AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary Progressive AphasiaNCT05525377

Better Living With Non-memory-led Dementia

A study testing Better living with non-memory led dementia course in people with Primary Progressive Aphasia and Frontotemporal Dementia, run by University College, London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a feasibility study on the effects of an online-based training and education programme for carers of people with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Better living with non-memory led dementia course
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
31 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
21 Jun 2022to 9 Feb 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • . Adults (18+) who self-identify as an unpaid carer (partners, children, friends, etc.) of someone with PPA, PCA or bvFTD who is not living in a full-time care facility.
  • . The care recipient has to have a confirmed diagnosis of dementia (through self-report of the carer, to reflect the 'real world' application of the intervention).

Who cannot join

  • . Those unable to comprehend written English
  • . Those with no access to the internet

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • University College London

    London, WC1N 3BG

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Better Living With Non-memory-led Dementia: Feasibility Study on the Effects of a Blended Online Training Course for Carers of People With Atypical AD and FTD.

This is a feasibility study on the effects of an online-based training and education programme for carers of people with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD).

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is:

To evaluate the feasibility of an online training course for carers of people with PCA, PPA, and bvFTD. Feasibility measures will focus on the recruitment process and measurement tools.

To determine the acceptability of an online training course for carers of people with PCA, PPA and bvFTD.

The study will involve 6 online modules over the course of 7 weeks. All sessions will take place over the internet, using an online platform. A research team member (facilitator) will be available to assist participants over the course completion.

Being tested
Better living with non-memory led dementia course
Keywords
"Posterior Cortical Atrophy"
Medical subject headings
Aphasia, Primary Progressive, Frontotemporal Dementia, Alzheimer Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Better living with non-memory led dementia courseBehavioural

    Caregivers online training and educational phenotype-specific programme on how to support people with non-memory-led dementia.

Study groups in NCT05525377
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalSubjects in the intervention group receive access to an online training and educational phenotype-specific programme on how to support their relative with non-memory-led dementia. The online course consists on 6 modules to complete in 7 weeks. A course facilitator is available throughout the duration of the intervention to support participants.
Receives: Behavioral: Better living with non-memory led dementia course
Treatment as usual (TAU)No interventionThe "treatment as usual" group does not receive access to the educational programme.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Study feasibility

    Feasibility of recruitment process and measurement tools (e.g., number of people agreeing to be sent information about the study, time taken to fill in questionnaires).

    Measured: Since June 2022 to January 2023 (8 months)

  2. Acceptability

    Prospective and retrospective acceptability (e.g., reasons for not taking part, task completion rate after every module)

    Measured: Since June 2022 to January 2023 (8 months)

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. WHO 5 Wellbeing Index

    Short self-reported measure of current mental wellbeing (ranging from 0 (minimun) to 25 (maximun) scores). 0 representing the worst imaginable well-being and 100 representing the best imaginable well-being.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7)

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (ranging from 0 (minimun) to 21 (maximun) scores). Higher scores indicates higher anxiety.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  3. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    Assesses depression severity (ranging from 0 (minimun) to 27 (maximun) scores. Higher scores indicate higher depression.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  4. De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale

    Measure variations in total loneliness score ranging from 0 (minimun) to 11 (maximun) scores. 0 meaning not lonely and 100 very severe lonely score.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  5. Lubben Social Network Scale

    Brief instrument designed to gauge social isolation in older adults by measuring perceived social support received by family and friends. Ranging from 0 (minimun) to 60 (maximun) scores. Higher scores represent higher social network.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  6. Pearling Mastery Scale

    Measures the extent to which an individual regards their life chances as being under their personal control. Ranging from 7 (minimun) to 28 (maximun) scores. Higher scores indicate greater levels of mastery.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  7. Caregiver self-efficacy scale

    Measures caregivers' beliefs about their ability to carry out behaviors such as obtaining respite, responding to disruptive patient behaviors, etc. Ranging from 0 (minimun) to 100 (maximun) scores. Higher scores reflect higher confidence.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  8. Dementia Management Strategies Scale

    Instrument to appraise 3 care styles of caregivers: 1) Active management, 2) Criticism and 3) Encouragement. Ranging from 34 (minimun) to 170 (maximun). Higher scores mean a greater presence of behaviours associated to the the corresponding caregiver style.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  9. The quality of carer-partner relationship scale

    Scale that measures closeness in a relationship. Ranging from 14 (minimun) to 70 (maximun). Higher scores reflect higher quality of carer-partner relationship.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 8 weeks and 3 months

  10. Questions about perceived burden and ethicality

    Tailored questions administered in a purposed-built interview. They

    Measured: At 8 weeks post-randomisation and 3 month follow up

  11. Health economics questions

    Tailored questions administered in a purposed-built interview.

    Measured: At 8 weeks post-randomisation and 3 month follow up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Sep 2022
  2. Study start21 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion9 Feb 2023
  4. Study completion9 Feb 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
31 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05525377
Sponsor's protocol ID
RDSImpact_ws4feasibility
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
12 Aug 2022
Last updated
27 Apr 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Suarez-Gonzalez A, John A, Brotherhood E, Camic PM, McKee-Jackson R, Melville M, Sullivan MP, Tudor-Edwards R, Windle G, Crutch S, Hoare Z, Stott J; Rare Dementia Support Impact team. "Better Living with Non-memory-led Dementia": protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a web-based caregiver educational programme. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Oct 11;9(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01403-1.

    PubMed 37821924

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Better living with non-memory led dementia course in people with Primary Progressive Aphasia and Frontotemporal Dementia, run by University College, London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Study feasibility (time frame: Since June 2022 to January 2023 (8 months)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05525377, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in