Sickle Cell DiseaseNCT05506358
Evaluation of Low-cost Techniques for Detecting Sickle Cell Disease and β-thalassemia in Nepal and Canada
A study testing High performance liquid chromatography, Automated sickling test and HbS solubility test in people with Sickle Cell Disease and Sickle Cell Trait, run by University of British Columbia at 3 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder associated with acute illness and organ damage. In high resource settings, early screening and treatment greatly improve quality of life. In low resource settings, however, mortality rate for children is high (50-90%). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Trait, Beta-Thalassemia
- What is being tested?
- High performance liquid chromatography, Automated sickling test and HbS solubility test
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 145 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 20 Sep 2022to 30 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Since the techniques evaluated in the study aims at detecting sickle cell disease (SCD), sickle cell trait (SCT), and β- thalassemia, the following number of participants will be included in Nepal:
- 20 individuals with SCD (HbSS)
- 20 individuals with SCT (HbAS)
- 20 individuals with sickle cell/β-thalassemia compound heterozygous form (HbS/β-thalassemia)
- 20 individuals with β-thalassemia (Hbβ/β-thalassemia)
- 20 individuals with β-thalassemia trait or carrier form (HbA/β- thalassemia)
Show all 12Show fewer
- 20 healthy individual participants or normal participants (HbAA, participants without any known hemoglobin disorders, such as SCD, SCT or β-thalassemia)
- The following number of participants will be included in Canada:
- 30 individuals with SCD (HbSS)
- 30 individuals with SCT (HbAS)
- 30 healthy individual participants or normal participants (HbAA, participants without any known hemoglobin disorders, such as SCD, SCT or β-thalassemia)
- Participants older than 1 year of age at the time of drawing blood will be eligible. Signed and dated consent or assent forms will be required by the participants or their parents/guardians.
Who cannot join
- The exclusion criteria for the study:
- Transfusion within the last 3 months
- Pregnancy Participants who wish to withdraw from the study will also be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 2 countries.
3 sites in 2 countries
Canada2 sites
BC Children's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3N1
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
About this study
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder associated with acute illness and organ damage. In high resource settings, early screening and treatment greatly improve quality of life. In low resource settings, however, mortality rate for children is high (50-90%). Low-cost and accurate screening techniques are critical to reducing the burden of the disease, especially in remote/rural settings. The most common and severe form of SCD is sickle cell anemia (SCA), caused by the inheritance of genes causing abnormal forms of hemoglobin (called sickle hemoglobin or hemoglobin S) from both parents. The asymptomatic or carrier form of the disease, known as sickle cell trait (SCT), is caused by the inheritance of only one variant gene from one of the parents. In areas such as Nepal, β-thalassemia (another inherited blood disorder) and SCD are both prevalent, and some combinations of these diseases lead to severe symptoms.
The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of low-cost point-of-care techniques for screening and detecting sickle cell disease, sickle cell trait, and β-thalassaemia, which will subsequently inform on feasible solutions for detecting the disease in rural, remote, or low-resource settings. One of the goals of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of techniques, such as the sickling test with low-cost microscopy and machine learning, HbS solubility test, commercial lateral-flow assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN), and the Gazelle Hb variant test, to supplement or replace gold standard tests (HPLC or electrophoresis), which are expensive, require highly trained personnel, and are not easily accessible in remote/rural settings.
Read more
The investigators hypothesize that:
- an automated sickling test (standard sickling test enhanced using low-cost microscopy and machine learning) has a higher overall accuracy than conventional screening techniques (solubility and sickling tests) to detect hemoglobin S in blood samples
- the automated sickling test can additionally classify SCD, SCT and healthy individuals with a sensitivity greater than 90%, based on morphology changes of red blood cells, unlike conventional sickling or solubility tests that do not distinguish between SCD and SCT cases
- Gazelle diagnostic device can detect β-thalassaemia and SCD/SCT with an overall accuracy greater than 90%, compared with HPLC as the reference test
Read the detailed description
Overall, the hypothesis is that an assessment of the performance and accuracies of low-cost point-of-care techniques (automated sickling test, solubility test, lateral-flow assays, Gazelle Hb variant test) against HPLC tests will provide researchers and health workers with feasible alternative options for screening and detecting SCD, SCT and β-thalassaemia in a variety of situations based on the needs of the communities and the resources available.
Objectives
Objectives specific to the current study are to:
- Determine accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of automated sickling test to detect HbS, compared to gold standard HPLC, and to conventional solubility test
- Determine whether SCD, SCT and healthy individuals can be classified using the automated sickling test that leverages machine learning on images of blood films under hypoxia
- Validate accuracy (>95% sensitivity and specificity) of lateral- flow assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN) to detect SCD/SCT, and of Gazelle variant test to detect SCD, SCT, and β-thalassaemia; and determine if low-cost techniques can potentially replace HPLC/electrophoresis tests in rural and remote settings
Long-term objectives of the overall project are to:
- Implement trained machine learning algorithm to classify SCD, SCT and healthy individuals during screening tests in Nepal
- Implement relevant low-cost point-of-care techniques in rural and remote communities of Nepal using insights and conclusions from current study
The plan of the study to screen the communities (e.g. in Nepalgunj, in Vancouver) using the following:
- Low-cost screening i. Sickling test with low-cost microscope and automated screening with machine learning ii. Sickling test with traditional microscope (conventional manual screening used in Nepal) iii. HbS solubility test iv. Commercial point-of-care assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN) v. Gazelle Hb variant test b. Gold standard test: HPLC, for determining the accuracies of low-cost screening techniques
De-identified data (images of blood films and associated documentation) will also be deposited in an online public repository, such as the Federated Research Data Repository (FRDR). FRDR is a service of the Digital Research Alliance of Canada (Alliance), a not-for-profit organization that supports digital research infrastructure in Canada. FRDR is hosted on national infrastructure, managed and administered by the Digital Research Alliance of Canada.
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Trait, Beta-Thalassemia, Sickle Cell-Beta Thalassemia, Sickle Cell-SS Disease
- Being tested
- High performance liquid chromatography, Automated sickling test, HbS solubility test, HemoTypeSC, Sickle SCAN
- Keywords
- low-cost test, point-of-care diagnostics, automated sickling test, solubility test, HemoTypeSC, Sickle Scan, Gazelle Hb Variant Test, Machine learning, Image database, Red blood cells
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Sickle Cell Trait, beta-Thalassemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High performance liquid chromatographyDiagnostic test
High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using the D10 System by Bio-Rad Laboratories will be used as the gold standard test.
Automated sickling testDevice
The standard sickling test using 2% sodium metabisulphite will be augmented using an automated microscope (such as Octopi) and machine learning, and will be used as one of the low-cost tests.
HbS solubility testDiagnostic test
Standard HbS solubility test currently used in Nepal (e.g. Sicklevue) will be used as one of the low-cost tests
HemoTypeSCDevice
A point-of-care lateral flow assay, HemoTypeSC (https://www.hemotype.com/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests
Sickle SCANDevice
A point-of-care lateral flow assay, Sickle SCAN (https://www.biomedomics.com/products/hematology/sicklescan/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests
Gazelle Hb Variant TestDevice
A portable electrophoresis machine, Gazelle diagnostic device (https://hemexhealth.com/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1) HbSS; 2) HbAS; 3) HbS/β-thalassemia; 4)Hbβ/β-thalassemia; 5) HbA/β- thalassemia; 6) HbAA | Other | Around 20 participants each (in Nepal):
* with the homozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbSS)
* with the heterozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbAS)
* with the compound heterozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbS/β-thalassemia)
* with the carrier form of β-thalassemia (HbA/β-thalassemia)
* with the carrier form of β-thalassemia (HbA/β-thalassemia)
* without any known hemoglobin disorders, such as sickle cell disease, sickle cell trait, β-thalassemia, etc.
Around 30 participants each (in Canada):
* with the homozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbSS)
* with the heterozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbAS)
* without any known hemoglobin disorders, such as sickle cell disease, sickle cell trait, β-thalassemia, etc. Receives: Diagnostic Test: High performance liquid chromatography; Device: Automated sickling test; Diagnostic Test: HbS solubility test; Device: HemoTypeSC; Device: Sickle SCAN; Device: Gazelle Hb Variant Test |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value
The following metrics will be determined for the low-cost tests to be evaluated as indicated below (where TP = true positive, TN = true negative, FP = false positive, FN = false negative):
- Sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN)
- Specificity = TN/(FP + TN)
- Positive predictive value = TP/(TP + FP)
- Negative predictive value = TN/(TN + FN)
These metrics will be calculated for the low-cost technologies against the reference test, HPLC, for detecting the presence of sickle hemoglobin and β- thalassemia. The low-cost technologies include automated sickling test (standard sickling test enhanced using low-cost microscopy and machine learning), solubility test, HemoTypeSC, Sickle SCAN, and Gazelle Hb Variant test. The test results of the low-cost technologies will be compared with those of the reference test to get the values of TP, TN, FP and FN, which will then be used to calculate the metrics listed above.
Measured: baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Aug 2022
- Study start20 Sep 2022
- Primary completion30 Mar 2023
- Study completion30 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sickle Cell DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Around 90 participants will be recruited in Canada - 30 with SCD (HbSS), 30 with SCT (HbAS), and 30 healthy participants (HbAA). Around 120 participants will be recruited in Nepal - 20 with SCD (HbSS), 20 with SCT (HbAS), 20 with sickle cell / β-thalassaemia compound heterozygous form (HbS/β-thalassemia), 20 with β-thalassaemia (Hbβ/ β-thalassemia), 20 with β-thalassaemia trait or carrier form (HbA/β-thalassemia), and 20 healthy participants (HbAA). 3-4 mL of blood will be drawn using standard phlebotomy practices. The following tests will be performed: a. Low-cost tests i. Sickling test with low-cost microscope and automated screening with machine learning ii. Sickling test with traditional microscope (conventional manual screening used in Nepal) iii. HbS solubility test iv. Commercial point-of-care assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN) v. Gazelle Hb variant test b. Gold standard test: HPLC, for determining the accuracies of low-cost screening techniques
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Boris Stoeber, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- Boris Stoeber, Principal investigator, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05506358
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H22-00294
- Other IDs
- 85/2022, H22-00294, H21-01929
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 15 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Only de-identified data and test results will be shared. The test results for the low-cost tests and HPLC tests will be published in aggregate form. De-identified images of blood films will be deposited in an online public repository, such as Federated Research Data Repository (FRDR).
Publications
Shrestha P, Lohse H, Bhatla C, McCartney H, Alzaki A, Sandhu N, Oli PK, Chaudhary S, Amid A, Onell R, Au N, Merkeley H, Kapoor V, Pande R, Stoeber B. Evaluation of low-cost techniques to detect sickle cell disease and beta-thalassemia: an open-label, international, multicentre study. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2025 Mar 29;35:100571. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100571. eCollection 2025 Apr.
PubMed 40230447
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Low-cost Techniques for Detecting Sickle Cell Disease and β-thalassemia in Nepal and Canada
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05506358
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H22-00294
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Trait, Beta-Thalassemia, Sickle Cell-Beta Thalassemia, Sickle Cell-SS Disease
- Keywords
- low-cost test, point-of-care diagnostics, automated sickling test, solubility test, HemoTypeSC, Sickle Scan, Gazelle Hb Variant Test, Machine learning
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 4 Jun 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder associated with acute illness and organ damage. In high resource settings, early screening and treatment greatly improve quality of life. In low resource settings, however, mortality rate for children is high (50-90%). Low-cost and accurate screening techniques are critical to reducing the burden of the disease, especially in remote/rural settings. The most common and severe form of SCD is sickle cell anemia (SCA), caused by the inheritance of genes causing abnormal forms of hemoglobin (called sickle hemoglobin or hemoglobin S) from both parents. The asymptomatic or carrier form of the disease, known as sickle cell trait (SCT), is caused by the inheritance of only one variant gene from one of the parents. In areas such as Nepal, β-thalassemia (another inherited blood disorder) and SCD are both prevalent, and some combinations of these diseases lead to severe symptoms.
The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of low-cost point-of-care techniques for screening and detecting sickle cell disease, sickle cell trait, and β-thalassaemia, which will subsequently inform on feasible solutions for detecting the disease in rural, remote, or low-resource settings. One of the goals of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of techniques, such as the sickling test with low-cost microscopy and machine learning, HbS solubility test, commercial lateral-flow assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN), and the Gazelle Hb variant test, to supplement or replace gold standard tests (HPLC or electrophoresis), which are expensive, require highly trained personnel, and are not easily accessible in remote/rural settings.
The investigators hypothesize that:
- an automated sickling test (standard sickling test enhanced using low-cost microscopy and machine learning) has a higher overall accuracy than conventional screening techniques (solubility and sickling tests) to detect hemoglobin S in blood samples
- the automated sickling test can additionally classify SCD, SCT and healthy individuals with a sensitivity greater than 90%, based on morphology changes of red blood cells, unlike conventional sickling or solubility tests that do not distinguish between SCD and SCT cases
- Gazelle diagnostic device can detect β-thalassaemia and SCD/SCT with an overall accuracy greater than 90%, compared with HPLC as the reference test
Detailed description
Overall, the hypothesis is that an assessment of the performance and accuracies of low-cost point-of-care techniques (automated sickling test, solubility test, lateral-flow assays, Gazelle Hb variant test) against HPLC tests will provide researchers and health workers with feasible alternative options for screening and detecting SCD, SCT and β-thalassaemia in a variety of situations based on the needs of the communities and the resources available.
Objectives
Objectives specific to the current study are to:
- Determine accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of automated sickling test to detect HbS, compared to gold standard HPLC, and to conventional solubility test
- Determine whether SCD, SCT and healthy individuals can be classified using the automated sickling test that leverages machine learning on images of blood films under hypoxia
- Validate accuracy (>95% sensitivity and specificity) of lateral- flow assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN) to detect SCD/SCT, and of Gazelle variant test to detect SCD, SCT, and β-thalassaemia; and determine if low-cost techniques can potentially replace HPLC/electrophoresis tests in rural and remote settings
Long-term objectives of the overall project are to:
- Implement trained machine learning algorithm to classify SCD, SCT and healthy individuals during screening tests in Nepal
- Implement relevant low-cost point-of-care techniques in rural and remote communities of Nepal using insights and conclusions from current study
The plan of the study to screen the communities (e.g. in Nepalgunj, in Vancouver) using the following:
- Low-cost screening i. Sickling test with low-cost microscope and automated screening with machine learning ii. Sickling test with traditional microscope (conventional manual screening used in Nepal) iii. HbS solubility test iv. Commercial point-of-care assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN) v. Gazelle Hb variant test b. Gold standard test: HPLC, for determining the accuracies of low-cost screening techniques
De-identified data (images of blood films and associated documentation) will also be deposited in an online public repository, such as the Federated Research Data Repository (FRDR). FRDR is a service of the Digital Research Alliance of Canada (Alliance), a not-for-profit organization that supports digital research infrastructure in Canada. FRDR is hosted on national infrastructure, managed and administered by the Digital Research Alliance of Canada.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Around 90 participants will be recruited in Canada - 30 with SCD (HbSS), 30 with SCT (HbAS), and 30 healthy participants (HbAA). Around 120 participants will be recruited in Nepal - 20 with SCD (HbSS), 20 with SCT (HbAS), 20 with sickle cell / β-thalassaemia compound heterozygous form (HbS/β-thalassemia), 20 with β-thalassaemia (Hbβ/ β-thalassemia), 20 with β-thalassaemia trait or carrier form (HbA/β-thalassemia), and 20 healthy participants (HbAA). 3-4 mL of blood will be drawn using standard phlebotomy practices. The following tests will be performed: a. Low-cost tests i. Sickling test with low-cost microscope and automated screening with machine learning ii. Sickling test with traditional microscope (conventional manual screening used in Nepal) iii. HbS solubility test iv. Commercial point-of-care assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN) v. Gazelle Hb variant test b. Gold standard test: HPLC, for determining the accuracies of low-cost screening techniques
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1) HbSS; 2) HbAS; 3) HbS/β-thalassemia; 4)Hbβ/β-thalassemia; 5) HbA/β- thalassemia; 6) HbAA | Other | Diagnostic Test: High performance liquid chromatography, Device: Automated sickling test, Diagnostic Test: HbS solubility test, Device: HemoTypeSC, Device: Sickle SCAN, Device: Gazelle Hb Variant TestAround 20 participants each (in Nepal): * with the homozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbSS) * with the heterozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbAS) * with the compound heterozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbS/β-thalassemia) * with the carrier form of β-thalassemia (HbA/β-thalassemia) * with the carrier form of β-thalassemia (HbA/β-thalassemia) * without any known hemoglobin disorders, such as sickle cell disease, sickle cell trait, β-thalassemia, etc. Around 30 participants each (in Canada): * with the homozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbSS) * with the heterozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbAS) * without any known hemoglobin disorders, such as sickle cell disease, sickle cell trait, β-thalassemia, etc. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Since the techniques evaluated in the study aims at detecting sickle cell disease (SCD), sickle cell trait (SCT), and β- thalassemia, the following number of participants will be included in Nepal:
- 20 individuals with SCD (HbSS)
- 20 individuals with SCT (HbAS)
- 20 individuals with sickle cell/β-thalassemia compound heterozygous form (HbS/β-thalassemia)
- 20 individuals with β-thalassemia (Hbβ/β-thalassemia)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Transfusion within the last 3 months
- Pregnancy Participants who wish to withdraw from the study will also be excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High performance liquid chromatographyHigh performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using the D10 System by Bio-Rad Laboratories will be used as the gold standard test. | Diagnostic test | 1) HbSS; 2) HbAS; 3) HbS/β-thalassemia; 4)Hbβ/β-thalassemia; 5) HbA/β- thalassemia; 6) HbAA |
| Automated sickling testThe standard sickling test using 2% sodium metabisulphite will be augmented using an automated microscope (such as Octopi) and machine learning, and will be used as one of the low-cost tests. | Device | 1) HbSS; 2) HbAS; 3) HbS/β-thalassemia; 4)Hbβ/β-thalassemia; 5) HbA/β- thalassemia; 6) HbAA |
| HbS solubility testStandard HbS solubility test currently used in Nepal (e.g. Sicklevue) will be used as one of the low-cost tests | Diagnostic test | 1) HbSS; 2) HbAS; 3) HbS/β-thalassemia; 4)Hbβ/β-thalassemia; 5) HbA/β- thalassemia; 6) HbAA |
| HemoTypeSCA point-of-care lateral flow assay, HemoTypeSC (https://www.hemotype.com/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests | Device | 1) HbSS; 2) HbAS; 3) HbS/β-thalassemia; 4)Hbβ/β-thalassemia; 5) HbA/β- thalassemia; 6) HbAA |
| Sickle SCANA point-of-care lateral flow assay, Sickle SCAN (https://www.biomedomics.com/products/hematology/sicklescan/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests | Device | 1) HbSS; 2) HbAS; 3) HbS/β-thalassemia; 4)Hbβ/β-thalassemia; 5) HbA/β- thalassemia; 6) HbAA |
| Gazelle Hb Variant TestA portable electrophoresis machine, Gazelle diagnostic device (https://hemexhealth.com/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests | Device | 1) HbSS; 2) HbAS; 3) HbS/β-thalassemia; 4)Hbβ/β-thalassemia; 5) HbA/β- thalassemia; 6) HbAA |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value
Time frame: baseline
The following metrics will be determined for the low-cost tests to be evaluated as indicated below (where TP = true positive, TN = true negative, FP = false positive, FN = false negative): 1. Sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN) 2. Specificity = TN/(FP + TN) 3. Positive predictive value = TP/(TP + FP) 4. Negative predictive value = TN/(TN + FN) These metrics will be calculated for the low-cost technologies against the reference test, HPLC, for detecting the presence of sickle hemoglobin and β- thalassemia. The low-cost technologies include automated sickling test (standard sickling test enhanced using low-cost microscopy and machine learning), solubility test, HemoTypeSC, Sickle SCAN, and Gazelle Hb Variant test. The test results of the low-cost technologies will be compared with those of the reference test to get the values of TP, TN, FP and FN, which will then be used to calculate the metrics listed above.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40230447Shrestha P, Lohse H, Bhatla C, McCartney H, Alzaki A, Sandhu N, Oli PK, Chaudhary S, Amid A, Onell R, Au N, Merkeley H, Kapoor V, Pande R, Stoeber B. Evaluation of low-cost techniques to detect sickle cell disease and beta-thalassemia: an open-label, international, multicentre study. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2025 Mar 29;35:100571. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100571. eCollection 2025 Apr.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Only de-identified data and test results will be shared. The test results for the low-cost tests and HPLC tests will be published in aggregate form. De-identified images of blood films will be deposited in an online public repository, such as Federated Research Data Repository (FRDR).
Related trials for Sickle Cell Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Long-term Mitapivat Dosing in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease: An Extension of a Phase I Pilot Study of Mitapivat
Sickle Cell Disease, Hemolytic Anemia
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Escalating Doses of Fostamatinib in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disorders, Sickle Cell Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical and Biomarker Effects of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Females With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Buprenorphine for the Management of Pain in Children With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Boris Stoeber principal investigator
University of British Columbia
3 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High performance liquid chromatography, Automated sickling test and HbS solubility test in people with Sickle Cell Disease and Sickle Cell Trait, run by University of British Columbia at 3 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Canada, Nepal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value (time frame: baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05506358, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2024.