Heart FailurePhysioSync-HFNCT05572736
Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Resynchronization in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
A study testing Conduction system pacing and Biventricular pacing in people with Heart Failure and Left Bundle-Branch Block, run by Hospital Moinhos de Vento at 14 sites in Brazil.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure, Left Bundle-Branch Block, Cardiac Resynchronization
- What is being tested?
- Conduction system pacing and Biventricular pacing
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 179 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesBrazil
- Study dates
- 7 Nov 2022to 10 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female, age ≥18 years
- Established diagnosis of symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II-III)
- Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% in prior 3 months
- Left bundle branch block (QRS ≥130 ms)
- Clinical indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy
- Patients should be clinically stable
- Patients should receive background standard of care for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, with the maximum tolerated doses of ACE inhibitor or ARB or ARNI, beta-blocker, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist
Who cannot join
- Life expectancy <12 months due to any disease
- Dementia or advanced cerebrovascular disease
- NYHA class IV
- Plan to implant an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), with or without resynchronization therapy (CRT-D)
- Enrollment in other clinical trials involving cardiac pacing
- Pregnancy or pre-menopausal women who do not use regular contraceptive methods
- Patients unable to understand and sign the consent for participation
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
Brazil14 sites
Hospital Geral Universitário de Cuiabá
Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, 78020-840
SOS Cardio
Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, 88030-000
Fundação Hospital do Coração Francisca Mendes
Manaus, Amazonas, 69097720
Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-000
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903
Hospital Mãe de Deus
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 900880-481
Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira
Recife, Pernambuco, 50070-902
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia
Rio de Janeiro, 22240-006
Hospital Ana Nery
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40301-155
Instituto de Cardiologia de Santa Catarina
São José, Santa Catarina, 88103-901
Beneficência Portuguesa
São Paulo, 01323-001
Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz
São Paulo, 01323-020
Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Piauí
Teresina, Piauí, 64049-550
Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio de Moraes
Vitória, Espírito Santo, 29041-295
About this study
Official title: Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Resynchronization in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (PhysioSync-HF)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Left Bundle-Branch Block, Cardiac Resynchronization, Conduction System Pacing
- Being tested
- Conduction system pacing, Biventricular pacing
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure, Bundle-Branch Block
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conduction system pacingDevice
Pacing from the His-Purkinje system (His-bundle pacing, left bundle branch area pacing, or deep septal pacing).
Biventricular pacingDevice
Pacing from the coronary sinus and right ventricular leads.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conduction system pacing | Experimental | Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either conduction system pacing or biventricular pacing. Receives: Device: Conduction system pacing |
| Biventricular pacing | Active comparator | Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either conduction system pacing or biventricular pacing. Receives: Device: Biventricular pacing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary Outcome Measure
Heart failure-related net composite outcome, a hierarchical composite of all-cause death, any hospitalization for heart failure, any urgent heart failure visit, and left ventricular ejection fraction change at 12 months.
The category of the composite outcome for each patient will be determined by assessing the following criteria sequentially, stopping when the event is present:
All-cause death: death during follow-up. Hospitalization for heart failure: any hospitalization for heart failure during follow-up.
Urgent heart failure visit: any urgent heart failure visit during follow-up. Left ventricular ejection fraction change: the difference between baseline and follow-up, categorized by every 5-point change.
The distribution of outcome categories will be compared by ordinal distribution analysis. Non-inferiority margin: odds ratio <1.2.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Key secondary outcome: Cost analysis (dominance) (superiority)
Mean total direct medical cost per patient at 12 months.
Measured: 12 months
Change in QRS complex
Measured: Duration of the QRS complex, defined as the widest paced QRS complex rated at 12-lead ECG, measured immediately after the index procedure
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction
Measured: 12 months
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume
Measured: 12 months
Change in natriuretic peptide values
BNP and NT-proBNP
Measured: 12 months
Change in 6-minute walk test
Measured: 12 months
Change in NYHA Classification
New York Heart Association Functional Class
Measured: 12 months
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score ranges from 0-100, where a lower score indicates a worse outcome.
Measured: 12 months
EuroQol Group 5-Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Measured: 12 months
Hierarchical endpoint of death, hospitalization for heart failure, urgent heart failure visit, and change in KCCQ Clinical Summary Score
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2022
- Study start7 Nov 2022
- Primary completion10 Jan 2025
- Study completion10 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 179 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Moinhos de Vento
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Brazil
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Carisi Polanczyk, MD PhD, Study chair, Hospital Moinhos de VentoAndre d'Avila, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)Alexander Dal Forno, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital SOS CardioLeandro Zimerman, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital Moinhos de VentoLuis E Rohde, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital Moinhos de VentoAndre Zimerman, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital Moinhos de VentoCaique Ternes, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital Moinhos de VentoFernanda D Alves, PhD, Study director, Hospital Moinhos de Vento
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05572736
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NUP: 25000.123471/2021-59
- Acronym
- PhysioSync-HF
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 2 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Zimerman A, Dal Forno A, Rohde LE, Ternes CM, Alves FD, Damiani LP, Martinelli-Filho M, Costa R, Fagundes AA, Barbosa RM, Gadelha EB, Lima CE, Silva MA, Maldonado JA, de Oliveira JC, Mallmann F, Baggio Junior JM, Duarte CE, de Souza LA, Santos JS, Silveira AD, Decker SRR, Zimerman LI, Polanczyk CA, d'Avila A. Conduction System vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure: The PhysioSync-HF Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2026 Apr 1;11(4):360-368. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2026.0101.
PubMed 41811324Decker SRR, Etges APBDS, Zimerman A, Alves FD, Ternes CM, Santos JS, Zimerman L, Rohde LE, Forno AD, d'Avila A, Kazi DS, Bertoldi EG, Polanczyk CA. Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing in Chronic Heart Failure: Protocol for the Economic Analysis of the PhysioSync-HF Trial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Dec;122(12):e20250254. doi: 10.36660/abc.20250254. English, Portuguese.
PubMed 41779515Zimerman A, Dal Forno A, Rohde LE, Ternes CM, Alves FD, Decker SR, Silveira AD, Damiani LP, Martinelli Filho M, Costa R, Fagundes AA, Barbosa RM, Gadelha EB, Lima CE, Silva MA, Maldonado JA, de Oliveira JC, Mallmann F, Baggio JM Jr, Duarte CE, Zimerman LI, D'Avila A, Polanczyk CA. Conduction system pacing vs biventricular resynchronization in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block: Rationale and design of the PhysioSync-HF Trial. Am Heart J. 2025 Dec;290:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.06.002. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
PubMed 40473010
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Resynchronization in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (PhysioSync-HF)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05572736
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PhysioSync-HF / NUP: 25000.123471/2021-59
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Left Bundle-Branch Block, Cardiac Resynchronization, Conduction System Pacing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 179 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Moinhos de VentoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Brazil
- Study start
- 7 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conduction system pacing | Experimental | Device: Conduction system pacingPatients will be randomized 1:1 to either conduction system pacing or biventricular pacing. |
| Biventricular pacing | Active comparator | Device: Biventricular pacingPatients will be randomized 1:1 to either conduction system pacing or biventricular pacing. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Male or female, age ≥18 years
- Established diagnosis of symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II-III)
- Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% in prior 3 months
- Left bundle branch block (QRS ≥130 ms)
- Clinical indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Life expectancy <12 months due to any disease
- Dementia or advanced cerebrovascular disease
- NYHA class IV
- Plan to implant an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), with or without resynchronization therapy (CRT-D)
- Enrollment in other clinical trials involving cardiac pacing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conduction system pacingPacing from the His-Purkinje system (His-bundle pacing, left bundle branch area pacing, or deep septal pacing). | Device | Conduction system pacing |
| Biventricular pacingPacing from the coronary sinus and right ventricular leads. | Device | Biventricular pacing |
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome Measure
Time frame: 12 months
Heart failure-related net composite outcome, a hierarchical composite of all-cause death, any hospitalization for heart failure, any urgent heart failure visit, and left ventricular ejection fraction change at 12 months. The category of the composite outcome for each patient will be determined by assessing the following criteria sequentially, stopping when the event is present: All-cause death: death during follow-up. Hospitalization for heart failure: any hospitalization for heart failure during follow-up. Urgent heart failure visit: any urgent heart failure visit during follow-up. Left ventricular ejection fraction change: the difference between baseline and follow-up, categorized by every 5-point change. The distribution of outcome categories will be compared by ordinal distribution analysis. Non-inferiority margin: odds ratio <1.2.
10 secondary outcomes
Key secondary outcome: Cost analysis (dominance) (superiority)
Time frame: 12 months
Change in QRS complex
Time frame: Duration of the QRS complex, defined as the widest paced QRS complex rated at 12-lead ECG, measured immediately after the index procedure
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction
Time frame: 12 months
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume
Time frame: 12 months
Change in natriuretic peptide values
Time frame: 12 months
Change in 6-minute walk test
Time frame: 12 months
Change in NYHA Classification
Time frame: 12 months
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score
Time frame: 12 months
EuroQol Group 5-Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Time frame: 12 months
Hierarchical endpoint of death, hospitalization for heart failure, urgent heart failure visit, and change in KCCQ Clinical Summary Score
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41811324Zimerman A, Dal Forno A, Rohde LE, Ternes CM, Alves FD, Damiani LP, Martinelli-Filho M, Costa R, Fagundes AA, Barbosa RM, Gadelha EB, Lima CE, Silva MA, Maldonado JA, de Oliveira JC, Mallmann F, Baggio Junior JM, Duarte CE, de Souza LA, Santos JS, Silveira AD, Decker SRR, Zimerman LI, Polanczyk CA, d'Avila A. Conduction System vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure: The PhysioSync-HF Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2026 Apr 1;11(4):360-368. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2026.0101.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41779515Decker SRR, Etges APBDS, Zimerman A, Alves FD, Ternes CM, Santos JS, Zimerman L, Rohde LE, Forno AD, d'Avila A, Kazi DS, Bertoldi EG, Polanczyk CA. Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing in Chronic Heart Failure: Protocol for the Economic Analysis of the PhysioSync-HF Trial. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Dec;122(12):e20250254. doi: 10.36660/abc.20250254. English, Portuguese.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40473010Zimerman A, Dal Forno A, Rohde LE, Ternes CM, Alves FD, Decker SR, Silveira AD, Damiani LP, Martinelli Filho M, Costa R, Fagundes AA, Barbosa RM, Gadelha EB, Lima CE, Silva MA, Maldonado JA, de Oliveira JC, Mallmann F, Baggio JM Jr, Duarte CE, Zimerman LI, D'Avila A, Polanczyk CA. Conduction system pacing vs biventricular resynchronization in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block: Rationale and design of the PhysioSync-HF Trial. Am Heart J. 2025 Dec;290:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.06.002. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Vericiguat in Pediatric Participants With Heart Failure Due to Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (MK-1242-036)
Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
RecruitingPhase 1/2
HS235 Study in Overweight and Obese Participants With Combined Pre and Post-Capillary Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Pulmonary Hypertension, Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Active, not recruiting
Heart Failure Patient Management and Interventions Using Continuous Patient Monitoring Outside Hospitals and Real-world Data
Chronic Heart Failure, Heart Transplant Recipient
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Multi-Scale Analysis of Phenotypes in Heart Failure (MAP-HEART)
Heart Failure
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Savagen (Sacubitril/Valsartan) in Malaysian HFrEF Patients
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), Heart Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Carisi Polanczyk, MD PhD study chair
Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Andre d'Avila, MD PhD principal investigator
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
Alexander Dal Forno, MD principal investigator
Hospital SOS Cardio
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conduction system pacing and Biventricular pacing in people with Heart Failure and Left Bundle-Branch Block, run by Hospital Moinhos de Vento at 14 sites in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary Outcome Measure (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05572736, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2025.