AzTrials
AzTrials

Compartment Syndrome of LegPhase 4CECSNCT05466539

Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS) Treated With Abobotulinumtoxin A

A Phase 4 study testing AbobotulinumtoxinA in people with Compartment Syndrome of Leg, run by Emory University at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS) is a painful condition affecting runners and it is caused by a reversible increase in pressure within a closed compartment in the leg. Currently, to diagnose CECS, a large needle is placed into the muscle to measure pressure, which is invasive and painful. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Compartment Syndrome of Leg
What is being tested?
AbobotulinumtoxinA
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
3 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
25 Apr 2024to 13 Aug 2025
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult male and female runners aged 18-65 years
  • Group providing normative values for SWE and needle manometry - ICP assessments
  • Confirmatory pressure values at diagnosis: Pre-exercise > 15 mmHg; 1-min. post > 30mmHg; or 5-min. post > 20mmHg
  • Ages 18-65 years inclusive at study onset.
  • Ability to adhere to protocol.
  • Botulinum toxin naïve (lower extremity). Others previously treated, > than 6 mos. before study entry.

Who cannot join

  • History of Neuromuscular disease, serious soft-tissue injury, fractures, and surgery to the lower limb(s).
  • Treatment Groups:
  • Diagnosis of comorbid pain conditions, including claudication and/or popliteal artery entrapment syndrome.
  • Serious soft tissue injury, fractures, or surgery in the lower limb(s) < than 12 months before study entry.
  • Current need for surgery at any level of the lower extremity.
  • Treatment with any drug known to interfere with neuromuscular function (e.g., aminoglycoside antibiotics or neuromuscular blocking agents).
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Any other medical condition, laboratory, or diagnostic procedure finding that might preclude the administration of aboBoNTA (Dysport®).
  • Ongoing infection at the injection sites.
  • Diagnosed as either resistant or sensitive to botulinum toxin treatment of any type or to any components of Dysport®
  • Cow milk protein allergy.
  • Vulnerable patient populations such as adults unable to consent, pregnant women, prisoners, persons who have not obtained the legal age for consent to treatment or procedures

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Emory Sports Medicine-Dunwoody

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30338

  • Emory Hawks Sports Medicine Center

    Brookhaven, Georgia, 30329

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS) Evaluated With Needle Manometry and Shear Wave Elastography, and Treated With Ultrasound-Guided AbobotulinumtoxinA

Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS) is a painful condition affecting runners and it is caused by a reversible increase in pressure within a closed compartment in the leg. Currently, to diagnose CECS, a large needle is placed into the muscle to measure pressure, which is invasive and painful. After diagnosis, the gold standard of treatment is surgery, which is also invasive, involves a prolonged return to play, and has a significant number of treatment failures. A growing literature has suggested alternative methods to both diagnosis and treatment that include the use of ultrasound to investigate muscle stiffness with shear wave elastography (SWE), and treatment with botulinum toxin injection into the muscle.

The investigators propose a single-site randomized clinical trial to investigate the use of abobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of CECS. Researchers also look to develop a non-invasive method for the diagnosis of CECS using SWE. To the researchers' knowledge, this is the first randomized study investigating the medication to treat this cause.

Read more

The study will take place at Emory's outpatient sports medicine clinic. Potential participants will primarily be identified and recruited from the departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics, Physical Therapy, and Sports medicine as a part of regular clinical care. Participants will be included in the randomized portion of the study if they meet the previously established diagnostic criteria for CECS with compartmental pressure testing.

This would be a landmark study to provide evidence for the use of an abobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of CECS, leading to the potential avoidance of a surgical procedure. It could also change the means of diagnosis without the use of painful and invasive needle pressure testing that would provide patients and athletes with ease of care.

Read the detailed description

Chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) is an underdiagnosed condition and a cause of lower extremity pain often observed in running athletes. In runners, CECS is characterized by a reversible increase in pressure within an inelastic fascial compartment(s) of the lower extremity, leading to compromised tissue perfusion and subsequent pain and neurologic symptoms. It impacts both pediatric and adult populations. As currently diagnosed and treated, chronic exertional compartment syndrome presents unique challenges. Evaluation of CECS includes a thorough history and physical exam to rule out other causes of exertional leg pain, but the differential diagnosis must remain high on the list. Needle manometry, an invasive and painful procedure, is therefore used to confirm the diagnosis of CECS by measuring intra-compartmental pressure (ICP).

A growing literature, however, positions ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) as a viable and attractive alternative to ICP testing as it is both non-invasive and cost-effective. Earlier efforts demonstrated that muscle compartment "hardness" may accurately and noninvasively predict ICP. Building on these, SWE now provides direct measures of related mechanical properties of muscle and compartment, namely, "stiffness", thereby demonstrating promise as a diagnostic tool for CECS. Fasciotomy, currently the most well-accepted treatment approach, still has a significant number of treatment failures, demonstrating the need for additional options. A series of case reports have highlighted the potential merits of botulinum toxin as an alternative non-invasive treatment to surgery. Further, there is a growing consensus that desired BoNT targeting is best achieved through incorporating ultrasound guidance during the injection. The largest case series study to date reported that 15/16 patients with CECS had complete exertional pain relief with aboBoNTA. However, the apparent high dosing also led to a reduction in strength in 11/16 patients - An average of 288 units for the anterior compartment and 180 for the lateral compartment. In sum, the optimal dosage has yet to be determined.

Recently, the research team reported a case of a 39-year-old female runner presenting with lower extremity pain. CECS was confirmed with ICP. In addition, SWE was utilized in diagnosis and management. Briefly, SWE testing showed post-exercise increases in "stiffness" in the right Tibialis Anterior and left Fibularis Brevis relative to baseline measures. To provide perspective, both pre- and post-exercise SWE measures were elevated in this patient compared to two age and sex-matched controls. Following onaBoNTA treatment, further SWE measures revealed a reduction in patient muscle stiffness from the initial pre- and post-exercise treadmill testing, reaching levels comparable to the two asymptomatic age and sex-matched controls by week 6. Collectively, these results support a relationship between changes in intra-compartmental pressure as measured by needle manometry and muscle compartment "stiffness" as measured by SWE, and, as such, a role for SWE in CECS diagnosis and management.

In sum, SWE-based diagnosis coupled with ultrasound-enhanced injection accuracy are introduced to potentially complement and/or replace traditional approaches, which have challenged the diagnosis and management of CECS.

Being tested
AbobotulinumtoxinA, Placebo
Keywords
Runners, Lower extremity pain, Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the Leg

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AbobotulinumtoxinADrug

    Also called Intervention Group

    Participants randomized to receive aboBoNTA will receive a maximum of 200 units of aboBoNTA distributed across the following muscles: Targeted muscles will be selected from the Anterior (A) and Lateral (L) Compartments. They include (A) Tibialis Anterior (60 units), Extensor Digitorum Longus (20) and Extensor Hallucis Longus (20); (L) Fibularis Brevis (50) and Fibularis Longus (50). Tibialis Anterior (60U); Extensor Digitorum Longus (20); Extensor Halluces Longus (20); Fibularis Brevis (50), and; Fibularis longus (50). Treatment distribution across targeted muscles will be based on clinical presentation including muscle compartment(s) involvement as determined by ICP testing and SWE imaging.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Also called Control Group

    Participants randomized into the normal saline group will receive injections distributed across the following muscles: Targeted muscles will be selected from the Anterior (A) and Lateral (L) Compartments. They include (A) Tibialis Anterior, Extensor Digitorum Longus, and Extensor Hallucis Longus; (L) Fibularis Brevis and Fibularis Longus. Tibialis Anterior; Extensor Digitorum Longus; Extensor Halluces Longus; Fibularis Brevis, and; Fibularis longus. Treatment distribution across targeted muscles will be based on clinical presentation including muscle compartment(s) involvement as determined by ICP testing.

Study groups in NCT05466539
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment GroupExperimentalAbobotulinumtoxinA
Receives: Drug: AbobotulinumtoxinA
Control GroupPlacebo comparatorNormal Saline
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Absolute change from baseline in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 3 months following treatment

    Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires to evaluate their pain at each follow-up visit. The Visual Analog Scale will be the subjective measurement to evaluate changes in pain scores, with values ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain). A higher score indicates worse pain

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Absolute change from baseline in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 5 weeks following treatment

    Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires to evaluate their pain at each follow-up visit. The Visual Analog Scale will be the subjective measurement to evaluate changes in pain scores, with values ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain). A higher score indicates worse pain

    Measured: Baseline and 5 weeks

  2. Absolute and Relative change from baseline in the Patient-Reported Outcomes from the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI).

    The UWRI evaluates the key elements runners use to self-assess running ability during recovery. Scores range from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating greater running ability.

    Measured: Baseline, 5 weeks and 3 months

  3. Absolute and Relative change from baseline in the Ultrasound shear wave elastography measure: stiffness in kilopascals (kPa)

    Ultrasound shear wave elastography measures (representing stiffness in kilopascals (kPa). A Samsung RS85 Prestige Ultrasound machine will be used. Muscle identification will be performed by trained clinicians in musculoskeletal ultrasound. All participants will be assessed in a supine position, with the foot neutral.

    All targets will first be identified via a short axis to the muscle - A transversal view that refers to the transducer being positioned perpendicular to the fibers.

    Measured: Baseline, 5 weeks and 3 months

  4. Absolute and Relative change from baseline in the Ultrasound shear wave shear wave velocity (m/s) (SWE)

    Ultrasound shear wave elastography measures shear wave velocity in m/s (SWE). A Samsung RS85 Prestige Ultrasound machine will be used. Muscle identification will be performed by trained clinicians in musculoskeletal ultrasound. All participants will be assessed in a supine position, with the foot neutral.

    All targets will first be identified via a short axis to the muscle - A transversal view that refers to the transducer being positioned perpendicular to the fibers.

    Measured: Baseline, 5 weeks and 3 months

  5. Absolute and Relative change from baseline in the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE)

    Participants will be asked how would they rate their affected region of interest today as a percentage of normal? Scoring ranges from 0-100% with 100% being normal.

    Measured: Baseline, 5 weeks and 3 months

  6. Absolute and Relative change from baseline in the Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS)

    GAS consists of several components including current problems, expectations, outcome assessed, pain treatment and review of achieved goals. It has a score based on respect to expectations at baseline (some function vs no function) and at the outcome: was the goal achieved? Yes (a lot more/ a little more/as expected) No (partially achieved, no change, got worse). Scores range from -2 to +2, with positive numbers being positive outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, 5 weeks and 3 months

  7. Absolute and Relative change from baseline in the Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)

    The patient is instructed to hold the corresponding limb or appropriate body part to be tested at a specific point in its available range of motion, working against gravity or while the practitioner provides opposing manual resistance to determine the grade to assign the muscle. Grades are from 0 to 5 with grade 5 being normal.

    Measured: Baseline, 5 weeks and 3 months

  8. Dynamometric Testing (DT) for both legs

    Dynamometric Testing (DT) (aka force generation) using Biodex Isokinetic dynamometer systems to measure peak force generated by knee extension, knee flexion, ankle plantarflexion, ankle dorsiflexion, ankle inversion, and ankle eversion

    Measured: Baseline, 5 weeks and 3 months

  9. Absolute and Relative change from baseline in the Ankle Range of Motion (Ankle ROM) using a goniometer

    The joint range of motion is calculated by measuring the angles between the beginning position and the ending position of available motion. Goniometers similar to a carpenter level are called gravity-dependent goniometers, or inclinometers, and are used most often to measure motion in the spine.

    Measured: Baseline, 5 weeks and 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jul 2022
  2. Study start25 Apr 2024
  3. Primary completion13 Aug 2025
  4. Study completion13 Aug 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
3 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05466539
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00003790
Acronym
CECS
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
5 Jul 2022
Last updated
21 Oct 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The research team will share Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices)

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing AbobotulinumtoxinA in people with Compartment Syndrome of Leg, run by Emory University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Absolute change from baseline in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 3 months following treatment (time frame: Baseline and 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in