AzTrials
AzTrials

Carpal Tunnel SyndromeNCT05589805

Comparison of Low-intensity Laser and ESWT in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

A study testing Extracorporeal shock wave therapy and Laser therapy in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Abant Izzet Baysal University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common neuropathy of the median nerve. Conservative methods are used in mild and moderate CTS in the treatment. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of low-intensity laser and ESWT treatments in patients with mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed with EMG. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
What is being tested?
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy and Laser therapy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
30 Oct 2022to 30 Oct 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18-65 years
  • Having a clinic compatible with carpal tunnel syndrome,
  • Patients with electrophysiological data compatible with mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome

Who cannot join

  • Cervical radiculopathy , polyneuropathy , brachial plexopathy , thoracic outlet syndrome
  • Regular use of oral steroids or nsaii in the last 3 months
  • Systemic disease (DM, hypothyroidism, RA, gout, acromegaly, CKD, dialysis)
  • Severe carpal tunnel syndrome (kts)

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Effectiveness of Low-intensity Laser and ESWT Treatments in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common neuropathy of the median nerve. Conservative methods are used in mild and moderate CTS in the treatment. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of low-intensity laser and ESWT treatments in patients with mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed with EMG.

Read the detailed description

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common neuropathy of the median nerve. Its incidence increases between the ages of 40-60. Its prevalence is 4-5%, and incidence is 2.7%. It is more common in women than men. The vast majority of cases are idiopathic.The first symptoms usually start at night. The patient wakes up with a feeling of swelling without any visible swelling and symptoms such as burning, numbness and tingling in the median nerve region.In severe cases, hand weakness and thenar atrophy develop. Provocative tests such as phalen, reverse phalen, tinel, carpal compression test, tourniquet test can be used in the examination.The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome is made by nerve conduction studies and electromyography. Conservative methods are used in mild and moderate CTS in the treatment. Surgical methods are recommended in severe cases and in cases unresponsive to conservative treatment.One of the methods used in the treatment is Laser (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation).There are low and high intensity laser applications according to their energy densities. The basic mechanism of action is tissue stimulation. ESWT (Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy), another treatment method, shows therapeutic properties by focusing high-amplitude sound waves on the desired area of the body. Apart from the mechanical effect, it also has an effect at the cellular level.In previous studies, both low-intensity laser and ESWT application were found to be effective in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. However, as far as we know, there is no study comparing the efficacy of low-intensity laser therapy and ESWT therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of low-intensity laser and ESWT treatments in patients with mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed with EMG.

Being tested
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy, Laser therapy, Control group
Keywords
carpal tunnel syndrome, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, laser treatment
Medical subject headings
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Extracorporeal shock wave therapyDevice

    In addition to wrist splint, ESWT treatment (1.5 bar, 5Hz, 1000 beats) will be applied to the patients with Elmed Vibrolith Ortho brand ESWT device, which we routinely use in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, for 3 weeks, once a week.

  • Laser therapyDevice

    In addition to the wrist splint, the patients will be treated with the BTL-4110 Laser Topline model low-intensity laser device, which we routinely use in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome in our hospital, 5 days a week for 15 sessions of laser treatment.

  • Control groupOther

    Patients will only be given a wrist splint to keep the wrist in neutral position.

Study groups in NCT05589805
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ESWT groupExperimentalIn addition to wrist splint, ESWT treatment (1.5 bar, 5Hz, 1000 beats) will be applied to the patients with the Elmed Vibrolith Ortho brand ESWT device, which we routinely use in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, for 3 weeks, once a week.
Receives: Device: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy
Laser groupExperimentalIn addition to the wrist splint, the patients will be treated with the BTL-4110 Laser Topline model low-intensity laser device, which we routinely use in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome in our hospital, 5 days a week for 15 sessions of laser treatment.
Receives: Device: Laser therapy
Control groupActive comparatorPatients will only be given a wrist splint to keep the wrist in neutral position.
Receives: Other: Control group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Analog Scale

    It is a 10 cm line on the horizontal plane where the patient evaluates the pain. There are lines from 0 to 10. 0 means no pain, and 10 means very severe pain. After this information is given to the patient, the patient will mark the pain they feel within 1 week.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Visual Analog Scale

    It is a 10 cm line on the horizontal plane where the patient evaluates the pain. There are lines from 0 to 10. 0 means no pain, and 10 means very severe pain. After this information is given to the patient, the patient will mark the pain they feel within 1 week.

    Measured: Post-treatment (3th week)

  3. Boston Scale

    The Boston Questionnaire was developed by Levine et al. in 1993. It consists of two parts, the symptom severity scale and the functional capacity scale.Boston Symptom Severity Scale consists of 11 questions. Symptoms such as pain, numbness, weakness, tingling are questioned. Symptoms are scored using a 5-answer scale between "absent and very severe". In the scoring of 11-55, a high score is interpreted as increased symptom severity.

    Boston Functional Capacity Scale consists of 8 questions. It questions the degree of difficulty of activities of daily living, and each question has five different answers with a score between 1 and 5. The average score is obtained by dividing the total score by the number of questions. Results are scored between 8-40 and high values are interpreted as impaired hand functionality.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Boston Scale

    The Boston Questionnaire was developed by Levine et al. in 1993. It consists of two parts, the symptom severity scale and the functional capacity scale.Boston Symptom Severity Scale consists of 11 questions. Symptoms such as pain, numbness, weakness, tingling are questioned. Symptoms are scored using a 5-answer scale between "absent and very severe". In the scoring of 11-55, a high score is interpreted as increased symptom severity.

    Boston Functional Capacity Scale consists of 8 questions. It questions the degree of difficulty of activities of daily living, and each question has five different answers with a score between 1 and 5. The average score is obtained by dividing the total score by the number of questions. Results are scored between 8-40 and high values are interpreted as impaired hand functionality.

    Measured: Post-treatment (3th week)

  5. Median nerve area measurement

    It will be measured from the distal finger line by manually surrounding the nerve just below the hyperechoic line surrounding the median nerve with the ultrasound device.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Median nerve area measurement

    It will be measured from the distal finger line by manually surrounding the nerve just below the hyperechoic line surrounding the median nerve with the ultrasound device.

    Measured: Post-treatment (3th week)

  7. LANNS neuropathic pain scale

    It is used to distinguish between neuropathic pain and nociceptive pain. It consists of 2 parts. The first part is filled by the patient. In the department, the physician tests whether allodynia is present. A score above 12 is classified as neuropathic pain.

    Measured: Baseline

  8. LANNS neuropathic pain scale

    It is used to distinguish between neuropathic pain and nociceptive pain. It consists of 2 parts. The first part is filled by the patient. In the department, the physician tests whether allodynia is present. A score above 12 is classified as neuropathic pain.

    Measured: Post-treatment (3th week)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Visual Analog Scale (paresteshia)

    t is a 10 cm line on the horizontal plane where the patient evaluates the pain. There are lines from 0 to 10. 0 means no pain, and 10 means very severe pain. After this information is given to the patient, the patient will mark the paresteshia they feel within 1 week.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Visual Analog Scale (paresteshia)

    t is a 10 cm line on the horizontal plane where the patient evaluates the pain. There are lines from 0 to 10. 0 means no pain, and 10 means very severe pain. After this information is given to the patient, the patient will mark the paresteshia they feel within 1 week.

    Measured: Post-treatment (3th week)

  3. Ouick Dash Score

    There are 11 items in total in this questionnaire. It is evaluated between 1-5 points according to the increasing degree of symptoms or difficulty. At least 10 of the questions must be answered in order for the Quick DASH score to be calculated. The result of the calculation is evaluated between 0 and 100.0 is interpreted as no difficulty and no symptoms, 100 as no activity or severe symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Ouick Dash Score

    There are 11 items in total in this questionnaire. It is evaluated between 1-5 points according to the increasing degree of symptoms or difficulty. At least 10 of the questions must be answered in order for the Quick DASH score to be calculated. The result of the calculation is evaluated between 0 and 100.0 is interpreted as no difficulty and no symptoms, 100 as no activity or severe symptoms.

    Measured: Post-treatment (3th week)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Oct 2022
  2. Study start30 Oct 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion20 Oct 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
90 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05589805
Sponsor's protocol ID
AIBU-FTR-EY-07
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
18 Oct 2022
Last updated
21 Oct 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Extracorporeal shock wave therapy and Laser therapy in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Abant Izzet Baysal University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Analog Scale (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in