AzTrials
AzTrials

FrailtyNCT05416047

An Investigation of Frailty Markers and Outcomes in Patients Requiring Emergency Laparotomy

An observational study of Frailty and Surgery, run by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Over 30,000 emergency abdominal operations (laparotomy, EmLAP) are performed in the UK annually and they are usually performed in adults over the age of 65. As such, it can be a risky operation with high chance of developing complications, including death, especially if there is frailty before the operation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Frailty, Surgery, Sarcopenia
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
30 May 2022to 1 Aug 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in Royal Alexandra Hospital

Who may be able to join

  • Over 40 years of age
  • NELA/ ELLSA inclusion criteria:
  • Open, laparoscopic, or laparoscopically-assisted procedures
  • Procedures involving the stomach, small or large bowel, or rectum for conditions such as perforation, ischaemia, abdominal abscess, bleeding or obstruction
  • Washout/evacuation of intra-peritoneal abscess (unless due to appendicitis or cholecystitis - excluded, see below)
  • Washout/evacuation of intra-peritoneal haematoma
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Bowel resection/repair due to incarcerated incisional, umbilical, inguinal and femoral hernias (but not hernia repair without bowel resection/repair). E.g. Large incisional hernia repair with bowel resection Bowel resection/repair due to obstructing/ incarcerated incisional hernias provided the presentation and findings were acute. This will include large incisional hernia repair with division of adhesions.
  • Laparotomy/laparoscopy with inoperable pathology (e.g. peritoneal/hepatic metastases) where the intention was to perform a definitive procedure. This does not include purely diagnostic procedures.
  • Laparoscopic/Open Adhesiolysis
  • Return to theatre for repair of substantial dehiscence of major abdominal wound (i.e. "burst abdomen")
  • Any reoperation/return to theatre for complications of elective general/upper GI surgery meeting the criteria above is included. Returns to theatre for complications following non-GI surgery are now excluded (see exclusion criteria below).

Who cannot join

  • Under 40 years of age
  • CT scan or postoperative finding of inoperable disseminated peritoneal disease
  • Open and close laparotomy (postoperative palliation, non-survivable global ischemia where there are <90cm from duodenojejunal junction to stoma)
  • Complication from colonic stenting requiring laparotomy
  • NELA exclusion criteria:
  • Elective laparotomy / laparoscopy
Show all 23Show fewer
  • Diagnostic laparotomy/laparoscopy where no subsequent procedure is performed (NB, if no procedure is performed because of inoperable pathology, then include)
  • Appendicectomy +/- drainage of localised collection unless the procedure is incidental to a non-elective procedure on the GI tract
  • Cholecystectomy +/- drainage of localised collection unless the procedure is incidental to a non-elective procedure on the GI tract (All surgery involving the appendix or gallbladder, including any surgery relating to complications such as abscess or bile leak is excluded. The only exception to this is if carried out as an incidental procedure to a more major procedure. There might be extreme cases of peritoneal contamination, but total exclusion avoids subjective judgement calls about severity of contamination.)
  • Non-elective hernia repair without bowel resection or division of adhesions
  • Minor abdominal wound dehiscence unless this causes bowel complications requiring resection.
  • Non-elective formation of a colostomy or ileostomy as either a trephine or a laparoscopic procedure (NB: if a midline laparotomy is performed, with the primary procedure being formation of a stoma then this should be included)
  • Vascular surgery, including abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
  • Caesarean section or obstetric laparotomies
  • Gynaecological laparotomy
  • Ruptured ectopic pregnancy, or pelvic abscesses due to pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Laparotomy/laparoscopy for pathology caused by blunt or penetrating trauma
  • All surgery relating to organ transplantation (including returns to theatre for any reason following transplant surgery)
  • Surgery relating to sclerosing peritonitis
  • Surgery for removal of dialysis catheters
  • Laparotomy/laparoscopy for oesophageal pathology
  • Laparotomy/laparoscopy for pathology of the spleen, renal tract, kidneys, liver, gall bladder and biliary tree, pancreas or urinary tract
  • Returns to theatre for complications (eg bowel injury, haematoma, collection) following non-GI surgery are now excluded. i.e returns to theatre following renal, urological, gynaecological, vascular, hepatic, pancreatic, splenic surgery are excluded

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Royal Alexandra Hospital

    Paisley, Renfrewshire, PA2 9PN

    Hwei Jene Ng, 01413146965, hweijene.ng@ggc.scot.nhs.uk

    Susan Moug, susan.moug@ggc.scot.nhs.uk

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Over 30,000 emergency abdominal operations (laparotomy, EmLAP) are performed in the UK annually and they are usually performed in adults over the age of 65. As such, it can be a risky operation with high chance of developing complications, including death, especially if there is frailty before the operation. Such patients are much more susceptible to infections or to have complications, such as wound breakdown, because of poor healing. Whilst some patients might be frail from the outset, surgery can cause patients to become frail ('surgical frailty'). This can happen in all age groups, not just the elderly and is not uncommon after an EmLap.

This study aims to establish blood tests (biomarkers) associated with frailty, explore the ability of frailty markers measured before EmLAP to predict death after EmLAP, define changes in frailty in EmLAP patients and analyse the influence of frailty on quality of life post EmLAP.

Read more

Over 2 years, 150 patients age ≥40 undergoing EmLAP in a hospital will be recruited and followed up for 90 days looking at different frailty markers. These include (a)blood tests (biomarkers) analysed in a special laboratory machine called mass spectrometer to identify chemical markers linked to frailty status (b)CT scan looking at muscle bulk (sarcopenia) (c)Rockwood Clinical Frailty Score, a scoring system assessing how much a patient can do (1 is fit; 9 is extremely frail).

The investigators hope that these results will improve our understanding of frailty and lead to further research to improve outcomes for EmLAP patients.

Read the detailed description

Over 30,000 emergency laparotomies (EmLAP) are performed in the UK annually yet research in EmLAP is sparse. The largest UK national observational cohort study (Emergency Laparotomy and frailty study, ELF) found higher rates of 30 and 90-day mortality as well as higher post-operative complications in the frail patients. These findings were reflected in the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) 7th report and the results have worsened.

Frailty is a clinical syndrome of increased vulnerability that results from ageing associated multi-system physiological decline resulting in reduction of the individual's ability to cope with physiological stress such as surgery. Frailty can be identified using different assessments but due to practicality in emergency setting, the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) is increasingly used and has been incorporated in NELA. Frailty is not unique to the older EmLAP population, it is also present in 16% of adults aged 40 to 65 years. If frailty pre-EmLAP is prevalent, then it must be remembered that surgery can induce frailty in non-frail patients and worsening frailty in those that were already frail (surgical frailty).

Overall, there is lack of understanding in the biochemical aetiology of frailty. Early detection of subclinical changes and changes at the molecular level are key to enhancing our understanding of the biology of frailty and ultimately improving patients outcomes. This study aims to establish blood based biomarkers that could identify frailty objectively in EmLAP patients. The secondary aims are to compare preoperative frailty markers in their ability to predict 30 and 90-day mortality post-EmLAP, define perioperative changes in frailty in patients undergoing EmLAP and analyse the influence of perioperative frailty on morbidity and quality of life post- EmLAP.

Methods A prospective single centred observational study will be conducted over on 150 patients ≥40 years of age that undergo EmLAP over 2years. Patients will be included according to the established NELA criteria. The variables collected include demographics, co-morbidities using, polypharmacy, lifestyle, place of residence, indication and type of surgery (as per NELA criteria) and prognostic NELA score.

The frailty markers will be collected preoperatively and post- operatively day 1 and 7:

  1. Blood sample for mass spectrometry analysis (additional blood tube on top of routine bloods)
  2. Preoperative CT abdomen pelvis
  3. Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) score (recorded on admission)
  4. Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) score (recorded on admission)
  5. Routine serum biochemistry and haematology: Hb, White cells, C- Reactive protein, Albumin
  6. Rockwood Clinical Frailty Score (CFS). Score 1 -9 with frail as ≥4.

Other follow-up data collection:

  1. Day 30 and 90 mortality assessed from medical records
  2. Place of residence post discharge following EmLAP
  3. Day 30 and 90 blood samples for mass spectrometry analysis
  4. 30 day morbidity (according Clavien Dindo classification)
  5. Total hospital stay including critical care stay
  6. Day 30 and 90 quality of life post EmLAP using EQ5D-5L.

The frailty markers will be compared between groups of frail and non-frail patients using statistical methods such as regression model and adjust for appropriate confounding variables.

Medical subject headings
Frailty, Sarcopenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT05416047
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Frail and no frailFrailty will be assessed using Rockwood Clinical Frailty Score
Sarcopenia and no sarcopeniaSarcopenia will be assessed using psoas muscle mass

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Preoperative frailty markers

    Recruited patients will be categorised into frail and non- frail group according to collected data on co-morbidities, CT measurement for sarcopenia, Rockwood CFS and frailty questionnaires results. Biomarker identified on mass spectrometry will be compared with result from patient grouping of frail and non- frail.

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Perioperative changes on 30- day morbidity, 30-day and 90-day mortality

    Data on length of total hospital stay, length of stay in critical care, post operative complications according to Clavien Dindo Classification, time from surgery to medical discharge (i.e. when medically well, excluding social issues etc), date and cause of death within 90 days post operative will be collected and compared among frail and non- frail group of patients.

    Measured: 90 days

  2. Influence of perioperative frailty on quality of life post emergency laparotomy

    Changes in quality of life post EmLAP and place of residence post discharge will be explored using EQ5D-5L questionnaire on day 30 and 90 post operative

    Measured: 90 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jun 2022
  2. Study start30 May 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05416047
Sponsor's protocol ID
GN20SG508
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
17 May 2022
Last updated
28 Apr 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ng HJ, Rattray NJW, Quasim T, Moug SJ. Changes in frailty status and discharge destination post emergency laparotomy. World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Apr 25;20(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00612-8.

    PubMed 40281633
  • Ng HJ, Quasim T, Rattray NJW, Moug S. Investigation of frailty markers including a novel biomarker panel in emergency laparotomy: protocol of a prospective cohort study. BMC Surg. 2023 Jul 5;23(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02093-5.

    PubMed 37408022

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Frailty and Surgery, run by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Preoperative frailty markers (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05416047, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in