AzTrials
AzTrials

Eating DisordersNCT05554250

Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Reward-Based Eating Drive (RED) Scale

An observational study of Eating Disorders and Eating Habit, run by Recep Tayyip Erdogan University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This research; The Turkish validity and reliability study of the "Reward-Based Eating Impulse Scale-13" developed by Ashley E. Mason was conducted to provide a new measurement tool for our country. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Eating Disorders, Eating Habit, Obesity
How many people
500 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Jan 2022to 28 Dec 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: Obese patients

Who may be able to join

  • Persons who are at least 18 years old, have a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 and above, are at least primary school graduates, can communicate verbally and agree to participate in the research.

Who cannot join

  • Persons with psychiatric illness who could not communicate, who could not read and understand Turkish, and who did not have the skills to read and understand the questionnaire were excluded from the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Recep Tayyip Erdogan University

    Rize, İslampasa, 53100

    CANAN ALTINSOY, MsC, +905427701668, cananaltinsoyyy@gmail.com

    Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, + 90 464 213 04 91, rizedhs6@saglik.gov.tr

    Recruiting

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

This research; The Turkish validity and reliability study of the "Reward-Based Eating Impulse Scale-13" developed by Ashley E. Mason was conducted to provide a new measurement tool for our country. At the same time, the study will provide a database for intervention studies to eliminate the effects of reward-based eating urge. Identifying reward-based eating in the middle and lower ranges of the eating disorder spectrum may contribute to halting the growing obesity epidemic. The Reward-Based Eating Impulse Scale will help researchers and clinicians to identify individuals who lack control over eating, cannot feel full, and are constantly preoccupied with eating.

Read the detailed description

Today, with the spread of Western-style nutrition, pleasure-based nutrition is increasing. Especially the easy access to delicious foods with high sugar, fat and salt content encourages individuals to have a diet based on pleasure rather than energy needs (Lowe, 2003). Reward-based eating behavior can occur in order to reinforce and strengthen positive emotions such as happiness and joy, or to suppress negative emotions such as stress and anxiety (Evers et al., 2013). If reward-based eating is repeated frequently in response to positive or negative emotions, it may underlie the development of eating pathology and binge eating disorder. Therefore, researchers working in the context of health behaviors, nutrition, and metabolic health triad evaluate reward-based eating before, during, and after interventions targeting changes in health behavior (Forman et al., 2013; Mason et al., 2016; Stevenson et al., 2018).

Individuals' degree of reward-based eating is measured by evaluating behaviors such as uncontrolled eating, food craving, food addiction, restrictive eating, and binge eating. Each of the scales focuses on a different aspect of problematic eating behavior (Price et al., 2015; Vainik et al., 2015). For example, the Yale Scale of Eating Addiction considers eating behavior in terms of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria. Therefore, only when the problem becomes pathological can they evaluate reward-based eating. Similarly, the Binge Eating Scale evaluates when problematic eating behavior is severe. The Nutrient Power Scale and the Tasty Eating Motivation Scale, on the other hand, evaluate the causes of binge eating behavior and food choice in the environmental context and focus on a less problematic process than the others (Burgess et al., 2014; Davis, 2013; Gearhardt, 2016; Lowe et al., 2009) . Each developed scale better measures one aspect of reward-based eating behavior. For example, a scale that assesses the urge to eat may measure less uncontrolled eating. While the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire measures emotional eating better, it measures less uncontrolled eating and binge eating (Gormally et al., 1982). All sub-dimensions indicate the stages of the person's pathology of binge eating. For example, people with high impulsivity about eating use food to cope with emotions over time and eventually develop binge eating disorder. Theoretical and experimental evidence suggests that none of these scales comprehensively assess reward-based eating (Davis, 2013).

In order to comprehensively evaluate this issue, the Reward-Based Eating Impulse Scale (RED-9) was developed by Epel et al., which aims to address all spectrums of reward-based eating (Epel et al., 2014). RED-9 is associated with body mass index (BMI) and also predicts changes in BMI over time. In a study of obese women, food craving was shown to be associated with higher RED-9 scores. Although RED-9 is short and simple to apply, it is unclear whether it assesses the full spectrum of reward-based eating (Mason et al., 2015; Mason et al., 2016). RED-13 assesses three dimensions of reward-based eating: lack of control over eating, inability to achieve satiety, and constant preoccupation with food. It has been shown that reduction in reward-based eating behavior may mediate the effect of obesity treatment on weight loss.

This research; The Turkish validity and reliability study of the "Reward-Based Eating Impulse Scale-13" developed by Ashley E. Mason was conducted to provide a new measurement tool for our country. At the same time, the study will provide a database for intervention studies to eliminate the effects of reward-based eating urge. Identifying reward-based eating in the middle and lower ranges of the eating disorder spectrum may contribute to halting the growing obesity epidemic. The Reward-Based Eating Impulse Scale will help researchers and clinicians to identify individuals who lack control over eating, cannot feel full, and are constantly preoccupied with eating.

Research Question Is the "Reward-based Eating Drive Scale (RED)" a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish society?

Keywords
validity, measuring tool, reliability, obesity, eating disorder, eating habits, reward
Medical subject headings
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Feeding Behavior, Obesity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT05554250
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Obese patientsThe population of the study consisted of individuals who applied to the Diet Polyclinic of a hospital, and the sample consisted of 500 individuals who applied to the Diet Polyclinic and met the research criteria.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reward-based Eating Scale

    The data of the research are obtained by "Personal Information Form" and "Reward-based Eating Drive Scale (RED-13)". High scores from the scale will help determine the risk group.

    Measured: 30 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Sep 2022
  2. Study start1 Jan 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion28 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05554250
Sponsor's protocol ID
RecepTayyipErdoganU
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
21 Sep 2022
Last updated
26 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Eating Disorders and Eating Habit, run by Recep Tayyip Erdogan University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reward-based Eating Scale (time frame: 30 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in