AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute LeukemiaNCT05428176

A High Intensity Electronic Health Intervention for the Reduction of Learning Disparities in Childhood Cancer Survivors

A study testing Best Practice, Internet-Based Intervention and Quality-of-Life Assessment in people with Acute Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by City of Hope Medical Center at 4 sites in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This clinical trial evaluates a high intensity electronic health (eHealth) intervention program for reducing learning disparities in children with cancer. Most children with leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma can be cured due to advancements in diagnosis and treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Best Practice, Internet-Based Intervention and Quality-of-Life Assessment
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
332 participants
Where
4 sitesUnited States
Study dates
10 Sep 2022to 30 Jun 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Documented informed consent of the participant and/or legally authorized representative
  • Assent, when appropriate, will be obtained per institutional guidelines
  • Primary participating parent/caregiver is English- or Spanish-speaking (any race/ethnicity)
  • Child is aged 6-12 years (yr.) (for the website usability pre-study, child is age 8 - 12 yrs.)
  • Child understands English (but can be bilingual)
  • Child treated for acute leukemia (e.g., acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myelogenous leukemia) or lymphoblastic lymphoma
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Child is in cancer remission and has completed cancer therapies, including maintenance treatment
  • Primary participating parent/caregiver has daily contact with the child
  • Child is enrolled in school

Who cannot join

  • Recent or current participation in a behavioral intervention study with a similar focus
  • History of major psychiatric condition (e.g., psychosis) in parent or child
  • Severe neurodevelopmental disorder in the child (e.g., down syndrome, intellectual disability)
  • Child has previously used the IXL online learning program extensively and unwilling to regularly use it again
  • Any other condition that would, in the investigator's judgment, contraindicate the patient's participation in the clinical study due to safety concerns with clinical study procedures
  • Prospective participants who, in the opinion of the investigator, may not be able to comply with all study procedures (including compliance issues related to feasibility/logistics)

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

United States4 sites
  • City of Hope Medical Center

    Duarte, California, 91010

  • Childrens Hospital of Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, 90027

  • Rady Children's Hospital San Diego

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • University of Calif San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94115

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Leveraging Digital Health Solutions to Reduce Learning and Functional Disparities in Children With Cancer

This clinical trial evaluates a high intensity electronic health (eHealth) intervention program for reducing learning disparities in children with cancer. Most children with leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma can be cured due to advancements in diagnosis and treatment. However, because treatments for these conditions target the central nervous system, these children are at increased risk for developing neurocognitive late effects (problems with attention, thinking, learning, and remembering). Fortunately, many survivors do well, but some children continue to struggle with learning and have academic difficulties after their cancer treatments. The purpose of this research study is to see whether providing parents with educational knowledge and parenting tips using videoconferencing and a special website better helps their cancer survivor child in learning and school achievement compared to typical services.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

  1. Determine the effectiveness of high intensity program (HIP)-eHealth on pediatric cancer survivors' learning and school-related outcomes up to 12 months post-enrollment.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Determine the effectiveness of HIP-eHealth on parental efficacy up to 12 months post-enrollment.

II. Examine the extent to which parents' self-reported efficacy and/or children's use of online learning activities correlates with the children's school functioning.

III. Examine differences in HIP-eHealth uptake and effects across socio-demographic groups.

OUTLINE:

PRE-STUDY: Parent-child dyads attend 4 intervention sessions over 10 weeks and provide feedback in support of intervention refinement.

Parent-child dyads are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients and parents undergo high intensity eHealth intervention through the interactive website and via videoconferencing for 30-50 minutes once every 3 to 4 weeks for up to 5 sessions over 6 months. Patients and parents also receive usual care. After 6 months, parents attend booster sessions at months 7, 9, and 11.

ARM II: Patients and parents receive usual care.

Being tested
Best Practice, Internet-Based Intervention, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Questionnaire Administration
Medical subject headings
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Best PracticeOther

    Receive usual care

  • Internet-Based InterventionOther

    Undergo eHealth intervention

  • Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther

    Ancillary studies

  • Questionnaire AdministrationOther

    Ancillary studies

Study groups in NCT05428176
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm I (high intensity e-Health program)ExperimentalPatients and parents receive the high intensity eHealth intervention through the interactive website and via videoconferencing for 30-50 minutes once every 3 to 4 weeks for up to 5 sessions over 6 months. Patients and parents also receive usual care. After 6 months, parents attend booster sessions at months 7, 9, and 11.
Receives: Other: Best Practice; Other: Internet-Based Intervention; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration
Arm II (usual care)Active comparatorPatients and parents receive usual care.
Receives: Other: Best Practice; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Child's improvement in academic functioning

    Measured using the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) Numerical Operations (NO) subset. The WIAT NO score at 1 year will be compared between treatment arms using the Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE), adjusting for baseline values and accounting for correlations among patients within a study site. An indicator variable for treatment arm will be included in the model, its significance tested, and a 95% confidence interval constructed.

    Measured: At baseline and 1 year

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Objective academic performance (Child)

    Assessed by WIAT reading and math scores, grades from school report cards, IXL diagnostic scores in math and English language arts (high intensity program e-health group only). The GEE will also be used to compare the effects of high intensity program e-Health intervention and low intensity program on this outcome. Non-normally distributed measurements will be transformed to achieve normality. If this is not possible, they will be dichotomized, and GEE for binary outcomes will be used for analysis. Potential modification of the treatment effect by covariates (e.g., child's age, parent's language, sex/gender, race/ethnicity, time since diagnosis) will be explored by including the two-way interaction of treatment by covariate. Will also perform subgroup analysis by estimating the within-subgroup intervention effects and constructing the 95% confidence intervals in groups defined by the covariates, e.g. sex/gender (men, women) and language (English, Spanish).

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  2. Attention performance (Child)

    Assessed with Conners Parent Report Attention and Hyperactivity subscales. The GEE will also be used to compare the effects of high intensity program e-Health intervention and low intensity program on this outcome. Non-normally distributed measurements will be transformed to achieve normality. If this is not possible, they will be dichotomized, and GEE for binary outcomes will be used for analysis. Potential modification of the treatment effect by covariates (e.g., child's age, parent's language, sex/gender, race/ethnicity, time since diagnosis) will be explored by including the two-way interaction of treatment by covariate. Will also perform subgroup analysis by estimating the within-subgroup intervention effects and constructing the 95% confidence intervals in groups defined by the covariates, e.g. sex/gender (men, women) and language (English, Spanish).

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  3. Parent-reported functioning of child (Child)

    Assessed by Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Psychosocial Functioning: School, Emotional, Social domains. The GEE will also be used to compare the effects of high intensity program e-Health intervention and low intensity program on this outcome. Non-normally distributed measurements will be transformed to achieve normality. If this is not possible, they will be dichotomized, and GEE for binary outcomes will be used for analysis. Potential modification of the treatment effect by covariates (e.g., child's age, parent's language, sex/gender, race/ethnicity, time since diagnosis) will be explored by including the two-way interaction of treatment by covariate. Will also perform subgroup analysis by estimating the within-subgroup intervention effects and constructing the 95% confidence intervals in groups defined by the covariates, e.g. sex/gender (men, women) and language (English, Spanish).

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  4. Use of learning strategies (Child)

    Assessed with School Motivation and Learning Strategies Inventory study strategies subscale, student self-regulatory strategy use scale. The GEE will also be used to compare the effects of high intensity program e-Health intervention and low intensity program on this outcome. Non-normally distributed measurements will be transformed to achieve normality. If this is not possible, they will be dichotomized, and GEE for binary outcomes will be used for analysis. Potential modification of the treatment effect by covariates (e.g., child's age, parent's language, sex/gender, race/ethnicity, time since diagnosis) will be explored by including the two-way interaction of treatment by covariate. Will also perform subgroup analysis by estimating the within-subgroup intervention effects and constructing the 95% confidence intervals in groups defined by the covariates, e.g. sex/gender (men, women) and language (English, Spanish).

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  5. Mean of item scores from the Student Intrinsic Motivation to Learn questionnaire

    Student Intrinsic Motivation to Learn Questionnaire measuring motivation for academic learning

    Measured: Baseline, time 2, time 3

  6. Mean of item scores from the Student Academic Self-efficacy questionnaire

    .Student Academic Self-efficacy measures self-confidence

    Measured: Baseline, time 2, time 3

  7. Knowledge of pro-learning parenting (Parents)

    Assessed with Parent Beliefs and Behaviors Questionnaire (PBQ-R3) knowledge scale. GEE models using one indicator variable of time will be used to examine the efficacy of the high intensity program eHealth intervention compared to low intensity program on these scores, adjusting for baseline measurements and study site, and accounting for within-site and within-individual correlations. Other parent-related covariates that are imbalanced at baseline will be included in the model. The efficacy of the intervention will be assessed by testing the significance of the interaction of treatment-by-time indicator.

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  8. Frequency of pro-learning behaviors (Parents)

    Assessed with PBQ-R3 parenting behaviors scale, and weekly time spent with the child in pro-learning behaviors and activities. GEE models using one indicator variable of time will be used to examine the efficacy of the high intensity program eHealth intervention compared to low intensity program on these scores, adjusting for baseline measurements and study site, and accounting for within-site and within-individual correlations. Other parent-related covariates that are imbalanced at baseline will be included in the model. The efficacy of the intervention will be assessed by testing the significance of the interaction of treatment-by-time indicator.

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  9. Parenting pro-learning efficacy (Parents)

    Assessed with PBQ-R3 efficacy scale. GEE models using one indicator variable of time will be used to examine the efficacy of the high intensity program eHealth intervention compared to low intensity program on these scores, adjusting for baseline measurements and study site, and accounting for within-site and within-individual correlations. Other parent-related covariates that are imbalanced at baseline will be included in the model. The efficacy of the intervention will be assessed by testing the significance of the interaction of treatment-by-time indicator.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 months, 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jun 2022
  2. Study start10 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Care provider
Enrolment
332 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05428176
Sponsor's protocol ID
22057
Other IDs
NCI-2022-04695, 22057, P30CA033572
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
10 Jun 2022
Last updated
14 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Best Practice, Internet-Based Intervention and Quality-of-Life Assessment in people with Acute Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by City of Hope Medical Center at 4 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Child's improvement in academic functioning (time frame: At baseline and 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in