AzTrials
AzTrials

Depressive DisorderDEPTREATNCT05503966

Combining Antidepressants and Attention Bias Modification in Depression

A study testing Attentional Bias Modification in people with Depressive Disorder, run by University of Oslo at 1 site in Norway.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric condition associated with significant disability, mortality and economic burden. A large proportion of MDD patients are treated in primary health care (PHC) in the municipalities and represent a challenging group. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Depressive Disorder
What is being tested?
Attentional Bias Modification
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
246 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
22 Sep 2022to 30 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Major Depressive Disorder
  • BDI II > 14
  • Age 18 - 65 years
  • Ability to understand and speak a Scandinavian language
  • Willingness and ability to give informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Current or past neurological illness
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Current alcohol and/or substance dependency disorders
  • Psychotic disorders
  • Bipolar disorder type 1,
  • Developmental disorders and mental retardation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Jan I Røssberg, PhD contact

+47 47876866

j.i.rossberg@medisin.uio.no

Nils I Landrø, PhD contact

+47 95038479

n.i.landro@psykologi.uio.no

Norway1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Jan Ivar Røssberg

    Oslo, Nydalen, Postboks 4959

    Jan I Røssberg, PhD, +4747876866, j.i.rossberg@medisin.uio.no

    Nils I Landrø, PhD, +4795038479, n.i.landro@psykologi.uio.no

    Recruiting

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: Combining Antidepressants and Attention Bias Modification in Depression: a Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric condition associated with significant disability, mortality and economic burden. A large proportion of MDD patients are treated in primary health care (PHC) in the municipalities and represent a challenging group. Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) training in combination with antidepressants (SSRIs) could be an effective treatment. The overall aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that adding an ABM procedure to regular treatment with antidepressants in PHC will result in further improvement of symptoms compared to treatment with antidepressants alone (treatment as usual, TAU) and as compared to an active comparison condition.

Methods: A total of 246 patients with a diagnosis of MDD will be included in this study. The study is a three-armed pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of ABM as add-on to treatment with antidepressants in primary care (ABM condition) compared to standard antidepressant treatment (TAU condition). In a third group participants will complete the same schedule of intermediate assessments as the ABM condition in addition to TAU , but no ABM, thus controlling for the non-training-specific aspects of the ABM condition (SSRI Active comparison group).

Read more

Discussion:

The clinical outcome of this study may help develop easy accessible, low cost treatment of depression in PHC. Moreover, the study aims to broaden our knowledge of optimal treatment for patients with a MDD by providing adjunct treatment to facilitate recovery and long term gain

Read the detailed description

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a debilitating disorder that affects 15% of the population and is a leading cause of disability worldwide. The economic burden of MDD is enormous, with estimates of direct/indirect costs of $210.2 billion/year in the US alone.

Although both psychotherapy and antidepressant medications are effective, it is not uncommon for a patient with MDD to have temporary symptom reduction after treatment but require an extended amount of time for full restoration of function. A large proportion of MDD patients are treated in PHC in the municipalities and represent a challenging group to treat effectively. At the same time, it is known that early treatment and coordinated follow-up can be efficient even without costly specialist interventions or hospital treatment. Thus, improved treatment of MDD in municipalities represents a tremendous opportunity for improvement of public health and well being in the general population.

Considerable progress has been made in characterizing mechanisms underlying depression vulnerability and this may be harnessed to improve future treatment strategies. The ability to deal effectively with stress and life events is influenced by the ability of the brain to rapidly adapt, which in turn is a function of synaptic plasticity. Further, it has been hypothesized that the capacity of synapses for functional and structural change plays an important role in the pathophysiology and treatment of mood disorders. These dysfunctional neural mechanisms are affected by antidepressants and increased synaptic plasticity may be one of the therapeutic mechanisms. However, enhancing plasticity alone may not lead to a sufficient treatment response in all individuals affected by depression. Indeed, the entrenched attentional biases seen in depression, such as the tendency to focus on and recall negative information, may persist and be further entrenched by changes in the neural underpinnings of learning and memory. Furthermore, negative attention biases are associated with persistence of sad mood in major depressive disorder. However, selective biases in attention can potentially be modified by a simple computerized technique: The Attention Bias Modification Task (ABM).

While some studies have reported an effect of ABM in depression, definitive conclusions have been limited by small samples and poor trial methodology in many studies. However, recently a large RCT study showed that ABM training led to significantly greater decrease in clinician-rated symptoms of depression as compared to the control condition. ABM induced a change in AB towards relatively more positive stimuli for participants that also showed greater symptom reduction. A secondary network analysis indicated that ABM primarily influenced the symptom "interest" which could mediate both symptoms, social support, functioning and quality of life. Furthermore, a sub-sample was included in a brain imaging study revealing that the ABM active group showed reduced activation in the amygdala and the anterior cingulate cortex when passively viewing negative images compared to the sham group. Other studies have also found that experimentally modifying negatively biased attention reduces depressive symptoms. However, some studies have showed that ABM is not significantly better in improving depressive symptoms as compared to sham.

In addition to explore mechanisms of neuroplasticity, in parallel research there has also been interest in understanding the effects of antidepressant drugs on psychological processes involved in depression. Thus, a number of studies for more than a decade have documented that SSRIs modify biases in emotional processing, thus they work by modifying the same underlying basic mechanism that are the focus when applying ABM procedures. Emotional processing is influenced early in the treatment and independently of change in subjective mood, and these effects have been shown in depressed subjects as well as in healthy volunteers. Most of these studies investigated the effects of a single dose of an SSRI compared with placebo. However, it has been showed that antidepressants as prescribed in the community also increases processing for positive information.

A logical next step is to combine SSRIs as prescribed in primary health with an ABM procedure. Combining pharmacological and psychological regimes are gold standard treatment options in both depression and anxiety and is not associated with baseline severity.Treatments, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) might also change attentional biases, but by implementing an ABM procedure we will more readily target these biases directly. By combining ABM with today's treatment options, we could potentially increase treatment efficacy and shorten treatment duration. Furthermore, ABM has the advantage of being entirely deliverable on a digital platform without the need for therapist interaction.

The main aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that adding an ABM procedure to regular treatment with antidepressants in PHC will result in a clinically important improvement of symptoms compared to treatment with antidepressants alone (TAU), and as compared to an active comparison condition. Secondary aims are to investigate possible effects of the combined treatment on anxiety symptoms, emotional blunting, rumination, perceived stress, psychosocial functioning/work and suicidal risk. Thirdly, a number of potential moderators will also be investigated.

Being tested
Attentional Bias Modification
Keywords
Major Depressive Disorder, Attentional Bias Modification, Primary Health Care
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Attentional Bias ModificationBehavioural

    Also called ABM

    The ABM task is based on a computerized visual Dot-probe task. In the dot-probe task paired stimuli of negative (angry and fearful), positive (happy) or neutral faces are presented, followed by one or two probes (dots) appearing in the spatial location of one of the stimuli. Participants are then required to press one of two buttons as quickly as possible to indicate the number of dots in the probe. In the ABM condition, probes are in the same locus as the more positive/less negative stimuli in 87% of the trials, as opposed to 13% with probes in the same locus as more negative/less positive stimuli. Thus, when completing the ABM, participants should learn to deploy their attention toward the relatively more positive stimuli, and in this way develop a more positive AB.

Study groups in NCT05503966
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Positive ABMExperimentalThe ABM intervention will be initiated two weeks after antidepressant treatment started (baseline) and continues with two daily sessions for two weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: Attentional Bias Modification
No ABMActive comparatorThis group will in addition to TAU complete the schedule of intermediate assessments as in the ABM group, but no ABM , thus controlling for the aspects of the ABM group that are additional to TAU (increased engagement in cognitive activity and repeated assessment over time), but not including the training component itself (SSRI Active comparison group).
Receives: Behavioral: Attentional Bias Modification
TAUNo interventionPatients allocated to this group will be assessed at baseline and at the primary end-point as well after 12 weeks and 6 months follow-up. They will not complete any instruments during the intervention period to prevent the effect of some cognitive activity and provide a more ecologically valid version of TAU as it happens in primary care.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

    Clinician rated depressive symptoms. Range (0-50). Higher score indicate more depressive symptoms

    Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.

  2. Beck Depression Inventory II

    Self rated depressive symptoms. Range (0-63). Higher score indicate more depressive symptoms

    Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.

Secondary outcomes (29)
  1. Beck Depression Inventory II

    Self rated depressive symptoms, Range (0-63). Higher score indicate more depressive symptoms

    Measured: Follow-up 12 weeks after baseline.

  2. Beck Depression Inventory II

    Self rated depressive symptoms, Range (0-63). Higher score indicate more depressive symptoms

    Measured: Follow-up 6 months after baseline

  3. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7

    Self rated anxiety symptoms. Range (0-21). Higher score indicate more anxiety symptoms

    Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.

  4. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7

    Self rated anxiety symptoms. Range (0-21). Higher score indicate more anxiety symptoms

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline.

  5. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7

    Self rated anxiety symptoms. Range (0-21). Higher score indicate more anxiety symptoms

    Measured: 6 months after baseline

  6. Oxford Depression Questionnaire

    Self rated emotional blunting symptoms. Range (0-80). Higher score indicate more symptoms.

    Measured: 8 weeks after baseline

  7. Oxford Depression Questionnaire

    Self rated emotional blunting symptoms. Range (0-80). Higher score indicate more symptoms.

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline.

  8. Oxford Depression Questionnaire

    Self rated emotional blunting symptoms. Range (0-80). Higher score indicate more symptoms.

    Measured: 6 months after baseline

  9. Rumination Response Scale

    Self rated level of rumination. Range (22-88). Higher score indicate more rumination.

    Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.

  10. Rumination Response Scale

    Self rated level of rumination. Range (22-88). Higher score indicate more rumination.

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline

  11. Rumination Response Scale

    Self rated level of rumination. Range (22-88). Higher score indicate more rumination.

    Measured: 6 months after baseline

  12. The Perceived Stress Scale

    Self rated subjective level of stress. Range (0-40). Higher score indicate more perceived stress.

    Measured: 8 after baseline

  13. The Perceived Stress Scale

    Self rated subjective level of stress. Range (0-40). Higher score indicate more perceived stress.

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline

  14. The Perceived Stress Scale

    Self rated subjective level of stress. Range (0-40). Higher score indicate more perceived stress.

    Measured: 6 months after baseline

  15. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale

    Self rated level of social functioning. Range (0-40). Higher score indicate poorer functioning

    Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.

  16. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale

    Self rated level of social functioning. Range (0-40). Higher score indicate poorer functioning

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline.

  17. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale

    Self rated level of social functioning. Range (0-40). Higher score indicate poorer functioning

    Measured: 6 months after baseline.

  18. Bergen Insomnia Scale

    Self rated level of sleep problems. Range (0-42). Higher score indicate more insomnia

    Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.

  19. Bergen Insomnia Scale

    Self rated level of sleep problems. Range (0-42). Higher score indicate more insomnia

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline.

  20. Bergen Insomnia Scale

    Self rated level of sleep problems. Range (0-42). Higher score indicate more insomnia

    Measured: 6 months after baseline.

  21. Beck depression Inventory II (Suicid item)

    Self reported level of suicidality. Range (0-3). Higher score indicate more suicidality.

    Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.

  22. Beck depression Inventory II (Suicid item)

    Self reported level of suicidality. Range (0-3). Higher score indicate more suicidality.

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline.

  23. Beck depression Inventory II (Suicid item)

    Self reported level of suicidality. Range (0-3). Higher score indicate more suicidality.

    Measured: 6 months after baseline.

  24. Dot probe

    Degree of attentional bias- Measure mean reaction time.

    Measured: 8 weeks after baseline.

  25. Dot probe

    Degree of attentional bias- Measure mean reaction time.

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline

  26. Dot probe

    Degree of attentional bias- Measure mean reaction time.

    Measured: 6 months after baseline.

  27. Facial Expression Rating Task

    Measure of detection threshold for correctly identifying the emotional facial expression. Measures of number of correct answer (Range 0-100%)

    Measured: 8 weeks after baseline

  28. Facial Expression Rating Task

    Measure of detection threshold for correctly identifying the emotional facial expression. Measures of number of correct answer (Range 0-100%)

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline

  29. Facial Expression Rating Task

    Measure of detection threshold for correctly identifying the emotional facial expression. Measures of number of correct answer (Range 0-100%)

    Measured: 6 months after baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Aug 2022
  2. Study start22 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The study is a three-armed, double-blinded, pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of ABM as add-on to treatment with antidepressants (SSRI ABM group) in primary care compared to standard antidepressant treatment (SSRI TAU group). The third group will in addition to TAU be engaged in answering all the questionnaires and perform all the tasks, but without ABM, thus controlling for being engaged in some cognitive activity (SSRI Active comparison group).
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
246 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05503966
Sponsor's protocol ID
273292
Acronym
DEPTREAT
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
9 Aug 2022
Last updated
28 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Anonymized data may be shared on request

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Attentional Bias Modification in people with Depressive Disorder, run by University of Oslo at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jan I Røssberg, PhD (+47 47876866, j.i.rossberg@medisin.uio.no), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (time frame: 8 weeks after baseline.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in