Newborn ComplicationINCASNCT05537389
Intravenous Neonatal Central Access Safety Trial
A study testing In-line filter in people with Newborn Complication and Catheter Complications, run by University of Turin, Italy at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Particulate contamination due to infusion therapy (administration of parenteral nutrition and medications) carries a potential health risk for infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 hour to 3 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Newborn Complication, Catheter Complications
- What is being tested?
- In-line filter
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 768 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 7 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 hour to 3 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- All patients admitted to NICU with at least one central venous catheter
Who cannot join
- Patients with peripheral venous catheter, patients with inflammatory episode at the time of enrollment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Central Lines Filtration in Newborns: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Particulate contamination due to infusion therapy (administration of parenteral nutrition and medications) carries a potential health risk for infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICU).
In-line filtration is increasingly used in critically-ill infants but its benefits, by preventing micro-particle infusion in neonates, remain to be demonstrated.
In-line filters in the intravenous administration sets prevent the infusion of particles, which may reduce infectious complications.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND Particulate contamination due to infusion therapy (administration of parenteral nutrition and medications) carries a potential health risk for infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICU).
This particulate consists of metals, drug crystals, glass fragments or cotton fibres and can be generated by drug packaging, incomplete reconstitution and chemical incompatibilities.
Filters have been shown to remove micro-organisms, endotoxin, air and particles in critically-ill adults and older infants, but its benefits in newborn remain to be demonstrated.
Although recommendations for the use of in-line intravenous filters have been published, there is no consensus on their use.
Moreover, 50% of inflammatory episodes in the setting of NICU are blood culture-negative. These episodes could be partly related to the presence of particles in the infusion lines.
PROJECT AIMS AND DESIGN:
Aim of this multicenter trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of in-line filtration in reducing culture-negative inflammatory episodes in infants admitted to NICU. Further aim is to evaluate the efficacy in the reduction of main CVC-associated complications when using filters.
PATIENTS:
All infants admitted to the NICUs are considered eligible for inclusion into the trial if prolonged infusion therapy (one week or more) is expected, with either umbilical vein catheters (UVC) in a central position or percutaneously inserted central venous catheter. Infants in whom a peripheral UVC is placed but for whom infusion therapy via central venous access is planned will be enrolled too.
Exclusion criteria: Infants will be excluded from participation in the trial if they have clinical characteristics requiring transfer to units not participating in the study before discontinuation of infusion therapy (neurological or surgical diseases, chromosomal abnormalities, and major malformations)..
PROTOCOL:
After randomization each infant will be subsequently allocated to experimental group (Filter) or to control group (Control) as per randomization. Each research unit will refer to its own protocols for infection sulveillance and prevention, although respecting some minimal standard criteria and indications, common and approved by all research units.
In the filter group, all infusions, with the exception of some solutions (eg blood products), will be subjected to filtration. The aqueous solutions (parenteral therapy and drugs) will be administered through 0.2 μm filters which will be replaced every 96 h; the lipid emulsions will be administered through 1.2 μm filters which will be replaced every 24 h. In case of emergency, life-saving drugs will be administered with bolus modality though the infusion line closer to the patient without the need for filtration. In case of drugs/solutions not supported by filtration (eg blood products), they will be administered through a dedicated unfiltered access, which will be removed as soon as the drug is no longer needed.
In the control group, all infusion will be administered through unfiltered accesses.
Data will be collected daily from enrolment up to 48 h after discontinuation of infusion therapy.
In case of inflammatory episode, all patients will undergo to defined specimens, as always in correct clinical practice: complete blood count, sepsis biomarkers (C- reactive protein, procalcitonin, presepsin) and blood culture.
At discharge information regarding the main neonatal pathologies will be recorded.
MAIN OUTCOME Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode sepsis-like, defined by alteration of the biomarkers of inflammation in a negative-culture contest.
SECONDARY OUTCOMES
- Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode defined by alteration of the biomarkers of inflammation in a positive-culture contest.
- Occurrence of phlebitis or local cutaneous inflammation
- Occurrence of luminal obstruction and/or extravascular fluid effusion
- Duration of mechanical ventilation
- Number of catheter days
- Length of stay
- Neonatal mortality
SAMPLE SIZE:
The baseline risk of inflammatory states in the target population remains undetermined. However, we hypothesize a range between 30% and 35%. Consequently, a median risk of 32.5% was assumed for the control group. With the application of filters, a plausible 30% risk reduction is anticipated, resulting in an estimated risk of 22.75% in the intervention arm. Utilizing Fisher's exact test to compare two independent proportions, with an alpha of 0.05, a power of 0.80, and a 1:1 group allocation, the calculated minimum sample size required for significance is 349 infants for each arm, leading to a total of N=698 infants. Accounting for an estimated 5% dropout rate during follow-up, the adjusted minimum sample size becomes N=736 infants"
DATA ANALYSIS:
Data will be analysed according to an intention-to-treat model. Therefore, data from all infants enrolled into the study will be considered for the analysis. Death and transfer to another hospital before discontinuation of infusion therapy, are the only two reasons for exclusion. The primary outcome will be evaluated by Fisher's exact test. Secondary outcomes will be evaluated by Fisher's exact test or appropriate generalized linear models.
EXPECTED RESULTS AND IMPACT ON CLINICAL PRACTICE:
If the use of in-line filters resulted in a significant decrease in negative-culture inflammatory episodes and/or in any other complications, the use of in-line filters in all intravenous administration systems may be recommended in NICU.
- Conditions
- Newborn Complication, Catheter Complications
- Being tested
- In-line filter
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
In-line filterDevice
All infusions, with the exception of some solutions (eg blood products), will be subjected to filtration. The aqueous solutions (parenteral therapy and drugs) will be administered through 0.2 μm filters which will be replaced every 96 h; the lipid emulsions will be administered through 1.2 μm filters which will be replaced every 24 h.
In case of emergency, life-saving drugs will be administered with bolus modality though the infusion line closer to the patient without the need for filtration.
In case of drugs/solutions not supported by filtration (eg blood products), they will be administered through a dedicated unfiltered access, which will be removed as soon as the drug is no longer needed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | Patients with central venous access (central umbilical venous catheter or epicutaneous cava catheter) |
| Filter | Experimental | Patients with central venous access and in-line filters (central umbilical venous catheter or epicutaneous cava catheter) Receives: Device: In-line filter |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode sepsis-like.
Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode sepsis-like, defined by alteration of the biomarkers of inflammation in a negative-culture contest.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Frequency of patients with at least one episode of sepsis.
Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode defined by alteration of the biomarkers of inflammation in a positive-culture contest.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2022
- Study start1 Jan 2023
- Primary completion7 Sep 2026
- Study completion7 Sep 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Newborn ComplicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 768 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Turin, Italy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pall Corporation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Francesco Cresi, MD, PhD, University of Turin, Italy
- Investigators
- Francesco Cresi, PhD MD, Study director, University of Turin, ItalyAlessandra Coscia, PhD MD, Study director, University of Turin, ItalyElena Maggiora, MD, Principal investigator, University of Turin, ItalyCecilia Capetti, MD, Principal investigator, University of Turin, ItalyFrancesca De Matteis, RN, Principal investigator, Città della salute e della Scienza di TorinoMartina Capitanio, MD, Principal investigator, University of Turin, ItalyFabio Mosca, Prof., Study chair, University of Milan, Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05537389
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INCAS
- Acronym
- INCAS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
van den Hoogen A, Krediet TG, Uiterwaal CS, Bolenius JF, Gerards LJ, Fleer A. In-line filters in central venous catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinat Med. 2006;34(1):71-4. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2006.009.
PubMed 16489888Sasse M, Dziuba F, Jack T, Koditz H, Kaussen T, Bertram H, Beerbaum P, Boehne M. In-line Filtration Decreases Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Renal and Hematologic Dysfunction in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Patients. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015 Aug;36(6):1270-8. doi: 10.1007/s00246-015-1157-x. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
PubMed 25845941Virlouvet AL, Pansiot J, Toumazi A, Colella M, Capewell A, Guerriero E, Storme T, Rioualen S, Bourmaud A, Biran V, Baud O. In-line filtration in very preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 19;10(1):5003. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61815-4.
PubMed 32193413Jack T, Boehne M, Brent BE, Hoy L, Koditz H, Wessel A, Sasse M. In-line filtration reduces severe complications and length of stay on pediatric intensive care unit: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Jun;38(6):1008-16. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2539-7. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
PubMed 22527062Foster JP, Richards R, Showell MG, Jones LJ. Intravenous in-line filters for preventing morbidity and mortality in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 6;2015(8):CD005248. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005248.pub3.
PubMed 26244380Eschborn S, Weitkamp JH. Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein: review of kinetics and performance for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. J Perinatol. 2019 Jul;39(7):893-903. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0363-4. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
PubMed 30926891van Lingen RA, Baerts W, Marquering AC, Ruijs GJ. The use of in-line intravenous filters in sick newborn infants. Acta Paediatr. 2004 May;93(5):658-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb02993.x.
PubMed 15174791Worthington P, Gura KM, Kraft MD, Nishikawa R, Guenter P, Sacks GS; ASPEN PN Safety Committee. Update on the Use of Filters for Parenteral Nutrition: An ASPEN Position Paper. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;36(1):29-39. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10587. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
PubMed 33091206Cresi F, Maggiora E, Capetti C, Capitanio M, Ferroglio M, Spada E, De Matteis F, Cosimi S, Mosca F, Coscia A; INCAS Trial Research Group. Effect of in-line filtration in newborns: study protocol of the Intravenous Neonatal Central Access Safety (INCAS) randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Jul 6;25(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08264-w.
PubMed 38971756
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Central Lines Filtration in Newborns: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05537389
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INCAS / INCAS
- Conditions
- Newborn Complication, Catheter Complications
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 768 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Turin, ItalyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pall Corporation
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Sep 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Particulate contamination due to infusion therapy (administration of parenteral nutrition and medications) carries a potential health risk for infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICU).
In-line filtration is increasingly used in critically-ill infants but its benefits, by preventing micro-particle infusion in neonates, remain to be demonstrated.
In-line filters in the intravenous administration sets prevent the infusion of particles, which may reduce infectious complications.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND Particulate contamination due to infusion therapy (administration of parenteral nutrition and medications) carries a potential health risk for infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICU).
This particulate consists of metals, drug crystals, glass fragments or cotton fibres and can be generated by drug packaging, incomplete reconstitution and chemical incompatibilities.
Filters have been shown to remove micro-organisms, endotoxin, air and particles in critically-ill adults and older infants, but its benefits in newborn remain to be demonstrated.
Although recommendations for the use of in-line intravenous filters have been published, there is no consensus on their use.
Moreover, 50% of inflammatory episodes in the setting of NICU are blood culture-negative. These episodes could be partly related to the presence of particles in the infusion lines.
PROJECT AIMS AND DESIGN:
Aim of this multicenter trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of in-line filtration in reducing culture-negative inflammatory episodes in infants admitted to NICU. Further aim is to evaluate the efficacy in the reduction of main CVC-associated complications when using filters.
PATIENTS:
All infants admitted to the NICUs are considered eligible for inclusion into the trial if prolonged infusion therapy (one week or more) is expected, with either umbilical vein catheters (UVC) in a central position or percutaneously inserted central venous catheter. Infants in whom a peripheral UVC is placed but for whom infusion therapy via central venous access is planned will be enrolled too.
Exclusion criteria: Infants will be excluded from participation in the trial if they have clinical characteristics requiring transfer to units not participating in the study before discontinuation of infusion therapy (neurological or surgical diseases, chromosomal abnormalities, and major malformations)..
PROTOCOL:
After randomization each infant will be subsequently allocated to experimental group (Filter) or to control group (Control) as per randomization. Each research unit will refer to its own protocols for infection sulveillance and prevention, although respecting some minimal standard criteria and indications, common and approved by all research units.
In the filter group, all infusions, with the exception of some solutions (eg blood products), will be subjected to filtration. The aqueous solutions (parenteral therapy and drugs) will be administered through 0.2 μm filters which will be replaced every 96 h; the lipid emulsions will be administered through 1.2 μm filters which will be replaced every 24 h. In case of emergency, life-saving drugs will be administered with bolus modality though the infusion line closer to the patient without the need for filtration. In case of drugs/solutions not supported by filtration (eg blood products), they will be administered through a dedicated unfiltered access, which will be removed as soon as the drug is no longer needed.
In the control group, all infusion will be administered through unfiltered accesses.
Data will be collected daily from enrolment up to 48 h after discontinuation of infusion therapy.
In case of inflammatory episode, all patients will undergo to defined specimens, as always in correct clinical practice: complete blood count, sepsis biomarkers (C- reactive protein, procalcitonin, presepsin) and blood culture.
At discharge information regarding the main neonatal pathologies will be recorded.
MAIN OUTCOME Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode sepsis-like, defined by alteration of the biomarkers of inflammation in a negative-culture contest.
SECONDARY OUTCOMES
- Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode defined by alteration of the biomarkers of inflammation in a positive-culture contest.
- Occurrence of phlebitis or local cutaneous inflammation
- Occurrence of luminal obstruction and/or extravascular fluid effusion
- Duration of mechanical ventilation
- Number of catheter days
- Length of stay
- Neonatal mortality
SAMPLE SIZE:
The baseline risk of inflammatory states in the target population remains undetermined. However, we hypothesize a range between 30% and 35%. Consequently, a median risk of 32.5% was assumed for the control group. With the application of filters, a plausible 30% risk reduction is anticipated, resulting in an estimated risk of 22.75% in the intervention arm. Utilizing Fisher's exact test to compare two independent proportions, with an alpha of 0.05, a power of 0.80, and a 1:1 group allocation, the calculated minimum sample size required for significance is 349 infants for each arm, leading to a total of N=698 infants. Accounting for an estimated 5% dropout rate during follow-up, the adjusted minimum sample size becomes N=736 infants"
DATA ANALYSIS:
Data will be analysed according to an intention-to-treat model. Therefore, data from all infants enrolled into the study will be considered for the analysis. Death and transfer to another hospital before discontinuation of infusion therapy, are the only two reasons for exclusion. The primary outcome will be evaluated by Fisher's exact test. Secondary outcomes will be evaluated by Fisher's exact test or appropriate generalized linear models.
EXPECTED RESULTS AND IMPACT ON CLINICAL PRACTICE:
If the use of in-line filters resulted in a significant decrease in negative-culture inflammatory episodes and/or in any other complications, the use of in-line filters in all intravenous administration systems may be recommended in NICU.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –Patients with central venous access (central umbilical venous catheter or epicutaneous cava catheter) |
| Filter | Experimental | Device: In-line filterPatients with central venous access and in-line filters (central umbilical venous catheter or epicutaneous cava catheter) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 hour to 3 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients admitted to NICU with at least one central venous catheter
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with peripheral venous catheter, patients with inflammatory episode at the time of enrollment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| In-line filterAll infusions, with the exception of some solutions (eg blood products), will be subjected to filtration. The aqueous solutions (parenteral therapy and drugs) will be administered through 0.2 μm filters which will be replaced every 96 h; the lipid emulsions will be administered through 1.2 μm filters which will be replaced every 24 h. In case of emergency, life-saving drugs will be administered with bolus modality though the infusion line closer to the patient without the need for filtration. In case of drugs/solutions not supported by filtration (eg blood products), they will be administered through a dedicated unfiltered access, which will be removed as soon as the drug is no longer needed. | Device | Filter |
Primary outcome
Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode sepsis-like.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months
Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode sepsis-like, defined by alteration of the biomarkers of inflammation in a negative-culture contest.
1 secondary outcome
Frequency of patients with at least one episode of sepsis.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 16489888van den Hoogen A, Krediet TG, Uiterwaal CS, Bolenius JF, Gerards LJ, Fleer A. In-line filters in central venous catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinat Med. 2006;34(1):71-4. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2006.009.
- Background: PubMed 25845941Sasse M, Dziuba F, Jack T, Koditz H, Kaussen T, Bertram H, Beerbaum P, Boehne M. In-line Filtration Decreases Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Renal and Hematologic Dysfunction in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Patients. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015 Aug;36(6):1270-8. doi: 10.1007/s00246-015-1157-x. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
- Background: PubMed 32193413Virlouvet AL, Pansiot J, Toumazi A, Colella M, Capewell A, Guerriero E, Storme T, Rioualen S, Bourmaud A, Biran V, Baud O. In-line filtration in very preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 19;10(1):5003. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61815-4.
- Background: PubMed 22527062Jack T, Boehne M, Brent BE, Hoy L, Koditz H, Wessel A, Sasse M. In-line filtration reduces severe complications and length of stay on pediatric intensive care unit: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Jun;38(6):1008-16. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2539-7. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
- Background: PubMed 26244380Foster JP, Richards R, Showell MG, Jones LJ. Intravenous in-line filters for preventing morbidity and mortality in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 6;2015(8):CD005248. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005248.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 30926891Eschborn S, Weitkamp JH. Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein: review of kinetics and performance for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. J Perinatol. 2019 Jul;39(7):893-903. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0363-4. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
- Background: PubMed 15174791van Lingen RA, Baerts W, Marquering AC, Ruijs GJ. The use of in-line intravenous filters in sick newborn infants. Acta Paediatr. 2004 May;93(5):658-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb02993.x.
- Background: PubMed 33091206Worthington P, Gura KM, Kraft MD, Nishikawa R, Guenter P, Sacks GS; ASPEN PN Safety Committee. Update on the Use of Filters for Parenteral Nutrition: An ASPEN Position Paper. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;36(1):29-39. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10587. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38971756Cresi F, Maggiora E, Capetti C, Capitanio M, Ferroglio M, Spada E, De Matteis F, Cosimi S, Mosca F, Coscia A; INCAS Trial Research Group. Effect of in-line filtration in newborns: study protocol of the Intravenous Neonatal Central Access Safety (INCAS) randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Jul 6;25(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08264-w.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Newborn Complication
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Study in Pediatric Participants With Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (Balance-CAH)
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia, Classic Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
Recruiting
REspiratory MEchanics for Delivering Individualised Exogenous Surfactant
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
RecruitingObservational study
Genetic Analysis of Pheochromocytomas, Paragangliomas and Associated Conditions
Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma
Enrolling by invitation
Accelerating Maternal and Newborn Survival: The AMANI Study
Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response (MPDSR) Implementation, Maternal Mortality
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Lonapegsomatropin Compared to Daily Somatropin in Children and Adolescents With Short Stature or Growth Failure Due to Growth Hormone Sufficient Disorders
Turner Syndrome, Short Stature Homeobox Gene Mutation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francesco Cresi, PhD MD study director
University of Turin, Italy
Alessandra Coscia, PhD MD study director
University of Turin, Italy
Elena Maggiora, MD principal investigator
University of Turin, Italy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing In-line filter in people with Newborn Complication and Catheter Complications, run by University of Turin, Italy at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency of patients with at least one inflammatory episode sepsis-like. (time frame: From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05537389, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2026.