AzTrials
AzTrials

Newborn ComplicationINCASNCT05537389

Intravenous Neonatal Central Access Safety Trial

A study testing In-line filter in people with Newborn Complication and Catheter Complications, run by University of Turin, Italy at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Particulate contamination due to infusion therapy (administration of parenteral nutrition and medications) carries a potential health risk for infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 hour to 3 months
Conditions the study is for
Newborn Complication, Catheter Complications
What is being tested?
In-line filter
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
768 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Jan 2023to 7 Sep 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 hour to 3 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • All patients admitted to NICU with at least one central venous catheter

Who cannot join

  • Patients with peripheral venous catheter, patients with inflammatory episode at the time of enrollment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Città della Salute e della Scienza

    Torino, Italia, 10100

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Central Lines Filtration in Newborns: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Particulate contamination due to infusion therapy (administration of parenteral nutrition and medications) carries a potential health risk for infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICU).

In-line filtration is increasingly used in critically-ill infants but its benefits, by preventing micro-particle infusion in neonates, remain to be demonstrated.

In-line filters in the intravenous administration sets prevent the infusion of particles, which may reduce infectious complications.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND Particulate contamination due to infusion therapy (administration of parenteral nutrition and medications) carries a potential health risk for infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICU).

This particulate consists of metals, drug crystals, glass fragments or cotton fibres and can be generated by drug packaging, incomplete reconstitution and chemical incompatibilities.

Filters have been shown to remove micro-organisms, endotoxin, air and particles in critically-ill adults and older infants, but its benefits in newborn remain to be demonstrated.

Although recommendations for the use of in-line intravenous filters have been published, there is no consensus on their use.

Moreover, 50% of inflammatory episodes in the setting of NICU are blood culture-negative. These episodes could be partly related to the presence of particles in the infusion lines.

PROJECT AIMS AND DESIGN:

Aim of this multicenter trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of in-line filtration in reducing culture-negative inflammatory episodes in infants admitted to NICU. Further aim is to evaluate the efficacy in the reduction of main CVC-associated complications when using filters.

PATIENTS:

All infants admitted to the NICUs are considered eligible for inclusion into the trial if prolonged infusion therapy (one week or more) is expected, with either umbilical vein catheters (UVC) in a central position or percutaneously inserted central venous catheter. Infants in whom a peripheral UVC is placed but for whom infusion therapy via central venous access is planned will be enrolled too.

Exclusion criteria: Infants will be excluded from participation in the trial if they have clinical characteristics requiring transfer to units not participating in the study before discontinuation of infusion therapy (neurological or surgical diseases, chromosomal abnormalities, and major malformations)..

PROTOCOL:

After randomization each infant will be subsequently allocated to experimental group (Filter) or to control group (Control) as per randomization. Each research unit will refer to its own protocols for infection sulveillance and prevention, although respecting some minimal standard criteria and indications, common and approved by all research units.

In the filter group, all infusions, with the exception of some solutions (eg blood products), will be subjected to filtration. The aqueous solutions (parenteral therapy and drugs) will be administered through 0.2 μm filters which will be replaced every 96 h; the lipid emulsions will be administered through 1.2 μm filters which will be replaced every 24 h. In case of emergency, life-saving drugs will be administered with bolus modality though the infusion line closer to the patient without the need for filtration. In case of drugs/solutions not supported by filtration (eg blood products), they will be administered through a dedicated unfiltered access, which will be removed as soon as the drug is no longer needed.

In the control group, all infusion will be administered through unfiltered accesses.

Data will be collected daily from enrolment up to 48 h after discontinuation of infusion therapy.

In case of inflammatory episode, all patients will undergo to defined specimens, as always in correct clinical practice: complete blood count, sepsis biomarkers (C- reactive protein, procalcitonin, presepsin) and blood culture.

At discharge information regarding the main neonatal pathologies will be recorded.

MAIN OUTCOME Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode sepsis-like, defined by alteration of the biomarkers of inflammation in a negative-culture contest.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

  • Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode defined by alteration of the biomarkers of inflammation in a positive-culture contest.
  • Occurrence of phlebitis or local cutaneous inflammation
  • Occurrence of luminal obstruction and/or extravascular fluid effusion
  • Duration of mechanical ventilation
  • Number of catheter days
  • Length of stay
  • Neonatal mortality

SAMPLE SIZE:

The baseline risk of inflammatory states in the target population remains undetermined. However, we hypothesize a range between 30% and 35%. Consequently, a median risk of 32.5% was assumed for the control group. With the application of filters, a plausible 30% risk reduction is anticipated, resulting in an estimated risk of 22.75% in the intervention arm. Utilizing Fisher's exact test to compare two independent proportions, with an alpha of 0.05, a power of 0.80, and a 1:1 group allocation, the calculated minimum sample size required for significance is 349 infants for each arm, leading to a total of N=698 infants. Accounting for an estimated 5% dropout rate during follow-up, the adjusted minimum sample size becomes N=736 infants"

DATA ANALYSIS:

Data will be analysed according to an intention-to-treat model. Therefore, data from all infants enrolled into the study will be considered for the analysis. Death and transfer to another hospital before discontinuation of infusion therapy, are the only two reasons for exclusion. The primary outcome will be evaluated by Fisher's exact test. Secondary outcomes will be evaluated by Fisher's exact test or appropriate generalized linear models.

EXPECTED RESULTS AND IMPACT ON CLINICAL PRACTICE:

If the use of in-line filters resulted in a significant decrease in negative-culture inflammatory episodes and/or in any other complications, the use of in-line filters in all intravenous administration systems may be recommended in NICU.

Being tested
In-line filter

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • In-line filterDevice

    All infusions, with the exception of some solutions (eg blood products), will be subjected to filtration. The aqueous solutions (parenteral therapy and drugs) will be administered through 0.2 μm filters which will be replaced every 96 h; the lipid emulsions will be administered through 1.2 μm filters which will be replaced every 24 h.

    In case of emergency, life-saving drugs will be administered with bolus modality though the infusion line closer to the patient without the need for filtration.

    In case of drugs/solutions not supported by filtration (eg blood products), they will be administered through a dedicated unfiltered access, which will be removed as soon as the drug is no longer needed.

Study groups in NCT05537389
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionPatients with central venous access (central umbilical venous catheter or epicutaneous cava catheter)
FilterExperimentalPatients with central venous access and in-line filters (central umbilical venous catheter or epicutaneous cava catheter)
Receives: Device: In-line filter

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode sepsis-like.

    Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode sepsis-like, defined by alteration of the biomarkers of inflammation in a negative-culture contest.

    Measured: From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Frequency of patients with at least one episode of sepsis.

    Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode defined by alteration of the biomarkers of inflammation in a positive-culture contest.

    Measured: From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Sep 2022
  2. Study start1 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion7 Sep 2026
  4. Study completion7 Sep 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
768 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05537389
Sponsor's protocol ID
INCAS
Acronym
INCAS
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
9 Sep 2022
Last updated
16 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • van den Hoogen A, Krediet TG, Uiterwaal CS, Bolenius JF, Gerards LJ, Fleer A. In-line filters in central venous catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinat Med. 2006;34(1):71-4. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2006.009.

    PubMed 16489888
  • Sasse M, Dziuba F, Jack T, Koditz H, Kaussen T, Bertram H, Beerbaum P, Boehne M. In-line Filtration Decreases Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Renal and Hematologic Dysfunction in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Patients. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015 Aug;36(6):1270-8. doi: 10.1007/s00246-015-1157-x. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

    PubMed 25845941
  • Virlouvet AL, Pansiot J, Toumazi A, Colella M, Capewell A, Guerriero E, Storme T, Rioualen S, Bourmaud A, Biran V, Baud O. In-line filtration in very preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 19;10(1):5003. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61815-4.

    PubMed 32193413
  • Jack T, Boehne M, Brent BE, Hoy L, Koditz H, Wessel A, Sasse M. In-line filtration reduces severe complications and length of stay on pediatric intensive care unit: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Jun;38(6):1008-16. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2539-7. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

    PubMed 22527062
  • Foster JP, Richards R, Showell MG, Jones LJ. Intravenous in-line filters for preventing morbidity and mortality in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 6;2015(8):CD005248. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005248.pub3.

    PubMed 26244380
  • Eschborn S, Weitkamp JH. Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein: review of kinetics and performance for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. J Perinatol. 2019 Jul;39(7):893-903. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0363-4. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

    PubMed 30926891
  • van Lingen RA, Baerts W, Marquering AC, Ruijs GJ. The use of in-line intravenous filters in sick newborn infants. Acta Paediatr. 2004 May;93(5):658-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb02993.x.

    PubMed 15174791
  • Worthington P, Gura KM, Kraft MD, Nishikawa R, Guenter P, Sacks GS; ASPEN PN Safety Committee. Update on the Use of Filters for Parenteral Nutrition: An ASPEN Position Paper. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;36(1):29-39. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10587. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

    PubMed 33091206
  • Cresi F, Maggiora E, Capetti C, Capitanio M, Ferroglio M, Spada E, De Matteis F, Cosimi S, Mosca F, Coscia A; INCAS Trial Research Group. Effect of in-line filtration in newborns: study protocol of the Intravenous Neonatal Central Access Safety (INCAS) randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Jul 6;25(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08264-w.

    PubMed 38971756

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing In-line filter in people with Newborn Complication and Catheter Complications, run by University of Turin, Italy at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode sepsis-like. (time frame: From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05537389, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in