Myeloid DysplasiaFISiM-LuspaNCT05520749
Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept: a Study by Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche
An observational study of Myeloid Dysplasia, run by Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche-ETS at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of malignancies characterized by reduced differentiation and increased apoptosis of hematopoietic progenitor cells, leading to ineffective hematopoiesis. Treatment of MDS varies according to prognosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myeloid Dysplasia
- What is being tested?
- Luspatercept
- How many people
- 215 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2022to 31 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients treated with luspatercept in Italy between November 2020 and January 2022 will be included in this study (i.e., around 215 subjects).
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients (i.e. aged >=18 years) with diagnosis of MDS according to WHO 2016 classification that met IPSS-R criteria for very low, low, or intermediate-risk MDS along with the following additional criteria:
- Ring Sideroblasts (RS) ≥15% of erythroid precursors in bone marrow in the absence of SF3B1 mutation, or ≥5% in the presence of SF3B1 mutation;
- Bone marrow blasts <5%;
- Peripheral white blood cell count <13,000/μL;
- ECOG PS 0-2;
- Refractory or intolerant to, or ineligible for prior ESA therapy.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Required RBC transfusions per the following criteria:
- Mean RBC transfusion requirement ≥2 units/8 weeks in the 16 weeks before the start of luspatercept treatment
- No consecutive 56-day period free from RBCTs in the 16 weeks before the start of luspatercept treatment
- Treatment with luspatercept
Who cannot join
- Any prior treatment with the following therapies:
- Prior therapy with disease modifying agents for MDS including immunomodulatory drugs (eg, lenalidomide), hypomethylating agents (eg, azacitidine or decitabine), and immunosuppressive therapy.
- Presence of the following conditions:
- Pregnancy
- The following blood and laboratory parameters: ANC <500/μL and Platelets <50,000/μL
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept in Adult Patients with Transfusion-dependent Anemia Due to Very Low-, Low- and Intermediate-risk (IPSS-R) Myelodysplastic Syndrome with Ring Sideroblasts: a Retrospective Multicenter Study by FISiM-ETS
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of malignancies characterized by reduced differentiation and increased apoptosis of hematopoietic progenitor cells, leading to ineffective hematopoiesis. Treatment of MDS varies according to prognosis. Patients with low IPSS-R risk have a low probability of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and the treatment is aimed at controlling cytopenia and improving quality of life (QOL). Anemia is the most common disease feature, occurring in 80%-85% of low-risk patients, 40% of whom eventually become RBC transfusion-dependent (TD).
Luspatercept is a recombinant fusion protein that selectively binds to ligands belonging to the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily. Luspatercept binds to GDF11, GDF8, activin B, and other ligands. This binding leads to inhibition of Smad2/3 signaling, which is abnormally high in disease models of ineffective erythropoiesis such as MDS, resulting in erythroid maturation and differentiation.
Read more
Luspatercept is now approved for the treatment of adult patients with TD anemia due to very low-, low-, and intermediate-risk MDS with ring sideroblasts, who had an unsatisfactory response to or are ineligible for erythropoietin-based therapy.
FISiM (Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodidplastiche) promotes a multicenter, retrospective observational study to collect information on the efficacy and safety of luspatercept in a real world Italian population of adult patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to very low- and intermediate-risk MDS with ring sideroblasts
Read the detailed description
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of malignancies characterized by reduced differentiation and increased apoptosis of hematopoietic progenitor cells, leading to ineffective hematopoiesis. The incidence of MDS ranges from 1.5 to 4 cases per 100,000 individuals per year. Prognosis is determined by a number of factors, including age, cytogenetic abnormalities, and cytopenia as determined by the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), but also by the occurrence of molecular aberrations (eg, gene mutations) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependence.
Treatment of MDS varies according to prognosis. Patients with low IPSS-R risk have a low probability of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and the treatment is aimed at controlling cytopenia and improving quality of life (QOL), whereas patients with high-risk disease have a shorter life expectancy and treatment is aimed at modifying the natural course of the disease.
Anemia is the most common disease feature, occurring in 80%-85% of low-risk patients, 40% of whom eventually become RBC transfusion-dependent (TD).
Besides lenalidomide, which is exclusively approved for patients with deletion of chromosome 5q, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) constitute the first option for patients with low risk disease. Patients who do not respond to ESAs have very limited options and ultimately require long-term RBC transfusions. Chronic transfusions lead to secondary iron overload and have a deleterious effect on the patient's QOL.
On April 26, 2019, Celgene Europe BV applied for a marketing authorization via the European Medicines Agency (EMA) centralized procedure for luspatercept (trade name Reblozyl). Luspatercept is a recombinant fusion protein that selectively binds to ligands belonging to the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily. Luspatercept binds to GDF11, GDF8, activin B, and other ligands. This binding leads to inhibition of Smad2/3 signaling, which is abnormally high in disease models of ineffective erythropoiesis such as MDS, resulting in erythroid maturation and differentiation.
The review of the benefit-risk balance was conducted by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), and the positive opinion was issued on April 30, 2020. The indication approved in the EU is as follows: "Reblozyl is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with TD anemia due to very low-, low-, and intermediate-risk MDS with ring sideroblasts, who had an unsatisfactory response to or are ineligible for erythropoietin-based therapy.
The clinical development program for luspatercept in MDS consists of 3 clinical trials, including the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study ACE-536-MDS-001 (MEDALIST) and 2 supportive phase 2, open-label, single-arm trials (A536-03 and A536-05).
In the MEDALIST trial, adult patients with very low, low, or intermediate IPSS-R risk MDS with ring sideroblasts who required RBC transfusions were randomized 2:1 to luspatercept (1mg/kg) or placebo by the SC route every 3 weeks.16 In both treatment groups, best supportive care could be used when clinically indicated, including RBC transfusions or iron chelation therapy, but excluding ESAs or other MDS-directed agents. The primary endpoint of the trial was the proportion of subjects who were RBC transfusion-independent (RBC-TI) over any 56-day period from week 1 to week 24.
In the MEDALIST trial, 229 subjects very low, low or intermediate IPSS-R risk MDS with ring sideroblasts were randomized: 153 to luspatercept and 76 to placebo (ITT population). Forty-nine (21.4%) patients discontinued from the study, with no differences between arms. Patients' baseline characteristics and prior medication use were well balanced across treatment arms. The percentage of responders (RBC-TI during 56 d through week 24) was 37.91% versus 13.16% (P < 0.0001) for patients receiving luspatercept versus placebo, respectively (Table 1). When the assessment period was extended to 84 days, the proportion of responders was 33.33% versus 11.84% through week 48 and 28.10% versus 7.89% through week 24.
The safety database comprised 571 subjects who received luspatercept. The mean luspatercept treatment duration was 49 weeks (median 45.6). Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were documented in 95.3% of patients in the pooled luspatercept group, compared to 91.2% of patients in the placebo group. Incidence rates of serious TEAEs (23.8% versus 15.0%), grade ≥3 TEAEs (34.9% versus 25.9%) and TEAEs leading to permanent drug discontinuation (8.8% versus 3.6%) were higher in the pooled luspatercept group. In the MDS cohort, the most frequent TEAEs leading to discontinuation were progression to high-risk MDS, transformation to AML, general physical deterioration and sepsis. Fatal TEAEs were observed in 1.8% versus 2.6% of patients receiving luspatercept versus placebo. The most frequently reported TEAEs (≥15%) in the MDS group were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, cough, dizziness, hypertension, peripheral edema, headache, viral upper respiratory tract infection, and back pain.
Overall, luspatercept significantly reduced red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements in patients with MDS with ring sideroblasts and had a generally manageable tolerability profile in clinical trials. Thus, luspatercept is an emerging treatment option in adults with transfusion-dependent anaemia due to MDS.
Despite that luspatercept is approved based on data of safety and efficacy from a large randomized clinical trial, the authors know that especially for human diseases arising in elderly people, features of subjects included in those randomized trials often do not reflect those of the population in which a therapy is intended to be used. Compliance to treatment and safety in clinical trials can also differ from real world settings. Consequently, in order to drive clinical decision-making process, data from randomized clinical trials should be integrated with evidence generated in a real world setting.
To date, no information is available on the efficacy and safety luspatercept in the treatment of MDS in real world populations. FiSIM (Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche) promotes a multicenter, retrospective observational study to collect information on the efficacy and safety of luspatercept in a real world Italian population of adult patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to very low- and intermediate-risk MDS with ring sideroblasts, who had an unsatisfactory response to or are ineligible for erythropoietin-based therapy.
- Conditions
- Myeloid Dysplasia
- Being tested
- Luspatercept
- Keywords
- Luspatercept safety, Luspatercept efficacy, Real World Study
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Refractory, with Excess of Blasts
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LuspaterceptDrug
Luspatercept treatment in adults with transfusion-dependent anaemia due to MDS
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Luspatercept treated patients | Adult patients (i.e. aged >=18 years) with diagnosis of MDS according to WHO 2016 classification that met IPSS-R criteria for very low, low, or intermediate-risk MDS treated with Luspatercept Receives: Drug: Luspatercept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Transfusion independence for 8 weeks or longer during weeks 1 through 24
Percentage of patients who achieved RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 8 weeks from week 1 to week 24. RBC-TI response is defined as the absence of any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period (ie, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57, Days 3 to 58, etc.) during the first 24 weeks of study treatment. Patients had to have at least 56 days (≥ 8 weeks) of transfusion independence prior to (and including) the Week 24 date to qualify as a responder. Patients who failed to achieve RBC-TI at least 56 days prior to or on the cut-off date were counted as non-responders.
Data will be summarised as frequencies and proportions or as medians and range and differences will be estimated by the chi square test (the Fisher exact test when appropriated) or the t test (the Wilcoxon Mann Whitney U test and the ANOVA model when appropriated based on patient characteristics distribution).
Measured: From week 1 through week 24 of treatment
Secondary outcomes (3)
Transfusion independence for 12 weeks or longer, assessed during weeks 1 through 24
Percentage of patients who achieved RBC-TI ≥ 12 weeks from week 1 to week 24. RBC-TI Response is defined as the absence of any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 84-day (12-week) period (ie, Days 1 to 84, Days 2 to 85, Days 3 to 86, etc.) during the first 24 weeks of treatment.
Data will be summarised as frequencies and proportions or as medians and range and differences will be estimated by the chi square test (the Fisher exact test when appropriated) or the t test (the Wilcoxon Mann Whitney U test and the ANOVA model when appropriated based on patient characteristics distribution).
Measured: From Week 1 through Week 24 of treatment
Transfusion independence for 12 weeks or longer, assessed during weeks 1 through 48
Percentage of patients who achieved RBC-TI ≥ 12 Weeks from Week 1 to week 48. RBC-TI Response is defined as the absence of any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 84-day (12-week) period (ie, Days 1 to 84, Days 2 to 85, Days 3 to 86, etc.) during the first 48 weeks of treatment.
Data will be summarised as frequencies and proportions or as medians and range and differences will be estimated by the chi square test (the Fisher exact test when appropriated) or the t test (the Wilcoxon Mann Whitney U test and the ANOVA model when appropriated based on patient characteristics distribution).
Measured: From Week 1 through Week 48 of treatment
Transfusion independence for 8 weeks or longer from week 1 through week 48
Percentage of patients who achieved RBC-TI ≥ 8 Weeks from week 1 through week 48.
RBC-TI response is defined as the absence of any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period during the first 48 weeks of study treatment.
Data will be summarised as frequencies and proportions or as medians and range and differences will be estimated by the chi square test (the Fisher exact test when appropriated) or the t test (the Wilcoxon Mann Whitney U test and the ANOVA model when appropriated based on patient characteristics distribution).
Measured: From Week 1 through Week 48 of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Aug 2022
- Study start1 Jan 2022
- Primary completion31 Dec 2022
- Study completion31 Jan 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myeloid DysplasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 215 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche-ETS
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Istituto Clinico Humanitas
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Matteo Della Porta, MD, Study director, Istituto Clinico HumanitasValeria Santini, MD, Study chair, Università degli studi di Firenze - AOU CareggiLorenza Borin, MD, Principal investigator, ASST-MONZADaniela Cilloni, MD, Principal investigator, Aziena Ospedaliera Mauriziano - TorinoBruno Fattizzo, MD, Principal investigator, Ospedale Policlinico di MilanoPellegrino Musto, MD, Principal investigator, Policlinico di BariEsther Oliva, MD, Principal investigator, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli di Reggio CalabriaMarta Riva, MD, Principal investigator, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05520749
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FISiM-Luspatercept (ICH 3140)
- Acronym
- FISiM-Luspa
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Lanino L, Restuccia F, Perego A, Ubezio M, Fattizzo B, Riva M, Consagra A, Musto P, Cilloni D, Oliva EN, Palmieri R, Poloni A, Califano C, Capodanno I, Itri F, Elena C, Fozza C, Pane F, Pelizzari AM, Breccia M, Di Bassiano F, Crisa E, Ferrero D, Giai V, Barraco D, Vaccarino A, Griguolo D, Minetto P, Quintini M, Paolini S, Sanpaolo G, Sessa M, Bocchia M, Di Renzo N, Diral E, Leuzzi L, Genua A, Guarini A, Molteni A, Nicolino B, Occhini U, Rivoli G, Bono R, Calvisi A, Castelli A, Di Bona E, Di Veroli A, Ferrara F, Fianchi L, Galimberti S, Grimaldi D, Marchetti M, Norata M, Frigeni M, Sancetta R, Selleri C, Tanasi I, Tosi P, Turrini M, Giordano L, Finelli C, Pasini P, Naldi I, Santini V, Della Porta MG; Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche (FISiM) Clinical network (https://www.fisimematologia.it/). Real-world efficacy and safety of luspatercept and predictive factors of response in patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts. Am J Hematol. 2023 Aug;98(8):E204-E208. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26960. Epub 2023 May 24. No abstract available.
PubMed 37222267
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept in Adult Patients with Transfusion-dependent Anemia Due to Very Low-, Low- and Intermediate-risk (IPSS-R) Myelodysplastic Syndrome with Ring Sideroblasts: a Retrospective Multicenter Study by FISiM-ETS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05520749
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FISiM-Luspa / FISiM-Luspatercept (ICH 3140)
- Conditions
- Myeloid Dysplasia
- Keywords
- Luspatercept safety, Luspatercept efficacy, Real World Study
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 215 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche-ETSUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Istituto Clinico Humanitas
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of malignancies characterized by reduced differentiation and increased apoptosis of hematopoietic progenitor cells, leading to ineffective hematopoiesis. Treatment of MDS varies according to prognosis. Patients with low IPSS-R risk have a low probability of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and the treatment is aimed at controlling cytopenia and improving quality of life (QOL). Anemia is the most common disease feature, occurring in 80%-85% of low-risk patients, 40% of whom eventually become RBC transfusion-dependent (TD).
Luspatercept is a recombinant fusion protein that selectively binds to ligands belonging to the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily. Luspatercept binds to GDF11, GDF8, activin B, and other ligands. This binding leads to inhibition of Smad2/3 signaling, which is abnormally high in disease models of ineffective erythropoiesis such as MDS, resulting in erythroid maturation and differentiation.
Luspatercept is now approved for the treatment of adult patients with TD anemia due to very low-, low-, and intermediate-risk MDS with ring sideroblasts, who had an unsatisfactory response to or are ineligible for erythropoietin-based therapy.
FISiM (Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodidplastiche) promotes a multicenter, retrospective observational study to collect information on the efficacy and safety of luspatercept in a real world Italian population of adult patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to very low- and intermediate-risk MDS with ring sideroblasts
Detailed description
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of malignancies characterized by reduced differentiation and increased apoptosis of hematopoietic progenitor cells, leading to ineffective hematopoiesis. The incidence of MDS ranges from 1.5 to 4 cases per 100,000 individuals per year. Prognosis is determined by a number of factors, including age, cytogenetic abnormalities, and cytopenia as determined by the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), but also by the occurrence of molecular aberrations (eg, gene mutations) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependence.
Treatment of MDS varies according to prognosis. Patients with low IPSS-R risk have a low probability of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and the treatment is aimed at controlling cytopenia and improving quality of life (QOL), whereas patients with high-risk disease have a shorter life expectancy and treatment is aimed at modifying the natural course of the disease.
Anemia is the most common disease feature, occurring in 80%-85% of low-risk patients, 40% of whom eventually become RBC transfusion-dependent (TD).
Besides lenalidomide, which is exclusively approved for patients with deletion of chromosome 5q, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) constitute the first option for patients with low risk disease. Patients who do not respond to ESAs have very limited options and ultimately require long-term RBC transfusions. Chronic transfusions lead to secondary iron overload and have a deleterious effect on the patient's QOL.
On April 26, 2019, Celgene Europe BV applied for a marketing authorization via the European Medicines Agency (EMA) centralized procedure for luspatercept (trade name Reblozyl). Luspatercept is a recombinant fusion protein that selectively binds to ligands belonging to the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily. Luspatercept binds to GDF11, GDF8, activin B, and other ligands. This binding leads to inhibition of Smad2/3 signaling, which is abnormally high in disease models of ineffective erythropoiesis such as MDS, resulting in erythroid maturation and differentiation.
The review of the benefit-risk balance was conducted by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), and the positive opinion was issued on April 30, 2020. The indication approved in the EU is as follows: "Reblozyl is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with TD anemia due to very low-, low-, and intermediate-risk MDS with ring sideroblasts, who had an unsatisfactory response to or are ineligible for erythropoietin-based therapy.
The clinical development program for luspatercept in MDS consists of 3 clinical trials, including the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study ACE-536-MDS-001 (MEDALIST) and 2 supportive phase 2, open-label, single-arm trials (A536-03 and A536-05).
In the MEDALIST trial, adult patients with very low, low, or intermediate IPSS-R risk MDS with ring sideroblasts who required RBC transfusions were randomized 2:1 to luspatercept (1mg/kg) or placebo by the SC route every 3 weeks.16 In both treatment groups, best supportive care could be used when clinically indicated, including RBC transfusions or iron chelation therapy, but excluding ESAs or other MDS-directed agents. The primary endpoint of the trial was the proportion of subjects who were RBC transfusion-independent (RBC-TI) over any 56-day period from week 1 to week 24.
In the MEDALIST trial, 229 subjects very low, low or intermediate IPSS-R risk MDS with ring sideroblasts were randomized: 153 to luspatercept and 76 to placebo (ITT population). Forty-nine (21.4%) patients discontinued from the study, with no differences between arms. Patients' baseline characteristics and prior medication use were well balanced across treatment arms. The percentage of responders (RBC-TI during 56 d through week 24) was 37.91% versus 13.16% (P < 0.0001) for patients receiving luspatercept versus placebo, respectively (Table 1). When the assessment period was extended to 84 days, the proportion of responders was 33.33% versus 11.84% through week 48 and 28.10% versus 7.89% through week 24.
The safety database comprised 571 subjects who received luspatercept. The mean luspatercept treatment duration was 49 weeks (median 45.6). Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were documented in 95.3% of patients in the pooled luspatercept group, compared to 91.2% of patients in the placebo group. Incidence rates of serious TEAEs (23.8% versus 15.0%), grade ≥3 TEAEs (34.9% versus 25.9%) and TEAEs leading to permanent drug discontinuation (8.8% versus 3.6%) were higher in the pooled luspatercept group. In the MDS cohort, the most frequent TEAEs leading to discontinuation were progression to high-risk MDS, transformation to AML, general physical deterioration and sepsis. Fatal TEAEs were observed in 1.8% versus 2.6% of patients receiving luspatercept versus placebo. The most frequently reported TEAEs (≥15%) in the MDS group were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, cough, dizziness, hypertension, peripheral edema, headache, viral upper respiratory tract infection, and back pain.
Overall, luspatercept significantly reduced red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements in patients with MDS with ring sideroblasts and had a generally manageable tolerability profile in clinical trials. Thus, luspatercept is an emerging treatment option in adults with transfusion-dependent anaemia due to MDS.
Despite that luspatercept is approved based on data of safety and efficacy from a large randomized clinical trial, the authors know that especially for human diseases arising in elderly people, features of subjects included in those randomized trials often do not reflect those of the population in which a therapy is intended to be used. Compliance to treatment and safety in clinical trials can also differ from real world settings. Consequently, in order to drive clinical decision-making process, data from randomized clinical trials should be integrated with evidence generated in a real world setting.
To date, no information is available on the efficacy and safety luspatercept in the treatment of MDS in real world populations. FiSIM (Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche) promotes a multicenter, retrospective observational study to collect information on the efficacy and safety of luspatercept in a real world Italian population of adult patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to very low- and intermediate-risk MDS with ring sideroblasts, who had an unsatisfactory response to or are ineligible for erythropoietin-based therapy.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Luspatercept treated patients | – | Drug: LuspaterceptAdult patients (i.e. aged >=18 years) with diagnosis of MDS according to WHO 2016 classification that met IPSS-R criteria for very low, low, or intermediate-risk MDS treated with Luspatercept |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients treated with luspatercept in Italy between November 2020 and January 2022 will be included in this study (i.e., around 215 subjects).
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Adult patients (i.e. aged >=18 years) with diagnosis of MDS according to WHO 2016 classification that met IPSS-R criteria for very low, low, or intermediate-risk MDS along with the following additional criteria:
- Ring Sideroblasts (RS) ≥15% of erythroid precursors in bone marrow in the absence of SF3B1 mutation, or ≥5% in the presence of SF3B1 mutation;
- Bone marrow blasts <5%;
- Peripheral white blood cell count <13,000/μL;
- ECOG PS 0-2;
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Prior therapy with disease modifying agents for MDS including immunomodulatory drugs (eg, lenalidomide), hypomethylating agents (eg, azacitidine or decitabine), and immunosuppressive therapy.
- Presence of the following conditions:
- Pregnancy
- The following blood and laboratory parameters: ANC <500/μL and Platelets <50,000/μL
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LuspaterceptLuspatercept treatment in adults with transfusion-dependent anaemia due to MDS | Drug | Luspatercept treated patients |
Primary outcome
Transfusion independence for 8 weeks or longer during weeks 1 through 24
Time frame: From week 1 through week 24 of treatment
Percentage of patients who achieved RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 8 weeks from week 1 to week 24. RBC-TI response is defined as the absence of any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period (ie, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57, Days 3 to 58, etc.) during the first 24 weeks of study treatment. Patients had to have at least 56 days (≥ 8 weeks) of transfusion independence prior to (and including) the Week 24 date to qualify as a responder. Patients who failed to achieve RBC-TI at least 56 days prior to or on the cut-off date were counted as non-responders. Data will be summarised as frequencies and proportions or as medians and range and differences will be estimated by the chi square test (the Fisher exact test when appropriated) or the t test (the Wilcoxon Mann Whitney U test and the ANOVA model when appropriated based on patient characteristics distribution).
3 secondary outcomes
Transfusion independence for 12 weeks or longer, assessed during weeks 1 through 24
Time frame: From Week 1 through Week 24 of treatment
Transfusion independence for 12 weeks or longer, assessed during weeks 1 through 48
Time frame: From Week 1 through Week 48 of treatment
Transfusion independence for 8 weeks or longer from week 1 through week 48
Time frame: From Week 1 through Week 48 of treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37222267Lanino L, Restuccia F, Perego A, Ubezio M, Fattizzo B, Riva M, Consagra A, Musto P, Cilloni D, Oliva EN, Palmieri R, Poloni A, Califano C, Capodanno I, Itri F, Elena C, Fozza C, Pane F, Pelizzari AM, Breccia M, Di Bassiano F, Crisa E, Ferrero D, Giai V, Barraco D, Vaccarino A, Griguolo D, Minetto P, Quintini M, Paolini S, Sanpaolo G, Sessa M, Bocchia M, Di Renzo N, Diral E, Leuzzi L, Genua A, Guarini A, Molteni A, Nicolino B, Occhini U, Rivoli G, Bono R, Calvisi A, Castelli A, Di Bona E, Di Veroli A, Ferrara F, Fianchi L, Galimberti S, Grimaldi D, Marchetti M, Norata M, Frigeni M, Sancetta R, Selleri C, Tanasi I, Tosi P, Turrini M, Giordano L, Finelli C, Pasini P, Naldi I, Santini V, Della Porta MG; Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche (FISiM) Clinical network (https://www.fisimematologia.it/). Real-world efficacy and safety of luspatercept and predictive factors of response in patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts. Am J Hematol. 2023 Aug;98(8):E204-E208. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26960. Epub 2023 May 24. No abstract available.
Related trials for Myeloid Dysplasia
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Omacetaxine + Azacitidine in Untreated Patients With High Grade MDS
High Grade Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Matteo Della Porta, MD study director
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Valeria Santini, MD study chair
Università degli studi di Firenze - AOU Careggi
Lorenza Borin, MD principal investigator
ASST-MONZA
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Myeloid Dysplasia, run by Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche-ETS at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Transfusion independence for 8 weeks or longer during weeks 1 through 24 (time frame: From week 1 through week 24 of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05520749, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2025.