Traumatic Brain InjuryBRAINI2NCT05413499
Blood Biomarkers to Improve Management of Children With Traumatic Brain Injury
A study testing Biomarkers research in people with Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Nantes University Hospital at 20 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13 to 15, is the cause of many consultations in paediatric emergency departments (1), even though it is a rare cause of acute complication: approximately 10% of children present with intracranial lesions (ICL) on the CT scan and less… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 0 days to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- What is being tested?
- Biomarkers research
- How many people
- 1,570 participants
- Where
- 20 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 2 Aug 2022to 26 May 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 0 days to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Children and adolescents <18 years old Consent from one of the parents of the child or from holder of parental responsibility Consent from the child or adolescent Parental affiliation with an appropriate health insurance system
- TBI population
- Admission within 24 hours of the injury
- Ability to follow-up by telephone, mail or email
- For the mTBI group:
- GCS score of 13-15 on admission
Show all 15Show fewer
- Indication for cerebral CT scan according to national or local guidelines or the in-charge physician OR diagnosis of concussion consistent with the fourth Zurich consensus statement (9) . Concussion was defined as a complex pathophysiological process caused by a direct blow to the head, face, neck, or elsewhere on the body with an impulsive force transmitted to the head (which may or may not have involved loss of consciousness), resulting in a brain injury with one or more symptoms in one or more of the following clinical domains: somatic, cognitive, emotional or behavioural, or sleep. To objectively help diagnose concussion, the validated Acute Concussion Evaluation (ACE) questionnaire (10) for children with mTBI will be used, the presence of ≥ 1 symptom on the ACE defines concussion.
- For the moderate or severe TBI group:
- GCS score of 3-12 on admission
- Indication for cerebral CT scan according to national or local guidelines or the in-charge physician
- Non-TBI control paediatric population
- Admission for any reason other than TBI
- Indication of blood sampling for their routine management
- GCS score of 15
- Otherwise healthy, i.e. without chronic pathology
Who cannot join
- TBI population
- Time of injury unknown or exceeding 24 hours
- Blood sampling not possible within 24 hours after the injury or 6 hours after the CT scan, if applicable
- Penetrating brain injury with skull fracture
- Pre-existing neurological disorders affecting the assessment of neurological outcome, seizure disorder/epilepsy, brain tumour, history of neurosurgery, stroke, encephalopathy
- Venepuncture not feasible
Show all 20Show fewer
- Pregnant woman
- Intoxication
- No clear primary mechanism of trauma
- No possibility for transferring CT scan images to the centralised platform in case of neuroimaging only performed in an outside hospital before transfer
- Participation in another interventional research study
- Non-TBI control paediatric population
- Pre-existing neurological disorders, seizure disorder/epilepsy, brain tumour, history or indication of neurosurgery, stroke, encephalopathy
- History of TBI
- Orthopaedic trauma or surgery within the last month
- Suspected meningitidis or encephalitis
- Venepuncture not feasible
- Pregnant woman
- Intoxication
- Participation in another interventional research study
Trial locations and contacts
20 sites in 4 countries.
20 sites in 4 countries
France15 sites
Brest University Hospital
Brest
Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital
Clermont-Ferrand
Louis Mourier Hospital (AP-HP)
Colombes
Grenoble University Hospital
Grenoble
La Roche/Yon Hospital
La Roche-sur-Yon
Lille University Hospital
Lille
Limoges University Hospital
Limoges
Lorient Hospital
Lorient
Montpellier University Hospital
Montpellier
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes
Armand Trousseau hospital (AP-HP)
Paris
Robert Debré Hospital (AP-HP)
Paris
Rennes University Hospital
Rennes
Saint Etienne University Hospital
Saint-Etienne
Saint Nazaire Hospital
Saint-Nazaire
Spain3 sites
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (ICS)
Barcelona
Hospital 12 de Octubre
Madrid
Hospital Infantil Universitario Nino Jesus
Madrid
About this study
Official title: BRAINI2-Paediatric : Blood Biomarkers to Improve Management of Children With Traumatic Brain Injury: a European, Prospective, Multicentre Clinical Study
Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13 to 15, is the cause of many consultations in paediatric emergency departments (1), even though it is a rare cause of acute complication: approximately 10% of children present with intracranial lesions (ICL) on the CT scan and less than 1% require neurosurgical intervention (2). Although ICLs remain a serious complication requiring rapid diagnosis, brain CT scans, the gold standard diagnostic test, cannot be performed routinely because many children would be unnecessarily exposed to ionising radiation associated with an increased risk of cancer (3). In recent years, several clinical decision rules for the management of mTBI have therefore been developed with the aim of identifying children at high or very low risk of ICL in order to better target CT scan indications. Despite this, the rate of CT scans performed has remained high, up to 35%, and has not decreased with the application of these clinical decision rules (4).
Furthermore, even though the majority of children and adolescents recover quickly after mTBI, nearly 30% will present symptoms such as headaches, dizziness, asthenia, memory, concentration or sleep disorders persisting beyond one month with a possible impact on their quality of life (5). Thus, there is a need to develop new strategies to (i) limit the use of CT scans while minimising the risk of late diagnosis of ICL, (ii) identify children with a higher risk of adverse outcome and/or post-concussive symptoms.
One of the most promising strategies is the use of brain-based blood biomarkers. This study therefore aims to provide new knowledge on two of them, GFAP and UCH-L1 (6,7), in particular by using an automated test combining them (the VIDAS® TBI test developed by bioMérieux) in order to improve the management of CT in the paediatric population at the diagnostic and prognostic levels.
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Being tested
- Biomarkers research
- Keywords
- TBI / Biomarkers / paediatric
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Biomarkers researchOther
For a part of the included population, the children with a mTBI and without indication of CT scan, a non-routine blood sample will be planned
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of GFAP and UCHL-1 used separately and in combination to detect the presence or absence of ICL on CT scan
Measured: Day 0
Secondary outcomes (6)
Prediction of early and mid-term prognosis after TBI : Number of participants with Early clinical worsening
Early clinical worsening defined by the occurrence of death from TBI, neurosurgical intervention, intubation for TBI, or hospital admission of two nights or more associated with ICL on CT scan for persistent neurological symptoms such as persistent alteration in mental status, recurrent emesis due to TBI, persistent severe headache, or ongoing seizure management (8), within 72 hours after TBI.
Measured: 72 hours after TBI
Prediction of early and mid-term prognosis after TBI : Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, paediatric version (GOS-E Peds)
Neurological outcome: Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, paediatric version (GOS-E Peds)
Measured: Month 1, Month 3
Prediction of early and mid-term prognosis after TBI : ost-concussion symptoms: Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ)
Post-concussion symptoms: Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ)
Measured: Month 1, Month 3
Prediction of early and mid-term prognosis after TBI : Health related quality of life: PedsQL questionnaire
Health related quality of life: PedsQL questionnaires
Measured: Month 1, Month 3
Prediction of early and mid-term prognosis after TBI : Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations
Comparison of serum GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations according to the TBI severity groups, i.e. mild (GCS score of 13-15), moderate (GCS score of 9-12) or severe (GCS score of 3-8)
Measured: Day 0
Establishment of age-appropriate physiological reference values
Measure of serum GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations in three age groups (under 2 years old, 2-9 years old and aged 10 and over) in a non-TBI control paediatric population
Measured: Day 0
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jun 2022
- Study start2 Aug 2022
- Primary completion26 May 2025
- Study completion26 May 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nantes University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,570 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Fleur LORTON, Principal investigator, Nantes University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05413499
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RC21_0595
- Acronym
- BRAINI2
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 3 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lorton F, Lagares A, de la Cruz J, Mejan O, Pavlov V, Sapin V, Poca MA, Lehner M, Biberthaler P, Chauvire-Drouard A, Gras-Le-Guen C, Scherdel P; BRAINI-2 paediatric Collaborative group; Collaborators. Performance of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) biomarkers in predicting CT scan results and neurological outcomes in children with traumatic brain injury (BRAINI-2 paediatric study): protocol of a European prospective multicentre study. BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e083531. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083531.
PubMed 38754888
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- BRAINI2-Paediatric : Blood Biomarkers to Improve Management of Children With Traumatic Brain Injury: a European, Prospective, Multicentre Clinical Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05413499
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BRAINI2 / RC21_0595
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Keywords
- TBI / Biomarkers / paediatric
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,570 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13 to 15, is the cause of many consultations in paediatric emergency departments (1), even though it is a rare cause of acute complication: approximately 10% of children present with intracranial lesions (ICL) on the CT scan and less than 1% require neurosurgical intervention (2). Although ICLs remain a serious complication requiring rapid diagnosis, brain CT scans, the gold standard diagnostic test, cannot be performed routinely because many children would be unnecessarily exposed to ionising radiation associated with an increased risk of cancer (3). In recent years, several clinical decision rules for the management of mTBI have therefore been developed with the aim of identifying children at high or very low risk of ICL in order to better target CT scan indications. Despite this, the rate of CT scans performed has remained high, up to 35%, and has not decreased with the application of these clinical decision rules (4).
Furthermore, even though the majority of children and adolescents recover quickly after mTBI, nearly 30% will present symptoms such as headaches, dizziness, asthenia, memory, concentration or sleep disorders persisting beyond one month with a possible impact on their quality of life (5). Thus, there is a need to develop new strategies to (i) limit the use of CT scans while minimising the risk of late diagnosis of ICL, (ii) identify children with a higher risk of adverse outcome and/or post-concussive symptoms.
One of the most promising strategies is the use of brain-based blood biomarkers. This study therefore aims to provide new knowledge on two of them, GFAP and UCH-L1 (6,7), in particular by using an automated test combining them (the VIDAS® TBI test developed by bioMérieux) in order to improve the management of CT in the paediatric population at the diagnostic and prognostic levels.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 0 days to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Children and adolescents <18 years old Consent from one of the parents of the child or from holder of parental responsibility Consent from the child or adolescent Parental affiliation with an appropriate health insurance system
- TBI population
- Non-TBI control paediatric population
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- TBI population
- Non-TBI control paediatric population
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Biomarkers researchFor a part of the included population, the children with a mTBI and without indication of CT scan, a non-routine blood sample will be planned | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of GFAP and UCHL-1 used separately and in combination to detect the presence or absence of ICL on CT scan
Time frame: Day 0
6 secondary outcomes
Prediction of early and mid-term prognosis after TBI : Number of participants with Early clinical worsening
Time frame: 72 hours after TBI
Prediction of early and mid-term prognosis after TBI : Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, paediatric version (GOS-E Peds)
Time frame: Month 1, Month 3
Prediction of early and mid-term prognosis after TBI : ost-concussion symptoms: Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ)
Time frame: Month 1, Month 3
Prediction of early and mid-term prognosis after TBI : Health related quality of life: PedsQL questionnaire
Time frame: Month 1, Month 3
Prediction of early and mid-term prognosis after TBI : Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations
Time frame: Day 0
Establishment of age-appropriate physiological reference values
Time frame: Day 0
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jun 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38754888Lorton F, Lagares A, de la Cruz J, Mejan O, Pavlov V, Sapin V, Poca MA, Lehner M, Biberthaler P, Chauvire-Drouard A, Gras-Le-Guen C, Scherdel P; BRAINI-2 paediatric Collaborative group; Collaborators. Performance of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) biomarkers in predicting CT scan results and neurological outcomes in children with traumatic brain injury (BRAINI-2 paediatric study): protocol of a European prospective multicentre study. BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e083531. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083531.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Nanopulse Laser Therapy
TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Different Intravenous Fluids on Post-operative Chronic Subdural Hematoma Size and Recurrence
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fleur LORTON principal investigator
Nantes University Hospital
20 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Biomarkers research in people with Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Nantes University Hospital at 20 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 20 sites in France, Spain, Germany, Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of GFAP and UCHL-1 used separately and in combination to detect the presence or absence of ICL on CT scan (time frame: Day 0). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05413499, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jun 2026.