AzTrials
AzTrials

Fracture of Radius and UlnaNCT05470257

Randomized Control Trial: Elbow Extension Versus Flexion Cast in Proximal Half Both Bone Forearm Fractures

A study testing Cast in people with Fracture of Radius and Ulna, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between two immobilization methods for pediatric proximal half both bone forearm fractures. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Fracture of Radius and Ulna
What is being tested?
Cast
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
7 Apr 2023to 12 Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ages 3-18
  • Skeletally immature
  • Unilateral Radius and Ulna Fracture located within the proximal ½ of each bone
  • Fracture requires reduction and casting

Who cannot join

  • Ages < 3
  • Distal ½ Radius and Ulna Forearm Fracture
  • Isolated radius or ulna fracture
  • Humerus Fracture of the Ipsilateral Arm (including floating elbow)
  • Metabolic Bone Disease
  • Open Fractures
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Monteggia and Galeazzi Fractures
  • Deformity or abnormality not allowing for standard casting (limb deficiency, contracture)
  • Parent speaks language other than english

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Children's of Alabama

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between two immobilization methods for pediatric proximal half both bone forearm fractures.

Read the detailed description

After being informed of the study including potential risks and benefits, all patients giving assent and guardian/parents consent who meet eligibility will undergo randomization of the casting technique used (elbow extension or elbow flexion casting). Randomization will occur using a random umber generator. Even numbers generated will result in an extension cast and odd numbers generated will result in a flexion cast.

The patients will be followed in clinic with an examination and x-rays at 2, 3, 5, and 8 weeks after casting to evaluate alignment of the fracture maintained by each cast. The two cohorts will be compared at the end of the study to determine which casting technique is the superior immobilization for pediatric proximal half both bone forearm fractures.

Being tested
Cast
Keywords
both bone forearm fracture, cast, pediatric
Medical subject headings
Radius Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CastOther

    Application of fiberglass long arm cast.

Study groups in NCT05470257
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Elbow Flexion CastExperimentalThis cohort will be placed in a long arm flexion cast.
Receives: Other: Cast
Elbow Extension CastExperimentalThis cohort will be placed in a long arm extension cast.
Receives: Other: Cast

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Alignment/Loss of Reduction

    During clinic visits, xrays will be obtained to measure alignment of the radius and ulna fracture and asses for loss of reduction or malalignment. We will compare the number of patients with proximal both bone forearm fractures that have lost alignment after 8 weeks between the flexion elbow cast cohort compared to the extension elbow cast cohort.

    Measured: This will be accessed in clinic via x-rays until 8 weeks status post cast application.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Cast Complications

    We will compare the casting complications between elbow extension versus elbow flexion casting cohorts. Casting complications we will observe will be cast saw burns, cast slipping, and need for bivalve of casts.

    Measured: Casting complications will be followed the full duration of the patient wearing a cast, which is expected to be around 6-8 weeks.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jul 2022
  2. Study start7 Apr 2023
  3. Primary completion12 Feb 2026
  4. Study completion12 Feb 2026

Why it stopped: Not able to enroll enough patients for analysis

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two cohorts will be established. One will include patients casted in elbow extension. The other cohort will include patients casted in elbow flexion.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
3 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05470257
Sponsor's protocol ID
BBFARCT
Other IDs
T35HL007473
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
20 Jul 2022
Last updated
17 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cast in people with Fracture of Radius and Ulna, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Not able to enroll enough patients for analysis). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Alignment/Loss of Reduction (time frame: This will be accessed in clinic via x-rays until 8 weeks status post cast application.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in