StressMISTNCT05427188
Effect of MIST on Esophageal Sensitivity in HV
A study testing Stress paradigm in people with Stress, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Effect of acute psychosocial stress on esophageal sensitivity in healthy volunteers. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Stress
- What is being tested?
- Stress paradigm
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- Jun 2022to Oct 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 18 to 65 years. All participants will receive and sign a copy of the informed consent before initiation of the study.
Who cannot join
- A history of any upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, complaints or diseases;
- Prior history of esophageal or gastric surgery or endoscopic anti-reflux procedure;
- Psychiatric disorders;
- Concomitant use of other medication or treatments except for oral contraceptives;
- Use of medication altering GI motility;
- Pregnant or nursing women;
- History of drugs or alcohol abuse.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Belgium1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
TARGID
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant
Annelies Geeraerts, 01643385, Annelies.Geeraerts@kuleuven.be
About this study
Official title: Effect of Acute Psychosocial Stress on Esophageal Sensitivity in Healthy Volunteers
Effect of acute psychosocial stress on esophageal sensitivity in healthy volunteers.
Read the detailed description
Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), defined as the presence of symptoms or lesions that can be attributed to the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus, is an increasingly prevalent condition in Western societies. The most typical symptoms are heartburn and regurgitation, however GERD can also manifest itself through a variety of other esophageal and extra-esophageal symptoms (e.g. chronic cough).
GERD patients can be divided into different categories based on upper endoscopy and pH or impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring. In the absence of lesions (esophagitis) during upper endoscopy, a pH or MII-pH monitoring will be performed. A first subcategory are patients with true GERD, characterized by an abnormal acid exposure and a positive or negative symptom association. The second and third category are patients with reflux hypersensitivity (RHS) and functional heartburn (FH)characterized by normal acid exposure on the MII-pH monitoring and a positive and negative symptom reflux association, respectively.
The basis for symptom generation/perception in GERD patients is not yet completely understood, but different mechanisms have been proposed including esophageal hypersensitivity, in which psychosocial stress is considered as a potential factor. This was shown in a study where 64% of the participants with heartburn reported that psychological factors, such as life stress, aggravate their symptoms. Furthermore, Fass et al. observed that auditory stress exacerbated symptom perception during esophageal acid perfusion (6). Moreover, our group investigated the effect of intravenous corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) on esophageal in healthy volunteers and showed that CRH is able to increase esophageal sensitivity to mechanical distention. Nevertheless, these previously performed studies in patients have some limitations: no measurable increase in cortisol (hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis was not affected in these studies) and patients with RHS and FH - in whom the effect of stress is hypothesized to be the most relevant - were not included.
To induce moderate psychologic stress in the current study, the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST) will be used. During this protocol, participants receive mental arithmetic challenges, together with social evaluative threat components from the program and/or the investigator (sham condition: threat components from the program and/or the investigator are absent). This MIST protocol can be used when investigating the effects of perceiving and processing psychosocial stress in the human brain in functional imaging studies.
Therefore, we want to investigate the relation between sensitivity to different stimuli (esophageal sensitivity) and psychosocial stress in healthy volunteers and patients (True GERD, RHS and FH).
- Conditions
- Stress
- Being tested
- Stress paradigm, Sham paradigm
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Stress paradigmBehavioural
HV will receive mental arithmetic challenges, together with social evaluative threat components from the program and/or the investigator
Sham paradigmBehavioural
HV will receive mental arithmetic challenges where threat components from the program and/or the investigator are absent
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MIST-paradigm | Experimental | HV assigned in the MIST paradigm will receive psychosocial stress Receives: Behavioral: Stress paradigm |
| Sham-paradigm | Sham comparator | HV assigned in the MIST paradigm will receive no psychosocial stress Receives: Behavioral: Sham paradigm |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Esophageal mechanical sensitivity
Change in balloon distention
Measured: Will be assessed at time point 180 minutes
Esophageal chemical sensitivity
Change in time for reaching pain threshold
Measured: We be assessed at time point 180 minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
Cortisol levels
Change in cortisol levels
Measured: every 15 minutes a saliva sample during 4.5 hours: at time points (in minutes) 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120, 135, 150, 165, 180, 195, 210, 225, 240, 255, 27
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jun 2022
- Study startJun 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completionOct 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StressStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof Dr Jan Tack, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05427188
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S65302-HV
- Acronym
- MIST
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 20 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 22 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Acute Psychosocial Stress on Esophageal Sensitivity in Healthy Volunteers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05427188
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MIST / S65302-HV
- Conditions
- Stress
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Effect of acute psychosocial stress on esophageal sensitivity in healthy volunteers.
Detailed description
Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), defined as the presence of symptoms or lesions that can be attributed to the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus, is an increasingly prevalent condition in Western societies. The most typical symptoms are heartburn and regurgitation, however GERD can also manifest itself through a variety of other esophageal and extra-esophageal symptoms (e.g. chronic cough).
GERD patients can be divided into different categories based on upper endoscopy and pH or impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring. In the absence of lesions (esophagitis) during upper endoscopy, a pH or MII-pH monitoring will be performed. A first subcategory are patients with true GERD, characterized by an abnormal acid exposure and a positive or negative symptom association. The second and third category are patients with reflux hypersensitivity (RHS) and functional heartburn (FH)characterized by normal acid exposure on the MII-pH monitoring and a positive and negative symptom reflux association, respectively.
The basis for symptom generation/perception in GERD patients is not yet completely understood, but different mechanisms have been proposed including esophageal hypersensitivity, in which psychosocial stress is considered as a potential factor. This was shown in a study where 64% of the participants with heartburn reported that psychological factors, such as life stress, aggravate their symptoms. Furthermore, Fass et al. observed that auditory stress exacerbated symptom perception during esophageal acid perfusion (6). Moreover, our group investigated the effect of intravenous corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) on esophageal in healthy volunteers and showed that CRH is able to increase esophageal sensitivity to mechanical distention. Nevertheless, these previously performed studies in patients have some limitations: no measurable increase in cortisol (hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis was not affected in these studies) and patients with RHS and FH - in whom the effect of stress is hypothesized to be the most relevant - were not included.
To induce moderate psychologic stress in the current study, the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST) will be used. During this protocol, participants receive mental arithmetic challenges, together with social evaluative threat components from the program and/or the investigator (sham condition: threat components from the program and/or the investigator are absent). This MIST protocol can be used when investigating the effects of perceiving and processing psychosocial stress in the human brain in functional imaging studies.
Therefore, we want to investigate the relation between sensitivity to different stimuli (esophageal sensitivity) and psychosocial stress in healthy volunteers and patients (True GERD, RHS and FH).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MIST-paradigm | Experimental | Behavioral: Stress paradigmHV assigned in the MIST paradigm will receive psychosocial stress |
| Sham-paradigm | Sham comparator | Behavioral: Sham paradigmHV assigned in the MIST paradigm will receive no psychosocial stress |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Aged between 18 to 65 years. All participants will receive and sign a copy of the informed consent before initiation of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- A history of any upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, complaints or diseases;
- Prior history of esophageal or gastric surgery or endoscopic anti-reflux procedure;
- Psychiatric disorders;
- Concomitant use of other medication or treatments except for oral contraceptives;
- Use of medication altering GI motility;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Stress paradigmHV will receive mental arithmetic challenges, together with social evaluative threat components from the program and/or the investigator | Behavioural | MIST-paradigm |
| Sham paradigmHV will receive mental arithmetic challenges where threat components from the program and/or the investigator are absent | Behavioural | Sham-paradigm |
Primary outcome
Esophageal mechanical sensitivity
Time frame: Will be assessed at time point 180 minutes
Change in balloon distention
Esophageal chemical sensitivity
Time frame: We be assessed at time point 180 minutes
Change in time for reaching pain threshold
1 secondary outcome
Cortisol levels
Time frame: every 15 minutes a saliva sample during 4.5 hours: at time points (in minutes) 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120, 135, 150, 165, 180, 195, 210, 225, 240, 255, 27
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jun 2022.
Related trials for Stress
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Periodontal Status and Biomarkers in MASLD
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)
Recruiting
NightWare and Cardiovascular Health in Women With PTSD
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Cardiovascular Diseases
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Stress paradigm in people with Stress, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Annelies Geeraerts (+321643385, annelies.geeraerts@kuleuven.be), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Esophageal mechanical sensitivity (time frame: Will be assessed at time point 180 minutes). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2022.