Tibial Plateau FractureNCT05397327
3D Virtual Planning for Tibial Plateau Fractures
A study testing 3D virtual planning software in people with Tibial Plateau Fracture, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 3 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Tibial plateau fractures are often complex fractures and need a good preoperative planning. The investigators think that a 3D virtual planning software will help the surgeons to get a better understanding of the fracture and therefore want to study the value of 3D virtual planning software in the preoperative planning… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tibial Plateau Fracture
- What is being tested?
- 3D virtual planning software
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2022to Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients of 18 years or older with a tibial plateau fracture who will receive surgical treatment for this fracture
Who cannot join
- patients with (general) bone diseases or osseous malformation syndromes,
- ipsilateral limb fractures,
- complicated tibial plateau fractures that need an external fixator,
- previous tibial plateau fractures
- previous surgical treatment of the tibial plateau
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 3 countries.
Job Doornberg, Professor contact
3 sites in 3 countries
United States1 site
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Jellina Huitema, MD, jhuitema@mgh.harvard.edu
Marilyn Heng, MD, mheng@mgh.harvard.edu
Australia1 site
Flinders Medical Center
Adelaide, South Australia, 5042
Ruurd Jaarsma, Professor, ruurd.jaarsma@sa.gov.au
Nynke van der Gaast, MD, nynke.vandergaast@radboudumc.nl
Netherlands1 site
Radboud University Medical Center
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525GA
Jellina Huitema, MD, +31243613808, jellina.huitema@radboudumc.nl
Erik Hermans, PhD, MD, +31243613808, erik.hermans@radboudumc.nl
About this study
Official title: Virtual 3D Surgical Planning for Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Tibial plateau fractures are often complex fractures and need a good preoperative planning. The investigators think that a 3D virtual planning software will help the surgeons to get a better understanding of the fracture and therefore want to study the value of 3D virtual planning software in the preoperative planning of tibial plateau fractures. The investigators hypothesize that this software will shorten the duration of surgery, decrease the peroperative bloodloss and the number of complications.
Patients with tibial plateau fractures who need surgical treatment will be asked to participate in this study. After participants have given informed consent, they will be randomized between a 'traditional preoperative planning' and a '3D virtual preoperative planning' group. Surgeons will plan their surgery using traditional planning tools (X-rays and CT scan) or traditional planning tools ánd the 3D virtual planning software.
6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery, participants will be asked to fill in 2 questionnaires about knee pain and knee function. After surgery a CT scan or X-ray will be performed conform standard of care in the hospital.
Read the detailed description
Patients with tibial plateau fractures are traditionally challenging to treat, especially the complex fracture patterns in which anatomic reconstruction of the articular surface can be very demanding. In a previous study, the researchteam showed that surgical decision-making should be guided by recognition of specific fracture characteristics, rather than the 'classic' classification of fractures by Schatzker. Recognition of these specific tibial plateau fracture patterns has been proven reliable and reproducible to guide surgeons plan their approach, reduction techniques and fixation.
Building on our improved understanding of (complex) tibial plateau fracture patterns, and how these specific fracture characteristics guide our surgical management, the next step includes meticulous pre-operative surgical planning to achieve the best functional results for our patients. A new state-of-the-art tool is currently available to aid surgeons in 3D virtual planning of approach, reduction strategy, and even application of hardware (i.e. size of plates and lengths of screws (https://sectra.com/medical/product/sectra-3d-trauma/).
Recent studies on virtual surgical planning for fracture care have shown variable results. One study concluded that there was a significant reduction in duration of surgery in about 75.0% of all cases. Another study showed improvement of the outcomes of acetabular fracture surgery by reduced duration of the surgery and improved quality of the reduction. However, a third study showed that 3D virtual reality is inferior compared to 3D printed models on acetabular fractures in terms of interobserver agreement. In conclusion, the added value of virtual preoperative planning has yet to be determined.
If virtual surgical planning is as promising as some of the previous results show, it could also have a significant impact on the surgical reduction in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. This might lead to a reduction of duration of surgery, less complications and better patient related outcomes, such as postoperative pain and knee function.
Therefore, the investigators would like to compare the conventional preoperative planning with the preoperative planning with use of the virtual planning software of Sectra AB for tibial plateau fractures in terms of duration of surgery, surgical complications and patient related outcomes.
To see if the virtual planning software is comparable with the postoperative situation, the investigators would like to compare the preoperative virtual plan with the postoperative CT scan in terms of residual displacement and placement of the osteosynthesis material.
Primary Objective:
What is the added value of pre-operative virtual 3D surgical planning compared to traditional pre-surgical planning (i.e. surgeons' interpretation and written planning of standard 2D- and 3D CT-imaging) in patients with tibial plateau fractures in terms of duration of surgery?
Secondary Objective(s):
What is the added value of pre-operative virtual 3D surgical planning compared to traditional pre-surgical planning (i.e. surgeons' interpretation and written planning of standard 2D- and 3D CT-imaging) in patients with tibial plateau fractures in terms of
- postoperative complications?
- peroperative deviations of surgical planning?
- quality of post-operative reduction (i.e. reduction of step-off)?
- patient related outcomes (i.e. postoperative pain and knee function)?
For this study, the investigators have chosen to perform a randomized controlled trial to reduce the risk of selection bias. Participants will be divided in two groups, where in the conventional group trauma surgeons will plan their surgery using X-rays, 2D and 3D CT scans. In the virtual group, surgeons will plan their surgery using the virtual 3D planning software of Sectra AB and X-rays, 2D and 3D CT scans.
In both groups, surgery will be performed conform standard of care. This means that the preoperative planning is used as a guideline for the surgery and there will be deviated from the planning if deemed necessary for the surgery.
Postoperative, surgeons will be asked to fill in questionnaires to determine deviations of the preoperative plan, time spent planning and satisfaction. Patients will be asked to fill in questionnaires to determine functional outcome and health related quality of life, a postoperative CT scan will be performed after surgery to determine quality of postoperative reduction, according to our standard-of-care.
Quality of reduction on a CT or X-ray does not always match with patient experienced outcomes. Therefore, the investigators have chosen to not only measure quality of reduction, but also patient related outcomes, such as postoperative knee function and health related quality of life. Because of this possible mismatch, the investigators have chosen for reduction of operation time as our primary outcome. A longer operation time is associated with more postoperative surgical complications and blood loss. Furthermore, operation time is valuable and therefore expensive. A reduction in operation time would therefore not only have an effect on patient related outcomes, but also have effect on healthcare costs.
This study will take place at the following three level I trauma centers:
- Flinders University Medical Center, Adelaide, Australia
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America
The investigators will ask patients who present themselves at the emergency department with a tibial plateau fracture that needs surgical treatment within 14 days of the injury to participate in this study. If they are willing to participate, an informed consent will be signed and furthermore, they will receive an information folder with specified information about this research study.
Surgical residents and surgeons will be informed about this study through an e-mail with a short outline of the research. They will be asked to inform the researcher when there is a patient with a tibial plateau fracture who needs surgical treatment. The researcher will visit the emergency department or ward to inform the patient and sign the informed consent. A patient can give informed consent until two days before the planned surgery to ensure the trauma surgeon has enough time to plan the surgery thoroughly.
When included, patients will randomly be divided into two groups through sealed opaque envelopes:
- Group 1: preoperative planning using the 3D virtual planning software of SECTRA
- Group 2: traditional preoperative planning (i.e. surgeons' interpretation and written planning of standard 2D- and 3D CT-imaging).
Concealed randomization will be obtained with the randomizer.org software and stratified by centers.
Per trauma center, the investigators will train three experienced trauma surgeons in using the SECTRA 3D virtual planning software. These surgeons perform the majority (i.e. 95%) of all patients admitted with tibial plateau fractures. The investigators will ask the surgeons from both the traditional and virtual planning groups to keep track of time they spent planning the surgery. After planning the surgery, the surgeons will fill in a questionnaire where they indicate their surgical plan (i.e. which screws and plates they are planning to use and which surgical approach they attend to perform) and time spent planning.
After the surgery, the surgeons will fill in a questionnaire where they will indicate if they deviated from the pre-operative plan and if they are satisfied with the postoperative result. Using the operative notes, the investigators will determine the used screws, plates and surgical approach and the total duration of surgery.
Postoperative patients will get a CT-scan to determine the quality of the postoperative reduction. After 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months the investigators will determine functional outcome and health related quality of life using the 'Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score' (KOOS) questionnaire, and the Short Form - 36 (SF-36) questionnaire.
The investigators will use CastorEDC for creating the patient and surgeon questionnaires and for storing patient information at the secured digital research environment of Radboud University Medical Center. All patient and surgeon information will be pseudonymized by the department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine of the participating hospital, therefore subjects privacy is protected. This key will be deleted after data collection is finished. For analysis, these questionnaires will be exported to SPSS. The data of the statistical analysis and the results will also be stored at the secured digital research environment. The data will be kept for 15 years. Only researchers involved in the study have access to the data.
- Conditions
- Tibial Plateau Fracture
- Being tested
- 3D virtual planning software
- Medical subject headings
- Tibial Plateau Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3D virtual planning softwareOther
3D virtual planning software developed by Sectra AB (Linköping, Sweden)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional planning group | No intervention | Conventional preoperative planning using x-rays and 2D and 3D CT scan |
| 3D virtual planning group | Experimental | Preoperative planning using x-rays, 2D and 3D CT scans and 3D virtual planning software Receives: Other: 3D virtual planning software |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Duration of surgery
Time in minutes from start of surgery till end of surgery
Measured: Intraoperative
Secondary outcomes (7)
Blood loss
Amount of blood loss in milliliters during surgery
Measured: Intraoperative
Surgical complications
Number of complications related to performed surgery or to condition
Measured: up to 30 days postoperative
Perioperative deviations
Number of perioperative deviations of the perioperative plan
Measured: Immediately after x-ray or CT scan is performed
Quality of reduction
Postoperative step off in millimeters as measured on postoperative CT scan or X-ray
Measured: Immediately after x-ray or CT scan is performed
Quality of reduction
Postoperative gap in millimeters as measured on postoperative CT scan or X-ray
Measured: Immediately after x-ray or CT scan is performed
Postoperative knee function
Participant indicated postoperative knee function as measured with the KOOS questionnaire (score between 0 and 100, with 100 being no pain/restrictions in knee function) and SF-36 questionnaire (score between 0 and 100, with 100 being no limitations in social functioning)
Measured: Measured at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative
Postoperative knee pain
Participant indicated postoperative knee function as measured with the KOOS questionnaire (score between 0 and 100, with 100 being no pain/restrictions in knee function) and SF-36 questionnaire (score between 0 and 100, with 100 being no limitations in social functioning)
Measured: Measured at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 May 2022
- Study start1 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completionJun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Tibial Plateau FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Radboud University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Flinders Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Job Doornberg, Professor, Principal investigator, University Medical Center Groningen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05397327
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL2022-13629
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 10 May 2022
- Last updated
- 31 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: We will use the digital research environment (DRE), developed by a collaboration of hospitals in the Netherlands, to share anonymized individual participant data between the three participating centers. Participant data that will be shared is: * 3D Virtual planning software * Time spent planning * Fracture Characteristics * Surgeon satisfaction * Patient Demographics * Age * Sex * Mechanism of injury * Comorbidities * BMI * Duration of surgery * Number of complications * Perioperative deviations * Quality of reduction * Knee pain and function * Surgeon characteristics * Area of practice * Sex * Specialization * Years in practice
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Virtual 3D Surgical Planning for Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05397327
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NL2022-13629
- Conditions
- Tibial Plateau Fracture
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Flinders Medical Center
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 May 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Tibial plateau fractures are often complex fractures and need a good preoperative planning. The investigators think that a 3D virtual planning software will help the surgeons to get a better understanding of the fracture and therefore want to study the value of 3D virtual planning software in the preoperative planning of tibial plateau fractures. The investigators hypothesize that this software will shorten the duration of surgery, decrease the peroperative bloodloss and the number of complications.
Patients with tibial plateau fractures who need surgical treatment will be asked to participate in this study. After participants have given informed consent, they will be randomized between a 'traditional preoperative planning' and a '3D virtual preoperative planning' group. Surgeons will plan their surgery using traditional planning tools (X-rays and CT scan) or traditional planning tools ánd the 3D virtual planning software.
6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery, participants will be asked to fill in 2 questionnaires about knee pain and knee function. After surgery a CT scan or X-ray will be performed conform standard of care in the hospital.
Detailed description
Patients with tibial plateau fractures are traditionally challenging to treat, especially the complex fracture patterns in which anatomic reconstruction of the articular surface can be very demanding. In a previous study, the researchteam showed that surgical decision-making should be guided by recognition of specific fracture characteristics, rather than the 'classic' classification of fractures by Schatzker. Recognition of these specific tibial plateau fracture patterns has been proven reliable and reproducible to guide surgeons plan their approach, reduction techniques and fixation.
Building on our improved understanding of (complex) tibial plateau fracture patterns, and how these specific fracture characteristics guide our surgical management, the next step includes meticulous pre-operative surgical planning to achieve the best functional results for our patients. A new state-of-the-art tool is currently available to aid surgeons in 3D virtual planning of approach, reduction strategy, and even application of hardware (i.e. size of plates and lengths of screws (https://sectra.com/medical/product/sectra-3d-trauma/).
Recent studies on virtual surgical planning for fracture care have shown variable results. One study concluded that there was a significant reduction in duration of surgery in about 75.0% of all cases. Another study showed improvement of the outcomes of acetabular fracture surgery by reduced duration of the surgery and improved quality of the reduction. However, a third study showed that 3D virtual reality is inferior compared to 3D printed models on acetabular fractures in terms of interobserver agreement. In conclusion, the added value of virtual preoperative planning has yet to be determined.
If virtual surgical planning is as promising as some of the previous results show, it could also have a significant impact on the surgical reduction in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. This might lead to a reduction of duration of surgery, less complications and better patient related outcomes, such as postoperative pain and knee function.
Therefore, the investigators would like to compare the conventional preoperative planning with the preoperative planning with use of the virtual planning software of Sectra AB for tibial plateau fractures in terms of duration of surgery, surgical complications and patient related outcomes.
To see if the virtual planning software is comparable with the postoperative situation, the investigators would like to compare the preoperative virtual plan with the postoperative CT scan in terms of residual displacement and placement of the osteosynthesis material.
Primary Objective:
What is the added value of pre-operative virtual 3D surgical planning compared to traditional pre-surgical planning (i.e. surgeons' interpretation and written planning of standard 2D- and 3D CT-imaging) in patients with tibial plateau fractures in terms of duration of surgery?
Secondary Objective(s):
What is the added value of pre-operative virtual 3D surgical planning compared to traditional pre-surgical planning (i.e. surgeons' interpretation and written planning of standard 2D- and 3D CT-imaging) in patients with tibial plateau fractures in terms of
- postoperative complications?
- peroperative deviations of surgical planning?
- quality of post-operative reduction (i.e. reduction of step-off)?
- patient related outcomes (i.e. postoperative pain and knee function)?
For this study, the investigators have chosen to perform a randomized controlled trial to reduce the risk of selection bias. Participants will be divided in two groups, where in the conventional group trauma surgeons will plan their surgery using X-rays, 2D and 3D CT scans. In the virtual group, surgeons will plan their surgery using the virtual 3D planning software of Sectra AB and X-rays, 2D and 3D CT scans.
In both groups, surgery will be performed conform standard of care. This means that the preoperative planning is used as a guideline for the surgery and there will be deviated from the planning if deemed necessary for the surgery.
Postoperative, surgeons will be asked to fill in questionnaires to determine deviations of the preoperative plan, time spent planning and satisfaction. Patients will be asked to fill in questionnaires to determine functional outcome and health related quality of life, a postoperative CT scan will be performed after surgery to determine quality of postoperative reduction, according to our standard-of-care.
Quality of reduction on a CT or X-ray does not always match with patient experienced outcomes. Therefore, the investigators have chosen to not only measure quality of reduction, but also patient related outcomes, such as postoperative knee function and health related quality of life. Because of this possible mismatch, the investigators have chosen for reduction of operation time as our primary outcome. A longer operation time is associated with more postoperative surgical complications and blood loss. Furthermore, operation time is valuable and therefore expensive. A reduction in operation time would therefore not only have an effect on patient related outcomes, but also have effect on healthcare costs.
This study will take place at the following three level I trauma centers:
- Flinders University Medical Center, Adelaide, Australia
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America
The investigators will ask patients who present themselves at the emergency department with a tibial plateau fracture that needs surgical treatment within 14 days of the injury to participate in this study. If they are willing to participate, an informed consent will be signed and furthermore, they will receive an information folder with specified information about this research study.
Surgical residents and surgeons will be informed about this study through an e-mail with a short outline of the research. They will be asked to inform the researcher when there is a patient with a tibial plateau fracture who needs surgical treatment. The researcher will visit the emergency department or ward to inform the patient and sign the informed consent. A patient can give informed consent until two days before the planned surgery to ensure the trauma surgeon has enough time to plan the surgery thoroughly.
When included, patients will randomly be divided into two groups through sealed opaque envelopes:
- Group 1: preoperative planning using the 3D virtual planning software of SECTRA
- Group 2: traditional preoperative planning (i.e. surgeons' interpretation and written planning of standard 2D- and 3D CT-imaging).
Concealed randomization will be obtained with the randomizer.org software and stratified by centers.
Per trauma center, the investigators will train three experienced trauma surgeons in using the SECTRA 3D virtual planning software. These surgeons perform the majority (i.e. 95%) of all patients admitted with tibial plateau fractures. The investigators will ask the surgeons from both the traditional and virtual planning groups to keep track of time they spent planning the surgery. After planning the surgery, the surgeons will fill in a questionnaire where they indicate their surgical plan (i.e. which screws and plates they are planning to use and which surgical approach they attend to perform) and time spent planning.
After the surgery, the surgeons will fill in a questionnaire where they will indicate if they deviated from the pre-operative plan and if they are satisfied with the postoperative result. Using the operative notes, the investigators will determine the used screws, plates and surgical approach and the total duration of surgery.
Postoperative patients will get a CT-scan to determine the quality of the postoperative reduction. After 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months the investigators will determine functional outcome and health related quality of life using the 'Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score' (KOOS) questionnaire, and the Short Form - 36 (SF-36) questionnaire.
The investigators will use CastorEDC for creating the patient and surgeon questionnaires and for storing patient information at the secured digital research environment of Radboud University Medical Center. All patient and surgeon information will be pseudonymized by the department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine of the participating hospital, therefore subjects privacy is protected. This key will be deleted after data collection is finished. For analysis, these questionnaires will be exported to SPSS. The data of the statistical analysis and the results will also be stored at the secured digital research environment. The data will be kept for 15 years. Only researchers involved in the study have access to the data.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional planning group | No intervention | –Conventional preoperative planning using x-rays and 2D and 3D CT scan |
| 3D virtual planning group | Experimental | Other: 3D virtual planning softwarePreoperative planning using x-rays, 2D and 3D CT scans and 3D virtual planning software |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult patients of 18 years or older with a tibial plateau fracture who will receive surgical treatment for this fracture
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- patients with (general) bone diseases or osseous malformation syndromes,
- ipsilateral limb fractures,
- complicated tibial plateau fractures that need an external fixator,
- previous tibial plateau fractures
- previous surgical treatment of the tibial plateau
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3D virtual planning software3D virtual planning software developed by Sectra AB (Linköping, Sweden) | Other | 3D virtual planning group |
Primary outcome
Duration of surgery
Time frame: Intraoperative
Time in minutes from start of surgery till end of surgery
7 secondary outcomes
Blood loss
Time frame: Intraoperative
Surgical complications
Time frame: up to 30 days postoperative
Perioperative deviations
Time frame: Immediately after x-ray or CT scan is performed
Quality of reduction
Time frame: Immediately after x-ray or CT scan is performed
Quality of reduction
Time frame: Immediately after x-ray or CT scan is performed
Postoperative knee function
Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative
Postoperative knee pain
Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. We will use the digital research environment (DRE), developed by a collaboration of hospitals in the Netherlands, to share anonymized individual participant data between the three participating centers. Participant data that will be shared is: * 3D Virtual planning software * Time spent planning * Fracture Characteristics * Surgeon satisfaction * Patient Demographics * Age * Sex * Mechanism of injury * Comorbidities * BMI * Duration of surgery * Number of complications * Perioperative deviations * Quality of reduction * Knee pain and function * Surgeon characteristics * Area of practice * Sex * Specialization * Years in practice
Related trials for Tibial Plateau Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Alloy Scaffold With Controlled Degradation for Periarticular Bone Defects
Periarticular Bone Defect, Proximal Humerus Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Personalized Weight-Bearing With Smart Crutch Tips After Surgery for Tibial Plateau Fractures
Tibial Plateau Fracture
Recruiting
Comparison of Functional Outcome Between Locking Plate Technique Versus Hybrid Ilizarov Technique in Patients With Schatzker Type V and VI Tibial Plateau Fractures
Tibial Plateau Fracture
Recruiting
Continuous Passive Motion Following Fixation of Pelvic and Knee Fractures
Fractures, Bone
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Weight Bearing in Unicondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures
Early Mobilization
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Job Doornberg, Professor contact
Job Doornberg, Professor principal investigator
University Medical Center Groningen
3 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 3D virtual planning software in people with Tibial Plateau Fracture, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 3 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States, Australia, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jellina Huitema, MD (+31243613808, jellina.huitema@radboudumc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Duration of surgery (time frame: Intraoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2022.