AzTrials
AzTrials

StressPhase 2NCT05408832

Personalized Trials for Stress Management Against Standard of Care

A Phase 2 study testing Personalized Trial ABCCBA, Personalized Trial CBAABC and Stress Management Techniques with No Randomization Sequence (or order) in people with Stress, run by Northwell Health at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if an N-of-1 study design, or within-subject trials that the investigators are calling "Personalized Trials" can improve health outcomes over standard practice for common stress management techniques. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Stress
What is being tested?
Personalized Trial ABCCBA, Personalized Trial CBAABC and Stress Management Techniques with No Randomization Sequence (or order)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
212 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
23 Jun 2022to 8 Jan 2024
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • English speaking
  • Self-report of perceived stress raw score of 20 or higher using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
  • Owns and can regularly access a smartphone capable of receiving text messages and accessing the internet
  • Can regularly wear a Fitbit device
  • Lives in the United States

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18 years old
  • Women who are pregnant
  • Does not speak English
  • Does not own or cannot regularly access a smartphone capable of receiving text messages
  • Cannot regularly wear a Fitbit device
  • Deemed unable to complete the study protocol as a result of cognitive impairment, severe medical or mental illness, or active or prior substance abuse
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Planned surgeries 6 months from study start date
  • Individuals who have been previously told by a doctor to not engage in brisk walking 30 minutes, three times per week
  • Individuals who have been previously told by a doctor to not engage in yoga
  • Lives outside the United States

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Institute of Health System Science

    New York, New York, 10022

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Re-engineering Precision Therapeutics Through N-of-1 Trials: Personalized Trials for Stress Management Against Standard of Care

The purpose of this study is to determine if an N-of-1 study design, or within-subject trials that the investigators are calling "Personalized Trials" can improve health outcomes over standard practice for common stress management techniques. This study uses three different stress management interventions to improve individual self-report of perceived stress: guided mindfulness meditation, guided yoga, and guided brisk walking. Arm 1 (n=53) and Arm 2 (n=53) of the trial will deliver the interventions using a Personalized Trial (within-subject, single N, cross-over trial) format. Participants in Arm 3 of the trial (N=106) will be offered the same number of interventions but will not be required to follow the established N-of-1 Personalized Trials framework. At the end of their Personalized Trial, participants in Arms 1 and 2 will receive a summarized report with personalized feedback. Participants in Arm 3 will also receive a report, but with summarized data . Both arms will receive 2 additional weeks of the stress management intervention of their choosing, while continuing to answer daily assessments and wear a Fitbit device. At the end of the study, a final survey will be sent assessing satisfaction with the study.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine if an N-of-1 (within-subject, single N, cross-over trial) study design, or what the investigators are calling "Personalized Trials" can improve health outcomes over standard practice for common stress management techniques, and can have widespread use in future research and clinical practice to address high public health burdens with a high heterogeneity of treatment response. This study is informed by three previously conducted feasibility pilots of methods to remotely implement Personalized Trials. This current study uses three different stress management interventions to improve individual self-report of perceived stress: guided mindfulness meditation, guided yoga, and guided brisk walking. Participants randomized to Arm 1 (N=53) and Arm 2 (N=53) will receive Personalized Trials stress management interventions (with arms receiving different order of interventions), whereas participants randomized to Arm 3 (N=106) will receive interventions but will not be required to follow the Personalized Trials format. All participants will begin with a 2-week run-in period, where no stress management interventions are given, but data are collected, including daily surveys and Fitbit-derived sleep and activity data, to obtain a baseline average for later statistical comparison. After successful completion of the baseline period, participants will be randomized to receive either one of two orders of 12-weeks of a Personalized Trial or self-directed (standard care) experience, where they can test 3 different stress management techniques in any order they choose while continuing to answer daily assessments and wearing their Fitbit device. At the end of the 12 weeks, all participants will continue to answer daily surveys and wear their Fitbit device for 2 weeks with no experimenter provided intervention, while the study team creates a report containing the individual's observed data. This report will be sent to each participant in all arms, and participants will have the opportunity to select one stress management technique to continue with for 2 additional weeks. After selection, participants will receive six additional sessions of their chosen treatment and will be observed for engagement in these additional wellness sessions. Participants will also be asked to complete daily survey assessments and Fitbit wear for these two additional weeks. At the end of the 18-week study, a final survey will be sent assessing satisfaction with the study. A random sample of 10% of participants from each arm will be asked to participate in a qualitative interview to discuss their experiences.

Conditions
Stress
Being tested
Personalized Trial ABCCBA, Personalized Trial CBAABC, Stress Management Techniques with No Randomization Sequence (or order)
Keywords
Stress, Personalized, N-of-1, Virtual, Feasibility, Yoga, Walking, Mindfulness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Personalized Trial ABCCBABehavioural

    Participants will receive links for 30-minute videos for all three interventions, for 2 weeks each, 3 times per week, in a specified order (ABCCBA), where A=mindfulness meditation, B=yoga, and C=brisk walking.

  • Personalized Trial CBAABCBehavioural

    Participants will receive links for 30-minute videos for all three interventions, for 2 weeks each, 3 times per week, in a specified order (CBAABC), where A=mindfulness meditation, B=yoga, and C=brisk walking.

  • Stress Management Techniques with No Randomization Sequence (or order)Behavioural

    Participants will have access to all 30-minute videos for A=mindfulness meditation, B=yoga, and C=brisk walking, during the 12-week phase of the study. They will be limited to 12 total views per stress management technique.

Study groups in NCT05408832
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Personalized Trial ABCCBAExperimentalParticipants in Arm 1 will receive a Personalized Trial of the 3 stress management interventions in an ABCCBA treatment order, where A=mindfulness meditation, B=yoga, and C=brisk walking. Participants in this arm will be prompted to complete 30-minute stress management sessions during applicable treatment weeks. A link to the stress management video will be delivered via text 3 times per week to the participant during applicable intervention periods in the personalized trial arms. Participants will be limited to three views of study-provided stress management content each week.
Receives: Behavioral: Personalized Trial ABCCBA
Personalized Trial CBAABCExperimentalParticipants in Arm 2 will receive a Personalized Trial of the 3 stress management interventions in a CBAABC treatment order, where A=mindfulness meditation, B=yoga, and C=brisk walking. Participants in this arm will be prompted to complete 30-minute stress management sessions during applicable treatment weeks. A link to the stress management video will be delivered via text 3 times per week to the participant during applicable intervention periods in the personalized trial arms. Participants will be limited to three views of the study-provided stress management content each week.
Receives: Behavioral: Personalized Trial CBAABC
Standard CareActive comparatorParticipants in Arm 3 will receive Standard Care of the 3 stress management techniques (mindfulness meditation, yoga, and brisk walking). Participants will receive access to the same number of views of the mindfulness meditation, yoga, and brisk walking content given to participants randomized in Arm 1 and Arm 2. However, they will not be prompted to complete any session according to a randomization sequence. A link to the stress management video will be delivered via text 1 time per week to the participant. Participants will be limited to 36 total views of study-provided stress management content (12 total views per stress management technique).
Receives: Behavioral: Stress Management Techniques with No Randomization Sequence (or order)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Between-Arm Difference in Change in Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) of Stress.

    Stress will be assessed via 3 daily text message prompts sent at random times throughout the day asking individuals to rate their stress on a scale of 0 (low) to 10 (high). Levels of EMA stress will be aggregated within the baseline assessment period and during the follow-up period to generate an overall mean and standard deviation for each period. The change in EMA stress between baseline and follow-up will be calculated by subtracting these aggregated means. The difference in change in EMA stress between baseline and follow-up periods will be compared between the personalized arms (Arm 1 and 2) and the standard of care arm (Arm 3) using a two-sample t-test and Generalized Linear Mixed Model analyses.

    Measured: EMA stress will be assessed 3 times daily via text message during the baseline assessment period (2 weeks) during follow-up period (13-18 weeks).

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Change in Mean Within-Subject Difference in Weekly Perceived Stress.

    Weekly perceived stress will be assessed with the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), modified to be delivered to assess the prior week rather than the prior month. The minimum total score possible is 0 and the maximum total score possible is 40. Higher values represent higher level of stress. Levels of weekly perceived stress will be aggregated within the baseline assessment period and during the follow-up period to generate an overall mean and standard deviation for each period. The change in weekly perceived stress between baseline and follow-up will be examined using Generalized Linear Mixed Model analyses.

    Measured: Perceived stress will be assessed weekly during the baseline assessment period (2 weeks) during follow-up period (13-18 weeks).

  2. Agreement of Intervention Selection Between Participant and Researcher.

    At the end of the intervention in the personalized trial arms (Arm 1 \& Arm 2), personalized trial data will be used to identify which intervention (mindfulness, yoga, or walking) was most effective at reducing stress. This recommendation will be presented in a personalized report sent after completion of the intervention. The number of participants in the personalized trial arms who select this recommended intervention during follow-up relative to the total number of participants in Arms 1 \& 2 will be presented as a count of participants/percentage, with a higher count of participants/percentage indicating greater levels of agreement.

    Measured: Assessed after completion of follow-up (18 weeks from baseline).

  3. Mean System Usability Score (SUS).

    The SUS is a validated 10-item questionnaire that asks users to score each item on a Likert scale from Strongly Disagree (rating of 1) to Strongly Agree (rating of 5). The SUS has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 40. The SUS will be presented to the participant as addressing the ease of use, complexity, consistency of the Personalized Trials system as a whole, from recruitment to receipt of the report.

    Odd items are scored by subtracting one from the user response. Even-numbered items are scored by subtracting the user responses from 5. This scales all values from 0 to 4 (with four being the most positive response). Converted responses are summed and multiplied by 2.5. This converts the range of possible values to a composite measure from 0 to 100, reported below. Participant SUS scores will be averaged together and an overall mean will be reported with standard deviation. Higher scored values correlate to a more usable system, and therefore a better outcome.

    Measured: Assessed once after the results report has been sent to the participant after completion of the trial (18 weeks from baseline).

  4. Participant Satisfaction With Personalized Trial Components.

    Participants will rate their satisfaction with the Trial overall and with individual elements of the trial in a satisfaction survey. Satisfaction items are not part of an already existing scale but were developed to assess participant satisfaction with specific elements of the current study and the trial overall. Participants will rate their satisfaction on a scale of 1 to 5, with higher numbers indicating greater levels of satisfaction. Means and standard deviations will be reported for each element of satisfaction.

    Measured: Assessed once after the results report has been sent to the participant after completion of the trial (18 weeks from baseline).

  5. Within-Subject Difference in Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) of Stress.

    Stress will be assessed via 3 daily text message prompts sent at random times throughout the day asking individuals to rate their stress on a scale of 0 (low) to 10 (high). Levels of EMA stress will be aggregated within the baseline assessment period and in each of the treatment periods (yoga, meditation, guided walking), and then averaged across each treatment period, to generate an overall mean and standard deviation for each period. Changes in EMA stress from baseline to each treatment period will be evaluated using Generalized Linear Mixed Model analyses.

    Measured: EMA stress will be assessed 3 times daily via text message during the 18 week trial.

  6. Within-Subject Difference in Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) of Fatigue.

    Fatigue will be assessed via 3 daily text message prompts sent at random times throughout the day asking individuals to rate their stress on a scale of 0 (low) to 10 (high). Levels of EMA fatigue will be aggregated within the baseline assessment period and in each of the treatment periods (yoga, meditation, guided walking), and then averaged across each treatment period, to generate an overall mean and standard deviation for each period. Changes in EMA fatigue from baseline to each treatment period will be evaluated using Generalized Linear Mixed Model analyses.

    Measured: EMA fatigue will be assessed 3 times daily via text message during the 18 week trial.

  7. Within-Subject Difference in Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) of Pain.

    Pain will be assessed via 3 daily text message prompts sent at random times throughout the day asking individuals to rate their stress on a scale of 0 (low) to 10 (high). Levels of EMA pain will be aggregated within the baseline assessment period and in each of the treatment periods (yoga, meditation, guided walking), and then averaged across each treatment period, to generate an overall mean and standard deviation for each period. Changes in EMA pain from baseline to each treatment period will be evaluated using Generalized Linear Mixed Model analyses.

    Measured: EMA pain will be assessed 3 times daily via text message during the 18 week trial.

  8. Within-Subject Difference in Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) of Mood.

    Mood will be assessed via 3 daily text message prompts sent at random times throughout the day asking individuals to rate their stress on a scale of 0 (low) to 10 (high). Levels of EMA mood will be aggregated within the baseline assessment period and in each of the treatment periods (yoga, meditation, guided walking), and then averaged across each treatment period, to generate an overall mean and standard deviation for each period. Changes in EMA mood from baseline to each treatment period will be evaluated using Generalized Linear Mixed Model analyses.

    Measured: EMA mood will be assessed 3 times daily via text message during the 18 week trial.

  9. Within-Subject Difference in Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) of Concentration.

    Concentration will be assessed via 3 daily text message prompts sent at random times throughout the day asking individuals to rate their stress on a scale of 0 (low) to 10 (high). Levels of EMA Concentration will be aggregated within the baseline assessment period and in each of the treatment periods (yoga, meditation, guided walking), and then averaged across each treatment period, to generate an overall mean and standard deviation for each period. Changes in EMA Concentration from baseline to each treatment period will be evaluated using Generalized Linear Mixed Model analyses.

    Measured: EMA concentration will be assessed 3 times daily via text message during the 18 week trial.

  10. Within-Subject Difference in Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) of Confidence.

    Confidence will be assessed via 3 daily text message prompts sent at random times throughout the day asking individuals to rate their stress on a scale of 0 (low) to 10 (high). Levels of EMA Confidence will be aggregated within the baseline assessment period and in each of the treatment periods (yoga, meditation, guided walking), and then averaged across each treatment period, to generate an overall mean and standard deviation for each period. Changes in EMA Confidence from baseline to each treatment period will be evaluated using Generalized Linear Mixed Model analyses.

    Measured: EMA confidence will be assessed 3 times daily via text message during the 18 week trial.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jun 2022
  2. Study start23 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion7 Jan 2024
  4. Study completion8 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Mixed between and within (Crossover) participant assignment. The study uses a between participant randomization; two arms have a multiple crossover design (with different intervention orders to the crossover) and one arm has no order prescribed.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
212 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05408832
Sponsor's protocol ID
21-0968
Other IDs
R01LM012836
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
2 Jun 2022
Last updated
23 Mar 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All collected individual participant data (IPD) will be de-identified and pooled before sharing on the Open Science Framework, along with a data dictionary. Supporting Information: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Informed Consent Form (ICF) Time Frame: The study protocol, including the statistical analysis plan, will be made available in addition to the informed consent form following completion of recruitment but prior to publication of any data from the current study. De-identified, pooled individual participant data will be made available within a year of final participant data collection. We anticipate this data to be available on the Open Science Framework platform indefinitely. Access Criteria: All data and supporting information will be stored on the Open Science Framework, a free web application with no access restrictions.

Publications

  • Goodwin AM, Miller D, D'Angelo S, Perrin A, Wiener R, Greene B, Romain AN, Arader L, Chandereng T, Kuen Cheung Y, Davidson KW, Butler M. Protocol for randomized personalized trial for stress management compared to standard of care. Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 19;14:1233884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1233884. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37794909

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Personalized Trial ABCCBA, Personalized Trial CBAABC and Stress Management Techniques with No Randomization Sequence (or order) in people with Stress, run by Northwell Health at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Mar 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Between-Arm Difference in Change in Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) of Stress. (time frame: EMA stress will be assessed 3 times daily via text message during the baseline assessment period (2 weeks) during follow-up period (13-18 weeks).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05408832, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in