measured: change from baseline to 8 hours
ventilator tidal volume
tidal volume in ml
Measured: change from baseline to 5 minutes
ventilator tidal volume
tidal volume in ml
Measured: change from baseline to 4 hours
ventilator tidal volume
tidal volume in ml
Measured: change from baseline to 8 hours
ventilator peak inspiratory pressure
peak airway pressure in CMH2O
Measured: change from baseline to 5 minutes
ventilator peak inspiratory pressure
peak airway pressure in CMH2O
Measured: change from baseline to 4 hours
ventilator peak inspiratory pressure
peak airway pressure in CMH2O
Measured: change from baseline to 8 hours
ventilator peak airway plateau pressure
airway plateau pressure in CMH2O
Measured: change from baseline to 5 minutes
ventilator peak airway plateau pressure
airway plateau pressure in CMH2O
Measured: change from baseline to 4 hours
ventilator peak airway plateau pressure
airway plateau pressure in CMH2O
Measured: change from baseline to 8 hours
ventilator peak end expiratory pressure
airway end expiratory pressure in CMH2O
Measured: change from baseline to 5 minutes
ventilator peak end expiratory pressure
airway end expiratory pressure in CMH2O
Measured: change from baseline to 4 hours
ventilator peak end expiratory pressure
airway end expiratory pressure in CMH2O
Measured: change from baseline to 8 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 May 2022
- Study start1 Jul 2015
- Primary completion1 Jul 2018
- Study completion1 Jul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ventilation Therapy; ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study was designed as a randomized, open-label, parallel, non-inferiority, controlled trial.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alyn Pediatric & Adolescent Rehabilitation Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Beijing Anzhen Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eliezer be'eri, Alyn Pediatric & Adolescent Rehabilitation Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05365620
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 047-21
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 14 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 12 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- In-line Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation as an Alternative to Invasive Suction for Secretion Management in Ventilated Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05365620
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 047-21
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alyn Pediatric & Adolescent Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Beijing Anzhen Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 May 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Catheter suction (CS), the standard method for airway secretion management during mechanical ventilation, is invasive and has significant hemodynamic and traumatic side effects. In-line mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (IL-MIE) is a new, noninvasive technology that clears secretions by cough-simulation, without interrupting ongoing ventilation. It is not known whether IL-MIE can be safely and effectively used as an alternative to CS in ventilated patients. Methods: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study comparing a standard protocol of CS, with automatic IL-MIE (CoughSync, Ruxin Medical Systems, Beijing) performed every 30 minutes, with CS added only if needed, in post-operative ventilated patients.
Detailed description
The study was designed as a randomized, open-label, parallel, non-inferiority, controlled trial. The study was carried out in two Intensive Care Units - the Cardiac Surgery ICU at Anzhen Hospital, and the Critical Care Medicine ICU at Tian Tan Hospital - both in Beijing, China, over a 36 month period between July 2015 and July 2018. The study group included patients aged 18 to 75 years undergoing mechanical ventilation during the immediate recovery period following a cardiac or neuro-surgical procedure.
Subjects were randomized to either a control group, managed for 8 hours with CS whenever the subject showed signs of airway secretion accumulation, as per standard clinical practice for those ICU's, or a study group, managed for 8 hours with automatic IL-MIE treatments (CoughSync, Ruxin Medical Systems Company Ltd, Beijing, China) performed automatically every 30 minutes, and with CS performed only if signs of airway secretion accumulation manifested despite ongoing IL-MIE. IL-MIE was performed using standard IL-MIE parameters (exsufflation pressure = -60 cm H2O, with flutter, 10 coughs/treatment).
Before each CS treatment, 100% oxygen was administered for one minute, regardless of the patient's baseline oxygen requirement, as per standard operating protocol in that ICU. Before IL-MIE treatments, no additional oxygen was administered beyond the patient's baseline oxygen requirement.
Pharmacological management in both groups included analgesia and sedation as routinely used postoperatively in those ICU's.
Demographic information and vital signs were recorded for all subjects. Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2 ) and oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) were defined as the primary end points of the study, and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), pulseoximetry (SpO2), heart rate (HR), and ventilator parameters (inspired oxygen, tidal volume [Vt], peak inspiratory pressure [PIP], airway plateau pressure [Pplat], and PEEP) as secondary end points.
All primary and secondary end-point data were recorded at baseline (2 minutes prior to starting the trial), and at 5 minutes, 4 hours and 8 hours after commencement of the trial. The number of CS treatments performed on each subject was recorded throughout the trial. Follow up for adverse events was performed during, and 48 hours after completion of, the trial.
Statistical Analysis:
The minimum sample size required to demonstrate non-inferiority, was calculated to be 49 in each cohort, or a total of 98 subjects in total.
Collected data were analyzed with a mixed model with repeated measures (MMRM) considering all observations (2 minutes before commencement of the trial protocol, and at 5 minutes, 4 hours and 8 hours thereafter) and accounting for the baseline value of oxygenation. For the indices of oxygenation derived from blood gas measurements (PaO2, SaO2 , and oxygenation index), non-inferiority was evaluated by comparison to the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the treatment effect in the MMRM model, with non-inferiority between the IL-MIE and control cohorts established if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the intergroup difference in least squares mean for a measured index was found to be higher than the pre-determined non-inferiority margin for that index. For comparison of other quantitative data between groups, a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test was used, based on the data distribution. For between-group comparison of subjects with significant adverse events, a chi-square test was used. The number of CS treatments performed in each cohort was analyzed post-hoc as an exploratory analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The study was designed as a randomized, open-label, parallel, non-inferiority, controlled trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Catheter Suction | Active comparator | Procedure: catheter suctionPatients in this arm were managed for 8 hours with Catheter Suction whenever the subject showed signs of airway secretion accumulation, as per standard clinical practice for those ICU's |
| Mechanical Inexsufflation | Experimental | Device: Mechanical In-Line InexsufflationPatients in this are were managed for 8 hours with automatic inexsufflation treatments (CoughSync, Ruxin Medical Systems Company Ltd, Beijing, China) performed automatically every 30 minutes, and with Catheter Suction performed only if signs of airway secretion accumulation manifested |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- patients undergoing mechanical ventilation during the immediate recovery period following a cardiac or neuro-surgical procedure
- Ventilation expected to last more than 8 hours
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- acute spinal cord shock
- recent airway trauma or surgery
- cardiogenic pulmonary edema or ARDS necessitating ventilation with a peak end expiratory pressure (PEEP) equal to or greater than 6 cmH2O
- pneumothorax
- hemoptysis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical In-Line InexsufflationIn-line mechanical inexsufflation (IL-MIE) is a new method for performing MIE in intubated patients, which overcomes the drawbacks of MIE for ICU use . IL-MIE devices are integrated in-line with the patient's ventilator circuit, and do not themselves perform insufflations. Rather, the regular inspiration provided by the ventilator serves as the insufflation phase of each simulated cough, and the IL-MIE device performs only exsufflation, timing the onset of each exsufflation to the beginning of passive exhalation. Figure 1 demonstrates the setup and mode of operation of an IL-MIE device. The concept of IL-MIE was first developed by one of the authors (EB) in the Department of Respiratory Rehabilitation of ALYN Hospital in Jerusalem, Israel. | Device | Mechanical Inexsufflation |
| catheter suctioncatheter suction is the standard, routine method for clearing secretions from the airway of a ventilated subject, by means of inserting a catheter into the endotracheal tube. | Procedure or surgery | Catheter Suction |
Primary outcome
PaO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 5 minutes
Arterial partial pressure of oxygen
PaO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 4 hours
Arterial partial pressure of oxygen
PaO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 8 hours
Arterial partial pressure of oxygen
SaO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 5 minutes
arterial oxygen saturation
SaO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 4 hours
arterial oxygen saturation
SaO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 8 hours
arterial oxygen saturation
PaO2/FiO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 5 minutes
oxygenation index - the ratio of blood oxygen to the percentage of inspired oxygen
PaO2/FiO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 4 hours
oxygenation index - the ratio of blood oxygen to the percentage of inspired oxygen
PaO2/FiO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 8 hours
oxygenation index - the ratio of blood oxygen to the percentage of inspired oxygen
24 secondary outcomes
PaCO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 5 minutes
PaCO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 4 hours
PaCO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 8 hours
SpO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 5 minutes
SpO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 4 hours
SpO2
Time frame: change from baseline to 8 hours
heart rate
Time frame: change from baseline to 5 minutes
heart rate
Time frame: change from baseline to 4 hours
heart rate
Time frame: change from baseline to 8 hours
inspired oxygen
Time frame: change from baseline to 5 minutes
inspired oxygen
Time frame: change from baseline to 4 hours
inspired oxygen
Time frame: change from baseline to 8 hours
ventilator tidal volume
Time frame: change from baseline to 5 minutes
ventilator tidal volume
Time frame: change from baseline to 4 hours
ventilator tidal volume
Time frame: change from baseline to 8 hours
ventilator peak inspiratory pressure
Time frame: change from baseline to 5 minutes
ventilator peak inspiratory pressure
Time frame: change from baseline to 4 hours
ventilator peak inspiratory pressure
Time frame: change from baseline to 8 hours
ventilator peak airway plateau pressure
Time frame: change from baseline to 5 minutes
ventilator peak airway plateau pressure
Time frame: change from baseline to 4 hours
ventilator peak airway plateau pressure
Time frame: change from baseline to 8 hours
ventilator peak end expiratory pressure
Time frame: change from baseline to 5 minutes
ventilator peak end expiratory pressure
Time frame: change from baseline to 4 hours
ventilator peak end expiratory pressure
Time frame: change from baseline to 8 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 May 2022.
Related trials for Ventilation Therapy; Complications
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Little Lungs Study
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, Severe Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Recruiting
Telerehabilitation Exercise Program for Postoperative Recovery in Lung Cancer.
Lung Neoplasms, Thoracic Surgery Lung
RecruitingObservational study
CytOSorb TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS Registry
Septic Shock, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness of an Innovative Chest Stabilizer in Rib Fracture Treatment: Impact on Respiratory Function, Complications, and Clinical Outcomes
Rib Fractures, Blunt Chest Trauma
Recruiting
Effects of Music Therapy, Breathing Exercises, and Virtual Reality on Obstetric Recovery, Pain, and Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Cesarean Section
Cesarean Section, Cesarean Section Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mechanical In-Line Inexsufflation and catheter suction in people with Ventilation Therapy; Complications and Airway Clearance Impairment, run by Alyn Pediatric & Adolescent Rehabilitation Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PaO2 (time frame: change from baseline to 5 minutes). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2022.