AzTrials
AzTrials

Vaccine HesitancyNCT05530044

Messaging Strategies to Increase Peer Education on COVID-19 Vaccination and Climate Change

A study testing Social diffusion intervention in people with Vaccine Hesitancy and Climate Change, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this protocol is to develop and evaluate peer communication interventions to encourage peer education around COVID-19 vaccination and climate change. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vaccine Hesitancy, Climate Change
What is being tested?
Social diffusion intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
600 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
30 Aug 2022to 20 Jan 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • English-speaking
  • English-reading
  • Reside in the United States
  • Over 18 years of age
  • Have passed Prolific's data quality checks on their previously submitted work
  • Have heard of COVID-19 and the COVID-19 vaccine

Who cannot join

  • Do not provide informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21205

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Developing and Evaluating Messaging Strategies to Increase Peer Education About COVID-19 Vaccination and Climate Change Among Adults in the United States

The primary objective of this protocol is to develop and evaluate peer communication interventions to encourage peer education around COVID-19 vaccination and climate change.

Read the detailed description

Investigators will use a RCT peer education intervention to address climate change-related behaviors as a control condition for the vaccination intervention. Both issues represent serious public health priorities and are sufficiently unrelated in order to act as control conditions for each other.

As a control topic, investigators will address climate change communication. This parallel topic was selected because it is (1) reasonably unrelated to the COVID-19 condition, (2) has clear individual-level behaviors that can be targeted for intervention, (3) has diversity in public attitudes like COVID-19 vaccines,18 (4) has parallels in COVID-19 in terms of polarization and discrediting of scientific research, (5) represents a significant threat to population health, and (6) has significant racial and ethnic disparities paralleling those of COVID-19.

Investigators will recruit a second sample of up to 800 eligible participants who will be asked to complete an intervention session, where they will receive training on how to talk to members of their social network about either COVID-19 vaccination or climate change. The two intervention conditions will differ based on topic (vaccination/climate change) but the intervention components will be comparable. During the intervention, participants will watch a series of videos that teach key communication skills for having conversation about the assigned topic. Additional videos will provide training in how to use social media as a communication platform to share information in case participants are unfamiliar. Participants will then complete practice activities where they will construct hypothetical conversations and react to/critique example conversations to practice implementing the communication skills. Upon completing the intervention, participants will be asked to try to talk to others in their social network about the topic area they were assigned to.

Two to four weeks after the intervention, participants who completed the intervention will be asked to complete a follow-up survey to assess whether participants had conversations with others in their social networks, if they used social media/text/e-mail to share accurate information, and to understand the outcome of the conversations (i.e. did they result in behavior change).

Being tested
Social diffusion intervention
Medical subject headings
Vaccination Hesitancy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Social diffusion interventionBehavioural

    training in communication skills

Study groups in NCT05530044
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
vaccineExperimentalPromotes COVID-19 vaccine uptake
Receives: Behavioral: Social diffusion intervention
climate changeActive comparatorPromotes climate change activism
Receives: Behavioral: Social diffusion intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Frequency of conversations about vaccines

    A brief measure of frequency of conversations about vaccines in the prior month

    Measured: 1 month

  2. Frequency of conversations about climate change

    A brief measure of frequency of conversations about climate in the prior month

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Actions to promote vaccine uptake in social network

    Number of social network members that participate encouraged to become vaccinated

    Measured: 1 month

  4. Actions to promote climate change activism in social network

    Number of social network members that participate encouraged to engage in climate change actions

    Measured: 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Sep 2022
  2. Study start30 Aug 2022
  3. Primary completion20 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion20 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
RCT
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
600 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05530044
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00018956
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
31 Aug 2022
Last updated
24 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: unidentified data

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Social diffusion intervention in people with Vaccine Hesitancy and Climate Change, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Frequency of conversations about vaccines (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in