Chronic Pain4PCPNCT05580419
Impact of 4PCP on Practitioner and Patient Outcomes
A study testing 4PCP Course in people with Chronic Pain, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 4 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Reducing opioid prescribing and improving outcomes in patients with chronic pain would benefit our nation. Neither addiction nor chronic pain spares any race, gender, or particular socio-economic status. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain
- What is being tested?
- 4PCP Course
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,188 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Mar 2023to Sep 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Practitioner Inclusion:
- General practitioners
- Part of a practice that has their own identifiable patient population including patients with chronic pain
- Able to fully answer questionnaires
- Able to attend 4PCP course
- English speaking
Patient inclusion:
- Age 14-80
- Self-report of chronic non-malignant pain > 3 months
- No foreseeable or planned surgeries for chronic pain
- Has attended at least 2 established visits in the enrolled practitioner's practice
- English speaking
Practitioner exclusion:
- Pain specialists
- Unable to fully answer questionnaires
- Unable to attend the 4PCP course
- Non-English speaking
Patient exclusion:
- Unable to answer questionnaires (e.g. stroke, dementia, developmental delay, etc.)
- Followed in a specialty pain clinic (PCP not managing pain care)
- Sickle cell disease
- Prisoners
- Non-English speaking
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United States4 sites
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Wisconsin Research and Education Network (WREN)
Madison, Wisconsin, 53715
SSM Health
Madison, Wisconsin, 53716
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
About this study
Official title: Impact of a Novel Community-Based Biobehavioral Chronic Pain Team Training Program (4PCP) on Practitioner and Patient Outcomes
Reducing opioid prescribing and improving outcomes in patients with chronic pain would benefit our nation. Neither addiction nor chronic pain spares any race, gender, or particular socio-economic status. This study is investigating a potentially inexpensive way of providing a previously costly service (the intensive chronic pain rehabilitation program), which is why insurers stopped covering it. Although it is unusual for an application from an academic institution to include a startup company (PainSTakers, LLC) as the curriculum provider, this is actually a long-term strength of this program, and the reason NIH recommended this route. It ensures that 4PCP will ultimately sustain itself rather than require government support for its continuation. Support for this application is not to provide the curriculum, but to determine if it is effective in the outcomes expected to be found. The curriculum is being provided freely only as an incentive for practitioners to participate in the research portion of the study. If the study is able to demonstrate its clinical effectiveness, the next step will be to show a positive economic impact for health care institutions and for health insurers who may then wish to support the program for their practitioners and their patients.
Read the detailed description
Practitioner procedures:
After the completion of informed consent, practitioners will be sent their first set of surveys (Baseline).
1 week before the first day of the practitioner's course, they will be sent a second set of surveys (Time 0).
6 months after course completion, practitioners will be sent their next set of surveys (Follow Up 1).
6 months after the distribution of Follow Up Survey 1, practitioners will be sent their next set of surveys (Follow Up 2).
6 months after the distribution of Follow Up Survey 2, practitioners will be sent their next set of surveys (Follow Up 3).
6 months after the distribution of Follow Up Survey 3, practitioners will be sent their final set of surveys (Follow Up 4).
Patient procedures:
After the completion of informed consent, patients will be sent their first set of surveys (Baseline).
1 week before the first day of the patient's practitioner's course, they will be sent a second set of surveys (Time 0).
6 months after their practitioner's course completion, patients will be sent their next set of surveys (Follow Up 1).
6 months after the distribution of Follow Up Survey 1, patients will be sent their next set of surveys (Follow Up 2).
6 months after the distribution of Follow Up Survey 2, patients will be sent their next set of surveys (Follow Up 3).
6 months after the distribution of Follow Up Survey 3, patients will be sent their final set of surveys (Follow Up 4).
Practitioner measures:
- Demographics
- HC-PAIRS
- Mini Z \& Burnout
- PABS-PT
- Skills Comparison
- Multi-Disc Perspective Questionnaire
- CPPP (for MDs/DOs)
- Know Pain-12
Patient measures:
- Demographics
- Medication information
- PEG-3
- PCS
- PROMIS 8A
- PROMIS Global Health
- PROMIS Pain Interference
- GAD-7
- PHQ-8
- Secondary measures abstracted from state prescribing records
Practitioner interventions:
4PCP training course
Patient interventions:
No direct interventions, but concepts practitioners learn from the 4PCP curriculum may change the way the practitioner continues care with the patient.
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Being tested
- 4PCP Course
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
4PCP CourseBehavioural
4PCP is a training framework for the management of chronic pain and gives practitioners lasting knowledge on how to better care for chronic pain patients.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 4PCP Course (for practitioners only) | Experimental | All enrolled practitioners will be assigned to take the 4PCP course as the intervention. Patients will not be assigned to the course and will only be completing surveys before and after their practitioner completes 4PCP. Receives: Behavioral: 4PCP Course |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Patient Participant Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3)
Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity will be assessed using the PEG-3 which is a self-report, 3 item survey which asks patient participants to rate their experiences on a 10 point Likert scale.
Measured: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Practitioner Chronic Pain Physician Perspectives Questionnaire (CPPP)
Practitioner chronic pain perspectives will be assessed using the CPPP, which is a self-report 26 item survey that asks practitioners to rate feelings related chronic pain on a 6 point Likert scale.
Measured: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Number of Patient Participants whose opioid dose tapered
Opioid Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) MME will be calculated from medical record/state prescription monitoring data to determine changes in patient opioid use. Based on MME changes, number of patients whose dose is tapered by at least 5% over 6 months will be counted.
Measured: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Secondary outcomes (9)
Change in Patient Participant Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Pain catastrophization will be assessed using the PCS which is a self-report, 13 item survey which asks participants to rate how often they have the thoughts and feelings described in each item when they are in pain on a 5 point Likert scale.
Measured: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Patient Participant Pain Interference (PI)
PI will be assessed using the PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 8a which is a self-report, 8 item survey which asks participants to rate the degree to which pain interfered in their lives on a 5-point Likert scale.
Measured: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Patient Participant Quality of Life (QoL)
QoL will be assessed using the PROMIS Global Health Scale which is a self-report, 10 item survey which asks participants to rate their perception of their physical and mental health on a 5-point Likert Scale.
Measured: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Patient Participant Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
Anxiety levels will be assessed using the GAD-7 which is a self-report, 8 item survey which asks participants to rate how often they have the thoughts/feelings/behaviors described in each item on a 4 point Likert scale.
Measured: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Patient Participant Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Patient Health will be assessed using the PHQ-9 which is a self-report, 10 item survey which asks participants to rate how bothered they have been by physical/mental symptoms on a 4-point Likert Scale.
Measured: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Practitioner Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS)
Practitioner pain and impairment relationship will be assessed using HC-PAIRS, which is a self-report 15 item survey that asks practitioners to answer questions about their perception on the abilities of chronic pain patients on a 7 point Likert scale.
Measured: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Practitioner Chronic Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Questionnaire (PABS-PT)
Practitioner career perspectives of chronic pain knowledge will be measured with the PABS-PT, which is a self-report 14 item survey that asks practitioners to rate their attitudes and beliefs on chronic pain care on a 6 point Likert scale.
Measured: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Practitioner Burn-Out (Mini Z)
Practitioner career burn-out perception will be assessed using the Mini Z scale, which is a self-report 10 item survey that asks practitioners to rate feelings related to burn-out on a 5 point Likert scale. This measure differs from the Burn-Out measure in Outcome 7 because it includes the addition of questions relating to workplace environment.
Measured: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Practitioner Burn-Out
Practitioner career burn-out perception will be assessed using the Practitioner Burn-Out scale, which is a self-report 3 item survey that asks practitioners to rate feelings related to burn-out on a 10 point Likert scale.
Measured: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Oct 2022
- Study start17 Mar 2023
- Primary completionSep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Virginia Commonwealth UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Single-blinded, stepped cluster design trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,188 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Case Western Reserve University, SSM Health, Wisconsin Research and Education Network, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thomas Chelimsky, M.D., Principal investigator, VCU
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05580419
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HM20025110
- Other IDs
- R01HS028630
- Acronym
- 4PCP
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Only de-identified aggregate data will be shared with other researchers.
Publications
Chelimsky TC, Fischer RL, Levin JB, Cheren MI, Marsh SK, Janata JW. The primary practice physician program for chronic pain ((c) 4PCP): outcomes of a primary physician-pain specialist collaboration for community-based training and support. Clin J Pain. 2013 Dec;29(12):1036-43. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182851584.
PubMed 23459398Why the US Should Develop a Primary Medical Specialty in Pain Medicine. American Board of Pain Medicine [Web]; Available from: http://abpm.org/uploads/files/talking%20points%20-%20federal%20approach%20needed%20final.pdf
Okumura MJ, Heisler M, Davis MM, Cabana MD, Demonner S, Kerr EA. Comfort of general internists and general pediatricians in providing care for young adults with chronic illnesses of childhood. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Oct;23(10):1621-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0716-8. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
PubMed 18661191Aydede M, Shriver A. Recently introduced definition of "nociplastic pain" by the International Association for the Study of Pain needs better formulation. Pain. 2018 Jun;159(6):1176-1177. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001184. No abstract available.
PubMed 29768305
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of a Novel Community-Based Biobehavioral Chronic Pain Team Training Program (4PCP) on Practitioner and Patient Outcomes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05580419
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 4PCP / HM20025110
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,188 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Case Western Reserve University, SSM Health, Wisconsin Research and Education Network, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Study start
- 17 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Reducing opioid prescribing and improving outcomes in patients with chronic pain would benefit our nation. Neither addiction nor chronic pain spares any race, gender, or particular socio-economic status. This study is investigating a potentially inexpensive way of providing a previously costly service (the intensive chronic pain rehabilitation program), which is why insurers stopped covering it. Although it is unusual for an application from an academic institution to include a startup company (PainSTakers, LLC) as the curriculum provider, this is actually a long-term strength of this program, and the reason NIH recommended this route. It ensures that 4PCP will ultimately sustain itself rather than require government support for its continuation. Support for this application is not to provide the curriculum, but to determine if it is effective in the outcomes expected to be found. The curriculum is being provided freely only as an incentive for practitioners to participate in the research portion of the study. If the study is able to demonstrate its clinical effectiveness, the next step will be to show a positive economic impact for health care institutions and for health insurers who may then wish to support the program for their practitioners and their patients.
Detailed description
Practitioner procedures:
After the completion of informed consent, practitioners will be sent their first set of surveys (Baseline).
1 week before the first day of the practitioner's course, they will be sent a second set of surveys (Time 0).
6 months after course completion, practitioners will be sent their next set of surveys (Follow Up 1).
6 months after the distribution of Follow Up Survey 1, practitioners will be sent their next set of surveys (Follow Up 2).
6 months after the distribution of Follow Up Survey 2, practitioners will be sent their next set of surveys (Follow Up 3).
6 months after the distribution of Follow Up Survey 3, practitioners will be sent their final set of surveys (Follow Up 4).
Patient procedures:
After the completion of informed consent, patients will be sent their first set of surveys (Baseline).
1 week before the first day of the patient's practitioner's course, they will be sent a second set of surveys (Time 0).
6 months after their practitioner's course completion, patients will be sent their next set of surveys (Follow Up 1).
6 months after the distribution of Follow Up Survey 1, patients will be sent their next set of surveys (Follow Up 2).
6 months after the distribution of Follow Up Survey 2, patients will be sent their next set of surveys (Follow Up 3).
6 months after the distribution of Follow Up Survey 3, patients will be sent their final set of surveys (Follow Up 4).
Practitioner measures:
- Demographics
- HC-PAIRS
- Mini Z \& Burnout
- PABS-PT
- Skills Comparison
- Multi-Disc Perspective Questionnaire
- CPPP (for MDs/DOs)
- Know Pain-12
Patient measures:
- Demographics
- Medication information
- PEG-3
- PCS
- PROMIS 8A
- PROMIS Global Health
- PROMIS Pain Interference
- GAD-7
- PHQ-8
- Secondary measures abstracted from state prescribing records
Practitioner interventions:
4PCP training course
Patient interventions:
No direct interventions, but concepts practitioners learn from the 4PCP curriculum may change the way the practitioner continues care with the patient.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Single-blinded, stepped cluster design trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 4PCP Course (for practitioners only) | Experimental | Behavioral: 4PCP CourseAll enrolled practitioners will be assigned to take the 4PCP course as the intervention. Patients will not be assigned to the course and will only be completing surveys before and after their practitioner completes 4PCP. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 4PCP Course4PCP is a training framework for the management of chronic pain and gives practitioners lasting knowledge on how to better care for chronic pain patients. | Behavioural | 4PCP Course (for practitioners only) |
Primary outcome
Change in Patient Participant Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3)
Time frame: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity will be assessed using the PEG-3 which is a self-report, 3 item survey which asks patient participants to rate their experiences on a 10 point Likert scale.
Change in Practitioner Chronic Pain Physician Perspectives Questionnaire (CPPP)
Time frame: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Practitioner chronic pain perspectives will be assessed using the CPPP, which is a self-report 26 item survey that asks practitioners to rate feelings related chronic pain on a 6 point Likert scale.
Number of Patient Participants whose opioid dose tapered
Time frame: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Opioid Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) MME will be calculated from medical record/state prescription monitoring data to determine changes in patient opioid use. Based on MME changes, number of patients whose dose is tapered by at least 5% over 6 months will be counted.
9 secondary outcomes
Change in Patient Participant Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time frame: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Patient Participant Pain Interference (PI)
Time frame: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Patient Participant Quality of Life (QoL)
Time frame: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Patient Participant Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
Time frame: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Patient Participant Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time frame: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Practitioner Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS)
Time frame: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Practitioner Chronic Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Questionnaire (PABS-PT)
Time frame: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Change in Practitioner Burn-Out (Mini Z)
Time frame: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Practitioner Burn-Out
Time frame: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 23459398Chelimsky TC, Fischer RL, Levin JB, Cheren MI, Marsh SK, Janata JW. The primary practice physician program for chronic pain ((c) 4PCP): outcomes of a primary physician-pain specialist collaboration for community-based training and support. Clin J Pain. 2013 Dec;29(12):1036-43. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182851584.
- BackgroundWhy the US Should Develop a Primary Medical Specialty in Pain Medicine. American Board of Pain Medicine [Web]; Available from: http://abpm.org/uploads/files/talking%20points%20-%20federal%20approach%20needed%20final.pdf
- Background: PubMed 18661191Okumura MJ, Heisler M, Davis MM, Cabana MD, Demonner S, Kerr EA. Comfort of general internists and general pediatricians in providing care for young adults with chronic illnesses of childhood. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Oct;23(10):1621-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0716-8. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
- Background: PubMed 29768305Aydede M, Shriver A. Recently introduced definition of "nociplastic pain" by the International Association for the Study of Pain needs better formulation. Pain. 2018 Jun;159(6):1176-1177. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001184. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Only de-identified aggregate data will be shared with other researchers.
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas Chelimsky, M.D. principal investigator
VCU
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 4PCP Course in people with Chronic Pain, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 4 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Patient Participant Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) (time frame: Upon enrollment, 1 week before practitioner course participation, up to 3 years after practitioner course participation). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05580419, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2026.