HyperglycemiaPhase 1/2CGMNCT05571397
Expanding Use of CGM in Critical Care: Impact on Nurse Work Patterns and Patient Outcomes
A Phase 1/2 study testing Dexcom G6 in people with Hyperglycemia, run by Ohio State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this implementation study is to assess the feasibility of real time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) implementation using a CGM plus (+) point-of-care (POC) protocol among patients on IV insulin or those with hyperglycemia (>250mg/dl) in the critical care hospital environments. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hyperglycemia
- What is being tested?
- Dexcom G6
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 201 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2023to 19 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adults >18 years old,
- admitted to Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center MICU and
- have hyperglycemia (glucose >250mg/dl) or are currently on IV insulin.
Who cannot join
- Current COVID-19 infection,
- Refractory shock (Levophed dose >0.5 mcg/kg/min or equivalent)
- Actively being treated for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)
- Actively being treated for hyperosmolar non-ketoacidosis (HONK)
- Pitting edema, anasarca, blue or purple discoloration to left upper extremity
- Treated with high dose acetaminophen (>1 gram Q6 hours)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Treated with hydroxyurea
- Are pregnant, patients
- Using home insulin pump therapy during hospitalization, or
- Reside in a corrections institution.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Expanding Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Beyond COVID in Critical Care: Impact on Nurse Work Patterns and Patient Outcomes
The primary objective of this implementation study is to assess the feasibility of real time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) implementation using a CGM plus (+) point-of-care (POC) protocol among patients on IV insulin or those with hyperglycemia (>250mg/dl) in the critical care hospital environments.
Read the detailed description
This study analyzes the feasibility of inpatient real time CGM implementation through the use of a CGM + POC protocol as routine care for glycemic monitoring among patients on IV insulin or those with hyperglycemia (>250mg/dl). The investigators will examine the effects on medical intensive care (MICU) patient's (N=100) glycemic control compared to matched historical control patients (N=100) from the MICU who received fingerstick POC.
- Conditions
- Hyperglycemia
- Being tested
- Dexcom G6
- Medical subject headings
- Hyperglycemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dexcom G6Device
Continuous Glucose Monitor
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dexcom CGM | Experimental | Dexcom G6 Receives: Device: Dexcom G6 |
| Historical Controls | No intervention | Matched historical controls |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Time in Target Glycemic Ranges
Percent of time in target glycemic ranges: 100-180 mg/dl, 70-180mg/dl, 140-180mg/d
Measured: For duration of MICU stay which was an average of 7.6 ± 4.1 days/patient
Secondary outcomes (1)
Percent of Time in Hypoglycemic Ranges
Percent of time in hypoglycemic ranges <70mg/dl and <55mg/dl
Measured: For duration of MICU stay which was an average of 7.6 ± 4.1 days/patient
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Oct 2022
- Study start1 Nov 2023
- Primary completion19 Sep 2024
- Study completion19 Sep 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HyperglycemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ohio State UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- CGM will be used by 100 MICU patients with glycemic control comparison with matched 100 MICU historical controls
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 201 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ohio State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- EILEEN FAULDS, PhD, Principal investigator, Ohio State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05571397
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021H0407
- Other IDs
- G220050
- Acronym
- CGM
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Faulds ER, Rayan MN, Patterson ES, McNett M, Exline M, Shoben A, Lin CJ, Jones L, Lee B, Rasul A, Mlachak M, Ruvalcaba C, Yin C, Ping Z, Dungan KM. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Hypoglycemia Alarms in Critical Care: Clinical Utility and Workflow Integration. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2026 Sep 16:15209156261487821. doi: 10.1177/15209156261487821. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42746746
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Expanding Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Beyond COVID in Critical Care: Impact on Nurse Work Patterns and Patient Outcomes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05571397
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CGM / 2021H0407
- Conditions
- Hyperglycemia
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 201 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ohio State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Sep 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 6 Feb 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this implementation study is to assess the feasibility of real time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) implementation using a CGM plus (+) point-of-care (POC) protocol among patients on IV insulin or those with hyperglycemia (>250mg/dl) in the critical care hospital environments.
Detailed description
This study analyzes the feasibility of inpatient real time CGM implementation through the use of a CGM + POC protocol as routine care for glycemic monitoring among patients on IV insulin or those with hyperglycemia (>250mg/dl). The investigators will examine the effects on medical intensive care (MICU) patient's (N=100) glycemic control compared to matched historical control patients (N=100) from the MICU who received fingerstick POC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- CGM will be used by 100 MICU patients with glycemic control comparison with matched 100 MICU historical controls
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dexcom CGM | Experimental | Device: Dexcom G6Dexcom G6 |
| Historical Controls | No intervention | –Matched historical controls |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- adults >18 years old,
- admitted to Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center MICU and
- have hyperglycemia (glucose >250mg/dl) or are currently on IV insulin.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Current COVID-19 infection,
- Refractory shock (Levophed dose >0.5 mcg/kg/min or equivalent)
- Actively being treated for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)
- Actively being treated for hyperosmolar non-ketoacidosis (HONK)
- Pitting edema, anasarca, blue or purple discoloration to left upper extremity
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dexcom G6Continuous Glucose Monitor | Device | Dexcom CGM |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Time in Target Glycemic Ranges
Time frame: For duration of MICU stay which was an average of 7.6 ± 4.1 days/patient
Percent of time in target glycemic ranges: 100-180 mg/dl, 70-180mg/dl, 140-180mg/d
1 secondary outcome
Percent of Time in Hypoglycemic Ranges
Time frame: For duration of MICU stay which was an average of 7.6 ± 4.1 days/patient
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42746746Faulds ER, Rayan MN, Patterson ES, McNett M, Exline M, Shoben A, Lin CJ, Jones L, Lee B, Rasul A, Mlachak M, Ruvalcaba C, Yin C, Ping Z, Dungan KM. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Hypoglycemia Alarms in Critical Care: Clinical Utility and Workflow Integration. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2026 Sep 16:15209156261487821. doi: 10.1177/15209156261487821. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hyperglycemia
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of the Clinical Spectrum of Diabetes and Obesity in Youth and Adults
Obesity, Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Food-i-Sense Analytics: Integrating AI Into Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Analysis for Precision Nutrition.
Prediabetes (Insulin Resistance, Impaired Glucose Tolerance), Artificial Intelligence Mobile Application
Not yet recruiting
Multimodal AI-Driven Out-of-Hospital Management for Hypertension and Cardiometabolic Risk
Hypertension, Hyperglycemia
Recruiting
Hypothalamic GLP-1 Response in Healthy Weight and Obesity
Obesity, Normal Weight
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
EILEEN FAULDS, PhD principal investigator
Ohio State University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Dexcom G6 in people with Hyperglycemia, run by Ohio State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Feb 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Time in Target Glycemic Ranges (time frame: For duration of MICU stay which was an average of 7.6 ± 4.1 days/patient). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05571397, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2026.