Depressive DisorderDEPTREATNCT05503966
Combining Antidepressants and Attention Bias Modification in Depression
A study testing Attentional Bias Modification in people with Depressive Disorder, run by University of Oslo at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric condition associated with significant disability, mortality and economic burden. A large proportion of MDD patients are treated in primary health care (PHC) in the municipalities and represent a challenging group. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Depressive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Attentional Bias Modification
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 246 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- 22 Sep 2022to 30 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Major Depressive Disorder
- BDI II > 14
- Age 18 - 65 years
- Ability to understand and speak a Scandinavian language
- Willingness and ability to give informed consent
Who cannot join
- Current or past neurological illness
- Traumatic brain injury
- Current alcohol and/or substance dependency disorders
- Psychotic disorders
- Bipolar disorder type 1,
- Developmental disorders and mental retardation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Norway1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Jan Ivar Røssberg
Oslo, Nydalen, Postboks 4959
Jan I Røssberg, PhD, +4747876866, j.i.rossberg@medisin.uio.no
Nils I Landrø, PhD, +4795038479, n.i.landro@psykologi.uio.no
About this study
Official title: Combining Antidepressants and Attention Bias Modification in Depression: a Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric condition associated with significant disability, mortality and economic burden. A large proportion of MDD patients are treated in primary health care (PHC) in the municipalities and represent a challenging group. Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) training in combination with antidepressants (SSRIs) could be an effective treatment. The overall aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that adding an ABM procedure to regular treatment with antidepressants in PHC will result in further improvement of symptoms compared to treatment with antidepressants alone (treatment as usual, TAU) and as compared to an active comparison condition.
Methods: A total of 246 patients with a diagnosis of MDD will be included in this study. The study is a three-armed pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of ABM as add-on to treatment with antidepressants in primary care (ABM condition) compared to standard antidepressant treatment (TAU condition). In a third group participants will complete the same schedule of intermediate assessments as the ABM condition in addition to TAU , but no ABM, thus controlling for the non-training-specific aspects of the ABM condition (SSRI Active comparison group).
Read more
Discussion:
The clinical outcome of this study may help develop easy accessible, low cost treatment of depression in PHC. Moreover, the study aims to broaden our knowledge of optimal treatment for patients with a MDD by providing adjunct treatment to facilitate recovery and long term gain
Read the detailed description
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a debilitating disorder that affects 15% of the population and is a leading cause of disability worldwide. The economic burden of MDD is enormous, with estimates of direct/indirect costs of $210.2 billion/year in the US alone.
Although both psychotherapy and antidepressant medications are effective, it is not uncommon for a patient with MDD to have temporary symptom reduction after treatment but require an extended amount of time for full restoration of function. A large proportion of MDD patients are treated in PHC in the municipalities and represent a challenging group to treat effectively. At the same time, it is known that early treatment and coordinated follow-up can be efficient even without costly specialist interventions or hospital treatment. Thus, improved treatment of MDD in municipalities represents a tremendous opportunity for improvement of public health and well being in the general population.
Considerable progress has been made in characterizing mechanisms underlying depression vulnerability and this may be harnessed to improve future treatment strategies. The ability to deal effectively with stress and life events is influenced by the ability of the brain to rapidly adapt, which in turn is a function of synaptic plasticity. Further, it has been hypothesized that the capacity of synapses for functional and structural change plays an important role in the pathophysiology and treatment of mood disorders. These dysfunctional neural mechanisms are affected by antidepressants and increased synaptic plasticity may be one of the therapeutic mechanisms. However, enhancing plasticity alone may not lead to a sufficient treatment response in all individuals affected by depression. Indeed, the entrenched attentional biases seen in depression, such as the tendency to focus on and recall negative information, may persist and be further entrenched by changes in the neural underpinnings of learning and memory. Furthermore, negative attention biases are associated with persistence of sad mood in major depressive disorder. However, selective biases in attention can potentially be modified by a simple computerized technique: The Attention Bias Modification Task (ABM).
While some studies have reported an effect of ABM in depression, definitive conclusions have been limited by small samples and poor trial methodology in many studies. However, recently a large RCT study showed that ABM training led to significantly greater decrease in clinician-rated symptoms of depression as compared to the control condition. ABM induced a change in AB towards relatively more positive stimuli for participants that also showed greater symptom reduction. A secondary network analysis indicated that ABM primarily influenced the symptom "interest" which could mediate both symptoms, social support, functioning and quality of life. Furthermore, a sub-sample was included in a brain imaging study revealing that the ABM active group showed reduced activation in the amygdala and the anterior cingulate cortex when passively viewing negative images compared to the sham group. Other studies have also found that experimentally modifying negatively biased attention reduces depressive symptoms. However, some studies have showed that ABM is not significantly better in improving depressive symptoms as compared to sham.
In addition to explore mechanisms of neuroplasticity, in parallel research there has also been interest in understanding the effects of antidepressant drugs on psychological processes involved in depression. Thus, a number of studies for more than a decade have documented that SSRIs modify biases in emotional processing, thus they work by modifying the same underlying basic mechanism that are the focus when applying ABM procedures. Emotional processing is influenced early in the treatment and independently of change in subjective mood, and these effects have been shown in depressed subjects as well as in healthy volunteers. Most of these studies investigated the effects of a single dose of an SSRI compared with placebo. However, it has been showed that antidepressants as prescribed in the community also increases processing for positive information.
A logical next step is to combine SSRIs as prescribed in primary health with an ABM procedure. Combining pharmacological and psychological regimes are gold standard treatment options in both depression and anxiety and is not associated with baseline severity.Treatments, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) might also change attentional biases, but by implementing an ABM procedure we will more readily target these biases directly. By combining ABM with today's treatment options, we could potentially increase treatment efficacy and shorten treatment duration. Furthermore, ABM has the advantage of being entirely deliverable on a digital platform without the need for therapist interaction.
The main aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that adding an ABM procedure to regular treatment with antidepressants in PHC will result in a clinically important improvement of symptoms compared to treatment with antidepressants alone (TAU), and as compared to an active comparison condition. Secondary aims are to investigate possible effects of the combined treatment on anxiety symptoms, emotional blunting, rumination, perceived stress, psychosocial functioning/work and suicidal risk. Thirdly, a number of potential moderators will also be investigated.
- Conditions
- Depressive Disorder
- Being tested
- Attentional Bias Modification
- Keywords
- Major Depressive Disorder, Attentional Bias Modification, Primary Health Care
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Attentional Bias ModificationBehavioural
Also called ABM
The ABM task is based on a computerized visual Dot-probe task. In the dot-probe task paired stimuli of negative (angry and fearful), positive (happy) or neutral faces are presented, followed by one or two probes (dots) appearing in the spatial location of one of the stimuli. Participants are then required to press one of two buttons as quickly as possible to indicate the number of dots in the probe. In the ABM condition, probes are in the same locus as the more positive/less negative stimuli in 87% of the trials, as opposed to 13% with probes in the same locus as more negative/less positive stimuli. Thus, when completing the ABM, participants should learn to deploy their attention toward the relatively more positive stimuli, and in this way develop a more positive AB.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Positive ABM | Experimental | The ABM intervention will be initiated two weeks after antidepressant treatment started (baseline) and continues with two daily sessions for two weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Attentional Bias Modification |
| No ABM | Active comparator | This group will in addition to TAU complete the schedule of intermediate assessments as in the ABM group, but no ABM , thus controlling for the aspects of the ABM group that are additional to TAU (increased engagement in cognitive activity and repeated assessment over time), but not including the training component itself (SSRI Active comparison group). Receives: Behavioral: Attentional Bias Modification |
| TAU | No intervention | Patients allocated to this group will be assessed at baseline and at the primary end-point as well after 12 weeks and 6 months follow-up. They will not complete any instruments during the intervention period to prevent the effect of some cognitive activity and provide a more ecologically valid version of TAU as it happens in primary care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Clinician rated depressive symptoms. Range (0-50). Higher score indicate more depressive symptoms
Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.
Beck Depression Inventory II
Self rated depressive symptoms. Range (0-63). Higher score indicate more depressive symptoms
Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.
Secondary outcomes (29)
Beck Depression Inventory II
Self rated depressive symptoms, Range (0-63). Higher score indicate more depressive symptoms
Measured: Follow-up 12 weeks after baseline.
Beck Depression Inventory II
Self rated depressive symptoms, Range (0-63). Higher score indicate more depressive symptoms
Measured: Follow-up 6 months after baseline
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7
Self rated anxiety symptoms. Range (0-21). Higher score indicate more anxiety symptoms
Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7
Self rated anxiety symptoms. Range (0-21). Higher score indicate more anxiety symptoms
Measured: 12 weeks after baseline.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7
Self rated anxiety symptoms. Range (0-21). Higher score indicate more anxiety symptoms
Measured: 6 months after baseline
Oxford Depression Questionnaire
Self rated emotional blunting symptoms. Range (0-80). Higher score indicate more symptoms.
Measured: 8 weeks after baseline
Oxford Depression Questionnaire
Self rated emotional blunting symptoms. Range (0-80). Higher score indicate more symptoms.
Measured: 12 weeks after baseline.
Oxford Depression Questionnaire
Self rated emotional blunting symptoms. Range (0-80). Higher score indicate more symptoms.
Measured: 6 months after baseline
Rumination Response Scale
Self rated level of rumination. Range (22-88). Higher score indicate more rumination.
Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.
Rumination Response Scale
Self rated level of rumination. Range (22-88). Higher score indicate more rumination.
Measured: 12 weeks after baseline
Rumination Response Scale
Self rated level of rumination. Range (22-88). Higher score indicate more rumination.
Measured: 6 months after baseline
The Perceived Stress Scale
Self rated subjective level of stress. Range (0-40). Higher score indicate more perceived stress.
Measured: 8 after baseline
The Perceived Stress Scale
Self rated subjective level of stress. Range (0-40). Higher score indicate more perceived stress.
Measured: 12 weeks after baseline
The Perceived Stress Scale
Self rated subjective level of stress. Range (0-40). Higher score indicate more perceived stress.
Measured: 6 months after baseline
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale
Self rated level of social functioning. Range (0-40). Higher score indicate poorer functioning
Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale
Self rated level of social functioning. Range (0-40). Higher score indicate poorer functioning
Measured: 12 weeks after baseline.
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale
Self rated level of social functioning. Range (0-40). Higher score indicate poorer functioning
Measured: 6 months after baseline.
Bergen Insomnia Scale
Self rated level of sleep problems. Range (0-42). Higher score indicate more insomnia
Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.
Bergen Insomnia Scale
Self rated level of sleep problems. Range (0-42). Higher score indicate more insomnia
Measured: 12 weeks after baseline.
Bergen Insomnia Scale
Self rated level of sleep problems. Range (0-42). Higher score indicate more insomnia
Measured: 6 months after baseline.
Beck depression Inventory II (Suicid item)
Self reported level of suicidality. Range (0-3). Higher score indicate more suicidality.
Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.
Beck depression Inventory II (Suicid item)
Self reported level of suicidality. Range (0-3). Higher score indicate more suicidality.
Measured: 12 weeks after baseline.
Beck depression Inventory II (Suicid item)
Self reported level of suicidality. Range (0-3). Higher score indicate more suicidality.
Measured: 6 months after baseline.
Dot probe
Degree of attentional bias- Measure mean reaction time.
Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.
Dot probe
Degree of attentional bias- Measure mean reaction time.
Measured: 12 weeks after baseline
Dot probe
Degree of attentional bias- Measure mean reaction time.
Measured: 6 months after baseline.
Facial Expression Rating Task
Measure of detection threshold for correctly identifying the emotional facial expression. Measures of number of correct answer (Range 0-100%)
Measured: 8 weeks after baseline
Facial Expression Rating Task
Measure of detection threshold for correctly identifying the emotional facial expression. Measures of number of correct answer (Range 0-100%)
Measured: 12 weeks after baseline
Facial Expression Rating Task
Measure of detection threshold for correctly identifying the emotional facial expression. Measures of number of correct answer (Range 0-100%)
Measured: 6 months after baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2022
- Study start22 Sep 2022
- Primary completion30 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Depressive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study is a three-armed, double-blinded, pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of ABM as add-on to treatment with antidepressants (SSRI ABM group) in primary care compared to standard antidepressant treatment (SSRI TAU group). The third group will in addition to TAU be engaged in answering all the questionnaires and perform all the tasks, but without ABM, thus controlling for being engaged in some cognitive activity (SSRI Active comparison group).
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 246 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oslo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Oxford
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jan Ivar Rossberg, University of Oslo
- Investigators
- Jan I Røssberg, PhD, Principal investigator, Universitetet i Oslo/Oslo universitetssykehus
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05503966
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 273292
- Acronym
- DEPTREAT
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 9 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 28 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Anonymized data may be shared on request
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Combining Antidepressants and Attention Bias Modification in Depression: a Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05503966
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DEPTREAT / 273292
- Conditions
- Depressive Disorder
- Keywords
- Major Depressive Disorder, Attentional Bias Modification, Primary Health Care
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 246 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OsloUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Oxford
- Study start
- 22 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric condition associated with significant disability, mortality and economic burden. A large proportion of MDD patients are treated in primary health care (PHC) in the municipalities and represent a challenging group. Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) training in combination with antidepressants (SSRIs) could be an effective treatment. The overall aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that adding an ABM procedure to regular treatment with antidepressants in PHC will result in further improvement of symptoms compared to treatment with antidepressants alone (treatment as usual, TAU) and as compared to an active comparison condition.
Methods: A total of 246 patients with a diagnosis of MDD will be included in this study. The study is a three-armed pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of ABM as add-on to treatment with antidepressants in primary care (ABM condition) compared to standard antidepressant treatment (TAU condition). In a third group participants will complete the same schedule of intermediate assessments as the ABM condition in addition to TAU , but no ABM, thus controlling for the non-training-specific aspects of the ABM condition (SSRI Active comparison group).
Discussion:
The clinical outcome of this study may help develop easy accessible, low cost treatment of depression in PHC. Moreover, the study aims to broaden our knowledge of optimal treatment for patients with a MDD by providing adjunct treatment to facilitate recovery and long term gain
Detailed description
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a debilitating disorder that affects 15% of the population and is a leading cause of disability worldwide. The economic burden of MDD is enormous, with estimates of direct/indirect costs of $210.2 billion/year in the US alone.
Although both psychotherapy and antidepressant medications are effective, it is not uncommon for a patient with MDD to have temporary symptom reduction after treatment but require an extended amount of time for full restoration of function. A large proportion of MDD patients are treated in PHC in the municipalities and represent a challenging group to treat effectively. At the same time, it is known that early treatment and coordinated follow-up can be efficient even without costly specialist interventions or hospital treatment. Thus, improved treatment of MDD in municipalities represents a tremendous opportunity for improvement of public health and well being in the general population.
Considerable progress has been made in characterizing mechanisms underlying depression vulnerability and this may be harnessed to improve future treatment strategies. The ability to deal effectively with stress and life events is influenced by the ability of the brain to rapidly adapt, which in turn is a function of synaptic plasticity. Further, it has been hypothesized that the capacity of synapses for functional and structural change plays an important role in the pathophysiology and treatment of mood disorders. These dysfunctional neural mechanisms are affected by antidepressants and increased synaptic plasticity may be one of the therapeutic mechanisms. However, enhancing plasticity alone may not lead to a sufficient treatment response in all individuals affected by depression. Indeed, the entrenched attentional biases seen in depression, such as the tendency to focus on and recall negative information, may persist and be further entrenched by changes in the neural underpinnings of learning and memory. Furthermore, negative attention biases are associated with persistence of sad mood in major depressive disorder. However, selective biases in attention can potentially be modified by a simple computerized technique: The Attention Bias Modification Task (ABM).
While some studies have reported an effect of ABM in depression, definitive conclusions have been limited by small samples and poor trial methodology in many studies. However, recently a large RCT study showed that ABM training led to significantly greater decrease in clinician-rated symptoms of depression as compared to the control condition. ABM induced a change in AB towards relatively more positive stimuli for participants that also showed greater symptom reduction. A secondary network analysis indicated that ABM primarily influenced the symptom "interest" which could mediate both symptoms, social support, functioning and quality of life. Furthermore, a sub-sample was included in a brain imaging study revealing that the ABM active group showed reduced activation in the amygdala and the anterior cingulate cortex when passively viewing negative images compared to the sham group. Other studies have also found that experimentally modifying negatively biased attention reduces depressive symptoms. However, some studies have showed that ABM is not significantly better in improving depressive symptoms as compared to sham.
In addition to explore mechanisms of neuroplasticity, in parallel research there has also been interest in understanding the effects of antidepressant drugs on psychological processes involved in depression. Thus, a number of studies for more than a decade have documented that SSRIs modify biases in emotional processing, thus they work by modifying the same underlying basic mechanism that are the focus when applying ABM procedures. Emotional processing is influenced early in the treatment and independently of change in subjective mood, and these effects have been shown in depressed subjects as well as in healthy volunteers. Most of these studies investigated the effects of a single dose of an SSRI compared with placebo. However, it has been showed that antidepressants as prescribed in the community also increases processing for positive information.
A logical next step is to combine SSRIs as prescribed in primary health with an ABM procedure. Combining pharmacological and psychological regimes are gold standard treatment options in both depression and anxiety and is not associated with baseline severity.Treatments, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) might also change attentional biases, but by implementing an ABM procedure we will more readily target these biases directly. By combining ABM with today's treatment options, we could potentially increase treatment efficacy and shorten treatment duration. Furthermore, ABM has the advantage of being entirely deliverable on a digital platform without the need for therapist interaction.
The main aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that adding an ABM procedure to regular treatment with antidepressants in PHC will result in a clinically important improvement of symptoms compared to treatment with antidepressants alone (TAU), and as compared to an active comparison condition. Secondary aims are to investigate possible effects of the combined treatment on anxiety symptoms, emotional blunting, rumination, perceived stress, psychosocial functioning/work and suicidal risk. Thirdly, a number of potential moderators will also be investigated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- The study is a three-armed, double-blinded, pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of ABM as add-on to treatment with antidepressants (SSRI ABM group) in primary care compared to standard antidepressant treatment (SSRI TAU group). The third group will in addition to TAU be engaged in answering all the questionnaires and perform all the tasks, but without ABM, thus controlling for being engaged in some cognitive activity (SSRI Active comparison group).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Positive ABM | Experimental | Behavioral: Attentional Bias ModificationThe ABM intervention will be initiated two weeks after antidepressant treatment started (baseline) and continues with two daily sessions for two weeks. |
| No ABM | Active comparator | Behavioral: Attentional Bias ModificationThis group will in addition to TAU complete the schedule of intermediate assessments as in the ABM group, but no ABM , thus controlling for the aspects of the ABM group that are additional to TAU (increased engagement in cognitive activity and repeated assessment over time), but not including the training component itself (SSRI Active comparison group). |
| TAU | No intervention | –Patients allocated to this group will be assessed at baseline and at the primary end-point as well after 12 weeks and 6 months follow-up. They will not complete any instruments during the intervention period to prevent the effect of some cognitive activity and provide a more ecologically valid version of TAU as it happens in primary care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Major Depressive Disorder
- BDI II > 14
- Age 18 - 65 years
- Ability to understand and speak a Scandinavian language
- Willingness and ability to give informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Current or past neurological illness
- Traumatic brain injury
- Current alcohol and/or substance dependency disorders
- Psychotic disorders
- Bipolar disorder type 1,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Attentional Bias ModificationAlso: ABMThe ABM task is based on a computerized visual Dot-probe task. In the dot-probe task paired stimuli of negative (angry and fearful), positive (happy) or neutral faces are presented, followed by one or two probes (dots) appearing in the spatial location of one of the stimuli. Participants are then required to press one of two buttons as quickly as possible to indicate the number of dots in the probe. In the ABM condition, probes are in the same locus as the more positive/less negative stimuli in 87% of the trials, as opposed to 13% with probes in the same locus as more negative/less positive stimuli. Thus, when completing the ABM, participants should learn to deploy their attention toward the relatively more positive stimuli, and in this way develop a more positive AB. | Behavioural | No ABM, Positive ABM |
Primary outcome
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time frame: 8 weeks after baseline.
Clinician rated depressive symptoms. Range (0-50). Higher score indicate more depressive symptoms
Beck Depression Inventory II
Time frame: 8 weeks after baseline.
Self rated depressive symptoms. Range (0-63). Higher score indicate more depressive symptoms
29 secondary outcomes
Beck Depression Inventory II
Time frame: Follow-up 12 weeks after baseline.
Beck Depression Inventory II
Time frame: Follow-up 6 months after baseline
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7
Time frame: 8 weeks after baseline.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7
Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7
Time frame: 6 months after baseline
Oxford Depression Questionnaire
Time frame: 8 weeks after baseline
Oxford Depression Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline.
Oxford Depression Questionnaire
Time frame: 6 months after baseline
Rumination Response Scale
Time frame: 8 weeks after baseline.
Rumination Response Scale
Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline
Rumination Response Scale
Time frame: 6 months after baseline
The Perceived Stress Scale
Time frame: 8 after baseline
The Perceived Stress Scale
Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline
The Perceived Stress Scale
Time frame: 6 months after baseline
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale
Time frame: 8 weeks after baseline.
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale
Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline.
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale
Time frame: 6 months after baseline.
Bergen Insomnia Scale
Time frame: 8 weeks after baseline.
Bergen Insomnia Scale
Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline.
Bergen Insomnia Scale
Time frame: 6 months after baseline.
Beck depression Inventory II (Suicid item)
Time frame: 8 weeks after baseline.
Beck depression Inventory II (Suicid item)
Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline.
Beck depression Inventory II (Suicid item)
Time frame: 6 months after baseline.
Dot probe
Time frame: 8 weeks after baseline.
Dot probe
Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline
Dot probe
Time frame: 6 months after baseline.
Facial Expression Rating Task
Time frame: 8 weeks after baseline
Facial Expression Rating Task
Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline
Facial Expression Rating Task
Time frame: 6 months after baseline
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Mar 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Anonymized data may be shared on request
Related trials for Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Examining the Effectiveness of a Brief Therapeutic Intervention for Reducing Self-Harm Among Adolescents
Self Injurious Behavior, Self Injurious Behavior Without Suicidal Intent
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Adult Participants With Major Depressive Disorder
Depressive Disorder, Major
Recruiting
EEG-Guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Adults With Depression
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Treatment Resistant Depression
Recruiting
Aquatic Exercise in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
Central Sensitization, Knee Osteoarthristis
Recruiting
Defining Neurobiological Links Between Substance Use and Mental Illness
Major Depressive Disorder, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jan I Røssberg, PhD principal investigator
Universitetet i Oslo/Oslo universitetssykehus
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Attentional Bias Modification in people with Depressive Disorder, run by University of Oslo at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jan I Røssberg, PhD (+47 47876866, j.i.rossberg@medisin.uio.no), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (time frame: 8 weeks after baseline.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2025.