StressNCT05486754
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) & Prostate Cancer
A study testing Cognitive behavioral stress management in people with Stress, run by University of Miami at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to test a stress management program for men with early-stage prostate cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Stress
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive behavioral stress management
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 260 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Jun 1999to 3 Aug 2006
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men who had undergone either a radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy (i.e., external beam or seed implant) for stage I or II prostate cancer in the preceding 18-months
- 50 years of age or older
- Ability to speak, read, and write in English
- Having a ninth grade reading level or greater
- Being free of cognitive impairment that would interfere with the study
- No active psychiatric symptoms in the previous three months.
Who cannot join
- Previous history of non-skin cancer
- Have received adjuvant treatment, including hormone treatment, for prostate cancer
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The purpose of this study is to test a stress management program for men with early-stage prostate cancer.
- Conditions
- Stress
- Being tested
- Cognitive behavioral stress management, Psychoeducational Control
- Keywords
- group therapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive behavioral stress managementBehavioural
Participants will receive in-person weekly stress management group sessions (3-8 participants) for two hours per week for ten weeks total. Each session will consist of a half hour of relaxation training and one and a half hours of stress management skill training, including coping effectiveness training, anger management, assertiveness training, and stress awareness.
Psychoeducational ControlBehavioural
Participants will receive one four-hour seminar in-person groups (3-8 participants) of educational information related to prostate cancer and abbreviated psychological information provided in cognitive behavioral stress management.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive behavioral stress management group | Experimental | Participants received the cognitive behavioral stress management intervention for 10 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive behavioral stress management |
| Health promotion group | Active comparator | Participants received the health promotion group for one day. Receives: Behavioral: Psychoeducational Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Perceived Stress Management Abilities as measured by the Measure of Current Status Questionnaire
The Measure of Current Status questionnaire is a 23-item questionnaire each scored on a range of 0-4. The total score ranges from 0-92 with the higher score corresponding to greater perceived abilities.
Measured: Baseline, up to 18 months
Change in post-traumatic event perceptions as measured by the Benefit Finding Scale questionnaire
The Benefit Finding Scale questionnaire is a 17-item measure capturing perception of a traumatic event (e.g., cancer diagnosis for participants) with each item scored on a scale of 1 to 5. The total score ranges from 17-85 with the higher score corresponding to greater perceived benefit.
Measured: Baseline, up to 18 months
Change in optimism as measured by the Life Orientation Test - Revised questionnaire
The Life Orientation Test - Revised questionnaire measures participant's optimism. The total score ranges from 0-24 with the higher score corresponding to greater levels of optimism.
Measured: Baseline, up to 18 months
Change in immune cell count
Immune cell count (including T-cell (Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 3+) and T-helper cells (CD 3+ CD 4+) will be evaluated from blood samples. Both values will be evaluated in count per cubic millimeter.
Measured: Baseline, up to 18 months
Change in immune cell percentage
Immune cell percentage (including T-cell (Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 3+) and T-helper cells (CD 3+ CD 4+) will be evaluated from blood samples. Both values evaluated in count per cubic millimeter over total cell count per cubic millimeter.
Measured: Baseline, up to 18 months
Change in natural killer cell percentage
Natural killer cell (CD56+CD3-) percentage is evaluated from blood samples. Values are evaluated in count per cubic millimeter over total cell count per cubic millimeter.
Measured: Baseline, up to 18 months
Change in natural killer cell count
Natural killer cell (CD56+CD3-) count is evaluated from blood samples. Values are evaluated in count per cubic millimeter.
Measured: Baseline, up to 18 months
Change in natural killer cell cytotoxicity as captured by activity percentage
Natural killer cell (CD56+CD3-) cytotoxicity is evaluated from blood samples. Cells are stimulated through exposure to a reactive cell line and the percentage of cells active are counted and divided by total cells present per cubic millimeter.
Measured: Baseline, up to 18 months
Change in ratio of natural killer cell cytotoxicity as captured by Lytic Index
Natural killer cell (CD56+CD3-) cytotoxicity is evaluated from blood samples. Cells are stimulated through exposure to a reactive cell line and quantified as the ratio of responsive to unresponsive cells required to kill 10% of the target cell line.
Measured: Baseline, up to 18 months
Change in count of natural killer cell cytotoxicity as captured by Kinetic Lytic Index
Natural killer cell (CD56+CD3-) cytotoxicity is evaluated from blood samples. Cells are stimulated through exposure to a reactive cell line and incubated for four hours total. Kinetic lytic index is quantified as the count of targeted cells killed during incubation. An average count of these cells will be calculated.
Measured: Baseline, up to 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Aug 2022
- Study start22 Jun 1999
- Primary completion3 Aug 2006
- Study completion3 Aug 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StressStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MiamiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Miami
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael H. Antoni, University of Miami
- Investigators
- Michael H Antoni, Ph.D., Principal investigator, University of Miami
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05486754
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19990288
- Other IDs
- 1P50CA084944
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 2 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Penedo FJ, Molton I, Dahn JR, Shen BJ, Kinsinger D, Traeger L, Siegel S, Schneiderman N, Antoni M. A randomized clinical trial of group-based cognitive-behavioral stress management in localized prostate cancer: development of stress management skills improves quality of life and benefit finding. Ann Behav Med. 2006 Jun;31(3):261-70. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3103_8.
PubMed 16700640Traeger L, Penedo FJ, Benedict C, Dahn JR, Lechner SC, Schneiderman N, Antoni MH. Identifying how and for whom cognitive-behavioral stress management improves emotional well-being among recent prostate cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2013 Feb;22(2):250-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.2074. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
PubMed 21932396Molton IR, Siegel SD, Penedo FJ, Dahn JR, Kinsinger D, Traeger LN, Carver CS, Shen BJ, Kumar M, Schneiderman N, Antoni MH. Promoting recovery of sexual functioning after radical prostatectomy with group-based stress management: the role of interpersonal sensitivity. J Psychosom Res. 2008 May;64(5):527-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.01.004.
PubMed 18440406Walsh EA, Antoni MH, Popok PJ, Moreno PI, Penedo FJ. Effects of a randomized-controlled trial of cognitive behavioral stress management: Psychosocial adaptation and immune status in men with early-stage prostate cancer. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2022 Nov-Dec;79:128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.10.012. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
PubMed 36375341
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) & Prostate Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05486754
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 19990288
- Conditions
- Stress
- Keywords
- group therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MiamiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Jun 1999 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Aug 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Aug 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to test a stress management program for men with early-stage prostate cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive behavioral stress management group | Experimental | Behavioral: Cognitive behavioral stress managementParticipants received the cognitive behavioral stress management intervention for 10 weeks. |
| Health promotion group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Psychoeducational ControlParticipants received the health promotion group for one day. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Men who had undergone either a radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy (i.e., external beam or seed implant) for stage I or II prostate cancer in the preceding 18-months
- 50 years of age or older
- Ability to speak, read, and write in English
- Having a ninth grade reading level or greater
- Being free of cognitive impairment that would interfere with the study
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Previous history of non-skin cancer
- Have received adjuvant treatment, including hormone treatment, for prostate cancer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive behavioral stress managementParticipants will receive in-person weekly stress management group sessions (3-8 participants) for two hours per week for ten weeks total. Each session will consist of a half hour of relaxation training and one and a half hours of stress management skill training, including coping effectiveness training, anger management, assertiveness training, and stress awareness. | Behavioural | Cognitive behavioral stress management group |
| Psychoeducational ControlParticipants will receive one four-hour seminar in-person groups (3-8 participants) of educational information related to prostate cancer and abbreviated psychological information provided in cognitive behavioral stress management. | Behavioural | Health promotion group |
Primary outcome
Change in Perceived Stress Management Abilities as measured by the Measure of Current Status Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, up to 18 months
The Measure of Current Status questionnaire is a 23-item questionnaire each scored on a range of 0-4. The total score ranges from 0-92 with the higher score corresponding to greater perceived abilities.
Change in post-traumatic event perceptions as measured by the Benefit Finding Scale questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, up to 18 months
The Benefit Finding Scale questionnaire is a 17-item measure capturing perception of a traumatic event (e.g., cancer diagnosis for participants) with each item scored on a scale of 1 to 5. The total score ranges from 17-85 with the higher score corresponding to greater perceived benefit.
Change in optimism as measured by the Life Orientation Test - Revised questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, up to 18 months
The Life Orientation Test - Revised questionnaire measures participant's optimism. The total score ranges from 0-24 with the higher score corresponding to greater levels of optimism.
Change in immune cell count
Time frame: Baseline, up to 18 months
Immune cell count (including T-cell (Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 3+) and T-helper cells (CD 3+ CD 4+) will be evaluated from blood samples. Both values will be evaluated in count per cubic millimeter.
Change in immune cell percentage
Time frame: Baseline, up to 18 months
Immune cell percentage (including T-cell (Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 3+) and T-helper cells (CD 3+ CD 4+) will be evaluated from blood samples. Both values evaluated in count per cubic millimeter over total cell count per cubic millimeter.
Change in natural killer cell percentage
Time frame: Baseline, up to 18 months
Natural killer cell (CD56+CD3-) percentage is evaluated from blood samples. Values are evaluated in count per cubic millimeter over total cell count per cubic millimeter.
Change in natural killer cell count
Time frame: Baseline, up to 18 months
Natural killer cell (CD56+CD3-) count is evaluated from blood samples. Values are evaluated in count per cubic millimeter.
Change in natural killer cell cytotoxicity as captured by activity percentage
Time frame: Baseline, up to 18 months
Natural killer cell (CD56+CD3-) cytotoxicity is evaluated from blood samples. Cells are stimulated through exposure to a reactive cell line and the percentage of cells active are counted and divided by total cells present per cubic millimeter.
Change in ratio of natural killer cell cytotoxicity as captured by Lytic Index
Time frame: Baseline, up to 18 months
Natural killer cell (CD56+CD3-) cytotoxicity is evaluated from blood samples. Cells are stimulated through exposure to a reactive cell line and quantified as the ratio of responsive to unresponsive cells required to kill 10% of the target cell line.
Change in count of natural killer cell cytotoxicity as captured by Kinetic Lytic Index
Time frame: Baseline, up to 18 months
Natural killer cell (CD56+CD3-) cytotoxicity is evaluated from blood samples. Cells are stimulated through exposure to a reactive cell line and incubated for four hours total. Kinetic lytic index is quantified as the count of targeted cells killed during incubation. An average count of these cells will be calculated.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2022.
- Results publication: PubMed 16700640Penedo FJ, Molton I, Dahn JR, Shen BJ, Kinsinger D, Traeger L, Siegel S, Schneiderman N, Antoni M. A randomized clinical trial of group-based cognitive-behavioral stress management in localized prostate cancer: development of stress management skills improves quality of life and benefit finding. Ann Behav Med. 2006 Jun;31(3):261-70. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3103_8.
- Results publication: PubMed 21932396Traeger L, Penedo FJ, Benedict C, Dahn JR, Lechner SC, Schneiderman N, Antoni MH. Identifying how and for whom cognitive-behavioral stress management improves emotional well-being among recent prostate cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2013 Feb;22(2):250-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.2074. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
- Results publication: PubMed 18440406Molton IR, Siegel SD, Penedo FJ, Dahn JR, Kinsinger D, Traeger LN, Carver CS, Shen BJ, Kumar M, Schneiderman N, Antoni MH. Promoting recovery of sexual functioning after radical prostatectomy with group-based stress management: the role of interpersonal sensitivity. J Psychosom Res. 2008 May;64(5):527-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.01.004.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36375341Walsh EA, Antoni MH, Popok PJ, Moreno PI, Penedo FJ. Effects of a randomized-controlled trial of cognitive behavioral stress management: Psychosocial adaptation and immune status in men with early-stage prostate cancer. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2022 Nov-Dec;79:128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.10.012. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stress
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Periodontal Status and Biomarkers in MASLD
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)
Recruiting
NightWare and Cardiovascular Health in Women With PTSD
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Cardiovascular Diseases
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael H Antoni, Ph.D. principal investigator
University of Miami
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cognitive behavioral stress management in people with Stress, run by University of Miami at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Perceived Stress Management Abilities as measured by the Measure of Current Status Questionnaire (time frame: Baseline, up to 18 months). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05486754, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2022.