Postoperative Pain, AcuteNCT05521516
Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation for Postoperative Analgesia
A study testing Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge in people with Postoperative Pain, Acute, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The moderate-to-severe pain many patients experience following surgery is often treated with opioids, which are associated with side effects such as nausea/vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression (and a risk of abuse, dependence, and diversion). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Pain, Acute
- What is being tested?
- Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 122 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Oct 2022to 11 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- undergoing one of these surgical procedures as a primary procedure (not revision):
- septoplasty [infraorbital nerve block]
- laparoscopic cholecystectomy [transversus abdominis nerve block]
- laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy [transversus abdominis nerve block]
- non-mastectomy breast surgery [paravertebral nerve block]
- percutaneous nephrolithotomy [erector spinae plane nerve block]
Show all 13Show fewer
- inguinal hernia repair [transversus abdominis nerve block]
- knee arthroplasty [adductor canal nerve block]
- hip arthroplasty [pericapsular nerve group block]
- shoulder acromioclavicular joint repair, labral repair, subacromial decompression, or Bankart repair (without rotator cuff repair) [interscalene nerve block]
- orthopedic hardware removal anticipated to be at least moderately painful postoperatively [various peripheral nerve blocks]
- analgesic plan includes a single-injection peripheral nerve block with a long-acting local anesthetic [may be waived for hip arthroplasty]
- age 18 years or older.
Who cannot join
- concurrent use of another electric stimulator (e.g., cardiac pacemaker)
- bleeding disorder
- anticoagulation
- skin abnormality at the treatment site
- psoriasis vulgaris
- morbid obesity as defined by a body mass index > 40
Show all 13Show fewer
- history of opioid abuse
- inability to communicate with the investigators or hospital staff
- pregnancy
- bilateral or multi-stage surgical procedures
- incarceration
- chronic opioid or tramadol use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use > 4 weeks)
- neuro-muscular deficit of the surgical area/limb.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of California San Diego
San Diego, California, 92130
About this study
Official title: Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation for Postoperative Analgesia: A Randomized, Participant- and Observer-Masked, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study
The moderate-to-severe pain many patients experience following surgery is often treated with opioids, which are associated with side effects such as nausea/vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression (and a risk of abuse, dependence, and diversion). Potent site-specific analgesia with fewer side effects may be provided with peripheral nerve blocks. However, these too have limitations such as a duration of action measured in hours, while the pain from surgery is usually measured in days or weeks. Peripheral nerve stimulation or "neuromodulation" is an alternative method of pain control involving the introduction of electrical current to stimulate various nerves that do not carry pain sensations, but which then decreases communication between pain fibers and the spinal cord and/or brain. Placing small electrodes specifically in the area of the ear is called "auricular neuromodulation" and is theorized to function by stimulating various cranial and peripheral nerves that influence a part of the brain called the "limbic system" which is involved with many aspects of behavior including responses to stress. A device that delivers auricular neuromodulation, the "Bridge" system, is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for use to reduce symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal for up to 5 days. However, one prospective and two published retrospective studies suggest that it may provide postoperative analgesia as well. The device itself is relatively simple to apply; has few contraindications, side effects, or adverse events; and has no potential for dependence, abuse, or diversion. Therefore, it has the potential to concurrently improve analgesia and decrease or even negate opioid requirements following surgery, only without the limitations of opioids and peripheral nerve blocks. The purpose of this pilot study is to explore the possibility of treating postoperative pain with percutaneous auricular neuromodulation, optimize the study protocol, and estimate the treatment effect in preparation for developing a subsequent definitive clinical trial.
Read the detailed description
The proposed study will be a randomized, participant- and observer-masked, sham-controlled, parallel-arm, human participants pilot study with two primary aims:
Specific Aim 1: To determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for a subsequent clinical trial that will compare the addition of percutaneous auricular neuromodulation to usual and customary analgesia following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.
Specific Aim 2: To estimate the treatment effect of adding percutaneous auricular neuromodulation to usual and customary analgesia on pain and opioid consumption following various surgical procedures. This will provide an idea of the optimal surgical procedures amenable to this analgesic technique and allow determination of the required sample size of a subsequent definitive clinical trial.
Hypothesis 1: Auricular neuromodulation decreases pain in the 5 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures currently treated with a single-injection peripheral nerve block.
Hypothesis 2: Auricular neuromodulation decreases opioid use in the 5 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures currently treated with a single-injection peripheral nerve block.
This will be a single-center (UCSD), randomized, participant- and observer-masked, sham-controlled, parallel-arm human participants pilot study.
Enrollment. Participants will be consenting adults undergoing various surgical procedures usually resulting in moderate-to-severe postoperative pain and treated with single-injection peripheral nerve blocks. Study inclusion will be proposed to eligible patients prior to surgery. If a patient desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained using a current UCSD IRB-approved ICF. The study population of interest includes women and men of all races, ethnicity, sexual identity, and socioeconomic status.
Preoperative Procedures. Following written, informed consent, the investigators will record baseline anthropometric information (age, sex, height, weight, current pain level). Participants will have their single-injection peripheral nerve block administered using ropivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine (standard at the enrolling institution) prior to undergoing their surgical procedure per standard of care. A "successful" regional block will be defined as sensory- and motor-block onset in all expected nerve distributions within the 30 minutes following the local anesthetic injection. Participants with a successful regional block and undergo the anticipated surgical procedure will be randomized and continue within the study.
Treatment Group Assignment. Each participant will be randomized to one of two treatment groups: Active (Experimental) or Sham treatment. There are sham devices produced that are identical to active devices, only they do not deliver electrical current. Randomization will be stratified by surgical procedure, in block sizes of 2. The computer-generated randomization list will be created by the University of California San Diego Investigational Drug Service in a 1:1 treatment group ratio assigned only after successful peripheral nerve block administration and the participant underwent the anticipated surgical procedure. The active and sham stimulators are indistinguishable in appearance, and therefore investigators, participants, and all clinical staff other than the individual who opens the randomization envelope and chooses a sham or active device will be masked to treatment group assignment for the duration of the data collection period.
Study intervention. The NSS-2 Bridge device will be affixed to the ear and activated prior to discharge from the recovery room (Experimental). There is currently no consensus regarding the placement on the ipsilateral or contralateral ear relative to the surgical procedure (if sided). Therefore, the investigators will apply the device to the side that the participant sleeps on least, to optimize comfort in bed and sleep.
Postoperative course. In addition to the experimental device and single-injection peripheral nerve block, participants will receive standard-of-care oral and intravenous postoperative analgesics which can include acetaminophen, ibuprofen, ketorolac, and opioids (this is surgeon- and patient-dependent). Therefore, all patients of this study-regardless of the treatment arm they are randomized to-will continue to receive current usual and customary analgesia: all will receive the same combination of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, ketorolac, opioids, and a single-injection peripheral nerve block as they would regardless of study participation. Prior to discharge, participants and their caretakers will be provided with verbal instructions regarding the care of the stimulator, and the telephone and pager numbers of an investigator available at all times during the first 5 days of treatment. The instructions for the stimulator are few: (1) participants can shower, but use a shower cap to cover the stimulator; (2) there are no controls so there is nothing that needs to be adjusted; (3) the device will run out of power after 5 days; (4) the investigators will call participants every day to answer any questions participants might have and describe how to remove the device as that time approaches.
Participants will be discharged when ready, as determined by standard criteria by the masked surgical service. Participants will be discharged home with their NSS-2 Bridge in situ and a prescription for immediate-release oral opioid, preferably oxycodone 5 mg tablets, taken for breakthrough pain. Participants will be contacted by telephone for end point collection beginning on postoperative day 1. The NSS-2 Bridge devices will be removed by patients or their caretakers at home on postoperative day 5. Similar to perineural catheters, this procedure encompasses simply removing the small dressings (the electrodes remain adhered to the dressings and therefore do not require a separate extraction step), removing the stimulator from behind the ear with simple traction, and discarding all components (these are disposable, single-use devices).
At the conclusion of the study, participants will be informed of the main results in lay-person language by either email or the U.S. Postal Service.
Study outcomes: This is an exploratory pilot study to assist in planning a subsequent definitive trial and the investigators therefore have no data analysis plan. The investigators will enroll convenience samples for each of the surgical procedures of up to 30 participants for each procedure and anticipate analyzing some surgical procedure separately from the others (hips, knees, breast, hernia/cholecystectomy, septoplasty). The two primary outcomes will be (1) the mean of the "average" pain recorded on postoperative days 1-5 measured with the Numeric Rating Scale ("average" pain is included in the Brief Pain Inventory pain domain); and (2) the cumulative opioids consumed from recovery room discharge until postoperative day 5, as measured in oral oxycodone equivalents.
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain, Acute
- Being tested
- Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge, Sham Treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 BridgeDevice
Application of 5 days of percutaneous auricular neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge device
Sham TreatmentDevice
Also called Placebo
Application of 5 days of a nonfunctional sham device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge | Active comparator | Application of 5 days of percutaneous auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge device Receives: Device: Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge |
| Sham Treatment | Sham comparator | Application of 5 days of a nonfunctional sham device Receives: Device: Sham Treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale First 5 Postoperative Days
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale. The outcome will the mean value of daily average pain scores measured with the Numeric Rating Scale. The primary outcome measure will be the mean value of the average daily pain measured on postoperative days 1-5.
Measured: The first 5 postoperative days
Total OPIOID Consumption From Recovery Room Discharge Until the Data Collection Phone Call on Postoperative Day 5 (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Total opioid consumption from recovery room discharge until the data collection phone call on postoperative day 5 (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents).
Measured: Postoperative days 0-5
Secondary outcomes (11)
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: Recorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous 24-hour period
WORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: Recorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous 24-hour period
LEAST (Lowest or Minimum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: Recorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8 for the previous 24-hour period
CURRENT Pain at the Time of the Data-collection Phone Call Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: Recorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)
Measured: Recorded on postoperative days 1-8
Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)
The interference sub scale of the Brief Pain Inventory short form is an instrument specifically designed to assess pain's impact on physical and emotional functioning. It is comprised of 7 questions involving physical and emotional functioning using a 0-10 Likert scale [0=no interference, good;10=complete interference, bad]: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life. The responses for these 7 questions are summed, resulting in a final scale of 0 (no interference=good) to 70 (complete interference=bad).
Measured: Recorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8 for the previous 24-hour period
Awakenings Due to Pain
The number of times the participant awoke the previous night due to pain
Measured: Recorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous night
Masking
Patient queried if they thought they received active stimulation (entered as "1"), a sham device (entered as "0"), or are not sure (entered as "0.5")
Measured: Recorded on postoperative day 1
Hospitalization Duration Measured in Days
Day relative to the day of surgery that patient was discharged from the hospital (e.g., same day is postoperative day 0, while the day following surgery is postoperative day 1)
Measured: Up to 2 weeks after surgery
Tourniquet Duration
Number of minutes the tourniquet was inflated
Measured: Intraoperative (within the operating room)
Surgical Duration
The time from surgical start to surgical stop measured in minutes and hours
Measured: Intraoperative (within the operating room)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Aug 2022
- Study start12 Oct 2022
- Primary completion8 Dec 2024
- Study completion11 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postoperative Pain, AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San DiegoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment: Randomized, Triple-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Arm Human Subjects Clinical Trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Diego
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS, University of California, San Diego
- Investigators
- Brian M Ilfeld, MD, Ms, Principal investigator, University of California, San Diego
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05521516
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Auricular NeuromodulationPilot
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ilfeld BM, Abramson WB, Said ET, Sztain JF, Finneran JJ 4th, Griggs JL, Abdullah B, Jensen EJ, Schaar A, Wallace AM. Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation to treat pain after ambulatory breast surgery: A randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study. Can J Pain. 2025 Jul 10;9(1):2521117. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2025.2521117. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 40657450Ilfeld BM, Finneran JJ 4th, Alexander B, Abramson WB, Sztain JF, Ball ST, Gonzales FB, Abdullah B, Cha BJ, Said ET. Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation (nerve stimulation) for the treatment of pain following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Jan 7;50(1):26-35. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105028.
PubMed 38388019Ilfeld BM, Abramson WB, Alexander B, Sztain JF, Said ET, Broderick RC, Sandler BJ, Doucet JJ, Adams LM, Abdullah B, Cha BJ, Finneran JJ 4th. Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation (nerve stimulation) for the treatment of pain following cholecystectomy and hernia repair: a randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Sep 2;49(9):628-634. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105283.
PubMed 38388014
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation for Postoperative Analgesia: A Randomized, Participant- and Observer-Masked, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05521516
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Auricular NeuromodulationPilot
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain, Acute
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San DiegoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 4 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The moderate-to-severe pain many patients experience following surgery is often treated with opioids, which are associated with side effects such as nausea/vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression (and a risk of abuse, dependence, and diversion). Potent site-specific analgesia with fewer side effects may be provided with peripheral nerve blocks. However, these too have limitations such as a duration of action measured in hours, while the pain from surgery is usually measured in days or weeks. Peripheral nerve stimulation or "neuromodulation" is an alternative method of pain control involving the introduction of electrical current to stimulate various nerves that do not carry pain sensations, but which then decreases communication between pain fibers and the spinal cord and/or brain. Placing small electrodes specifically in the area of the ear is called "auricular neuromodulation" and is theorized to function by stimulating various cranial and peripheral nerves that influence a part of the brain called the "limbic system" which is involved with many aspects of behavior including responses to stress. A device that delivers auricular neuromodulation, the "Bridge" system, is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for use to reduce symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal for up to 5 days. However, one prospective and two published retrospective studies suggest that it may provide postoperative analgesia as well. The device itself is relatively simple to apply; has few contraindications, side effects, or adverse events; and has no potential for dependence, abuse, or diversion. Therefore, it has the potential to concurrently improve analgesia and decrease or even negate opioid requirements following surgery, only without the limitations of opioids and peripheral nerve blocks. The purpose of this pilot study is to explore the possibility of treating postoperative pain with percutaneous auricular neuromodulation, optimize the study protocol, and estimate the treatment effect in preparation for developing a subsequent definitive clinical trial.
Detailed description
The proposed study will be a randomized, participant- and observer-masked, sham-controlled, parallel-arm, human participants pilot study with two primary aims:
Specific Aim 1: To determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for a subsequent clinical trial that will compare the addition of percutaneous auricular neuromodulation to usual and customary analgesia following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.
Specific Aim 2: To estimate the treatment effect of adding percutaneous auricular neuromodulation to usual and customary analgesia on pain and opioid consumption following various surgical procedures. This will provide an idea of the optimal surgical procedures amenable to this analgesic technique and allow determination of the required sample size of a subsequent definitive clinical trial.
Hypothesis 1: Auricular neuromodulation decreases pain in the 5 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures currently treated with a single-injection peripheral nerve block.
Hypothesis 2: Auricular neuromodulation decreases opioid use in the 5 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures currently treated with a single-injection peripheral nerve block.
This will be a single-center (UCSD), randomized, participant- and observer-masked, sham-controlled, parallel-arm human participants pilot study.
Enrollment. Participants will be consenting adults undergoing various surgical procedures usually resulting in moderate-to-severe postoperative pain and treated with single-injection peripheral nerve blocks. Study inclusion will be proposed to eligible patients prior to surgery. If a patient desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained using a current UCSD IRB-approved ICF. The study population of interest includes women and men of all races, ethnicity, sexual identity, and socioeconomic status.
Preoperative Procedures. Following written, informed consent, the investigators will record baseline anthropometric information (age, sex, height, weight, current pain level). Participants will have their single-injection peripheral nerve block administered using ropivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine (standard at the enrolling institution) prior to undergoing their surgical procedure per standard of care. A "successful" regional block will be defined as sensory- and motor-block onset in all expected nerve distributions within the 30 minutes following the local anesthetic injection. Participants with a successful regional block and undergo the anticipated surgical procedure will be randomized and continue within the study.
Treatment Group Assignment. Each participant will be randomized to one of two treatment groups: Active (Experimental) or Sham treatment. There are sham devices produced that are identical to active devices, only they do not deliver electrical current. Randomization will be stratified by surgical procedure, in block sizes of 2. The computer-generated randomization list will be created by the University of California San Diego Investigational Drug Service in a 1:1 treatment group ratio assigned only after successful peripheral nerve block administration and the participant underwent the anticipated surgical procedure. The active and sham stimulators are indistinguishable in appearance, and therefore investigators, participants, and all clinical staff other than the individual who opens the randomization envelope and chooses a sham or active device will be masked to treatment group assignment for the duration of the data collection period.
Study intervention. The NSS-2 Bridge device will be affixed to the ear and activated prior to discharge from the recovery room (Experimental). There is currently no consensus regarding the placement on the ipsilateral or contralateral ear relative to the surgical procedure (if sided). Therefore, the investigators will apply the device to the side that the participant sleeps on least, to optimize comfort in bed and sleep.
Postoperative course. In addition to the experimental device and single-injection peripheral nerve block, participants will receive standard-of-care oral and intravenous postoperative analgesics which can include acetaminophen, ibuprofen, ketorolac, and opioids (this is surgeon- and patient-dependent). Therefore, all patients of this study-regardless of the treatment arm they are randomized to-will continue to receive current usual and customary analgesia: all will receive the same combination of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, ketorolac, opioids, and a single-injection peripheral nerve block as they would regardless of study participation. Prior to discharge, participants and their caretakers will be provided with verbal instructions regarding the care of the stimulator, and the telephone and pager numbers of an investigator available at all times during the first 5 days of treatment. The instructions for the stimulator are few: (1) participants can shower, but use a shower cap to cover the stimulator; (2) there are no controls so there is nothing that needs to be adjusted; (3) the device will run out of power after 5 days; (4) the investigators will call participants every day to answer any questions participants might have and describe how to remove the device as that time approaches.
Participants will be discharged when ready, as determined by standard criteria by the masked surgical service. Participants will be discharged home with their NSS-2 Bridge in situ and a prescription for immediate-release oral opioid, preferably oxycodone 5 mg tablets, taken for breakthrough pain. Participants will be contacted by telephone for end point collection beginning on postoperative day 1. The NSS-2 Bridge devices will be removed by patients or their caretakers at home on postoperative day 5. Similar to perineural catheters, this procedure encompasses simply removing the small dressings (the electrodes remain adhered to the dressings and therefore do not require a separate extraction step), removing the stimulator from behind the ear with simple traction, and discarding all components (these are disposable, single-use devices).
At the conclusion of the study, participants will be informed of the main results in lay-person language by either email or the U.S. Postal Service.
Study outcomes: This is an exploratory pilot study to assist in planning a subsequent definitive trial and the investigators therefore have no data analysis plan. The investigators will enroll convenience samples for each of the surgical procedures of up to 30 participants for each procedure and anticipate analyzing some surgical procedure separately from the others (hips, knees, breast, hernia/cholecystectomy, septoplasty). The two primary outcomes will be (1) the mean of the "average" pain recorded on postoperative days 1-5 measured with the Numeric Rating Scale ("average" pain is included in the Brief Pain Inventory pain domain); and (2) the cumulative opioids consumed from recovery room discharge until postoperative day 5, as measured in oral oxycodone equivalents.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment: Randomized, Triple-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Arm Human Subjects Clinical Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge | Active comparator | Device: Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 BridgeApplication of 5 days of percutaneous auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge device |
| Sham Treatment | Sham comparator | Device: Sham TreatmentApplication of 5 days of a nonfunctional sham device |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- undergoing one of these surgical procedures as a primary procedure (not revision):
- analgesic plan includes a single-injection peripheral nerve block with a long-acting local anesthetic [may be waived for hip arthroplasty]
- age 18 years or older.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- concurrent use of another electric stimulator (e.g., cardiac pacemaker)
- bleeding disorder
- anticoagulation
- skin abnormality at the treatment site
- psoriasis vulgaris
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 BridgeApplication of 5 days of percutaneous auricular neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge device | Device | Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge |
| Sham TreatmentAlso: PlaceboApplication of 5 days of a nonfunctional sham device | Device | Sham Treatment |
Primary outcome
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale First 5 Postoperative Days
Time frame: The first 5 postoperative days
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale. The outcome will the mean value of daily average pain scores measured with the Numeric Rating Scale. The primary outcome measure will be the mean value of the average daily pain measured on postoperative days 1-5.
Total OPIOID Consumption From Recovery Room Discharge Until the Data Collection Phone Call on Postoperative Day 5 (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Time frame: Postoperative days 0-5
Total opioid consumption from recovery room discharge until the data collection phone call on postoperative day 5 (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents).
11 secondary outcomes
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous 24-hour period
WORST (Highest or Maximum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous 24-hour period
LEAST (Lowest or Minimum) Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8 for the previous 24-hour period
CURRENT Pain at the Time of the Data-collection Phone Call Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 1-8
Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)
Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 2, 4, 6, and 8 for the previous 24-hour period
Awakenings Due to Pain
Time frame: Recorded on postoperative days 1-8 for the previous night
Masking
Time frame: Recorded on postoperative day 1
Hospitalization Duration Measured in Days
Time frame: Up to 2 weeks after surgery
Tourniquet Duration
Time frame: Intraoperative (within the operating room)
Surgical Duration
Time frame: Intraoperative (within the operating room)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40657450Ilfeld BM, Abramson WB, Said ET, Sztain JF, Finneran JJ 4th, Griggs JL, Abdullah B, Jensen EJ, Schaar A, Wallace AM. Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation to treat pain after ambulatory breast surgery: A randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study. Can J Pain. 2025 Jul 10;9(1):2521117. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2025.2521117. eCollection 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38388019Ilfeld BM, Finneran JJ 4th, Alexander B, Abramson WB, Sztain JF, Ball ST, Gonzales FB, Abdullah B, Cha BJ, Said ET. Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation (nerve stimulation) for the treatment of pain following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Jan 7;50(1):26-35. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105028.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38388014Ilfeld BM, Abramson WB, Alexander B, Sztain JF, Said ET, Broderick RC, Sandler BJ, Doucet JJ, Adams LM, Abdullah B, Cha BJ, Finneran JJ 4th. Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation (nerve stimulation) for the treatment of pain following cholecystectomy and hernia repair: a randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Sep 2;49(9):628-634. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105283.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Suzetrigine (Journavx) as Multimodal Therapy for Pain Management in Adults Undergoing Surgery for Hip Fracture
Hip Fractures (ICD-10 72.01-72.2), Post Operative Analgesia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of CYT-1010 in Healthy Volunteers and Participants With Acute Pain After Third Molar Extraction
Acute Postoperative Pain, Dental Pain
Not yet recruiting
Two Bupivacaine Concentrations for Recto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Postoperative Pain, Acute Pain
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Pain and Apical Healing After Root Canal (re)Treatment With Laser-activated Irrigation Versus Sonic or no Activation
Apical Periodontitis, Post Operative Pain, Acute
Recruiting
Rectus Sheath Catheters Following Midline Laparotomy
Acute Abdomen, Ileus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brian M Ilfeld, MD, Ms principal investigator
University of California, San Diego
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Active Percutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation with NSS-2 Bridge in people with Postoperative Pain, Acute, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale First 5 Postoperative Days (time frame: The first 5 postoperative days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05521516, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2025.