Behavior and Behavior MechanismsNCT05451511
COVID-19 Resource Offers Among Rent and Utility Assistance Applicants in St. Louis
A study testing Door-In-The-Face Technique and Foot-In-The-Door Technique in people with Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms and Communication, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate health messaging strategies that help individuals with a high degree of housing-related needs engage in COVID-19 vaccination and testing behaviors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms, Communication
- What is being tested?
- Door-In-The-Face Technique and Foot-In-The-Door Technique
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 526 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Jul 2022to 25 Sep 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Applicants for rent and utility assistance in St. Louis City or County
- English language proficiency
- Be willing to be contacted via text message or email
- Resident of St. Louis City or County
Who cannot join
- N/A
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63130
About this study
Official title: Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics Underserved Populations Supplement Rent Relief and COVID-19 in St. Louis: COVID-19 Resource Offers Among Rent and Utility Assistance Applicants in St. Louis
The purpose of this study is to evaluate health messaging strategies that help individuals with a high degree of housing-related needs engage in COVID-19 vaccination and testing behaviors. Findings from this research can help other communities determine how best to integrate social needs and COVID-19 prevention services. Participants' contact information will be shared with us by 211 with the participants' previously given consent. The study team will send via text message a link to a survey that includes a screen where they will provide informed consent. Those who provide consent will be randomly assigned to receive one of two surveys. The order of the offers is what varies across the surveys. Participants will be asked, along with other survey items, if they have been vaccinated against COVID-19. If they have not, they will be asked if they are interested in receiving help to receive a vaccine. Participants will also be asked if they are interested in receiving an at-home COVID self-test. If they say yes to assistance with vaccination, a vaccine navigator will call and assist them. If they say yes to receiving a COVID test, the study team will ship them a test that has been procured from the City of St. Louis Mayor's office. One month later participants will be sent a follow-up survey that asks about their experiences either with testing or with vaccination if applicable.
- Conditions
- Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms, Communication
- Being tested
- Door-In-The-Face Technique, Foot-In-The-Door Technique
- Medical subject headings
- Behavior, Communication
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Door-In-The-Face TechniqueOther
Sequential request strategies will be applied as an intervention. For the Door-In-The-Face Technique, participants first receive a large request they are unlikely to accept, followed by a smaller request that is the true behavior of interest.
Foot-In-The-Door TechniqueOther
Sequential request strategies will be applied as an intervention. For the Foot-In-The-Door Technique, participants are shown an easier first request that they are likely to accept, followed by a larger request that is not the behavior of interest.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Door-In-The-Face Technique | Active comparator | Using sequential request strategies, participants randomized to the Door-In-The-Face Technique group will be asked if they would like vaccination support (if not already vaccinated) and if they say no, they will be asked if they'd like to try a COVID-19 self-test at home. Receives: Other: Door-In-The-Face Technique |
| Foot-In-The-Door Technique | Active comparator | Using sequential request strategies, participants randomized to the Foot-In-The-Door Technique group will be first asked if they are interested in trying an at-home COVID-19 test and then asked if they are interested in vaccination support (if not already vaccinated). Receives: Other: Foot-In-The-Door Technique |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion Vaccinated
Via a mobile-optimized web-based survey, the investigators will ask individuals seeking rental/housing assistance if they are thinking about getting vaccinated and report the proportion "already vaccinated."
Measured: Baseline
Sequential Request Strategy Effectiveness (Vaccination)
To compare differences in testing acceptance and vaccination responses by sequential request strategy, the investigators will identify which strategy is associated with greater testing and vaccination intentions. This will be shown by those who accepted an offer for assistance getting vaccinated.
Measured: Baseline
Sequential Request Strategy Effectiveness (Testing)
To compare differences in testing acceptance and vaccination responses by sequential request strategy, the investigators will identify which strategy is associated with greater testing and vaccination intentions. This will be shown by those who accepted an offer for a test kit.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jul 2022
- Study start5 Jul 2022
- Primary completion25 Sep 2022
- Study completion25 Sep 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Behavior and Behavior MechanismsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Washington University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 526 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Matthew Kreuter, Washington University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05451511
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3R01CA235773-03S2
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics Underserved Populations Supplement Rent Relief and COVID-19 in St. Louis: COVID-19 Resource Offers Among Rent and Utility Assistance Applicants in St. Louis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05451511
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 3R01CA235773-03S2
- Conditions
- Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms, Communication
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 526 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Sep 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 Sep 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate health messaging strategies that help individuals with a high degree of housing-related needs engage in COVID-19 vaccination and testing behaviors. Findings from this research can help other communities determine how best to integrate social needs and COVID-19 prevention services. Participants' contact information will be shared with us by 211 with the participants' previously given consent. The study team will send via text message a link to a survey that includes a screen where they will provide informed consent. Those who provide consent will be randomly assigned to receive one of two surveys. The order of the offers is what varies across the surveys. Participants will be asked, along with other survey items, if they have been vaccinated against COVID-19. If they have not, they will be asked if they are interested in receiving help to receive a vaccine. Participants will also be asked if they are interested in receiving an at-home COVID self-test. If they say yes to assistance with vaccination, a vaccine navigator will call and assist them. If they say yes to receiving a COVID test, the study team will ship them a test that has been procured from the City of St. Louis Mayor's office. One month later participants will be sent a follow-up survey that asks about their experiences either with testing or with vaccination if applicable.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Door-In-The-Face Technique | Active comparator | Other: Door-In-The-Face TechniqueUsing sequential request strategies, participants randomized to the Door-In-The-Face Technique group will be asked if they would like vaccination support (if not already vaccinated) and if they say no, they will be asked if they'd like to try a COVID-19 self-test at home. |
| Foot-In-The-Door Technique | Active comparator | Other: Foot-In-The-Door TechniqueUsing sequential request strategies, participants randomized to the Foot-In-The-Door Technique group will be first asked if they are interested in trying an at-home COVID-19 test and then asked if they are interested in vaccination support (if not already vaccinated). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Applicants for rent and utility assistance in St. Louis City or County
- English language proficiency
- Be willing to be contacted via text message or email
- Resident of St. Louis City or County
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- N/A
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Door-In-The-Face TechniqueSequential request strategies will be applied as an intervention. For the Door-In-The-Face Technique, participants first receive a large request they are unlikely to accept, followed by a smaller request that is the true behavior of interest. | Other | Door-In-The-Face Technique |
| Foot-In-The-Door TechniqueSequential request strategies will be applied as an intervention. For the Foot-In-The-Door Technique, participants are shown an easier first request that they are likely to accept, followed by a larger request that is not the behavior of interest. | Other | Foot-In-The-Door Technique |
Primary outcome
Proportion Vaccinated
Time frame: Baseline
Via a mobile-optimized web-based survey, the investigators will ask individuals seeking rental/housing assistance if they are thinking about getting vaccinated and report the proportion "already vaccinated."
Sequential Request Strategy Effectiveness (Vaccination)
Time frame: Baseline
To compare differences in testing acceptance and vaccination responses by sequential request strategy, the investigators will identify which strategy is associated with greater testing and vaccination intentions. This will be shown by those who accepted an offer for assistance getting vaccinated.
Sequential Request Strategy Effectiveness (Testing)
Time frame: Baseline
To compare differences in testing acceptance and vaccination responses by sequential request strategy, the investigators will identify which strategy is associated with greater testing and vaccination intentions. This will be shown by those who accepted an offer for a test kit.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
Recruiting
Effects of Baduanjin Exercise on Improving Health in Sedentary Young and Middle-Aged Adults
Sedentary Lifestyle, Behavioral Intervention
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Web-based Single-session Intervention Combined With Ecological Momentary Assessment and Intervention for Patients With Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Awaiting Inpatient Treatment
PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Depression
Recruiting
Effects of a Mindful Self-Compassion Intervention on Psychological Adjustment in Breast Cancer Survivors
Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Depression, Bipolar Disorder and Suicide Risk
Behavioral Symptoms, Suicide
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Aerobic and Resistance Training With and Without Neurodynamic Exercises on Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy Symptoms and Associated Neuro-immune Mechanisms
Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Door-In-The-Face Technique and Foot-In-The-Door Technique in people with Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms and Communication, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Sep 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion Vaccinated (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.