Randomized Clinical TrialNCT05415293
Commerical DHA Supplementation
A study testing Expecta 200mg DHA and Promise 275mg DHA in people with Randomized Clinical Trial and Docosahexaenoic Acid, run by University of New Mexico at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare blood levels of women who take commericially available, low dose docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) dietary supplements in pregnancy with women who do not take supplements. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Randomized Clinical Trial, Docosahexaenoic Acid, Pregnancy
- What is being tested?
- Expecta 200mg DHA and Promise 275mg DHA
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2011to May 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant
- 34-36 weeks gestational age
Who cannot join
- Maternal medical disease
- Gestational diabetes
- Pre-eclampsia
- Fetal anomalies
- Ingestion of DHA or fish oil dietary supplements during the current pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of New Mexico Hospital
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131
About this study
Official title: Serum Docosahexaenoic Acid After Third Trimester Commercially Available Supplementation: a Randomized Clinical Trial
The purpose of this study is to compare blood levels of women who take commericially available, low dose docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) dietary supplements in pregnancy with women who do not take supplements.
Read the detailed description
The investigators recruited 73 pregnant women in the late third trimester from a low-risk midwifery clinic in compliance with the protocol approved by the investigators institutional review board regulations (HRPO #10-417). All women in the clinic were offered participation and enrollment was performed at 34-36 weeks gestational age for those who agreed. Exclusion criteria included, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes or pre-gestational diabetes, chronic use of medications, and other medical complication of pregnancy. Maternal data including age, gravidity, parity, gestational age, ethnicity, BMI at delivery, and mode of delivery were collected in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act guidelines. Neonatal data, including gender, birth weight, height, and head circumference and maternal delivery charactersitics were collected after reviewing the delivery record.
Subjects consented to randomization into a group receiving a fish oil based 275mg Promise DHA (Biotegrity; Granbury, TX) by mouth each day, or an algae-based 200mg Expecta DHA (Mead Johnson; Evansville, IN) by mouth each day, or dietary habits as usual. Randomization assignments were concealed in opaque envelopes and revealed at the time of enrollment. Calendars were kept to document supplement use and unused supplements were turned in at the time of admission to labor and delivery. Pill counts were performed to verify the accuracy of calendars.
Sample size considerations: The investigators primary outcome measure was DHA level in maternal serum and neonatal cord blood. To detect a 15% increase in DHA proportions, it would require a sample size of 19 in each group. This study is a pilot investigation, designed to determine if a larger supplementation study would be feasible in the investigators population.
Collection of blood samples A venous blood sample was collected from each participant at the time of enrollment and randomization. Maternal blood was drawn from the antecubital fossa in tubes containing EDTA and stored at -4 degrees C. A second maternal sample was retrieved at the time of admission for labor in a similar fashion. Neonatal samples were similarly collected at the time of delivery, just after cord clamping. Within 72 hours of collection, nonhemolyzed maternal and neonatal samples were identified and centrifuged for 5 minutes in a clinical centrifuge, and the plasma portion was extracted and stored in 2-mL vials at -78 degrees C until fatty acid analysis was performed.
Fatty acid analyses:
Samples were allowed to thaw at room temperature and lipid extraction was performed using chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v) according to the method of Folch et al (1957). The extracted lipid residue was weighed after drying at 45oC under a stream of nitrogen. The total phospholipid component of serum was isolated by silicic acid column chromatography (26) of the total lipid fraction obtained by extracting a 1-mL aliquot of serum with chloroform: methanol (2:1,v/v). Fatty acids were transesterified to generate methyl esters using 0.5 N NaOH in methanol and 14% (w/v) boron trifluoride in methanol (27). Undecenoic acid (Nu-Check Prep, Elysian, MN) was added prior to methylation, and served as an internal standard.
Fatty acid methyl esters were quantified using a gas chromatograph (6890N, Agilent Technologies, Sunnyvale, CA) equipped with an autoinjector, a split/splitless capillary injection system, and a flame ionization detector as described elsewhere(28)(). A customized fatty acid mixture described by Loor and Herbein (28) and made with pure methyl ester standards, including AA and DHA, (Nu-Check Prep, Elysian, MN, USA; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used to identify peaks and determine response factors for integration with a Chem DataStation (Agilent Technologies, Sunnyvale, CA).
- Conditions
- Randomized Clinical Trial, Docosahexaenoic Acid, Pregnancy
- Being tested
- Expecta 200mg DHA, Promise 275mg DHA
- Keywords
- docosahexaenoic acid, pregnancy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Expecta 200mg DHADietary supplement
Also called algae DHA
Promise 275mg DHADietary supplement
Also called fish oil DHA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Expecta 200mg DHA supplement | Active comparator | Women receive one daily softgel 200mg DHA algae-based DHA supplement sold as "Expecta." Receives: Dietary Supplement: Expecta 200mg DHA |
| Promise 275mg DHA supplement | Active comparator | Women receive one daily softgel 275mg DHA fish oil-based DHA supplement sold as "Promise." Receives: Dietary Supplement: Promise 275mg DHA |
| Control/ no supplement | No intervention | Women received care as usual and did not take any DHA supplement. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maternal serum DHA weight % at delivery
Weight proportion of DHA in the total plasma phospholipids after supplementation
Measured: 5 months
DHA in newborn cord blood after supplementation
Weight proportion of DHA in the total plasma phospholipids of newborn cord blood after maternal supplementation
Measured: up to 72 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jun 2022
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionMay 2011
- Study completionMay 2011
Why it stopped: PI has confirmed there are no results because the samples were degraded.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Randomized Clinical TrialStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of New Mexico
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ellen Mozurkewich, University of New Mexico
- Investigators
- Steffen A Brown, MD, Study director, University of New MexicoEllen L Mozurkewich, MD, MS, Principal investigator, University of New Mexico
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05415293
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Mozurkewich 10-417
- Other IDs
- UL1RR031977
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 11 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Wolfe MD, Chuang LT, Rayburn WF, Wen PC, VanderJagt DJ, Glew RH. Low fatty acid concentrations in neonatal cord serum correlate with maternal serum. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Aug;25(8):1292-6. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.631064. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
PubMed 22023348
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Serum Docosahexaenoic Acid After Third Trimester Commercially Available Supplementation: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05415293
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Mozurkewich 10-417
- Conditions
- Randomized Clinical Trial, Docosahexaenoic Acid, Pregnancy
- Keywords
- docosahexaenoic acid, pregnancy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: PI has confirmed there are no results because the samples were degraded.
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of New MexicoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
- Study start
- May 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare blood levels of women who take commericially available, low dose docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) dietary supplements in pregnancy with women who do not take supplements.
Detailed description
The investigators recruited 73 pregnant women in the late third trimester from a low-risk midwifery clinic in compliance with the protocol approved by the investigators institutional review board regulations (HRPO #10-417). All women in the clinic were offered participation and enrollment was performed at 34-36 weeks gestational age for those who agreed. Exclusion criteria included, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes or pre-gestational diabetes, chronic use of medications, and other medical complication of pregnancy. Maternal data including age, gravidity, parity, gestational age, ethnicity, BMI at delivery, and mode of delivery were collected in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act guidelines. Neonatal data, including gender, birth weight, height, and head circumference and maternal delivery charactersitics were collected after reviewing the delivery record.
Subjects consented to randomization into a group receiving a fish oil based 275mg Promise DHA (Biotegrity; Granbury, TX) by mouth each day, or an algae-based 200mg Expecta DHA (Mead Johnson; Evansville, IN) by mouth each day, or dietary habits as usual. Randomization assignments were concealed in opaque envelopes and revealed at the time of enrollment. Calendars were kept to document supplement use and unused supplements were turned in at the time of admission to labor and delivery. Pill counts were performed to verify the accuracy of calendars.
Sample size considerations: The investigators primary outcome measure was DHA level in maternal serum and neonatal cord blood. To detect a 15% increase in DHA proportions, it would require a sample size of 19 in each group. This study is a pilot investigation, designed to determine if a larger supplementation study would be feasible in the investigators population.
Collection of blood samples A venous blood sample was collected from each participant at the time of enrollment and randomization. Maternal blood was drawn from the antecubital fossa in tubes containing EDTA and stored at -4 degrees C. A second maternal sample was retrieved at the time of admission for labor in a similar fashion. Neonatal samples were similarly collected at the time of delivery, just after cord clamping. Within 72 hours of collection, nonhemolyzed maternal and neonatal samples were identified and centrifuged for 5 minutes in a clinical centrifuge, and the plasma portion was extracted and stored in 2-mL vials at -78 degrees C until fatty acid analysis was performed.
Fatty acid analyses:
Samples were allowed to thaw at room temperature and lipid extraction was performed using chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v) according to the method of Folch et al (1957). The extracted lipid residue was weighed after drying at 45oC under a stream of nitrogen. The total phospholipid component of serum was isolated by silicic acid column chromatography (26) of the total lipid fraction obtained by extracting a 1-mL aliquot of serum with chloroform: methanol (2:1,v/v). Fatty acids were transesterified to generate methyl esters using 0.5 N NaOH in methanol and 14% (w/v) boron trifluoride in methanol (27). Undecenoic acid (Nu-Check Prep, Elysian, MN) was added prior to methylation, and served as an internal standard.
Fatty acid methyl esters were quantified using a gas chromatograph (6890N, Agilent Technologies, Sunnyvale, CA) equipped with an autoinjector, a split/splitless capillary injection system, and a flame ionization detector as described elsewhere(28)(). A customized fatty acid mixture described by Loor and Herbein (28) and made with pure methyl ester standards, including AA and DHA, (Nu-Check Prep, Elysian, MN, USA; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used to identify peaks and determine response factors for integration with a Chem DataStation (Agilent Technologies, Sunnyvale, CA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Expecta 200mg DHA supplement | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: Expecta 200mg DHAWomen receive one daily softgel 200mg DHA algae-based DHA supplement sold as "Expecta." |
| Promise 275mg DHA supplement | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: Promise 275mg DHAWomen receive one daily softgel 275mg DHA fish oil-based DHA supplement sold as "Promise." |
| Control/ no supplement | No intervention | –Women received care as usual and did not take any DHA supplement. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnant
- 34-36 weeks gestational age
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Maternal medical disease
- Gestational diabetes
- Pre-eclampsia
- Fetal anomalies
- Ingestion of DHA or fish oil dietary supplements during the current pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Expecta 200mg DHAAlso: algae DHA | Dietary supplement | Expecta 200mg DHA supplement |
| Promise 275mg DHAAlso: fish oil DHA | Dietary supplement | Promise 275mg DHA supplement |
Primary outcome
Maternal serum DHA weight % at delivery
Time frame: 5 months
Weight proportion of DHA in the total plasma phospholipids after supplementation
DHA in newborn cord blood after supplementation
Time frame: up to 72 hours
Weight proportion of DHA in the total plasma phospholipids of newborn cord blood after maternal supplementation
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: PI has confirmed there are no results because the samples were degraded.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jan 2024.
- Background: PubMed 22023348Wolfe MD, Chuang LT, Rayburn WF, Wen PC, VanderJagt DJ, Glew RH. Low fatty acid concentrations in neonatal cord serum correlate with maternal serum. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Aug;25(8):1292-6. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.631064. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
Related trials for Randomized Clinical Trial
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of Phenytoin Mucoadhesive Film for Oral Ulcers in Healthy Volunteers
Oral Ulcer, Oral Mucositis
Recruiting
HEME Home Transfusion Program
Leukemia, Myeloma
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use on Perioperative Anxiety and Postoperative Pain in Parturients Undergoing Cesarean Section
Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block on Quality of Recovery After Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Pain, Postoperative Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Venetoclax and HMA Treatment of Older and Unfit Adults With FLT3 Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Steffen A Brown, MD study director
University of New Mexico
Ellen L Mozurkewich, MD, MS principal investigator
University of New Mexico
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Expecta 200mg DHA and Promise 275mg DHA in people with Randomized Clinical Trial and Docosahexaenoic Acid, run by University of New Mexico at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: PI has confirmed there are no results because the samples were degraded.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maternal serum DHA weight % at delivery (time frame: 5 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05415293, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2024.