Cardiac DiseaseNCT05602298
The Quality of Recovery-15 Survey After Cardiac Surgery
An observational study of Cardiac Disease and Surgery, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Patient reported outcomes are becoming increasingly recognized as an important metric to determine efficacy of interventions following recovery after cardiac surgery. Quality of Recovery 15 survey is a tool that attempts to measure patients' recovery across several different domains (i.e physical, emotional and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Disease, Surgery, Surgery-Complications
- What is being tested?
- Quality of Recovery 15 survey
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 4 Aug 2022to 1 May 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients undergoing inpatient or outpatient cardiac surgery at St. Paul's Hospital
Who may be able to join
- all patients undergoing cardiac surgery (outpatient or inpatient surgery)
Who cannot join
- At baseline patient screening:
- Patients who have severe cognitive impairment (score of 1 or 2) measured through the use of the three minute screening tool, Mini-Cog 26
- Patient has limited ability to complete assessment at baseline
- Unable to read/speak English
- Significant hearing impairments
- Critical state before surgery with high probability of death within 24 hours
- After cardiac surgery, patients will be removed from further data collection if:
- They require a tracheostomy or 5 days of ventilation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
Nicola Edwards, MHA, 604-861-9024, nedwards@providencehealth.bc.ca
Terri Sun, MD
About this study
Official title: The Validity of the Quality of Recovery Score 15 Following Cardiac Surgery
Patient reported outcomes are becoming increasingly recognized as an important metric to determine efficacy of interventions following recovery after cardiac surgery. Quality of Recovery 15 survey is a tool that attempts to measure patients' recovery across several different domains (i.e physical, emotional and social). This tool has been validated extensively in the post operative patient population, but these studies contained only small numbers of cardiac surgery patients. This population faces unique challenges to recovery such as a longer duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital LOS, delirium, significant pain in the first 24-48 hours and post operative arrhythmias. This study aims to validate the QoR 15 in this population exclusively to determine if it is feasible, valid, reliable and responsive in this unique population.
Read the detailed description
The QoR-15 will be administered at three time points, verbally to the patient by a standardized script. The time points are at baseline QoR-15 (t=0) at time of enrollment in the PAC, surgical daycare or surgical ward, post extubation day 1 (t=2), and post extubation day 2 (t=3) and 12 weeks following surgery. Concurrently, patients will also be asked to rate their overall postoperative recovery using an 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), from "poor recovery" to "excellent recovery". A subset of patients will also be asked to repeat the QoR 15 questionnaire 30-60 min later to measure repeatability. Duration to complete each QoR-15 will be recorded.
Baseline demographic information (sex, age, ethnicity, comorbidities such as smoking status, lung disease, history of MI, hypertension, heart failure, renal failure, NYHA class) will be collected at time of enrollment. Intraoperative data (type of surgical procedure, duration of procedure, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time), Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit (CSICU) LoS, duration of mechanical ventilation, and hospital LoS will be collected following patient discharge from hospital.
Post operative complications will be assessed using the Clavien-Dindo Classification, which is a 5 scale classification system, ranking complications on severity, depending on therapy required. Days alive and at home to Day 30 (DAH 30) (10) is a quantifiable and patient centred outcome that may be used as a proxy for a patient's recovery after surgery. This will be collected from chart review at 30 days following surgery and will be used as a metric to assess construct validity.
- Conditions
- Cardiac Disease, Surgery, Surgery-Complications, Cardiac Valve Disease, Cardiac Complication, Cardiac Event
- Being tested
- Quality of Recovery 15 survey
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Diseases, Heart Valve Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Quality of Recovery 15 surveyOther
QOR 15 is a patient reported outcomes measure (PROM) tool used as a global measure of patient recovery after surgery and anesthesia. It uses fifteen questions to assess various domains of patient health: pain, physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, and emotional state.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of the QoR 15 (1.1)
Response rate (Percentage of questionnaires completed at each time point)
Measured: Aug 4, 2022 to Jan 1, 2023
Feasibility of the QoR 15 (1.2)
Proportion of questions completed independently without help/clarification by research assistant (Percentage)
Measured: Aug 4, 2022 to Jan 1, 2023
Feasibility of the QoR 15 (1.3)
Proportion of questions completed/answered (Percentage)
Measured: Aug 4, 2022 to Jan 1, 2023
Feasibility of the QoR 15 (1.4)
Time taken to complete the questionnaire (median +/- IQR)
Measured: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
Validity (2.1)
Correlation between QoR 15 compared with VAS global rating of health using 100mm scale (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Measured: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
Validity (2.2)
Correlation with NRS pain score (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Measured: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
Validity (2.3)
Association between QoR 15 with age, gender, duration of surgery, duration of ICU stay, duration of hospital stay, opioid consumption, surgical complications and DAH 30 will be assessed using multivariable linear regression
Measured: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
Reliability (3.1)
Internal consistency - averaged correlation between each item with QoR15
Measured: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
Reliability (3.2)
15-25 patients will be asked to repeat a second time 30-60min later and their QoR 15 score compared
Measured: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
Reliability (3.3)
Inter-item correlation matrix
Measured: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
Reliability (3.4)
Interdimensional and item total dimension correlation
Measured: July 18. 2022 to Jan 1, 2023
Responsiveness (4.1)
Cohen effect size (avg change scores from pretest to post tes, divided by SD at baseline Standardised response mean (change scores divided by SD of change scores)
Measured: July 18. 2022 to Jan 1, 2023
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2022
- Study start4 Aug 2022
- Primary completion1 Feb 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion1 May 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiac DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Terri Sun, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- Alana Flexman, Study director, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05602298
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H22-01459
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 11 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 2 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.
PubMed 23411725Myles PS, Shulman MA, Reilly J, Kasza J, Romero L. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;128(6):1029-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
PubMed 35430086Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Three Quality of Recovery Scales. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jul;125(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158.
PubMed 27159009Campfort M, Cayla C, Lasocki S, Rineau E, Leger M. Early quality of recovery according to QoR-15 score is associated with one-month postoperative complications after elective surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2022 Jun;78:110638. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110638. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
PubMed 35033845
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Validity of the Quality of Recovery Score 15 Following Cardiac Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05602298
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H22-01459
- Conditions
- Cardiac Disease, Surgery, Surgery-Complications, Cardiac Valve Disease, Cardiac Complication, Cardiac Event
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patient reported outcomes are becoming increasingly recognized as an important metric to determine efficacy of interventions following recovery after cardiac surgery. Quality of Recovery 15 survey is a tool that attempts to measure patients' recovery across several different domains (i.e physical, emotional and social). This tool has been validated extensively in the post operative patient population, but these studies contained only small numbers of cardiac surgery patients. This population faces unique challenges to recovery such as a longer duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital LOS, delirium, significant pain in the first 24-48 hours and post operative arrhythmias. This study aims to validate the QoR 15 in this population exclusively to determine if it is feasible, valid, reliable and responsive in this unique population.
Detailed description
The QoR-15 will be administered at three time points, verbally to the patient by a standardized script. The time points are at baseline QoR-15 (t=0) at time of enrollment in the PAC, surgical daycare or surgical ward, post extubation day 1 (t=2), and post extubation day 2 (t=3) and 12 weeks following surgery. Concurrently, patients will also be asked to rate their overall postoperative recovery using an 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), from "poor recovery" to "excellent recovery". A subset of patients will also be asked to repeat the QoR 15 questionnaire 30-60 min later to measure repeatability. Duration to complete each QoR-15 will be recorded.
Baseline demographic information (sex, age, ethnicity, comorbidities such as smoking status, lung disease, history of MI, hypertension, heart failure, renal failure, NYHA class) will be collected at time of enrollment. Intraoperative data (type of surgical procedure, duration of procedure, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time), Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit (CSICU) LoS, duration of mechanical ventilation, and hospital LoS will be collected following patient discharge from hospital.
Post operative complications will be assessed using the Clavien-Dindo Classification, which is a 5 scale classification system, ranking complications on severity, depending on therapy required. Days alive and at home to Day 30 (DAH 30) (10) is a quantifiable and patient centred outcome that may be used as a proxy for a patient's recovery after surgery. This will be collected from chart review at 30 days following surgery and will be used as a metric to assess construct validity.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients undergoing inpatient or outpatient cardiac surgery at St. Paul's Hospital
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- all patients undergoing cardiac surgery (outpatient or inpatient surgery)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- At baseline patient screening:
- After cardiac surgery, patients will be removed from further data collection if:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Recovery 15 surveyQOR 15 is a patient reported outcomes measure (PROM) tool used as a global measure of patient recovery after surgery and anesthesia. It uses fifteen questions to assess various domains of patient health: pain, physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, and emotional state. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of the QoR 15 (1.1)
Time frame: Aug 4, 2022 to Jan 1, 2023
Response rate (Percentage of questionnaires completed at each time point)
Feasibility of the QoR 15 (1.2)
Time frame: Aug 4, 2022 to Jan 1, 2023
Proportion of questions completed independently without help/clarification by research assistant (Percentage)
Feasibility of the QoR 15 (1.3)
Time frame: Aug 4, 2022 to Jan 1, 2023
Proportion of questions completed/answered (Percentage)
Feasibility of the QoR 15 (1.4)
Time frame: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
Time taken to complete the questionnaire (median +/- IQR)
Validity (2.1)
Time frame: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
Correlation between QoR 15 compared with VAS global rating of health using 100mm scale (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Validity (2.2)
Time frame: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
Correlation with NRS pain score (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Validity (2.3)
Time frame: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
Association between QoR 15 with age, gender, duration of surgery, duration of ICU stay, duration of hospital stay, opioid consumption, surgical complications and DAH 30 will be assessed using multivariable linear regression
Reliability (3.1)
Time frame: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
Internal consistency - averaged correlation between each item with QoR15
Reliability (3.2)
Time frame: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
15-25 patients will be asked to repeat a second time 30-60min later and their QoR 15 score compared
Reliability (3.3)
Time frame: Aug 4, 2022 to Feb 1, 2023
Inter-item correlation matrix
Reliability (3.4)
Time frame: July 18. 2022 to Jan 1, 2023
Interdimensional and item total dimension correlation
Responsiveness (4.1)
Time frame: July 18. 2022 to Jan 1, 2023
Cohen effect size (avg change scores from pretest to post tes, divided by SD at baseline Standardised response mean (change scores divided by SD of change scores)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Nov 2022.
- Background: PubMed 23411725Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.
- Background: PubMed 35430086Myles PS, Shulman MA, Reilly J, Kasza J, Romero L. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;128(6):1029-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
- Background: PubMed 27159009Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Three Quality of Recovery Scales. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jul;125(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158.
- Background: PubMed 35033845Campfort M, Cayla C, Lasocki S, Rineau E, Leger M. Early quality of recovery according to QoR-15 score is associated with one-month postoperative complications after elective surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2022 Jun;78:110638. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110638. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cardiac Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alana Flexman study director
University of British Columbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiac Disease and Surgery, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Terri Sun (6047797817, terri.sun@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of the QoR 15 (1.1) (time frame: Aug 4, 2022 to Jan 1, 2023). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05602298, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2022.