Left Bundle-Branch BlockNCT05434962
The Left Bundle Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trial
A study testing Cardiac resynchronization therapy in people with Left Bundle-Branch Block and Heart Failure, run by Óscar Cano Pérez at 10 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular (BiV) pacing significantly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), impaired LV function and heart failure in spite of optimal medical treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Left Bundle-Branch Block, Heart Failure, Impaired Left Ventricular Function
- What is being tested?
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 176 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 27 Jun 2022to 31 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age > 18 years
- Class I or IIa indication for CRT according to current ESC or ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines
- left bundle branch block according to Strauss criteria
- Signed and dated informed consent
Who cannot join
- Pregnant woman
- Permanent or long-lasting atrial fibrillation
- Previous CRT device
- Previous PM/ICD with ventricular pacing > 10%
- Conventional pacemaker indication
- Nonspecific IVCD (intraventricular conduction delay)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Unstable angina, acute Myocardial Infarction (MI), Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG), Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty (PCI), valve repair or replacement within 90 days prior enrollment
- Indication for valve repair or replacement
- Already included in another clinical study that could confoud the results of the present study
- Life expectancy < 12 months
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
10 sites in 1 country
Spain10 sites
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis
Alicante, Alicante
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
Granada, Granada, 18014
Hospital Universitario San Cecilio
Granada, Granada, 18016
Hospital Universitario Juan Ramón Jiménez
Huelva, Huelva, 21005
Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Hospital 12 Octubre
Madrid, Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario Puerta De Hierro
Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca
Murcia, Murcia
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe
Valencia, Valencia, 46026
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 50009
About this study
Official title: A Non-inferiority Randomized Comparison Between LEFT BUNDLE Branch Area Pacing and Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The LEFT-BUNDLE-CRT Trial
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular (BiV) pacing significantly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), impaired LV function and heart failure in spite of optimal medical treatment. CRT positive effects are based on the existence of an electromechanical dyssynchrony induced by the abnormal activation sequence associated with the presence of a left bundle branch block (LBBB), which is thought to be responsible for a negative LV remodeling leading to LVEF impairment and heart failure progression. However, one third of patients undergoing CRT are considered non responders due to different reasons. Recently, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a novel physiological pacing modality aiming for conduction system recruitment in patients with normal or impaired atrioventricular conduction, including patients with LBBB. LBBAP achieves LBBB correction in up to 85% of the cases and thus could be a promising pacing modality for CRT candidates.
Read the detailed description
Medical device: Only CE-marked CRT-P or CRT-D Medtronic devices locally approved and commercially available (Medtronic 3830 Pacing Lead) shall be used in this protocol.
Indication: Pacing and sensing in the right atrium or ventricle. It is also designed for pacing and sensing in the bundle as an alternative to pacing in the right ventricle in a single or dual chamber pacing system.
Intended use: Patients with an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Duration of the study: Approximate inclusion period of 18 months
Follow-up: Patients will be followed for 12 months ± 4 weeks after implant
Planned study period: The study is planned to start in Q1 2022
No. of sites: Approximately 11 sites in Spain.
No. of subjects: 176 patients will be enrolled in the study
Study type: Post-market study
Study rationale: Previous studies show 85% implantation success, significant reduction in QRS duration, and significant improvement in NYHA functional class, LVEF, and LV end-diastolic diameter. Left bundle branch pacing could be an alternative to conventional biventricular pacing.
Study design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority, open.
Objectives of the study:
- Primary objective: The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate that LBBAP is associated with a non-inferior percentage of CRT responders at 6 months follow-up than conventional BiV pacing using a conventional CS lead in patients with CRT indications according to current guidelines. Positive CRT response will be defined either by an improved Clinical Composite Score or ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months follow-up
- Secondary objectives: To evaluate reverse ventricular remodeling response and dyssynchrony parameters based on echocardiographic data at 6 and 12 months follow-up. To asess clinical outcome using the Clinical Composite Score, 6 minute walking test, quality of life measurements (EuroQuol EQ 5-D) at 6 and 12 months follow-up. To evaluate HF related hospitalizations at 6 and 12 months follow-up. To evaluate mortality (global and cardiovascular) and need for cardiac transplantation at 6 and 12 month follow-up. To evaluate incidence of ventricular arrhythmias at 6 and 12 month follow-up. To evaluate differences in CRT response depending on the final LBBAP modality (LBBP vs deep septal pacing). To evaluate device related complications at 6 and 12 month follow-up.
Primary Outcome Measures: Improved Clinical Composite Score or ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months follow-up.
Participating sites:
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
- Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada
- Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia
- Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid
- Hospital General de Alicante
- Hospital Bellvitge, Barcelona
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid
- Hospital Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza
- Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva
- Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada
Study population: Subjects 18 years of age or older will be included in the study. Both sexes are eligible to participate. Subjects must present a left bundle branch block (according to Strauss criteria) with indication of CRT class I or IIa according to clinical practice guidelines. A selection of the subjects will be made before inclusion following the selection clinical investigation plan. After confirming that the subject meets the inclusion criteria and does not meet the exclusion criteria, they will be included in the clinical study.
Study population criteria:
- Inclusion criteria: age > 18 years; Class I or IIa indication for CRT according to current ESC or ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines; left bundle branch block according to Strauss criteria; Signed and dated informed consent.
- Exclusion criteria: Pregnant woman; Permanent or long-lasting atrial fibrillation; Previous CRT device; Previous PM/ICD with ventricular pacing > 10%; Conventional pacemaker indication; Nonspecific IVCD (intraventricular conduction delay); Unstable angina, acute Myocardial Infarction (MI), Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG), Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty (PCI), valve repair or replacement within 90 days prior enrollment; Indication for valve repair or replacement; Already included in another clinical study that could confoud the results of the present study; Life expectancy < 12 months.
Device Implantation Procedure: CRT obtained by biventricular pacing vs. CRT obtained by stimulating the left branch area.
Follow-up: Follow-up should be carried out with pre-established periodic clinical appointments 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge. In the follow-up, routine examinations such as vital signs, electrocardiogram and echocardiogram (6 and 12 months) are recorded to check the evaluation of the reverse ventricular remodeling response and asynchrony parameters based on echocardiographic data.
Statistical considerations: Once patients have signed the informed consent at baseline visit, patients will be considered as "Enrolled population" in the statistical analysis. The sample size is based on the primary endpoint: Improved Clinical Composite Score or ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months follow-up, showing that LBBAP is non-inferior to BiV-CRT. Accounting for a global attrition rate of 10% and considering the block size for randomization, 176 patients shall be enrolled.
- Being tested
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy
- Keywords
- cardiac resynchronization therapy, conduction ssystem pacing
- Medical subject headings
- Bundle-Branch Block, Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cardiac resynchronization therapyDevice
Standard BiV-CRT The CRT-P/CRT-D device and leads should be implanted according to the physician's manual provided with the devices. Only locally approved Medtronic CRT-P/CRT-D generators will be used during the study. The LV lead should be implanted at a lateral or posterolateral CS branch in a basal or mid ventricular position confirmed by ortogonal fluoroscopic views (RAO and LAO 40º). Acceptable LV pacing threshold should be <3V@0,5ms and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) margin should be >1V with respect to the pacing threshold.
LBBAP-CRT The CRT-P/CRT-D device and leads should be implanted according to the physician's standard practice. Only locally approved Medtronic CRT-P/CRT-D generators will be used during the study. During the implant procedure lead impedances, pacing and sensing parameters will be measured using a pacing system analyzer (PSA). For LBBAP, the Medtronic 3830 lead will be used. Acceptable LBBAP threshold should be <2,5V@0,5ms
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) obtained by stimulating the left branch area | Experimental | The CRT-P/CRT-D device and leads should be implanted according to the physician's standard practice. Only locally approved Medtronic CRT-P/CRT-D generators will be used during the study. It is strongly encouraged the designation of a single and experienced implanting physician at each center for the LBBAP implant procedures.
During the implant procedure lead impedances, pacing and sensing parameters will be measured using a pacing system analyzer (PSA).
For LBBAP, the Medtronic 3830 lead will be used. Acceptable LBBAP threshold should be <2,5V@0,5ms. Receives: Device: Cardiac resynchronization therapy |
| Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) obtained by biventricular pacing | Active comparator | The CRT-P/CRT-D device and leads should be implanted according to the physician's manual provided with the devices. Only locally approved Medtronic CRT-P/CRT-D generators will be used during the study.
Investigators may use any market approved right atrial (RA) pace/sense lead, right ventricular (RV) pacing/defibrillator lead with pace/sense capabilities and any market approved unipolar/bipolar/quadripolar LV pacing lead.
During the implant procedure lead impedances, pacing and sensing parameters will be measured using a pacing system analyzer (PSA).
The LV lead should be implanted at a lateral or posterolateral CS branch in a basal or mid ventricular position confirmed by ortogonal fluoroscopic views (RAO and LAO 40º).
Acceptable LV pacing threshold should be <3V@0,5ms and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) margin should be >1V with respect to the pacing threshold Receives: Device: Cardiac resynchronization therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CRT response
Positive CRT response will be defined either by an improved Clinical Composite Score or ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume
Measured: 6 months follow-up
Secondary outcomes (9)
Left ventricular ejection fraction
To evaluate left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 and 12 months follow-up
Measured: 6 and 12 months follow-up
Clinical outcome
Assessed by the Clinical Composite Score
Measured: 6 and 12 months follow-up
Exercise capacity
Assessed by 6 minute walking test
Measured: 6 and 12 months follow-up
The EQ-5D three-level version (EQ-5D-3L)
Is a generic measure of health status consisting of 2 parts. The first assesses health in five dimensions (mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain / discomfort, anxiety / depression), each of which has 3 levels of response (no problems, some problems, extreme problems / unable to). This part of the questionnaire provides a descriptive profile that can be used to generate a health state profile. Each health state can potentially be assigned a summary index score based on societal preference weights for the health state. Health state index scores generally range from less than 0 (where 0 is a health state equivalent to death; negative values are valued as worse than death) to 1 (perfect health), with higher scores indicating higher health utility. The second part consists of a VAS on which the patient rates his / her perceived health from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health)
Measured: 6 and 12 months follow-up
Heart Failure Hospitalizations
Assessment of heart failure hospitalizations
Measured: 6 and 12 months follow-up
Mortality
To evaluate mortality (global and cardiovascular)
Measured: 6 and 12 months follow-up
Cardiac transplantation
To evaluate the need for cardiac transplantation during follow-up
Measured: 6 and 12 months follow-up
Ventricular arrhythmias
To evaluate incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (clinical and registered by the ICD/PM)
Measured: 6 and 12 month follow-up
Device related complications
Device related complications needing re-intervention
Measured: 6 and 12 month follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jun 2022
- Study start27 Jun 2022
- Primary completion30 Jun 2025
- Study completion31 Aug 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Left Bundle-Branch BlockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 176 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Óscar Cano Pérez
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Spanish Society of Cardiology
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Óscar Cano Pérez, Spanish Society of Cardiology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05434962
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LB-CRT-001
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 16 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Non-inferiority Randomized Comparison Between LEFT BUNDLE Branch Area Pacing and Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The LEFT-BUNDLE-CRT Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05434962
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LB-CRT-001
- Keywords
- cardiac resynchronization therapy, conduction ssystem pacing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 176 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Óscar Cano PérezUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Spanish Society of Cardiology
- Study start
- 27 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular (BiV) pacing significantly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), impaired LV function and heart failure in spite of optimal medical treatment. CRT positive effects are based on the existence of an electromechanical dyssynchrony induced by the abnormal activation sequence associated with the presence of a left bundle branch block (LBBB), which is thought to be responsible for a negative LV remodeling leading to LVEF impairment and heart failure progression. However, one third of patients undergoing CRT are considered non responders due to different reasons. Recently, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a novel physiological pacing modality aiming for conduction system recruitment in patients with normal or impaired atrioventricular conduction, including patients with LBBB. LBBAP achieves LBBB correction in up to 85% of the cases and thus could be a promising pacing modality for CRT candidates.
Detailed description
Medical device: Only CE-marked CRT-P or CRT-D Medtronic devices locally approved and commercially available (Medtronic 3830 Pacing Lead) shall be used in this protocol.
Indication: Pacing and sensing in the right atrium or ventricle. It is also designed for pacing and sensing in the bundle as an alternative to pacing in the right ventricle in a single or dual chamber pacing system.
Intended use: Patients with an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Duration of the study: Approximate inclusion period of 18 months
Follow-up: Patients will be followed for 12 months ± 4 weeks after implant
Planned study period: The study is planned to start in Q1 2022
No. of sites: Approximately 11 sites in Spain.
No. of subjects: 176 patients will be enrolled in the study
Study type: Post-market study
Study rationale: Previous studies show 85% implantation success, significant reduction in QRS duration, and significant improvement in NYHA functional class, LVEF, and LV end-diastolic diameter. Left bundle branch pacing could be an alternative to conventional biventricular pacing.
Study design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority, open.
Objectives of the study:
- Primary objective: The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate that LBBAP is associated with a non-inferior percentage of CRT responders at 6 months follow-up than conventional BiV pacing using a conventional CS lead in patients with CRT indications according to current guidelines. Positive CRT response will be defined either by an improved Clinical Composite Score or ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months follow-up
- Secondary objectives: To evaluate reverse ventricular remodeling response and dyssynchrony parameters based on echocardiographic data at 6 and 12 months follow-up. To asess clinical outcome using the Clinical Composite Score, 6 minute walking test, quality of life measurements (EuroQuol EQ 5-D) at 6 and 12 months follow-up. To evaluate HF related hospitalizations at 6 and 12 months follow-up. To evaluate mortality (global and cardiovascular) and need for cardiac transplantation at 6 and 12 month follow-up. To evaluate incidence of ventricular arrhythmias at 6 and 12 month follow-up. To evaluate differences in CRT response depending on the final LBBAP modality (LBBP vs deep septal pacing). To evaluate device related complications at 6 and 12 month follow-up.
Primary Outcome Measures: Improved Clinical Composite Score or ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months follow-up.
Participating sites:
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
- Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada
- Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia
- Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid
- Hospital General de Alicante
- Hospital Bellvitge, Barcelona
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid
- Hospital Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza
- Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva
- Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada
Study population: Subjects 18 years of age or older will be included in the study. Both sexes are eligible to participate. Subjects must present a left bundle branch block (according to Strauss criteria) with indication of CRT class I or IIa according to clinical practice guidelines. A selection of the subjects will be made before inclusion following the selection clinical investigation plan. After confirming that the subject meets the inclusion criteria and does not meet the exclusion criteria, they will be included in the clinical study.
Study population criteria:
- Inclusion criteria: age > 18 years; Class I or IIa indication for CRT according to current ESC or ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines; left bundle branch block according to Strauss criteria; Signed and dated informed consent.
- Exclusion criteria: Pregnant woman; Permanent or long-lasting atrial fibrillation; Previous CRT device; Previous PM/ICD with ventricular pacing > 10%; Conventional pacemaker indication; Nonspecific IVCD (intraventricular conduction delay); Unstable angina, acute Myocardial Infarction (MI), Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG), Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty (PCI), valve repair or replacement within 90 days prior enrollment; Indication for valve repair or replacement; Already included in another clinical study that could confoud the results of the present study; Life expectancy < 12 months.
Device Implantation Procedure: CRT obtained by biventricular pacing vs. CRT obtained by stimulating the left branch area.
Follow-up: Follow-up should be carried out with pre-established periodic clinical appointments 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge. In the follow-up, routine examinations such as vital signs, electrocardiogram and echocardiogram (6 and 12 months) are recorded to check the evaluation of the reverse ventricular remodeling response and asynchrony parameters based on echocardiographic data.
Statistical considerations: Once patients have signed the informed consent at baseline visit, patients will be considered as "Enrolled population" in the statistical analysis. The sample size is based on the primary endpoint: Improved Clinical Composite Score or ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months follow-up, showing that LBBAP is non-inferior to BiV-CRT. Accounting for a global attrition rate of 10% and considering the block size for randomization, 176 patients shall be enrolled.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) obtained by stimulating the left branch area | Experimental | Device: Cardiac resynchronization therapyThe CRT-P/CRT-D device and leads should be implanted according to the physician's standard practice. Only locally approved Medtronic CRT-P/CRT-D generators will be used during the study. It is strongly encouraged the designation of a single and experienced implanting physician at each center for the LBBAP implant procedures. During the implant procedure lead impedances, pacing and sensing parameters will be measured using a pacing system analyzer (PSA). For LBBAP, the Medtronic 3830 lead will be used. Acceptable LBBAP threshold should be <2,5V@0,5ms. |
| Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) obtained by biventricular pacing | Active comparator | Device: Cardiac resynchronization therapyThe CRT-P/CRT-D device and leads should be implanted according to the physician's manual provided with the devices. Only locally approved Medtronic CRT-P/CRT-D generators will be used during the study. Investigators may use any market approved right atrial (RA) pace/sense lead, right ventricular (RV) pacing/defibrillator lead with pace/sense capabilities and any market approved unipolar/bipolar/quadripolar LV pacing lead. During the implant procedure lead impedances, pacing and sensing parameters will be measured using a pacing system analyzer (PSA). The LV lead should be implanted at a lateral or posterolateral CS branch in a basal or mid ventricular position confirmed by ortogonal fluoroscopic views (RAO and LAO 40º). Acceptable LV pacing threshold should be <3V@0,5ms and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) margin should be >1V with respect to the pacing threshold |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- age > 18 years
- Class I or IIa indication for CRT according to current ESC or ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines
- left bundle branch block according to Strauss criteria
- Signed and dated informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Pregnant woman
- Permanent or long-lasting atrial fibrillation
- Previous CRT device
- Previous PM/ICD with ventricular pacing > 10%
- Conventional pacemaker indication
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiac resynchronization therapyStandard BiV-CRT The CRT-P/CRT-D device and leads should be implanted according to the physician's manual provided with the devices. Only locally approved Medtronic CRT-P/CRT-D generators will be used during the study. The LV lead should be implanted at a lateral or posterolateral CS branch in a basal or mid ventricular position confirmed by ortogonal fluoroscopic views (RAO and LAO 40º). Acceptable LV pacing threshold should be <3V@0,5ms and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) margin should be >1V with respect to the pacing threshold. LBBAP-CRT The CRT-P/CRT-D device and leads should be implanted according to the physician's standard practice. Only locally approved Medtronic CRT-P/CRT-D generators will be used during the study. During the implant procedure lead impedances, pacing and sensing parameters will be measured using a pacing system analyzer (PSA). For LBBAP, the Medtronic 3830 lead will be used. Acceptable LBBAP threshold should be <2,5V@0,5ms | Device | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) obtained by biventricular pacing, Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) obtained by stimulating the left branch area |
Primary outcome
CRT response
Time frame: 6 months follow-up
Positive CRT response will be defined either by an improved Clinical Composite Score or ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume
9 secondary outcomes
Left ventricular ejection fraction
Time frame: 6 and 12 months follow-up
Clinical outcome
Time frame: 6 and 12 months follow-up
Exercise capacity
Time frame: 6 and 12 months follow-up
The EQ-5D three-level version (EQ-5D-3L)
Time frame: 6 and 12 months follow-up
Heart Failure Hospitalizations
Time frame: 6 and 12 months follow-up
Mortality
Time frame: 6 and 12 months follow-up
Cardiac transplantation
Time frame: 6 and 12 months follow-up
Ventricular arrhythmias
Time frame: 6 and 12 month follow-up
Device related complications
Time frame: 6 and 12 month follow-up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Left Bundle-Branch Block
Recruiting
Advancing Clinical Heart Failure Outcomes Leveraging Defibrillation Lead Implant System for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
Heart Failure, Systolic Bundle Branch Block, Left
Recruiting
Novel Approach to Conduction System Pacing With Use of Ultrasound
Conduction Block, Atrioventricular, Bundle-Branch Block
Recruiting
Clinical Monitoring Strategy Versus Electrophysiology-guided Algorithmic Approach With a New LBBB After TAVI
Left Bundle-Branch Block, Aortic Valve Stenosis
RecruitingObservational study
Safety, Performance, and Clinical Benefit of Pacing the Left Bundle Branch Area - Post-Market Clinical Follow-up
Bradycardia, Atrioventricular Block
Recruiting
The Impact of LBBAP vs RVP on the Incidence of New-onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Atrioventricular Block
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing, Right Ventricular Pacing
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cardiac resynchronization therapy in people with Left Bundle-Branch Block and Heart Failure, run by Óscar Cano Pérez at 10 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CRT response (time frame: 6 months follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2025.