Chronic PainNCT05546749
Virtual Reality for Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder Pilot
A study testing RelieVRx in people with Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder, run by Albert Einstein College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a pilot feasibility study of a virtual reality device for patients with co-morbid chronic pain and opioid use disorder. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain, Opioid Use Disorder
- What is being tested?
- RelieVRx
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 8 Feb 2023to 12 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ≥18 years old
- English proficiency
- receiving methadone treatment for DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition) confirmed Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) in the Montefiore network for at least 12 weeks, with no dose change in 14 days to ensure treatment stability
- chronic pain of at least moderate pain severity (score ≥4 on the Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity (PEG) scale)
- willingness to participate in all study components
- ability to provide informed consent, assessed using consent teach-back
Who cannot join
- conditions that could make participation in VR hazardous or cause adverse effects (current or prior diagnosis of epilepsy, seizure disorder, dementia, or migraines, any medical condition predisposing to nausea or dizziness, hypersensitivity to flashing light or motion)
- conditions that could prevent proper use of the VR headset (stereoscopic vision or severe hearing impairment, or injury to eyes, face, or neck that prevents use of the VR headset)
- acute exacerbation of psychiatric conditions that preclude the ability to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Virtual Reality Treatment in a Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program for Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder
This is a pilot feasibility study of a virtual reality device for patients with co-morbid chronic pain and opioid use disorder.
Read the detailed description
The investigators will conduct a study of patients with co-morbid chronic pain and opioid use disorder enrolled in a methadone maintenance treatment program (MMTP) to pilot device feasibility and measure changes in pain intensity and opioid craving. All patients will be randomized to one of each of the following arms: 1) RelieVRx (intervention group) or 2) Non-immersive sham VR (control group).
The intervention being piloted is the RelieVRx - AppliedVR, Los Angeles, California - VR hardware and software. RelieVRx incorporates evidence-based principles of cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and pain neuroscience education into an immersive and enhanced biofeedback experience. RelieVRx includes breathing training and relaxation response exercises that activate the parasympathetic nervous system. RelieVRx was designed for at-home use and comes with a sequence of daily immersive experiences.
RelieVRx is typically delivered in a 56-day program through daily virtual experiences, with each experience lasting between 2 and 16 minutes. In this pilot study, the investigators will conduct virtual experiences twice weekly at the MMTP. Over 6 weeks, participants in both groups will participate in 20-30 minute VR sessions twice per week. Each session will last about 20-30 minutes and go through 1-5 virtual experiences. The sham VR control is a non-immersive set of 56 daily virtual experiences, tuned to the length of the RelieVRx. Control participants will similarly experience 1-5 virtual experiences in each 20-30 session.
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain, Opioid Use Disorder
- Being tested
- RelieVRx, Sham VR
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain, Opioid-Related Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RelieVRxDevice
The virtual reality device that will be piloted is called RelieVRx, which incorporates evidence-based principles of cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and pain neuroscience education into an immersive and enhanced biofeedback experience. RelieVRx includes breathing training and relaxation response exercises that activate the parasympathetic nervous system. RelieVRx was designed for at-home use and comes with a sequence of daily immersive experiences.
Sham VRDevice
The sham VR control is a non-immersive set of 56 daily virtual experiences, tuned to the length of the RelieVRx.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RelieVRx | Active comparator | RelieVRx was designed for at-home use and comes with a sequence of daily immersive experiences. Participants in the intervention group will complete 20-30 minute VR sessions twice per week over the course of 6 weeks. Receives: Device: RelieVRx |
| Sham Virtual Reality | Sham comparator | The sham virtual reality (VR) device is also by RelieVRx. However, it lacks the immersive nature of the interventional VR. Control participants will complete 20-30 minute VR sessions twice per week over the course of 6 weeks. Receives: Device: Sham VR |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Pain Intensity
Change in Pain Intensity from baseline was assessed using the single items Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity scale. Patients were asked to assess their average pain over the past 7 days on an 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0-10 where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. Positive mean scores were associated with increased pain intensity from baseline and negative mean scores were associated with decreased pain intensity from baseline. Scores were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Opioid Craving
Change in Opioid Craving was assessed using the Opioid Medication Craving Visual Analog Scale. This 3-item scale asked participants to rate how strong their desire to use opioids was during the previous 24 hours; the likelihood that they would use opioids if placed in the environment in which they had previously used drugs/alcohol; and how strong their urges for opioids are when something in their environment reminds them of it. Responses were marked on visual scale ranging from 0-100 where "0" signified 'No Desire or Likelihood of Use' and "100" signified 'Strong Desire or Likelihood of use. Positive mean scores were associated with increased opioid craving from baseline and negative mean scores were associated with decreased opioid craving from baseline. Scores were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: From baseline to 6 weeks
Percentage of Participants Contacted That Are Enrolled
The percentage of participants contacted who were enrolled into the study was used to assess the feasibility of the study. Results were summarized using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: Baseline, up to 2 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change in Pain Interference
Change in pain interference was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short Form 4a scale. This form consists of 4 items which asked participants to rate the degree to which their pain interfered with a range of activities over the prior 7 days. Responses to the 4 items are summed up on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Not at all" = 0 to "Very much" = 4, for an overall possible scoring range of 0-16 such that higher scores are associated with greater pain interference. For purposes of reporting of this change from baseline outcome measure, positive mean scores were associated with greater pain interference relative to baseline and negative mean scores were associated with reduced pain interference relative to baseline. Scores were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Sleep
Change in sleep was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Short Form 6a. This form consists of 6 items which asked participants to assess quality and attributes of their sleep patterns over the prior 7 days. Response options for the sleep quality item range from "Very poor" = 1 to "Very good = 5" and from "Not at all" = 1 to "Very much" = 5 for the remaining five items. The two positively phrased items are reverse-coded and sum scores are calculated and the raw sum score is rescaled on the PROMIS conversion table to determine a standardized T-score (overall mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10). For purposes of reporting of this change from baseline outcome measure, positive mean scores were associated with greater sleep disturbance and decreased overall sleep quality relative to baseline and negative mean scores were associated with decreased sleep disturbance and increased overall sleep quality relative to baseline.
Measured: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Cognitive Function
Change in cognitive function was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS 29) Cognitive Function domain form. This form consists of 2 questions which asked participants to assess cognitive function over the prior 7 days. Both questions for this measure are summed up on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much" = 4, for an overall possible scoring range of 0-8 such that higher scores are associated with increased overall cognitive function. For purposes of reporting of this change from baseline outcome measure, positive mean scores were associated with increased overall cognitive function from baseline and negative mean scores were associated with decreased overall cognitive function from baseline. Scores were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Social Function
Change in social function was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Social 4a Heal form. This form consists of 4 items which asked participants to assess their leisure, family, work and general social function behaviors over the prior 7 days. Responses to the 4 items are summed up on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Never" = 0 to "Always" = 4, for an overall possible scoring range of 0-16 such that higher scores are associated with increased inhibition in social function/participation. For purposes of reporting of this change from baseline outcome measure, positive mean scores were associated with decreased inhibition to social participation relative to baseline and negative mean scores were associated with increased inhibition to social participation relative to baseline. Scores were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Physical Function
Change in physical function was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Social 6b Heal form. This form consists of 6 items which asked participants to assess their physical function and ability to conduct chores, climb stairs, walk, and run errands. Responses to the 6 items are summed up on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Without any difficulty" (or "Not at all") = 0 to "Unable to do" (or "Cannot do") = 4, for an overall possible scoring range of 0-24 such that higher scores are associated with increased inhibition in physical function. For purposes of reporting of this change from baseline outcome measure, positive mean scores were associated with decreased inhibition in physical function relative to baseline and negative mean scores were associated with increased inhibition in physical function relative to baseline. Scores were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Depression
Change in depression was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression 4a Heal form. This form consists of 4 items which asked participants to assess the frequency of depressive symptoms over the prior 7 days. Responses to the 4 items are summed up on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Never" = 0 to "Always" = 4, for an overall possible scoring range of 0-16 such that higher scores are associated with a greater level of depression-related symptoms. For purposes of reporting of this change from baseline outcome measure, positive mean scores were associated with greater frequency of depression-related symptoms relative to baseline and negative mean scores were associated with reduced frequency of depression-related symptoms relative to baseline. Scores were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Anxiety
Change in anxiety was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety 4a Heal form. This form consists of 4 items which asked participants to assess the frequency of onset of anxiety-related symptoms over the prior 7 days. Responses to the 4 items are summed up on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Never" = 0 to "Always" = 4, for an overall possible scoring range of 0-16 such that higher scores are associated with a greater level of anxiety-related symptoms. For purposes of reporting of this change from baseline outcome measure, positive mean scores were associated with greater frequency of anxiety symptoms relative to baseline and negative mean scores were associated with reduced frequency of anxiety symptoms relative to baseline. Scores were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Measured: From baseline to 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2022
- Study start8 Feb 2023
- Primary completion12 Jul 2023
- Study completion12 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hector Perez, MD, MS, Principal investigator, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05546749
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022-14257
- Other IDs
- 1R01DA060796-01
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 5 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Virtual Reality Treatment in a Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program for Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05546749
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2022-14257
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain, Opioid Use Disorder
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Albert Einstein College of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Study start
- 8 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 5 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a pilot feasibility study of a virtual reality device for patients with co-morbid chronic pain and opioid use disorder.
Detailed description
The investigators will conduct a study of patients with co-morbid chronic pain and opioid use disorder enrolled in a methadone maintenance treatment program (MMTP) to pilot device feasibility and measure changes in pain intensity and opioid craving. All patients will be randomized to one of each of the following arms: 1) RelieVRx (intervention group) or 2) Non-immersive sham VR (control group).
The intervention being piloted is the RelieVRx - AppliedVR, Los Angeles, California - VR hardware and software. RelieVRx incorporates evidence-based principles of cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and pain neuroscience education into an immersive and enhanced biofeedback experience. RelieVRx includes breathing training and relaxation response exercises that activate the parasympathetic nervous system. RelieVRx was designed for at-home use and comes with a sequence of daily immersive experiences.
RelieVRx is typically delivered in a 56-day program through daily virtual experiences, with each experience lasting between 2 and 16 minutes. In this pilot study, the investigators will conduct virtual experiences twice weekly at the MMTP. Over 6 weeks, participants in both groups will participate in 20-30 minute VR sessions twice per week. Each session will last about 20-30 minutes and go through 1-5 virtual experiences. The sham VR control is a non-immersive set of 56 daily virtual experiences, tuned to the length of the RelieVRx. Control participants will similarly experience 1-5 virtual experiences in each 20-30 session.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RelieVRx | Active comparator | Device: RelieVRxRelieVRx was designed for at-home use and comes with a sequence of daily immersive experiences. Participants in the intervention group will complete 20-30 minute VR sessions twice per week over the course of 6 weeks. |
| Sham Virtual Reality | Sham comparator | Device: Sham VRThe sham virtual reality (VR) device is also by RelieVRx. However, it lacks the immersive nature of the interventional VR. Control participants will complete 20-30 minute VR sessions twice per week over the course of 6 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- ≥18 years old
- English proficiency
- receiving methadone treatment for DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition) confirmed Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) in the Montefiore network for at least 12 weeks, with no dose change in 14 days to ensure treatment stability
- chronic pain of at least moderate pain severity (score ≥4 on the Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity (PEG) scale)
- willingness to participate in all study components
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- conditions that could make participation in VR hazardous or cause adverse effects (current or prior diagnosis of epilepsy, seizure disorder, dementia, or migraines, any medical condition predisposing to nausea or dizziness, hypersensitivity to flashing light or motion)
- conditions that could prevent proper use of the VR headset (stereoscopic vision or severe hearing impairment, or injury to eyes, face, or neck that prevents use of the VR headset)
- acute exacerbation of psychiatric conditions that preclude the ability to participate in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RelieVRxThe virtual reality device that will be piloted is called RelieVRx, which incorporates evidence-based principles of cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and pain neuroscience education into an immersive and enhanced biofeedback experience. RelieVRx includes breathing training and relaxation response exercises that activate the parasympathetic nervous system. RelieVRx was designed for at-home use and comes with a sequence of daily immersive experiences. | Device | RelieVRx |
| Sham VRThe sham VR control is a non-immersive set of 56 daily virtual experiences, tuned to the length of the RelieVRx. | Device | Sham Virtual Reality |
Primary outcome
Change in Pain Intensity
Time frame: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Pain Intensity from baseline was assessed using the single items Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity scale. Patients were asked to assess their average pain over the past 7 days on an 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0-10 where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. Positive mean scores were associated with increased pain intensity from baseline and negative mean scores were associated with decreased pain intensity from baseline. Scores were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Change in Opioid Craving
Time frame: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Opioid Craving was assessed using the Opioid Medication Craving Visual Analog Scale. This 3-item scale asked participants to rate how strong their desire to use opioids was during the previous 24 hours; the likelihood that they would use opioids if placed in the environment in which they had previously used drugs/alcohol; and how strong their urges for opioids are when something in their environment reminds them of it. Responses were marked on visual scale ranging from 0-100 where "0" signified 'No Desire or Likelihood of Use' and "100" signified 'Strong Desire or Likelihood of use. Positive mean scores were associated with increased opioid craving from baseline and negative mean scores were associated with decreased opioid craving from baseline. Scores were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Percentage of Participants Contacted That Are Enrolled
Time frame: Baseline, up to 2 weeks
The percentage of participants contacted who were enrolled into the study was used to assess the feasibility of the study. Results were summarized using basic descriptive statistics.
7 secondary outcomes
Change in Pain Interference
Time frame: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Sleep
Time frame: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Cognitive Function
Time frame: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Social Function
Time frame: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Physical Function
Time frame: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Depression
Time frame: From baseline to 6 weeks
Change in Anxiety
Time frame: From baseline to 6 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hector Perez, MD, MS principal investigator
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing RelieVRx in people with Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder, run by Albert Einstein College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Pain Intensity (time frame: From baseline to 6 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2025.