AzTrials
AzTrials

StressStressBlocNCT05392972

Stress of Anesthesia Professionals in the Operating Room

An observational study of Stress, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study was to determine whether there was an association between the resilience of anesthesia professionals in the operating room of the Grenoble University Hospital and perceived work-related stress. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Stress
What is being tested?
Assessment of stress, resilience and associated factors in anesthesia professionals
How many people
74 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Jun 2022to 12 Dec 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: resident in anesthesiology, anesthesiologist, student nurse in anesthesia, volunteer nurse in anesthesia and working at the university hospital center grenoble alpes

Who may be able to join

  • resident in anaesthesiology, Anesthesiologist,anaesthetic nursing student, anaesthetic nurse graduated
  • Criteria for non-inclusion:
  • Professionals objecting to the use of their data in the the research
  • Professionals working part-time
  • Professionals who had a number of CA > 3 during the month of the study.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • University Hospital Grenoble

    Grenoble

Other trials in France

About this study

The objective of this study was to determine whether there was an association between the resilience of anesthesia professionals in the operating room of the Grenoble University Hospital and perceived work-related stress.

Read the detailed description

This trial will be conducted at the Grenoble Alpes University Hospital (CHUGA). Volunteer anesthesiologists, anesthesia interns, nurse anesthetists and nurse anesthetist students will answer questionnaires evaluating resilience, perceived stress in the last month, sleep quality, number of hours worked in the month, number of night hours and will evaluate each working day the perceived stress with the visual analogical scale of stress over 3 periods of the working day

The main objective is to determine if there is an association between the resilience (questionnaire: Connord davidson resielience scale: CDRISC10) of the anesthesia professionals in the block of the CHUGA and the perceived stress at work (Perceived stress sacle 10: PSS10).

The secondary objectives are to study the association between:

  1. The mean of the two stress VAS (at the beginning and end of the shift) collected and the PSS10 over the same period.
  2. The median of the peaks of stress VAS collected and the PSS10 over the same period.
  3. The PSS10 and the PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)
  4. The PSS10 and the number of hours worked in the month.
  5. The PSS10 and the number of night hours worked in the month.
Conditions
Stress
Being tested
Assessment of stress, resilience and associated factors in anesthesia professionals
Keywords
Stress, Professional Resilience, Anaesthesiology, sleep quality
Medical subject headings
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Assessment of stress, resilience and associated factors in anesthesia professionalsBehavioural

    Assessment of stress, resilience and associated factors in anesthesia professionals

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Resilience

    Measurement of resilience by Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 (CD RISC 10 from 0 to 40) in participants. A high score indicates better resilience.

    Measured: at day 0

  2. Perceived Stress Scale

    The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS10 from 10 To 50) measures the degree to which respondents feel their lives are unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded. A high score indicates more stress.

    Measured: at day 30

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Self-reported stress at the beginning of the workday.

    Stress level self reported by participants on visual analogical scale (VAS from 0 to 100); One end of the scale represents the maximum conceivable symptom strength (i. e., 100%), the other end no symptoms whatsoever (i. e., 0%).

    Measured: Each work day at the start of the shift. From day 0 to day 30.

  2. Self-reported stress at the end of the workday.

    Stress level self reported by participants on visual analogical scale (VAS from 0 to 100); One end of the scale represents the maximum conceivable symptom strength (i. e., 100%), the other end no symptoms whatsoever (i. e., 0%).

    Measured: Every working day at the end of the shift. From day 0 to day 30.

  3. Maximum self-reported stress of the workday.

    Stress level self reported by participants on visual analogical scale (VAS from 0 to 100); One end of the scale represents the maximum conceivable symptom strength (i. e., 100%), the other end no symptoms whatsoever (i. e., 0%).

    Measured: Every working day at the end of the shift. From day 0 to day 30.

  4. The score of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    The PSQI contains 19 self-assessed questions. These 19 questions combine to yield 7 components: (1) subjective sleep quality, (2) sleep latency, (3) sleep duration, (4) habitual sleep efficiency, (5) sleep disturbance, (6) use of sleeping medication, and (7) daytime dysfunction. Each component gives a score from 0 to 3 points (0 indicates no difficulty, while 3 indicates major difficulty). The scores of the seven components are then added together to give an overall score of 0 to 21 points (0 indicating no difficulty, and 21 indicating major difficulty).

    Measured: at day 30

  5. number of hours worked

    number of hours worked during the working day

    Measured: Each work day at the end of the service. From day 0 to day 30.

  6. number of hours worked at night

    the number of hours worked during the work night

    Measured: Each night of work at the end of the service. From day 0 to day 30.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2022
  2. Study start1 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion12 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion12 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
74 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05392972
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB 00010254 - 2022 - 055
Acronym
StressBloc
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
16 May 2022
Last updated
13 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stress, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Resilience (time frame: at day 0). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in