Gastric Outlet ObstructionEATINGNCT05605327
EUS-guided Versus Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
A study testing EUS-guided gastroenterostomy and Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy in people with Gastric Outlet Obstruction, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven.
Trial summary
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a common complication of various types of malignancy arising from the pancreas, bile ducts, retroperitoneum and distal stomach. As these tumours grow they may invade or compress the distal stomach or gastric outlet causing patients to develop the classical manifestations of GOO… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Outlet Obstruction
- What is being tested?
- EUS-guided gastroenterostomy and Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2022to 1 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants eligible for inclusion in the EATING-C must meet all of the following criteria:
- Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
- ≥ 18 years old
- Endoscopic or radiological confirmation of a gastric outlet obstruction due to an obstructive malignant neoplastic lesion extending from the distal one third of the stomach or the duodenum
- GOOSS score(8) < 2 (no oral intake or liquids only)
- Performance status justifying palliative treatment for mGOO
Show all 12Show fewer
- No contra-indications to undergo deep conscious sedation or general anesthesia All participants that are considered for Trial participation, per the above criteria will be documented on the Screening Log, including Screen Failures.
- Participants eligible for inclusion in the EATING-RCT must meet all of the following criteria:
- EATING-C inclusion criteria
- Endoscopic and surgical creation of a gastrojejunostomy are deemed both technically feasible by the treating physician.
- Expected survival exceeds 2 months.
- ECOG Performance Status ≤2
Who cannot join
- Participants eligible for the EATING-C Trial must not meet any of the following criteria:
- Patients with benign GOO
- Patients who are candidates for curative surgical resection of the primary disease
- Patients whose mGOO is likely to resolve very quickly (within days or weeks) under anti-tumoral treatment (such as lymphoproliferative diseases).
- Participants eligible for the EATING-RCT Trial must not meet any of the following criteria:
- ECOG Performance status > 2
Show all 15Show fewer
- Expected survival of less than 2 months according to disease extent and comorbidities, as assessed by an oncologist or a treating physician. If unclear, the Coordinating Investigator is to be contacted, after which in- or exclusion will be decided upon by means of consensus.
- Peritoneal carcinomatosis with signs of obstruction on cross-sectional imaging (on either small or large bowel level).
- In case these parameters leads to ambiguity in individual patients at participating sites, the Coordinating Investigator will be contacted and a final conjoint decision for in/exclusion will be made after revision of radiological findings.
- Grade II and III ascites OR ascites interfering with the EUS-GJ trajectory, complicating successful creation of an EUS-GJ.
- Previous surgical procedures or reconstructions impeding EUS-GJ.
- Diffuse tumor involvement of the gastric wall impeding EUS-GJ
- Participation in other interventional procedures which may be of influence on primary or secondary outcome parameters
- Presence of other strictures in gastrointestinal tract leading to radiological or clinical signs of obstruction or patency issues.
- Participants who meet one or more of the above exclusion criteria must not proceed to be enrolled/randomized in the Trial and will be identified on the Screening Log as Screen Failure.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
Natalie Vandenende contact
About this study
Official title: A Multicentre Cohort Study and a Randomized Controlled Trial of EUS-guided Versus LaparOscopic GAsTrojejunostomY for malIgNant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: EATING Trial
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a common complication of various types of malignancy arising from the pancreas, bile ducts, retroperitoneum and distal stomach. As these tumours grow they may invade or compress the distal stomach or gastric outlet causing patients to develop the classical manifestations of GOO including vomiting, weight loss, electrolyte disturbances loss of quality of life as well as a reduced life expectancy. Until recently these patients were managed using either endoscopic stenting or surgery. Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (L-GJ) has been regarded as the golden standard in the management of GOO. However surgery is invasive and may lead to peri-operative complications and longer hospitalization which further greatly impacts on the quality of life of these patients in which survival is already greatly impaired by their oncological problem. Recently it has been shown that a special stent can be utilized to circumvent the tumour obstruction without the need for surgery. This technique utilizes endoscopic ultrasound to connect the stomach to the jejunum at a site distal to the tumour obstruction. This techniques is minimally invasive compared to surgery. In a large retrospective propensity matched study we recently compared endoscopic ultrasound placement of an AXIOS stent to laparoscopic surgery and could show that the EUS-guided approach led to less complications (2.6 vs 26%) and shorter hospital stay compared to surgery.1 Our study and that of other groups, has led the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) to recommend that EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) can be considered for patients with malignant GOO as an alternative for surgery and endoscopic stenting, acknowledging that further randomized controlled trials comparing the EUS-GJ approach to surgery, are necessary.2 Based on the above clinical need we set out to design a multicentre international trial with the main aim of comparing EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy to laparoscopic gastroenterostomy. The planned study has two components: 1. Randomized study (EATING RCT)- patients that meet the strict inclusion criteria for the (EATING-RCT) will be randomized to either EUS-GJ or L-GJ. 2. Patients in whom inclusion criteria for the RCT are not met, will be invited to participate in the observational arm of the study (EATING-C) comparing EUS-GJ, enteral stenting and surgical gastrojenostomy in a "real world scenario" setting. With this combined design we aim to include all patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction undergoing treatment. This will be an international multicentre effort, with expert centers in Belgium and other countries in Europe, including UZ Brussel (BE), UCL (BE), Hôpital Erasme (BE), UCL Namur (BE), UZ Gent (BE), Alicante (Spain), Gemelli Rome (Italy), San-Rafaelle Milan (Italy) and G.B. Rossi University Hospital Verona (Italy) as participating centres (total n=11).
This envisaged investigator driven study will be performed using an AXIOS stent produced by the company BOSTON SCIENTIFIC. This stent is registered in Europe and CE approved for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, the gall bladder and bile ducts. As described above we and other groups have used this product off-label to succesfully perform EUS-guided GJ. High-quality randomized controlled data are however required that will be generated in the proposed EATING RCT study. It is expected that the data, generated by the EATING RCT trial will contribute significantly to resolve the current question regarding the best management of patients with GOO. Ultimately the objective should be to provide high quality affordable care that is minimally invasive to cancer patients with GOO. Such high quality data will also be crucial when applying for registration and CE approval of this product for use in the management of GOO .
Read the detailed description
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a relatively common disease manifestation amongst patients with various types of malignancy. Until now, laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (L-GJ) has been regarded as the golden standard for these specific patients, although recent (low-quality) evidence suggests that off-label EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) with the Hot-AXIOS stent might provide a safer alternative with similar effectiveness and shorter hospital stay. The available comparative studies are unfortunately mainly of retrospective design, include low numbers of EUS-GJ procedures and therefore prone to bias.
Currently, EUS-GJ is performed in the participating centres with the off-label use of the Hot-AXIOS stent outside study context continuously. Moreover, whilst awaiting randomized confirmation, the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has suggested EUS-GJ as an alternative to L-GJ and enteral stenting in centers with expertise.
Study hypothesis: In patients with malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction we hypothesize that endoscopic ultrasound guided placement of a lumen apposing stent, to create a gastrojejunostomy, will result in reduced procedure related morbidity, shorter time-to-tolerate oral intake, shorter hospital stay and a higher quality of life compared to surgery, while reducing procedure related and overall costs. Primary endpoint is the overall rate of procedure-related adverse events happening within 90 days of the endoscopic or surgical procedure. Key secondary endpoints are time to oral intake and post-procedural hospital stay.
The EATING study will utilize a combined design. In the EATING-C prospective, multicentre, real-life, cohort study all patients with mGOO will be enrolled irrespective of their performance status, their disease stage and treatment (i.e. EUS-GJ, OR surgical [laparoscopic or not] GJ OR enteral stenting).
The subgroup of patients with expected survival over 2 months and without radiographic signs of significantly obstructive peritoneal disease will be included in the EATING-RCT, an international, open-label, parallel group, superiority randomized controlled trial in which patients who fulfill the inclusion/exclusion criteria (see 4.2 inclusion criteria) and give written informed consent will be randomized to either EUS-GJ or L-GJ. The same outcomes will be prospectively evaluated in the EATING-C and EATING-RCT up to 12 months or death of the patient, whichever comes first.
During the assessment of eligibility, patients will receive explanation of the treatment possibilities for mGOO. If they fall within criteria for EATING-RCT they will be asked informed consent for a randomization to L-GJ versus EUS-GJ. If they meet EATING-C, but not EATING-RCT criteria or if they are willing to receive one specific procedure only, these patients will not be randomized and thus be included in the EATING-C.
Expected full trial duration: 12 months after inclusion of last patient (target n=120).
Individual trial duration for patient: 12 months after treatment or time until death (whichever comes first).
In previous published experiences, surgical Gastro-Jejunostomy has been associated with a 20 to 40% rate of adverse events (10.1055/s-0043-101695, 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000887). Previous experiences of EUS-guided Gastro-Jejunostomy have found a 10 to 15% rate of adverse events (10.1097/MCG.0000000000000887, 10.1016/j.dld.2020.04.021). We performed an international, multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis of consecutive EUS-GJ and L-GJ procedures in 3 European centres In this study we observed a 2.7% vs. 27.0% rate of overall adverse events in EUS-GJ vs. L-GJ respectively.
- Conditions
- Gastric Outlet Obstruction
- Being tested
- EUS-guided gastroenterostomy, Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy
- Medical subject headings
- Gastric Outlet Obstruction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EUS-guided gastroenterostomyDevice
EUS-guided gastroenterostomy using the Hot-Axios and the WEST approach.
Laparoscopic gastroenterostomyOther
Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EUS-guided gastroenterostomy | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy |
| Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Procedure related adverse event
ASGE lexicon
Measured: 90 days
Secondary outcomes (7)
Time to oral intake
during admission
Measured: 90 days
Hospital stay
during admission
Measured: 90 days
Technical success
Succesfull creation of a gastroenterostomy with the selected technique
Measured: with time from EUS-GE placement to discharge (up to 1 week)
Clinical success
GOOS score >2
Measured: during admission
Treatment cost
Overall
Measured: within 12 months
Chemotherapy (re)initiation
Y/N, can chemotherapy be started/reinitiated
Measured: within 12 months
mGOO recurrence
Y/N
Measured: within 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Nov 2022
- Study start1 Nov 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Oct 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Oct 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Gastric Outlet ObstructionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasme University Hospital, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, University Hospital, Ghent, Université Catholique de Louvain, San Raffaele University Hospital, Italy, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Hospital del Rio Hortega, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Universita di Verona
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05605327
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- s65286
- Acronym
- EATING
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 16 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicentre Cohort Study and a Randomized Controlled Trial of EUS-guided Versus LaparOscopic GAsTrojejunostomY for malIgNant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: EATING Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05605327
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EATING / s65286
- Conditions
- Gastric Outlet Obstruction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasme University Hospital, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, University Hospital, Ghent, Université Catholique de Louvain, San Raffaele University Hospital, Italy, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Hospital del Rio Hortega, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Universita di Verona
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a common complication of various types of malignancy arising from the pancreas, bile ducts, retroperitoneum and distal stomach. As these tumours grow they may invade or compress the distal stomach or gastric outlet causing patients to develop the classical manifestations of GOO including vomiting, weight loss, electrolyte disturbances loss of quality of life as well as a reduced life expectancy. Until recently these patients were managed using either endoscopic stenting or surgery. Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (L-GJ) has been regarded as the golden standard in the management of GOO. However surgery is invasive and may lead to peri-operative complications and longer hospitalization which further greatly impacts on the quality of life of these patients in which survival is already greatly impaired by their oncological problem. Recently it has been shown that a special stent can be utilized to circumvent the tumour obstruction without the need for surgery. This technique utilizes endoscopic ultrasound to connect the stomach to the jejunum at a site distal to the tumour obstruction. This techniques is minimally invasive compared to surgery. In a large retrospective propensity matched study we recently compared endoscopic ultrasound placement of an AXIOS stent to laparoscopic surgery and could show that the EUS-guided approach led to less complications (2.6 vs 26%) and shorter hospital stay compared to surgery.1 Our study and that of other groups, has led the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) to recommend that EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) can be considered for patients with malignant GOO as an alternative for surgery and endoscopic stenting, acknowledging that further randomized controlled trials comparing the EUS-GJ approach to surgery, are necessary.2 Based on the above clinical need we set out to design a multicentre international trial with the main aim of comparing EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy to laparoscopic gastroenterostomy. The planned study has two components: 1. Randomized study (EATING RCT)- patients that meet the strict inclusion criteria for the (EATING-RCT) will be randomized to either EUS-GJ or L-GJ. 2. Patients in whom inclusion criteria for the RCT are not met, will be invited to participate in the observational arm of the study (EATING-C) comparing EUS-GJ, enteral stenting and surgical gastrojenostomy in a "real world scenario" setting. With this combined design we aim to include all patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction undergoing treatment. This will be an international multicentre effort, with expert centers in Belgium and other countries in Europe, including UZ Brussel (BE), UCL (BE), Hôpital Erasme (BE), UCL Namur (BE), UZ Gent (BE), Alicante (Spain), Gemelli Rome (Italy), San-Rafaelle Milan (Italy) and G.B. Rossi University Hospital Verona (Italy) as participating centres (total n=11).
This envisaged investigator driven study will be performed using an AXIOS stent produced by the company BOSTON SCIENTIFIC. This stent is registered in Europe and CE approved for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, the gall bladder and bile ducts. As described above we and other groups have used this product off-label to succesfully perform EUS-guided GJ. High-quality randomized controlled data are however required that will be generated in the proposed EATING RCT study. It is expected that the data, generated by the EATING RCT trial will contribute significantly to resolve the current question regarding the best management of patients with GOO. Ultimately the objective should be to provide high quality affordable care that is minimally invasive to cancer patients with GOO. Such high quality data will also be crucial when applying for registration and CE approval of this product for use in the management of GOO .
Detailed description
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a relatively common disease manifestation amongst patients with various types of malignancy. Until now, laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (L-GJ) has been regarded as the golden standard for these specific patients, although recent (low-quality) evidence suggests that off-label EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) with the Hot-AXIOS stent might provide a safer alternative with similar effectiveness and shorter hospital stay. The available comparative studies are unfortunately mainly of retrospective design, include low numbers of EUS-GJ procedures and therefore prone to bias.
Currently, EUS-GJ is performed in the participating centres with the off-label use of the Hot-AXIOS stent outside study context continuously. Moreover, whilst awaiting randomized confirmation, the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has suggested EUS-GJ as an alternative to L-GJ and enteral stenting in centers with expertise.
Study hypothesis: In patients with malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction we hypothesize that endoscopic ultrasound guided placement of a lumen apposing stent, to create a gastrojejunostomy, will result in reduced procedure related morbidity, shorter time-to-tolerate oral intake, shorter hospital stay and a higher quality of life compared to surgery, while reducing procedure related and overall costs. Primary endpoint is the overall rate of procedure-related adverse events happening within 90 days of the endoscopic or surgical procedure. Key secondary endpoints are time to oral intake and post-procedural hospital stay.
The EATING study will utilize a combined design. In the EATING-C prospective, multicentre, real-life, cohort study all patients with mGOO will be enrolled irrespective of their performance status, their disease stage and treatment (i.e. EUS-GJ, OR surgical [laparoscopic or not] GJ OR enteral stenting).
The subgroup of patients with expected survival over 2 months and without radiographic signs of significantly obstructive peritoneal disease will be included in the EATING-RCT, an international, open-label, parallel group, superiority randomized controlled trial in which patients who fulfill the inclusion/exclusion criteria (see 4.2 inclusion criteria) and give written informed consent will be randomized to either EUS-GJ or L-GJ. The same outcomes will be prospectively evaluated in the EATING-C and EATING-RCT up to 12 months or death of the patient, whichever comes first.
During the assessment of eligibility, patients will receive explanation of the treatment possibilities for mGOO. If they fall within criteria for EATING-RCT they will be asked informed consent for a randomization to L-GJ versus EUS-GJ. If they meet EATING-C, but not EATING-RCT criteria or if they are willing to receive one specific procedure only, these patients will not be randomized and thus be included in the EATING-C.
Expected full trial duration: 12 months after inclusion of last patient (target n=120).
Individual trial duration for patient: 12 months after treatment or time until death (whichever comes first).
In previous published experiences, surgical Gastro-Jejunostomy has been associated with a 20 to 40% rate of adverse events (10.1055/s-0043-101695, 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000887). Previous experiences of EUS-guided Gastro-Jejunostomy have found a 10 to 15% rate of adverse events (10.1097/MCG.0000000000000887, 10.1016/j.dld.2020.04.021). We performed an international, multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis of consecutive EUS-GJ and L-GJ procedures in 3 European centres In this study we observed a 2.7% vs. 27.0% rate of overall adverse events in EUS-GJ vs. L-GJ respectively.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EUS-guided gastroenterostomy | Experimental | Device: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy |
| Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy | Active comparator | Other: Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Participants eligible for inclusion in the EATING-C must meet all of the following criteria:
- Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
- ≥ 18 years old
- Endoscopic or radiological confirmation of a gastric outlet obstruction due to an obstructive malignant neoplastic lesion extending from the distal one third of the stomach or the duodenum
- GOOSS score(8) < 2 (no oral intake or liquids only)
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Patients with benign GOO
- Patients who are candidates for curative surgical resection of the primary disease
- Patients whose mGOO is likely to resolve very quickly (within days or weeks) under anti-tumoral treatment (such as lymphoproliferative diseases).
- Participants eligible for the EATING-RCT Trial must not meet any of the following criteria:
- ECOG Performance status > 2
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EUS-guided gastroenterostomyEUS-guided gastroenterostomy using the Hot-Axios and the WEST approach. | Device | EUS-guided gastroenterostomy |
| Laparoscopic gastroenterostomyLaparoscopic gastroenterostomy | Other | Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy |
Primary outcome
Procedure related adverse event
Time frame: 90 days
ASGE lexicon
7 secondary outcomes
Time to oral intake
Time frame: 90 days
Hospital stay
Time frame: 90 days
Technical success
Time frame: with time from EUS-GE placement to discharge (up to 1 week)
Clinical success
Time frame: during admission
Treatment cost
Time frame: within 12 months
Chemotherapy (re)initiation
Time frame: within 12 months
mGOO recurrence
Time frame: within 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gastric Outlet Obstruction
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Randomized Study Comparing Two Dosing Schedules for Hypofractionated Image-Guided Radiation Therapy
Melanoma, Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
Testing an Enhanced Digital Delivery Model for Inherited Cancer Genetic Testing in Young Adults With Cancer
Miscellaneous Neoplasm, Nos, Non-Neoplastic Condition, Nos
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Pilot Study of IT Topotecan and Maintenance Chemotherapy for HR-EBTs in Children < 6 Years, Post Consolidation
CNS Embryonal Tumor, CNS, Medulloblastoma
Not yet recruiting
Prophylactic PPI Use After EUS-GE Procedure
Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Natalie Vandenende contact
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EUS-guided gastroenterostomy and Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy in people with Gastric Outlet Obstruction, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Michiel Bronswijk, MD (+3215505159, mjh.bronswijk@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Procedure related adverse event (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2022.